| Configuration: NeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50 model (Sahraeian et al. 2022) | Protocol: SEQC2 HCC1395 library preparation and DNA input, indel F1 (Sahraeian et al. 2022 Table S4) Dataset: SEQC2 HCC1395/HCC1395BL library-preparation replicates (TruSeq-Nano and Nextera Flex, 1-100 ng DNA) | 63.9% F1 (INDELs, average over the 6 library pairs as printed) percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50 on SEQC2 HCC1395/HCC1395BL library-preparation replicates (TruSeq-Nano and Nextera Flex, 1-100 ng DNA), INDELs (Sahraeian et al. 2022) somatic-neusomatic-20261010-protocol-sahraeian2022-library-prep-indel Aggregation: Not reported Achieving robust somatic mutation detection with deep learning models derived from reference data sets of a cancer sample; Sahraeian et al. 2022, Additional file 2: Supplementary Tables S1-S10 (13059_2021_2592_MOESM2_ESM.pdf) · Additional file 2 Table S4, INDELs section, row 'Average', column 'NeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50' |
|---|
| Configuration: NeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50 model (Sahraeian et al. 2022) | Protocol: SEQC2 HCC1395 library preparation and DNA input, indel F1 (Sahraeian et al. 2022 Table S4) Dataset: SEQC2 HCC1395/HCC1395BL library-preparation replicates (TruSeq-Nano and Nextera Flex, 1-100 ng DNA) | 74.9% F1 (INDELs, tumour LBP_Nextera_T_100ng with normal LBP_Nextera_N_100ng) percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50 on SEQC2 HCC1395/HCC1395BL library-preparation replicates (TruSeq-Nano and Nextera Flex, 1-100 ng DNA), INDELs (Sahraeian et al. 2022) somatic-neusomatic-20261010-protocol-sahraeian2022-library-prep-indel Aggregation: Not reported Achieving robust somatic mutation detection with deep learning models derived from reference data sets of a cancer sample; Sahraeian et al. 2022, Additional file 2: Supplementary Tables S1-S10 (13059_2021_2592_MOESM2_ESM.pdf) · Additional file 2 Table S4, INDELs section, row 'LBP_Nextera_T_100ng vs LBP_Nextera_N_100ng', column 'NeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50' |
|---|
| Configuration: NeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50 model (Sahraeian et al. 2022) | Protocol: SEQC2 HCC1395 library preparation and DNA input, indel F1 (Sahraeian et al. 2022 Table S4) Dataset: SEQC2 HCC1395/HCC1395BL library-preparation replicates (TruSeq-Nano and Nextera Flex, 1-100 ng DNA) | 76% F1 (INDELs, tumour LBP_Nextera_T_10ng with normal LBP_Nextera_N_10ng) percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50 on SEQC2 HCC1395/HCC1395BL library-preparation replicates (TruSeq-Nano and Nextera Flex, 1-100 ng DNA), INDELs (Sahraeian et al. 2022) somatic-neusomatic-20261010-protocol-sahraeian2022-library-prep-indel Aggregation: Not reported Achieving robust somatic mutation detection with deep learning models derived from reference data sets of a cancer sample; Sahraeian et al. 2022, Additional file 2: Supplementary Tables S1-S10 (13059_2021_2592_MOESM2_ESM.pdf) · Additional file 2 Table S4, INDELs section, row 'LBP_Nextera_T_10ng vs LBP_Nextera_N_10ng', column 'NeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50' |
|---|
