rewire.itbenchmarks
Configuration

Historical Erlangen MTB protein-function interpretation

Prior P/LP, VUS and B/LB functional-impact review; different classification semantics from oncogenicity.

1 evaluation · 2 results

Overview

Prior P/LP, VUS and B/LB functional-impact review; different classification semantics from oncogenicity.

Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.

Evaluations and results

1 evaluation · 2 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Filter evaluations

Applied filters: All linked evaluations

Exact evaluated configurations and original reported results
Tested configurationProtocol and datasetFindingEvidence and details
Configuration: Historical Erlangen MTB protein-function interpretationProtocol: OncoVI three-class assessment: MTB selected expert reassessment
Dataset: MTB selected expert reassessment
34% expert_concordance
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Historical MTB agreement with expert oncogenicity reassessment

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

Oncogenicity Variant Interpreter (OncoVI) Supports Harmonized Somatic Variant Interpretation in Precision Oncology · Results, validation data set, paragraph ending 46/135; Figure 4A
Configuration: Historical Erlangen MTB protein-function interpretationProtocol: OncoVI three-class assessment: MTB selected expert reassessment
Dataset: MTB selected expert reassessment
46 expert_concordant_variants
count · unknown

Uncertainty: Not reported

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Historical MTB agreement with expert oncogenicity reassessment

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

Oncogenicity Variant Interpreter (OncoVI) Supports Harmonized Somatic Variant Interpretation in Precision Oncology · Results, validation data set, paragraph ending 46/135; Figure 4A

Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-09-30-e37e3ab1284d.

Use this model

How it works, versions and access
Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

0 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-09-30-e37e3ab1284d
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance

No evidence rows match these filters. Choose another scope or clear the search.

Sources and history

View linked audit checks and correction history

Release 2026-09-30-e37e3ab1284d · Record review: source checked

1 source records and release historyDownload this release
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: uc-clinical-20260930-oncovi-prior-mtb

areas
dna-genomes
contexts
clinical_research
review
method: automated_source_review; reviewer: Codex clinical coverage worker; date: 2026-09-30; note: Transcription from inspected primary source. No execution, independent replication or human scientific review.; source id: uc-clinical-20260930-source-oncovi
Related records

Suggest a correction