LIRICAL 1.3.4 (Yuan et al. 2024)
LIRICAL 1.3.4: Few parameter options; no protocol variants; singleton; AMELIE trio mode was unavailable and LIRICAL trio mode was under development.
Overview
An explanatory profile has not yet been reviewed for this record.
Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.
Evaluations and results
2 evaluations · 14 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.
Sorted by Top-1 accuracy (proportion of solved cases with the causal gene within the tool's top-ranked genes) (higher is better). The best value in each column is highlighted. Decimals are rounded for display; each value links to the printed value and its source.
| Tested configuration | Protocol and dataset | Top-1 accuracy (proportion of solved cases with the causal gene within the tool's top-ranked genes) | Top-10 accuracy (proportion of solved cases with the causal gene within the tool's top-ranked genes) | Top-20 accuracy (proportion of solved cases with the causal gene within the tool's top-ranked genes) | Top-30 accuracy (proportion of solved cases with the causal gene within the tool's top-ranked genes) | Top-40 accuracy (proportion of solved cases with the causal gene within the tool's top-ranked genes) | Top-5 accuracy (proportion of solved cases with the causal gene within the tool's top-ranked genes) | Top-50 accuracy (proportion of solved cases with the causal gene within the tool's top-ranked genes) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIRICAL 1.3.4 (Yuan et al. 2024)Evaluation | Causal-gene rank in 152 KGD trio-family exomes across parameter protocols (Yuan et al. 2024 Table 1), KingMed in-house trio cohort, 152 families (Yuan et al. 2024) | 58.6% (best in column) | 85.5% (best in column) | 94.1% (best in column) | 95.4% (best in column) | 96.1% (best in column) | 75.7% (best in column) | 96.1% (best in column) |
| LIRICAL 1.3.4 (Yuan et al. 2024)Evaluation | Causal-gene rank in 305 DDD trio-family exomes across parameter protocols (Yuan et al. 2024 Table 1), DDD 305 solved probands (Yuan et al. selection) | 46.6% | 83.3% | 91.8% | 93.8% | 95.7% | 75.4% | 95.7% |
All 14 result rows with coverage, uncertainty and sources
Filter evaluations
Applied filters: All linked evaluations
| Tested configuration | Protocol and dataset | Finding | Evidence and details |
|---|---|---|---|
| Configuration: LIRICAL 1.3.4 (Yuan et al. 2024) | Protocol: Causal-gene rank in 305 DDD trio-family exomes across parameter protocols (Yuan et al. 2024 Table 1) Dataset: DDD 305 solved probands (Yuan et al. selection) | 46.6% Top-1 accuracy (proportion of solved cases with the causal gene within the tool's top-ranked genes) percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcerare-ranking-20261009-protocol-yuan2024-ddd-parameter-protocols Aggregation: Not reported Refined preferences of prioritizers improve intelligent diagnosis for Mendelian diseases · Table 1 row (DDD, LIRICAL, PROT printed as a dash), column 'Top1 (%)' |
| Configuration: LIRICAL 1.3.4 (Yuan et al. 2024) | Protocol: Causal-gene rank in 305 DDD trio-family exomes across parameter protocols (Yuan et al. 2024 Table 1) Dataset: DDD 305 solved probands (Yuan et al. selection) | 83.3% Top-10 accuracy (proportion of solved cases with the causal gene within the tool's top-ranked genes) percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcerare-ranking-20261009-protocol-yuan2024-ddd-parameter-protocols Aggregation: Not reported Refined preferences of prioritizers improve intelligent diagnosis for Mendelian diseases · Table 1 row (DDD, LIRICAL, PROT printed as a dash), column 'Top10 (%)' |
| Configuration: LIRICAL 1.3.4 (Yuan et al. 2024) | Protocol: Causal-gene rank in 305 DDD trio-family exomes across parameter protocols (Yuan et al. 2024 Table 1) Dataset: DDD 305 solved probands (Yuan et al. selection) | 91.8% Top-20 accuracy (proportion of solved cases with the causal gene within the tool's top-ranked genes) percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcerare-ranking-20261009-protocol-yuan2024-ddd-parameter-protocols Aggregation: Not reported Refined preferences of prioritizers improve intelligent diagnosis for Mendelian diseases · Table 1 row (DDD, LIRICAL, PROT printed as a dash), column 'Top20 (%)' |