| Configuration: NeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50 model (Sahraeian et al. 2022) | Protocol: SEQC2 HCC1395 library preparation and DNA input, indel F1 (Sahraeian et al. 2022 Table S4) Dataset: SEQC2 HCC1395/HCC1395BL library-preparation replicates (TruSeq-Nano and Nextera Flex, 1-100 ng DNA) | 68.4% F1 (INDELs, tumour LBP_Nextera_T_1ng with normal LBP_Nextera_N_1ng) percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50 on SEQC2 HCC1395/HCC1395BL library-preparation replicates (TruSeq-Nano and Nextera Flex, 1-100 ng DNA), INDELs (Sahraeian et al. 2022) somatic-neusomatic-20261010-protocol-sahraeian2022-library-prep-indel Aggregation: Not reported Achieving robust somatic mutation detection with deep learning models derived from reference data sets of a cancer sample; Sahraeian et al. 2022, Additional file 2: Supplementary Tables S1-S10 (13059_2021_2592_MOESM2_ESM.pdf) · Additional file 2 Table S4, INDELs section, row 'LBP_Nextera_T_1ng vs LBP_Nextera_N_1ng', column 'NeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50' |
|---|
| Configuration: NeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50 model (Sahraeian et al. 2022) | Protocol: SEQC2 HCC1395 library preparation and DNA input, indel F1 (Sahraeian et al. 2022 Table S4) Dataset: SEQC2 HCC1395/HCC1395BL library-preparation replicates (TruSeq-Nano and Nextera Flex, 1-100 ng DNA) | 72.1% F1 (INDELs, tumour LBP_TruSeq_T_100ng with normal LBP_TruSeq_N_100ng) percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50 on SEQC2 HCC1395/HCC1395BL library-preparation replicates (TruSeq-Nano and Nextera Flex, 1-100 ng DNA), INDELs (Sahraeian et al. 2022) somatic-neusomatic-20261010-protocol-sahraeian2022-library-prep-indel Aggregation: Not reported Achieving robust somatic mutation detection with deep learning models derived from reference data sets of a cancer sample; Sahraeian et al. 2022, Additional file 2: Supplementary Tables S1-S10 (13059_2021_2592_MOESM2_ESM.pdf) · Additional file 2 Table S4, INDELs section, row 'LBP_TruSeq_T_100ng vs LBP_TruSeq_N_100ng', column 'NeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50' |
|---|
| Configuration: NeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50 model (Sahraeian et al. 2022) | Protocol: SEQC2 HCC1395 library preparation and DNA input, indel F1 (Sahraeian et al. 2022 Table S4) Dataset: SEQC2 HCC1395/HCC1395BL library-preparation replicates (TruSeq-Nano and Nextera Flex, 1-100 ng DNA) | 65.8% F1 (INDELs, tumour LBP_TruSeq_T_10ng with normal LBP_TruSeq_N_10ng) percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50 on SEQC2 HCC1395/HCC1395BL library-preparation replicates (TruSeq-Nano and Nextera Flex, 1-100 ng DNA), INDELs (Sahraeian et al. 2022) somatic-neusomatic-20261010-protocol-sahraeian2022-library-prep-indel Aggregation: Not reported Achieving robust somatic mutation detection with deep learning models derived from reference data sets of a cancer sample; Sahraeian et al. 2022, Additional file 2: Supplementary Tables S1-S10 (13059_2021_2592_MOESM2_ESM.pdf) · Additional file 2 Table S4, INDELs section, row 'LBP_TruSeq_T_10ng vs LBP_TruSeq_N_10ng', column 'NeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50' |
|---|
| Configuration: NeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50 model (Sahraeian et al. 2022) | Protocol: SEQC2 HCC1395 library preparation and DNA input, indel F1 (Sahraeian et al. 2022 Table S4) Dataset: SEQC2 HCC1395/HCC1395BL library-preparation replicates (TruSeq-Nano and Nextera Flex, 1-100 ng DNA) | 26% F1 (INDELs, tumour LBP_TruSeq_T_1ng with normal LBP_TruSeq_N_1ng) percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50 on SEQC2 HCC1395/HCC1395BL library-preparation replicates (TruSeq-Nano and Nextera Flex, 1-100 ng DNA), INDELs (Sahraeian et al. 2022) somatic-neusomatic-20261010-protocol-sahraeian2022-library-prep-indel Aggregation: Not reported Achieving robust somatic mutation detection with deep learning models derived from reference data sets of a cancer sample; Sahraeian et al. 2022, Additional file 2: Supplementary Tables S1-S10 (13059_2021_2592_MOESM2_ESM.pdf) · Additional file 2 Table S4, INDELs section, row 'LBP_TruSeq_T_1ng vs LBP_TruSeq_N_1ng', column 'NeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50' |
