| Configuration: Arriba | Protocol: EnFusion undiluted Seraseq duplicate benchmark Dataset: Undiluted Seraseq Fusion RNA control, duplicate libraries | 13 mean Seraseq fusions identified fusions · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceArriba evaluation Consensus ≥3 callers, with specified filtering and known fusion list rescue; Table 2 displays mean of duplicate undiluted experiments. Only 14 Seraseq fusions are positive; all others counted false positive. Comparators processed by same authors. Aggregation: Not reported Discovery of clinically relevant fusions in pediatric cancer · Table 2, Arriba row, corresponding column (JATS Tab2) |
|---|
| Configuration: Arriba | Protocol: EnFusion undiluted Seraseq duplicate benchmark Dataset: Undiluted Seraseq Fusion RNA control, duplicate libraries | 23.5 mean total fusions identified fusions · lower Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceArriba evaluation Consensus ≥3 callers, with specified filtering and known fusion list rescue; Table 2 displays mean of duplicate undiluted experiments. Only 14 Seraseq fusions are positive; all others counted false positive. Comparators processed by same authors. Aggregation: Not reported Discovery of clinically relevant fusions in pediatric cancer · Table 2, Arriba row, corresponding column (JATS Tab2) |
|---|
| Configuration: Arriba | Protocol: EnFusion undiluted Seraseq duplicate benchmark Dataset: Undiluted Seraseq Fusion RNA control, duplicate libraries | 55.3% precision % · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceArriba evaluation Consensus ≥3 callers, with specified filtering and known fusion list rescue; Table 2 displays mean of duplicate undiluted experiments. Only 14 Seraseq fusions are positive; all others counted false positive. Comparators processed by same authors. Aggregation: Not reported Discovery of clinically relevant fusions in pediatric cancer · Table 2, Arriba row, corresponding column (JATS Tab2) |
|---|
| Configuration: Arriba | Protocol: EnFusion undiluted Seraseq duplicate benchmark Dataset: Undiluted Seraseq Fusion RNA control, duplicate libraries | 92.9% sensitivity % · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceArriba evaluation Consensus ≥3 callers, with specified filtering and known fusion list rescue; Table 2 displays mean of duplicate undiluted experiments. Only 14 Seraseq fusions are positive; all others counted false positive. Comparators processed by same authors. Aggregation: Not reported Discovery of clinically relevant fusions in pediatric cancer · Table 2, Arriba row, corresponding column (JATS Tab2) |
|---|
| Configuration: EnFusion 3 callers + filter + known fusion list | Protocol: EnFusion undiluted Seraseq duplicate benchmark Dataset: Undiluted Seraseq Fusion RNA control, duplicate libraries | 14 mean Seraseq fusions identified fusions · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceEnFusion 3 callers + filter + known fusion list evaluation Consensus ≥3 callers, with specified filtering and known fusion list rescue; Table 2 displays mean of duplicate undiluted experiments. Only 14 Seraseq fusions are positive; all others counted false positive. Comparators processed by same authors. Aggregation: Not reported Discovery of clinically relevant fusions in pediatric cancer · Table 2, EnFusion 3 callers + filter + known fusion list row, corresponding column (JATS Tab2) |
|---|
| Configuration: EnFusion 3 callers + filter + known fusion list | Protocol: EnFusion undiluted Seraseq duplicate benchmark Dataset: Undiluted Seraseq Fusion RNA control, duplicate libraries | 14 mean total fusions identified fusions · lower Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceEnFusion 3 callers + filter + known fusion list evaluation Consensus ≥3 callers, with specified filtering and known fusion list rescue; Table 2 displays mean of duplicate undiluted experiments. Only 14 Seraseq fusions are positive; all others counted false positive. Comparators processed by same authors. Aggregation: Not reported Discovery of clinically relevant fusions in pediatric cancer · Table 2, EnFusion 3 callers + filter + known fusion list row, corresponding column (JATS Tab2) |
|---|
| Configuration: EnFusion 3 callers + filter + known fusion list | Protocol: EnFusion undiluted Seraseq duplicate benchmark Dataset: Undiluted Seraseq Fusion RNA control, duplicate libraries | 100% precision % · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceEnFusion 3 callers + filter + known fusion list evaluation Consensus ≥3 callers, with specified filtering and known fusion list rescue; Table 2 displays mean of duplicate undiluted experiments. Only 14 Seraseq fusions are positive; all others counted false positive. Comparators processed by same authors. Aggregation: Not reported Discovery of clinically relevant fusions in pediatric cancer · Table 2, EnFusion 3 callers + filter + known fusion list row, corresponding column (JATS Tab2) |
|---|
| Configuration: EnFusion 3 callers + filter + known fusion list | Protocol: EnFusion undiluted Seraseq duplicate benchmark Dataset: Undiluted Seraseq Fusion RNA control, duplicate libraries | 100% sensitivity % · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceEnFusion 3 callers + filter + known fusion list evaluation Consensus ≥3 callers, with specified filtering and known fusion list rescue; Table 2 displays mean of duplicate undiluted experiments. Only 14 Seraseq fusions are positive; all others counted false positive. Comparators processed by same authors. Aggregation: Not reported Discovery of clinically relevant fusions in pediatric cancer · Table 2, EnFusion 3 callers + filter + known fusion list row, corresponding column (JATS Tab2) |
