Causal-gene rank in 152 KGD trio-family exomes across parameter protocols (Yuan et al. 2024 Table 1)
Proportion of solved cases whose causal gene each tool and parameter protocol ranks within the top k.
Overview
Proportion of solved cases whose causal gene each tool and parameter protocol ranks within the top k.
Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.
13 recorded evaluations, 91 metric rows. A comparison chart has not yet been validated for these results. The table retains the individual findings and their sources.
Results
Results are available, but no reviewed comparison panel is linked in this release.
All evaluations
13 evaluations · 91 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.
Filter evaluations
Applied filters: All linked evaluations
| Tested configuration | Protocol and dataset | Finding | Evidence and details |
|---|---|---|---|
| Configuration: AMELIE 3.1.0, Protocol A (Yuan et al. 2024) | Protocol: Causal-gene rank in 152 KGD trio-family exomes across parameter protocols (Yuan et al. 2024 Table 1) Dataset: KingMed in-house trio cohort, 152 families (Yuan et al. 2024) | 50.7% top-1-accuracy percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcerare-ranking-20261009-protocol-yuan2024-kgd-parameter-protocols Aggregation: Not reported Refined preferences of prioritizers improve intelligent diagnosis for Mendelian diseases · Table 1 row (KGD, AMELIE, PROT A), column 'Top1 (%)' |
| Configuration: AMELIE 3.1.0, Protocol A (Yuan et al. 2024) | Protocol: Causal-gene rank in 152 KGD trio-family exomes across parameter protocols (Yuan et al. 2024 Table 1) Dataset: KingMed in-house trio cohort, 152 families (Yuan et al. 2024) | 86.8% top-10-accuracy percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcerare-ranking-20261009-protocol-yuan2024-kgd-parameter-protocols Aggregation: Not reported Refined preferences of prioritizers improve intelligent diagnosis for Mendelian diseases · Table 1 row (KGD, AMELIE, PROT A), column 'Top10 (%)' |
| Configuration: AMELIE 3.1.0, Protocol A (Yuan et al. 2024) | Protocol: Causal-gene rank in 152 KGD trio-family exomes across parameter protocols (Yuan et al. 2024 Table 1) Dataset: KingMed in-house trio cohort, 152 families (Yuan et al. 2024) | 88.2% top-20-accuracy percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcerare-ranking-20261009-protocol-yuan2024-kgd-parameter-protocols Aggregation: Not reported Refined preferences of prioritizers improve intelligent diagnosis for Mendelian diseases · Table 1 row (KGD, AMELIE, PROT A), column 'Top20 (%)' |
| Configuration: AMELIE 3.1.0, Protocol A (Yuan et al. 2024) | Protocol: Causal-gene rank in 152 KGD trio-family exomes across parameter protocols (Yuan et al. 2024 Table 1) Dataset: KingMed in-house trio cohort, 152 families (Yuan et al. 2024) | 89.5% top-30-accuracy percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcerare-ranking-20261009-protocol-yuan2024-kgd-parameter-protocols Aggregation: Not reported Refined preferences of prioritizers improve intelligent diagnosis for Mendelian diseases · Table 1 row (KGD, AMELIE, PROT A), column 'Top30 (%)' |
| Configuration: AMELIE 3.1.0, Protocol A (Yuan et al. 2024) | Protocol: Causal-gene rank in 152 KGD trio-family exomes across parameter protocols (Yuan et al. 2024 Table 1) Dataset: KingMed in-house trio cohort, 152 families (Yuan et al. 2024) | 89.5% top-40-accuracy percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcerare-ranking-20261009-protocol-yuan2024-kgd-parameter-protocols Aggregation: Not reported Refined preferences of prioritizers improve intelligent diagnosis for Mendelian diseases · Table 1 row (KGD, AMELIE, PROT A), column 'Top40 (%)' |