|---|
| Configuration: NeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50 model (Sahraeian et al. 2022) | Protocol: SEQC2 HCC1395 library preparation and DNA input, SNV F1 (Sahraeian et al. 2022 Table S4) Dataset: SEQC2 HCC1395/HCC1395BL library-preparation replicates (TruSeq-Nano and Nextera Flex, 1-100 ng DNA) | 79.4% F1 (SNVs, average over the 6 library pairs as printed) percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50 on SEQC2 HCC1395/HCC1395BL library-preparation replicates (TruSeq-Nano and Nextera Flex, 1-100 ng DNA), SNVs (Sahraeian et al. 2022) somatic-neusomatic-20261010-protocol-sahraeian2022-library-prep-snv Aggregation: Not reported Achieving robust somatic mutation detection with deep learning models derived from reference data sets of a cancer sample; Sahraeian et al. 2022, Additional file 2: Supplementary Tables S1-S10 (13059_2021_2592_MOESM2_ESM.pdf) · Additional file 2 Table S4, SNVs section, row 'Average', column 'NeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50' |
|---|
| Configuration: NeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50 model (Sahraeian et al. 2022) | Protocol: SEQC2 HCC1395 library preparation and DNA input, SNV F1 (Sahraeian et al. 2022 Table S4) Dataset: SEQC2 HCC1395/HCC1395BL library-preparation replicates (TruSeq-Nano and Nextera Flex, 1-100 ng DNA) | 91.8% F1 (SNVs, tumour LBP_Nextera_T_100ng with normal LBP_Nextera_N_100ng) percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50 on SEQC2 HCC1395/HCC1395BL library-preparation replicates (TruSeq-Nano and Nextera Flex, 1-100 ng DNA), SNVs (Sahraeian et al. 2022) somatic-neusomatic-20261010-protocol-sahraeian2022-library-prep-snv Aggregation: Not reported Achieving robust somatic mutation detection with deep learning models derived from reference data sets of a cancer sample; Sahraeian et al. 2022, Additional file 2: Supplementary Tables S1-S10 (13059_2021_2592_MOESM2_ESM.pdf) · Additional file 2 Table S4, SNVs section, row 'LBP_Nextera_T_100ng vs LBP_Nextera_N_100ng', column 'NeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50' |
|---|
| Configuration: NeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50 model (Sahraeian et al. 2022) | Protocol: SEQC2 HCC1395 library preparation and DNA input, SNV F1 (Sahraeian et al. 2022 Table S4) Dataset: SEQC2 HCC1395/HCC1395BL library-preparation replicates (TruSeq-Nano and Nextera Flex, 1-100 ng DNA) | 93.4% F1 (SNVs, tumour LBP_Nextera_T_10ng with normal LBP_Nextera_N_10ng) percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50 on SEQC2 HCC1395/HCC1395BL library-preparation replicates (TruSeq-Nano and Nextera Flex, 1-100 ng DNA), SNVs (Sahraeian et al. 2022) somatic-neusomatic-20261010-protocol-sahraeian2022-library-prep-snv Aggregation: Not reported Achieving robust somatic mutation detection with deep learning models derived from reference data sets of a cancer sample; Sahraeian et al. 2022, Additional file 2: Supplementary Tables S1-S10 (13059_2021_2592_MOESM2_ESM.pdf) · Additional file 2 Table S4, SNVs section, row 'LBP_Nextera_T_10ng vs LBP_Nextera_N_10ng', column 'NeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50' |
|---|