| Configuration: LIRICAL 1.3.4 (Yuan et al. 2024) | Protocol: Causal-gene rank in 305 DDD trio-family exomes across parameter protocols (Yuan et al. 2024 Table 1) Dataset: DDD 305 solved probands (Yuan et al. selection) | 93.8% Top-30 accuracy (proportion of solved cases with the causal gene within the tool's top-ranked genes) percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcerare-ranking-20261009-protocol-yuan2024-ddd-parameter-protocols Aggregation: Not reported Refined preferences of prioritizers improve intelligent diagnosis for Mendelian diseases · Table 1 row (DDD, LIRICAL, PROT printed as a dash), column 'Top30 (%)' |
| Configuration: LIRICAL 1.3.4 (Yuan et al. 2024) | Protocol: Causal-gene rank in 305 DDD trio-family exomes across parameter protocols (Yuan et al. 2024 Table 1) Dataset: DDD 305 solved probands (Yuan et al. selection) | 95.7% Top-40 accuracy (proportion of solved cases with the causal gene within the tool's top-ranked genes) percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcerare-ranking-20261009-protocol-yuan2024-ddd-parameter-protocols Aggregation: Not reported Refined preferences of prioritizers improve intelligent diagnosis for Mendelian diseases · Table 1 row (DDD, LIRICAL, PROT printed as a dash), column 'Top40 (%)' |
| Configuration: LIRICAL 1.3.4 (Yuan et al. 2024) | Protocol: Causal-gene rank in 305 DDD trio-family exomes across parameter protocols (Yuan et al. 2024 Table 1) Dataset: DDD 305 solved probands (Yuan et al. selection) | 75.4% Top-5 accuracy (proportion of solved cases with the causal gene within the tool's top-ranked genes) percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcerare-ranking-20261009-protocol-yuan2024-ddd-parameter-protocols Aggregation: Not reported Refined preferences of prioritizers improve intelligent diagnosis for Mendelian diseases · Table 1 row (DDD, LIRICAL, PROT printed as a dash), column 'Top5 (%)' |
| Configuration: LIRICAL 1.3.4 (Yuan et al. 2024) | Protocol: Causal-gene rank in 305 DDD trio-family exomes across parameter protocols (Yuan et al. 2024 Table 1) Dataset: DDD 305 solved probands (Yuan et al. selection) | 95.7% Top-50 accuracy (proportion of solved cases with the causal gene within the tool's top-ranked genes) percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcerare-ranking-20261009-protocol-yuan2024-ddd-parameter-protocols Aggregation: Not reported Refined preferences of prioritizers improve intelligent diagnosis for Mendelian diseases · Table 1 row (DDD, LIRICAL, PROT printed as a dash), column 'Top50 (%)' |
| Configuration: LIRICAL 1.3.4 (Yuan et al. 2024) | Protocol: Causal-gene rank in 152 KGD trio-family exomes across parameter protocols (Yuan et al. 2024 Table 1) Dataset: KingMed in-house trio cohort, 152 families (Yuan et al. 2024) | 58.6% Top-1 accuracy (proportion of solved cases with the causal gene within the tool's top-ranked genes) percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcerare-ranking-20261009-protocol-yuan2024-kgd-parameter-protocols Aggregation: Not reported Refined preferences of prioritizers improve intelligent diagnosis for Mendelian diseases · Table 1 row (KGD, LIRICAL, PROT printed as a dash), column 'Top1 (%)' |
| Configuration: LIRICAL 1.3.4 (Yuan et al. 2024) | Protocol: Causal-gene rank in 152 KGD trio-family exomes across parameter protocols (Yuan et al. 2024 Table 1) Dataset: KingMed in-house trio cohort, 152 families (Yuan et al. 2024) | 85.5% Top-10 accuracy (proportion of solved cases with the causal gene within the tool's top-ranked genes) percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcerare-ranking-20261009-protocol-yuan2024-kgd-parameter-protocols Aggregation: Not reported Refined preferences of prioritizers improve intelligent diagnosis for Mendelian diseases · Table 1 row (KGD, LIRICAL, PROT printed as a dash), column 'Top10 (%)' |
| Configuration: LIRICAL 1.3.4 (Yuan et al. 2024) | Protocol: Causal-gene rank in 152 KGD trio-family exomes across parameter protocols (Yuan et al. 2024 Table 1) Dataset: KingMed in-house trio cohort, 152 families (Yuan et al. 2024) | 94.1% Top-20 accuracy (proportion of solved cases with the causal gene within the tool's top-ranked genes) percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcerare-ranking-20261009-protocol-yuan2024-kgd-parameter-protocols Aggregation: Not reported Refined preferences of prioritizers improve intelligent diagnosis for Mendelian diseases · Table 1 row (KGD, LIRICAL, PROT printed as a dash), column 'Top20 (%)' |