| Configuration: AMELIE 3.1.0, Protocol A (Yuan et al. 2024) | Protocol: Causal-gene rank in 152 KGD trio-family exomes across parameter protocols (Yuan et al. 2024 Table 1) Dataset: KingMed in-house trio cohort, 152 families (Yuan et al. 2024) | 79.6% top-5-accuracy percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcerare-ranking-20261009-protocol-yuan2024-kgd-parameter-protocols Aggregation: Not reported Refined preferences of prioritizers improve intelligent diagnosis for Mendelian diseases · Table 1 row (KGD, AMELIE, PROT A), column 'Top5 (%)' |
| Configuration: AMELIE 3.1.0, Protocol A (Yuan et al. 2024) | Protocol: Causal-gene rank in 152 KGD trio-family exomes across parameter protocols (Yuan et al. 2024 Table 1) Dataset: KingMed in-house trio cohort, 152 families (Yuan et al. 2024) | 89.5% top-50-accuracy percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcerare-ranking-20261009-protocol-yuan2024-kgd-parameter-protocols Aggregation: Not reported Refined preferences of prioritizers improve intelligent diagnosis for Mendelian diseases · Table 1 row (KGD, AMELIE, PROT A), column 'Top50 (%)' |
| Configuration: AMELIE 3.1.0, Protocol B (Yuan et al. 2024) | Protocol: Causal-gene rank in 152 KGD trio-family exomes across parameter protocols (Yuan et al. 2024 Table 1) Dataset: KingMed in-house trio cohort, 152 families (Yuan et al. 2024) | 52% top-1-accuracy percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcerare-ranking-20261009-protocol-yuan2024-kgd-parameter-protocols Aggregation: Not reported Refined preferences of prioritizers improve intelligent diagnosis for Mendelian diseases · Table 1 row (KGD, AMELIE, PROT B), column 'Top1 (%)' |
| Configuration: AMELIE 3.1.0, Protocol B (Yuan et al. 2024) | Protocol: Causal-gene rank in 152 KGD trio-family exomes across parameter protocols (Yuan et al. 2024 Table 1) Dataset: KingMed in-house trio cohort, 152 families (Yuan et al. 2024) | 87.5% top-10-accuracy percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcerare-ranking-20261009-protocol-yuan2024-kgd-parameter-protocols Aggregation: Not reported Refined preferences of prioritizers improve intelligent diagnosis for Mendelian diseases · Table 1 row (KGD, AMELIE, PROT B), column 'Top10 (%)' |
| Configuration: AMELIE 3.1.0, Protocol B (Yuan et al. 2024) | Protocol: Causal-gene rank in 152 KGD trio-family exomes across parameter protocols (Yuan et al. 2024 Table 1) Dataset: KingMed in-house trio cohort, 152 families (Yuan et al. 2024) | 88.8% top-20-accuracy percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcerare-ranking-20261009-protocol-yuan2024-kgd-parameter-protocols Aggregation: Not reported Refined preferences of prioritizers improve intelligent diagnosis for Mendelian diseases · Table 1 row (KGD, AMELIE, PROT B), column 'Top20 (%)' |
| Configuration: AMELIE 3.1.0, Protocol B (Yuan et al. 2024) | Protocol: Causal-gene rank in 152 KGD trio-family exomes across parameter protocols (Yuan et al. 2024 Table 1) Dataset: KingMed in-house trio cohort, 152 families (Yuan et al. 2024) | 90.1% top-30-accuracy percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcerare-ranking-20261009-protocol-yuan2024-kgd-parameter-protocols Aggregation: Not reported Refined preferences of prioritizers improve intelligent diagnosis for Mendelian diseases · Table 1 row (KGD, AMELIE, PROT B), column 'Top30 (%)' |