| Configuration: NeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50 model (Sahraeian et al. 2022) | Protocol: SEQC2 HCC1395 library preparation and DNA input, SNV F1 (Sahraeian et al. 2022 Table S4) Dataset: SEQC2 HCC1395/HCC1395BL library-preparation replicates (TruSeq-Nano and Nextera Flex, 1-100 ng DNA) | 90.6% F1 (SNVs, tumour LBP_Nextera_T_1ng with normal LBP_Nextera_N_1ng) percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50 on SEQC2 HCC1395/HCC1395BL library-preparation replicates (TruSeq-Nano and Nextera Flex, 1-100 ng DNA), SNVs (Sahraeian et al. 2022) somatic-neusomatic-20261010-protocol-sahraeian2022-library-prep-snv Aggregation: Not reported Achieving robust somatic mutation detection with deep learning models derived from reference data sets of a cancer sample; Sahraeian et al. 2022, Additional file 2: Supplementary Tables S1-S10 (13059_2021_2592_MOESM2_ESM.pdf) · Additional file 2 Table S4, SNVs section, row 'LBP_Nextera_T_1ng vs LBP_Nextera_N_1ng', column 'NeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50' |
|---|
| Configuration: NeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50 model (Sahraeian et al. 2022) | Protocol: SEQC2 HCC1395 library preparation and DNA input, SNV F1 (Sahraeian et al. 2022 Table S4) Dataset: SEQC2 HCC1395/HCC1395BL library-preparation replicates (TruSeq-Nano and Nextera Flex, 1-100 ng DNA) | 89.2% F1 (SNVs, tumour LBP_TruSeq_T_100ng with normal LBP_TruSeq_N_100ng) percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50 on SEQC2 HCC1395/HCC1395BL library-preparation replicates (TruSeq-Nano and Nextera Flex, 1-100 ng DNA), SNVs (Sahraeian et al. 2022) somatic-neusomatic-20261010-protocol-sahraeian2022-library-prep-snv Aggregation: Not reported Achieving robust somatic mutation detection with deep learning models derived from reference data sets of a cancer sample; Sahraeian et al. 2022, Additional file 2: Supplementary Tables S1-S10 (13059_2021_2592_MOESM2_ESM.pdf) · Additional file 2 Table S4, SNVs section, row 'LBP_TruSeq_T_100ng vs LBP_TruSeq_N_100ng', column 'NeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50' |
|---|
| Configuration: NeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50 model (Sahraeian et al. 2022) | Protocol: SEQC2 HCC1395 library preparation and DNA input, SNV F1 (Sahraeian et al. 2022 Table S4) Dataset: SEQC2 HCC1395/HCC1395BL library-preparation replicates (TruSeq-Nano and Nextera Flex, 1-100 ng DNA) | 85.5% F1 (SNVs, tumour LBP_TruSeq_T_10ng with normal LBP_TruSeq_N_10ng) percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50 on SEQC2 HCC1395/HCC1395BL library-preparation replicates (TruSeq-Nano and Nextera Flex, 1-100 ng DNA), SNVs (Sahraeian et al. 2022) somatic-neusomatic-20261010-protocol-sahraeian2022-library-prep-snv Aggregation: Not reported Achieving robust somatic mutation detection with deep learning models derived from reference data sets of a cancer sample; Sahraeian et al. 2022, Additional file 2: Supplementary Tables S1-S10 (13059_2021_2592_MOESM2_ESM.pdf) · Additional file 2 Table S4, SNVs section, row 'LBP_TruSeq_T_10ng vs LBP_TruSeq_N_10ng', column 'NeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50' |
|---|
| Configuration: NeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50 model (Sahraeian et al. 2022) | Protocol: SEQC2 HCC1395 library preparation and DNA input, SNV F1 (Sahraeian et al. 2022 Table S4) Dataset: SEQC2 HCC1395/HCC1395BL library-preparation replicates (TruSeq-Nano and Nextera Flex, 1-100 ng DNA) | 25.6% F1 (SNVs, tumour LBP_TruSeq_T_1ng with normal LBP_TruSeq_N_1ng) percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50 on SEQC2 HCC1395/HCC1395BL library-preparation replicates (TruSeq-Nano and Nextera Flex, 1-100 ng DNA), SNVs (Sahraeian et al. 2022) somatic-neusomatic-20261010-protocol-sahraeian2022-library-prep-snv Aggregation: Not reported Achieving robust somatic mutation detection with deep learning models derived from reference data sets of a cancer sample; Sahraeian et al. 2022, Additional file 2: Supplementary Tables S1-S10 (13059_2021_2592_MOESM2_ESM.pdf) · Additional file 2 Table S4, SNVs section, row 'LBP_TruSeq_T_1ng vs LBP_TruSeq_N_1ng', column 'NeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50' |
