Configuration

Vote ensemble Muse, Mutect2, Strelka, at least 2 agree (Guille et al. 2025)

Voting ensemble 'Muse-Mutect2-Strelka' retained by the authors (Comb-Cost-Effective).

Overview

Voting ensemble 'Muse-Mutect2-Strelka' retained by the authors (Comb-Cost-Effective).

Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.

Evaluations and results

1 evaluation · 6 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Filter evaluations

Tested model or methodProtocolDatasetEvaluation setupMetricEvidence origin

Applied filters: All linked evaluations

Exact evaluated configurations and original reported results
Tested configuration	Protocol and dataset	Finding	Evidence and details
Configuration: Vote ensemble Muse, Mutect2, Strelka, at least 2 agree (Guille et al. 2025)	Protocol: SEQC2 HCC1395 WES validation sample, somatic SNVs (Guille et al. 2025 Table S7) Dataset: SEQC2 HCC1395/HCC1395BL WES, Fudan replicate (WES_FD_T_1), high-confidence regions	0.875 f1-score fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Author-reported evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source Muse-Mutect2-Strelka on SEQC2 HCC1395 WES validation SNVs (Guille et al. 2025) somatic-20261009-protocol-guille2025-seqc2-fd-wes-snv Aggregation: Not reported A benchmarking study of individual somatic variant callers and voting-based ensembles for whole-exome sequencing; Guille et al. 2025, Supplementary Table S7 (validation dataset) · Supplementary Table S7 (tables7_bbae697.xls, sheet 'Results'), H21; Tools 'Muse-Mutect2-Strelka'; column 'F1'
Configuration: Vote ensemble Muse, Mutect2, Strelka, at least 2 agree (Guille et al. 2025)	Protocol: SEQC2 HCC1395 WES validation sample, somatic SNVs (Guille et al. 2025 Table S7) Dataset: SEQC2 HCC1395/HCC1395BL WES, Fudan replicate (WES_FD_T_1), high-confidence regions	89 false-positive-count count · lower Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Author-reported evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source Muse-Mutect2-Strelka on SEQC2 HCC1395 WES validation SNVs (Guille et al. 2025) somatic-20261009-protocol-guille2025-seqc2-fd-wes-snv Aggregation: Not reported A benchmarking study of individual somatic variant callers and voting-based ensembles for whole-exome sequencing; Guille et al. 2025, Supplementary Table S7 (validation dataset) · Supplementary Table S7 (tables7_bbae697.xls, sheet 'Results'), E21; Tools 'Muse-Mutect2-Strelka'; column 'FP'
Configuration: Vote ensemble Muse, Mutect2, Strelka, at least 2 agree (Guille et al. 2025)	Protocol: SEQC2 HCC1395 WES validation sample, somatic SNVs (Guille et al. 2025 Table S7) Dataset: SEQC2 HCC1395/HCC1395BL WES, Fudan replicate (WES_FD_T_1), high-confidence regions	5.91e-7 false-positive-rate fraction · lower Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Author-reported evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source Muse-Mutect2-Strelka on SEQC2 HCC1395 WES validation SNVs (Guille et al. 2025) somatic-20261009-protocol-guille2025-seqc2-fd-wes-snv Aggregation: Not reported A benchmarking study of individual somatic variant callers and voting-based ensembles for whole-exome sequencing; Guille et al. 2025, Supplementary Table S7 (validation dataset) · Supplementary Table S7 (tables7_bbae697.xls, sheet 'Results'), G21; Tools 'Muse-Mutect2-Strelka'; column 'FPR'
Configuration: Vote ensemble Muse, Mutect2, Strelka, at least 2 agree (Guille et al. 2025)	Protocol: SEQC2 HCC1395 WES validation sample, somatic SNVs (Guille et al. 2025 Table S7) Dataset: SEQC2 HCC1395/HCC1395BL WES, Fudan replicate (WES_FD_T_1), high-confidence regions	0.916 precision fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Author-reported evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source Muse-Mutect2-Strelka on SEQC2 HCC1395 WES validation SNVs (Guille et al. 2025) somatic-20261009-protocol-guille2025-seqc2-fd-wes-snv Aggregation: Not reported A benchmarking study of individual somatic variant callers and voting-based ensembles for whole-exome sequencing; Guille et al. 2025, Supplementary Table S7 (validation dataset) · Supplementary Table S7 (tables7_bbae697.xls, sheet 'Results'), I21; Tools 'Muse-Mutect2-Strelka'; column 'PPV'
Configuration: Vote ensemble Muse, Mutect2, Strelka, at least 2 agree (Guille et al. 2025)	Protocol: SEQC2 HCC1395 WES validation sample, somatic SNVs (Guille et al. 2025 Table S7) Dataset: SEQC2 HCC1395/HCC1395BL WES, Fudan replicate (WES_FD_T_1), high-confidence regions	0.838 recall fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Author-reported evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source Muse-Mutect2-Strelka on SEQC2 HCC1395 WES validation SNVs (Guille et al. 2025) somatic-20261009-protocol-guille2025-seqc2-fd-wes-snv Aggregation: Not reported A benchmarking study of individual somatic variant callers and voting-based ensembles for whole-exome sequencing; Guille et al. 2025, Supplementary Table S7 (validation dataset) · Supplementary Table S7 (tables7_bbae697.xls, sheet 'Results'), F21; Tools 'Muse-Mutect2-Strelka'; column 'TPR'
Configuration: Vote ensemble Muse, Mutect2, Strelka, at least 2 agree (Guille et al. 2025)	Protocol: SEQC2 HCC1395 WES validation sample, somatic SNVs (Guille et al. 2025 Table S7) Dataset: SEQC2 HCC1395/HCC1395BL WES, Fudan replicate (WES_FD_T_1), high-confidence regions	972 true-positive-count count · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Author-reported evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source Muse-Mutect2-Strelka on SEQC2 HCC1395 WES validation SNVs (Guille et al. 2025) somatic-20261009-protocol-guille2025-seqc2-fd-wes-snv Aggregation: Not reported A benchmarking study of individual somatic variant callers and voting-based ensembles for whole-exome sequencing; Guille et al. 2025, Supplementary Table S7 (validation dataset) · Supplementary Table S7 (tables7_bbae697.xls, sheet 'Results'), D21; Tools 'Muse-Mutect2-Strelka'; column 'TP'

Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-10-09-8cc1db47c7f9.

Use this model

How it works, versions and access

Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

0 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-10-09-8cc1db47c7f9
Property and statement	Original source and location	Review and provenance

No evidence rows match these filters. Choose another scope or clear the search.

All evidence (JSONL) (gzip)How to read the evidence

Sources and history

Release 2026-10-09-8cc1db47c7f9 · Record review: source checked

2 source records and release history

A benchmarking study of individual somatic variant callers and voting-based ensembles for whole-exome sequencing · Original source · Briefings in Bioinformatics 26(1):bbae697, published online 2025-01-18; PMC11790059 full-text XML
Guille et al. 2025, Supplementary Table S7 (validation dataset) · Original source · tables7_bbae697.xls inside the Europe PMC supplementary files bundle for PMC11790059

Download this release (gzip)

Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: somatic-20261009-config-guille2025-vote-3snv-min2

areas: dna-genomes
contexts: clinical_research
method types: conventional_pipeline
reported name: Muse-Mutect2-Strelka
foundation model eligible: false
protocol: A variant is called when at least 2 of the 3 member callers report it; member caller versions as in Table 1
method role: Authors' own retained ensemble, selected on the four development datasets and then applied to the validation sample
selection: Table S7 category 'Comb-Cost-Effective'
source locator: Supplementary Table S7 row 'Muse-Mutect2-Strelka'; Results 'Evaluation of the ensemble approach' and 'Validation'
missing metadata: version: reason: inapplicable; note: Ensemble of the listed caller versions

Related records

configuration of: Majority-vote consensus of somatic callers
system: Muse-Mutect2-Strelka on SEQC2 HCC1395 WES validation SNVs (Guille et al. 2025)

Suggest a correction