| Configuration: LIRICAL 1.3.4 (Yuan et al. 2024) | Protocol: Causal-gene rank in 152 KGD trio-family exomes across parameter protocols (Yuan et al. 2024 Table 1) Dataset: KingMed in-house trio cohort, 152 families (Yuan et al. 2024) | 95.4% Top-30 accuracy (proportion of solved cases with the causal gene within the tool's top-ranked genes) percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcerare-ranking-20261009-protocol-yuan2024-kgd-parameter-protocols Aggregation: Not reported Refined preferences of prioritizers improve intelligent diagnosis for Mendelian diseases · Table 1 row (KGD, LIRICAL, PROT printed as a dash), column 'Top30 (%)' |
| Configuration: LIRICAL 1.3.4 (Yuan et al. 2024) | Protocol: Causal-gene rank in 152 KGD trio-family exomes across parameter protocols (Yuan et al. 2024 Table 1) Dataset: KingMed in-house trio cohort, 152 families (Yuan et al. 2024) | 96.1% Top-40 accuracy (proportion of solved cases with the causal gene within the tool's top-ranked genes) percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcerare-ranking-20261009-protocol-yuan2024-kgd-parameter-protocols Aggregation: Not reported Refined preferences of prioritizers improve intelligent diagnosis for Mendelian diseases · Table 1 row (KGD, LIRICAL, PROT printed as a dash), column 'Top40 (%)' |
| Configuration: LIRICAL 1.3.4 (Yuan et al. 2024) | Protocol: Causal-gene rank in 152 KGD trio-family exomes across parameter protocols (Yuan et al. 2024 Table 1) Dataset: KingMed in-house trio cohort, 152 families (Yuan et al. 2024) | 75.7% Top-5 accuracy (proportion of solved cases with the causal gene within the tool's top-ranked genes) percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcerare-ranking-20261009-protocol-yuan2024-kgd-parameter-protocols Aggregation: Not reported Refined preferences of prioritizers improve intelligent diagnosis for Mendelian diseases · Table 1 row (KGD, LIRICAL, PROT printed as a dash), column 'Top5 (%)' |
| Configuration: LIRICAL 1.3.4 (Yuan et al. 2024) | Protocol: Causal-gene rank in 152 KGD trio-family exomes across parameter protocols (Yuan et al. 2024 Table 1) Dataset: KingMed in-house trio cohort, 152 families (Yuan et al. 2024) | 96.1% Top-50 accuracy (proportion of solved cases with the causal gene within the tool's top-ranked genes) percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcerare-ranking-20261009-protocol-yuan2024-kgd-parameter-protocols Aggregation: Not reported Refined preferences of prioritizers improve intelligent diagnosis for Mendelian diseases · Table 1 row (KGD, LIRICAL, PROT printed as a dash), column 'Top50 (%)' |
Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-11-02-a7f03c9e55a5.
Use this configuration
How it works, versions and access
Additional methodological details, versions and access terms have not yet been extracted into a structured profile for this configuration. Consult the linked sources and evaluation records below.
Evidence
Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.
Evidence table
Inspect claims, sources and review details
Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.
One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.
0 evidence rows matching the loaded filters
| Property and statement | Original source and location | Review and provenance |
|---|
No evidence rows match these filters. Choose another scope or clear the search.
Sources and history
Release 2026-11-02-a7f03c9e55a5 · Record review: source checked
1 source record and release history
- Refined preferences of prioritizers improve intelligent diagnosis for Mendelian diseases · Original source · Scientific Reports 14:2845, published 2024-02-03; PMC10838329 full-text XML
Technical metadata and extraction receipts
Stable ID: rare-ranking-20261009-config-yuan2024-lirical
- areas
- dna-genomes
- contexts
- clinical_research
- method types
- conventional_pipeline
- reported name
- LIRICAL 1.3.4 (Yuan et al. 2024)
- foundation model eligible
- false
- version
- 1.3.4
- parameters
- Few parameter options; no protocol variants; singleton; AMELIE trio mode was unavailable and LIRICAL trio mode was under development (Discussion paragraph 1, item 4)
- source locator
- Table 1 rows 'LIRICAL'; Results 'Performance improvement assessment'; Discussion paragraph 1, item 4
- provenance note
- LIRICAL 1.3.4 (Yuan et al. 2024) as evaluated in the cited comparison.
Related records
- configuration of: LIRICAL
- system: LIRICAL on DDD
- system: LIRICAL on KGD