|---|
| Configuration: NeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50 model (Sahraeian et al. 2022) | Protocol: SEQC2 HCC1395 tumour purity, coverage and normal contamination, indel F1 (Sahraeian et al. 2022 Table S3) Dataset: SEQC2 tumour-normal titration: HCC1395 gDNA mixed with HCC1395BL gDNA at 5-100% tumour purity, 10x-300x WGS | 50.7% F1 (INDELs, average over the 47 purity-coverage pairs as printed) percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50 on SEQC2 tumour-normal titration, INDELs (Sahraeian et al. 2022) somatic-neusomatic-20261010-protocol-sahraeian2022-titration-indel Aggregation: Not reported Achieving robust somatic mutation detection with deep learning models derived from reference data sets of a cancer sample; Sahraeian et al. 2022, Additional file 2: Supplementary Tables S1-S10 (13059_2021_2592_MOESM2_ESM.pdf) · Additional file 2 Table S3, INDELs section, row 'Average', column 'NeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50' |
|---|
| Configuration: NeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50 model (Sahraeian et al. 2022) | Protocol: SEQC2 HCC1395 tumour purity, coverage and normal contamination, indel F1 (Sahraeian et al. 2022 Table S3) Dataset: SEQC2 tumour-normal titration: HCC1395 gDNA mixed with HCC1395BL gDNA at 5-100% tumour purity, 10x-300x WGS | 34.4% F1 (INDELs, tumour SPP_100x_10%T with normal SPP_100x_100%N) percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50 on SEQC2 tumour-normal titration, INDELs (Sahraeian et al. 2022) somatic-neusomatic-20261010-protocol-sahraeian2022-titration-indel Aggregation: Not reported Achieving robust somatic mutation detection with deep learning models derived from reference data sets of a cancer sample; Sahraeian et al. 2022, Additional file 2: Supplementary Tables S1-S10 (13059_2021_2592_MOESM2_ESM.pdf) · Additional file 2 Table S3, INDELs section, row 'SPP_100x_10%T vs SPP_100x_100%N', column 'NeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50' |
|---|
| Configuration: NeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50 model (Sahraeian et al. 2022) | Protocol: SEQC2 HCC1395 tumour purity, coverage and normal contamination, indel F1 (Sahraeian et al. 2022 Table S3) Dataset: SEQC2 tumour-normal titration: HCC1395 gDNA mixed with HCC1395BL gDNA at 5-100% tumour purity, 10x-300x WGS | 83.8% F1 (INDELs, tumour SPP_100x_100%T with normal SPP_100x_100%N) percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50 on SEQC2 tumour-normal titration, INDELs (Sahraeian et al. 2022) somatic-neusomatic-20261010-protocol-sahraeian2022-titration-indel Aggregation: Not reported Achieving robust somatic mutation detection with deep learning models derived from reference data sets of a cancer sample; Sahraeian et al. 2022, Additional file 2: Supplementary Tables S1-S10 (13059_2021_2592_MOESM2_ESM.pdf) · Additional file 2 Table S3, INDELs section, row 'SPP_100x_100%T vs SPP_100x_100%N', column 'NeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50' |
|---|
| Configuration: NeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50 model (Sahraeian et al. 2022) | Protocol: SEQC2 HCC1395 tumour purity, coverage and normal contamination, indel F1 (Sahraeian et al. 2022 Table S3) Dataset: SEQC2 tumour-normal titration: HCC1395 gDNA mixed with HCC1395BL gDNA at 5-100% tumour purity, 10x-300x WGS | 61.2% F1 (INDELs, tumour SPP_100x_20%T with normal SPP_100x_100%N) percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50 on SEQC2 tumour-normal titration, INDELs (Sahraeian et al. 2022) somatic-neusomatic-20261010-protocol-sahraeian2022-titration-indel Aggregation: Not reported Achieving robust somatic mutation detection with deep learning models derived from reference data sets of a cancer sample; Sahraeian et al. 2022, Additional file 2: Supplementary Tables S1-S10 (13059_2021_2592_MOESM2_ESM.pdf) · Additional file 2 Table S3, INDELs section, row 'SPP_100x_20%T vs SPP_100x_100%N', column 'NeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50' |