|---|
| Configuration: EnFusion 3 callers | Protocol: EnFusion undiluted Seraseq duplicate benchmark Dataset: Undiluted Seraseq Fusion RNA control, duplicate libraries | 14 mean Seraseq fusions identified fusions · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceEnFusion 3 callers evaluation Consensus ≥3 callers, with specified filtering and known fusion list rescue; Table 2 displays mean of duplicate undiluted experiments. Only 14 Seraseq fusions are positive; all others counted false positive. Comparators processed by same authors. Aggregation: Not reported Discovery of clinically relevant fusions in pediatric cancer · Table 2, EnFusion 3 callers row, corresponding column (JATS Tab2) |
|---|
| Configuration: EnFusion 3 callers | Protocol: EnFusion undiluted Seraseq duplicate benchmark Dataset: Undiluted Seraseq Fusion RNA control, duplicate libraries | 15.5 mean total fusions identified fusions · lower Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceEnFusion 3 callers evaluation Consensus ≥3 callers, with specified filtering and known fusion list rescue; Table 2 displays mean of duplicate undiluted experiments. Only 14 Seraseq fusions are positive; all others counted false positive. Comparators processed by same authors. Aggregation: Not reported Discovery of clinically relevant fusions in pediatric cancer · Table 2, EnFusion 3 callers row, corresponding column (JATS Tab2) |
|---|
| Configuration: EnFusion 3 callers | Protocol: EnFusion undiluted Seraseq duplicate benchmark Dataset: Undiluted Seraseq Fusion RNA control, duplicate libraries | 90.3% precision % · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceEnFusion 3 callers evaluation Consensus ≥3 callers, with specified filtering and known fusion list rescue; Table 2 displays mean of duplicate undiluted experiments. Only 14 Seraseq fusions are positive; all others counted false positive. Comparators processed by same authors. Aggregation: Not reported Discovery of clinically relevant fusions in pediatric cancer · Table 2, EnFusion 3 callers row, corresponding column (JATS Tab2) |
|---|
| Configuration: EnFusion 3 callers | Protocol: EnFusion undiluted Seraseq duplicate benchmark Dataset: Undiluted Seraseq Fusion RNA control, duplicate libraries | 100% sensitivity % · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceEnFusion 3 callers evaluation Consensus ≥3 callers, with specified filtering and known fusion list rescue; Table 2 displays mean of duplicate undiluted experiments. Only 14 Seraseq fusions are positive; all others counted false positive. Comparators processed by same authors. Aggregation: Not reported Discovery of clinically relevant fusions in pediatric cancer · Table 2, EnFusion 3 callers row, corresponding column (JATS Tab2) |
|---|
| Configuration: STAR-Fusion | Protocol: EnFusion undiluted Seraseq duplicate benchmark Dataset: Undiluted Seraseq Fusion RNA control, duplicate libraries | 14 mean Seraseq fusions identified fusions · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceSTAR-Fusion evaluation Consensus ≥3 callers, with specified filtering and known fusion list rescue; Table 2 displays mean of duplicate undiluted experiments. Only 14 Seraseq fusions are positive; all others counted false positive. Comparators processed by same authors. Aggregation: Not reported Discovery of clinically relevant fusions in pediatric cancer · Table 2, STAR-Fusion row, corresponding column (JATS Tab2) |
|---|
| Configuration: STAR-Fusion | Protocol: EnFusion undiluted Seraseq duplicate benchmark Dataset: Undiluted Seraseq Fusion RNA control, duplicate libraries | 32 mean total fusions identified fusions · lower Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceSTAR-Fusion evaluation Consensus ≥3 callers, with specified filtering and known fusion list rescue; Table 2 displays mean of duplicate undiluted experiments. Only 14 Seraseq fusions are positive; all others counted false positive. Comparators processed by same authors. Aggregation: Not reported Discovery of clinically relevant fusions in pediatric cancer · Table 2, STAR-Fusion row, corresponding column (JATS Tab2) |
|---|
| Configuration: STAR-Fusion | Protocol: EnFusion undiluted Seraseq duplicate benchmark Dataset: Undiluted Seraseq Fusion RNA control, duplicate libraries | 43.6% precision % · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceSTAR-Fusion evaluation Consensus ≥3 callers, with specified filtering and known fusion list rescue; Table 2 displays mean of duplicate undiluted experiments. Only 14 Seraseq fusions are positive; all others counted false positive. Comparators processed by same authors. Aggregation: Not reported Discovery of clinically relevant fusions in pediatric cancer · Table 2, STAR-Fusion row, corresponding column (JATS Tab2) |
|---|
| Configuration: STAR-Fusion | Protocol: EnFusion undiluted Seraseq duplicate benchmark Dataset: Undiluted Seraseq Fusion RNA control, duplicate libraries | 100% sensitivity % · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceSTAR-Fusion evaluation Consensus ≥3 callers, with specified filtering and known fusion list rescue; Table 2 displays mean of duplicate undiluted experiments. Only 14 Seraseq fusions are positive; all others counted false positive. Comparators processed by same authors. Aggregation: Not reported Discovery of clinically relevant fusions in pediatric cancer · Table 2, STAR-Fusion row, corresponding column (JATS Tab2) |
|---|