|---|
| Configuration: NeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50 model (Sahraeian et al. 2022) | Protocol: SEQC2 HCC1395 tumour purity, coverage and normal contamination, indel F1 (Sahraeian et al. 2022 Table S3) Dataset: SEQC2 tumour-normal titration: HCC1395 gDNA mixed with HCC1395BL gDNA at 5-100% tumour purity, 10x-300x WGS | 15.8% F1 (INDELs, tumour SPP_100x_5%T with normal SPP_100x_100%N) percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50 on SEQC2 tumour-normal titration, INDELs (Sahraeian et al. 2022) somatic-neusomatic-20261010-protocol-sahraeian2022-titration-indel Aggregation: Not reported Achieving robust somatic mutation detection with deep learning models derived from reference data sets of a cancer sample; Sahraeian et al. 2022, Additional file 2: Supplementary Tables S1-S10 (13059_2021_2592_MOESM2_ESM.pdf) · Additional file 2 Table S3, INDELs section, row 'SPP_100x_5%T vs SPP_100x_100%N', column 'NeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50' |
|---|
| Configuration: NeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50 model (Sahraeian et al. 2022) | Protocol: SEQC2 HCC1395 tumour purity, coverage and normal contamination, indel F1 (Sahraeian et al. 2022 Table S3) Dataset: SEQC2 tumour-normal titration: HCC1395 gDNA mixed with HCC1395BL gDNA at 5-100% tumour purity, 10x-300x WGS | 80.4% F1 (INDELs, tumour SPP_100x_50%T with normal SPP_100x_100%N) percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50 on SEQC2 tumour-normal titration, INDELs (Sahraeian et al. 2022) somatic-neusomatic-20261010-protocol-sahraeian2022-titration-indel Aggregation: Not reported Achieving robust somatic mutation detection with deep learning models derived from reference data sets of a cancer sample; Sahraeian et al. 2022, Additional file 2: Supplementary Tables S1-S10 (13059_2021_2592_MOESM2_ESM.pdf) · Additional file 2 Table S3, INDELs section, row 'SPP_100x_50%T vs SPP_100x_100%N', column 'NeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50' |
|---|
| Configuration: NeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50 model (Sahraeian et al. 2022) | Protocol: SEQC2 HCC1395 tumour purity, coverage and normal contamination, indel F1 (Sahraeian et al. 2022 Table S3) Dataset: SEQC2 tumour-normal titration: HCC1395 gDNA mixed with HCC1395BL gDNA at 5-100% tumour purity, 10x-300x WGS | 84% F1 (INDELs, tumour SPP_100x_75%T with normal SPP_100x_100%N) percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50 on SEQC2 tumour-normal titration, INDELs (Sahraeian et al. 2022) somatic-neusomatic-20261010-protocol-sahraeian2022-titration-indel Aggregation: Not reported Achieving robust somatic mutation detection with deep learning models derived from reference data sets of a cancer sample; Sahraeian et al. 2022, Additional file 2: Supplementary Tables S1-S10 (13059_2021_2592_MOESM2_ESM.pdf) · Additional file 2 Table S3, INDELs section, row 'SPP_100x_75%T vs SPP_100x_100%N', column 'NeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50' |
|---|
| Configuration: NeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50 model (Sahraeian et al. 2022) | Protocol: SEQC2 HCC1395 tumour purity, coverage and normal contamination, indel F1 (Sahraeian et al. 2022 Table S3) Dataset: SEQC2 tumour-normal titration: HCC1395 gDNA mixed with HCC1395BL gDNA at 5-100% tumour purity, 10x-300x WGS | 0.7% F1 (INDELs, tumour SPP_10x_10%T with normal SPP_10x_100%N) percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50 on SEQC2 tumour-normal titration, INDELs (Sahraeian et al. 2022) somatic-neusomatic-20261010-protocol-sahraeian2022-titration-indel Aggregation: Not reported Achieving robust somatic mutation detection with deep learning models derived from reference data sets of a cancer sample; Sahraeian et al. 2022, Additional file 2: Supplementary Tables S1-S10 (13059_2021_2592_MOESM2_ESM.pdf) · Additional file 2 Table S3, INDELs section, row 'SPP_10x_10%T vs SPP_10x_100%N', column 'NeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50' |
|---|
| Configuration: NeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50 model (Sahraeian et al. 2022) | Protocol: SEQC2 HCC1395 tumour purity, coverage and normal contamination, indel F1 (Sahraeian et al. 2022 Table S3) Dataset: SEQC2 tumour-normal titration: HCC1395 gDNA mixed with HCC1395BL gDNA at 5-100% tumour purity, 10x-300x WGS | 31.1% F1 (INDELs, tumour SPP_10x_100%T with normal SPP_10x_100%N) percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50 on SEQC2 tumour-normal titration, INDELs (Sahraeian et al. 2022) somatic-neusomatic-20261010-protocol-sahraeian2022-titration-indel Aggregation: Not reported Achieving robust somatic mutation detection with deep learning models derived from reference data sets of a cancer sample; Sahraeian et al. 2022, Additional file 2: Supplementary Tables S1-S10 (13059_2021_2592_MOESM2_ESM.pdf) · Additional file 2 Table S3, INDELs section, row 'SPP_10x_100%T vs SPP_10x_100%N', column 'NeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50' |
|---|
| Configuration: NeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50 model (Sahraeian et al. 2022) | Protocol: SEQC2 HCC1395 tumour purity, coverage and normal contamination, indel F1 (Sahraeian et al. 2022 Table S3) Dataset: SEQC2 tumour-normal titration: HCC1395 gDNA mixed with HCC1395BL gDNA at 5-100% tumour purity, 10x-300x WGS | 3.5% F1 (INDELs, tumour SPP_10x_20%T with normal SPP_10x_100%N) percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50 on SEQC2 tumour-normal titration, INDELs (Sahraeian et al. 2022) somatic-neusomatic-20261010-protocol-sahraeian2022-titration-indel Aggregation: Not reported Achieving robust somatic mutation detection with deep learning models derived from reference data sets of a cancer sample; Sahraeian et al. 2022, Additional file 2: Supplementary Tables S1-S10 (13059_2021_2592_MOESM2_ESM.pdf) · Additional file 2 Table S3, INDELs section, row 'SPP_10x_20%T vs SPP_10x_100%N', column 'NeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50' |
|---|
| Configuration: NeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50 model (Sahraeian et al. 2022) | Protocol: SEQC2 HCC1395 tumour purity, coverage and normal contamination, indel F1 (Sahraeian et al. 2022 Table S3) Dataset: SEQC2 tumour-normal titration: HCC1395 gDNA mixed with HCC1395BL gDNA at 5-100% tumour purity, 10x-300x WGS | 0.3% F1 (INDELs, tumour SPP_10x_5%T with normal SPP_10x_100%N) percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50 on SEQC2 tumour-normal titration, INDELs (Sahraeian et al. 2022) somatic-neusomatic-20261010-protocol-sahraeian2022-titration-indel Aggregation: Not reported Achieving robust somatic mutation detection with deep learning models derived from reference data sets of a cancer sample; Sahraeian et al. 2022, Additional file 2: Supplementary Tables S1-S10 (13059_2021_2592_MOESM2_ESM.pdf) · Additional file 2 Table S3, INDELs section, row 'SPP_10x_5%T vs SPP_10x_100%N', column 'NeuSomatic-S SEQC-WGS-GT-50' |
|---|