| Configuration: AMELIE 3.1.0, Protocol B (Yuan et al. 2024) | Protocol: Causal-gene rank in 152 KGD trio-family exomes across parameter protocols (Yuan et al. 2024 Table 1) Dataset: KingMed in-house trio cohort, 152 families (Yuan et al. 2024) | 90.8% top-40-accuracy percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcerare-ranking-20261009-protocol-yuan2024-kgd-parameter-protocols Aggregation: Not reported Refined preferences of prioritizers improve intelligent diagnosis for Mendelian diseases · Table 1 row (KGD, AMELIE, PROT B), column 'Top40 (%)' |
| Configuration: AMELIE 3.1.0, Protocol B (Yuan et al. 2024) | Protocol: Causal-gene rank in 152 KGD trio-family exomes across parameter protocols (Yuan et al. 2024 Table 1) Dataset: KingMed in-house trio cohort, 152 families (Yuan et al. 2024) | 80.3% top-5-accuracy percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcerare-ranking-20261009-protocol-yuan2024-kgd-parameter-protocols Aggregation: Not reported Refined preferences of prioritizers improve intelligent diagnosis for Mendelian diseases · Table 1 row (KGD, AMELIE, PROT B), column 'Top5 (%)' |
| Configuration: AMELIE 3.1.0, Protocol B (Yuan et al. 2024) | Protocol: Causal-gene rank in 152 KGD trio-family exomes across parameter protocols (Yuan et al. 2024 Table 1) Dataset: KingMed in-house trio cohort, 152 families (Yuan et al. 2024) | 90.8% top-50-accuracy percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcerare-ranking-20261009-protocol-yuan2024-kgd-parameter-protocols Aggregation: Not reported Refined preferences of prioritizers improve intelligent diagnosis for Mendelian diseases · Table 1 row (KGD, AMELIE, PROT B), column 'Top50 (%)' |
| Configuration: AMELIE 3.1.0, Protocol C (Yuan et al. 2024) | Protocol: Causal-gene rank in 152 KGD trio-family exomes across parameter protocols (Yuan et al. 2024 Table 1) Dataset: KingMed in-house trio cohort, 152 families (Yuan et al. 2024) | 54.6% top-1-accuracy percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcerare-ranking-20261009-protocol-yuan2024-kgd-parameter-protocols Aggregation: Not reported Refined preferences of prioritizers improve intelligent diagnosis for Mendelian diseases · Table 1 row (KGD, AMELIE, PROT C), column 'Top1 (%)' |
| Configuration: AMELIE 3.1.0, Protocol C (Yuan et al. 2024) | Protocol: Causal-gene rank in 152 KGD trio-family exomes across parameter protocols (Yuan et al. 2024 Table 1) Dataset: KingMed in-house trio cohort, 152 families (Yuan et al. 2024) | 86.8% top-10-accuracy percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcerare-ranking-20261009-protocol-yuan2024-kgd-parameter-protocols Aggregation: Not reported Refined preferences of prioritizers improve intelligent diagnosis for Mendelian diseases · Table 1 row (KGD, AMELIE, PROT C), column 'Top10 (%)' |
| Configuration: AMELIE 3.1.0, Protocol C (Yuan et al. 2024) | Protocol: Causal-gene rank in 152 KGD trio-family exomes across parameter protocols (Yuan et al. 2024 Table 1) Dataset: KingMed in-house trio cohort, 152 families (Yuan et al. 2024) | 87.5% top-20-accuracy percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcerare-ranking-20261009-protocol-yuan2024-kgd-parameter-protocols Aggregation: Not reported Refined preferences of prioritizers improve intelligent diagnosis for Mendelian diseases · Table 1 row (KGD, AMELIE, PROT C), column 'Top20 (%)' |
| Configuration: AMELIE 3.1.0, Protocol C (Yuan et al. 2024) | Protocol: Causal-gene rank in 152 KGD trio-family exomes across parameter protocols (Yuan et al. 2024 Table 1) Dataset: KingMed in-house trio cohort, 152 families (Yuan et al. 2024) | 88.2% top-30-accuracy percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcerare-ranking-20261009-protocol-yuan2024-kgd-parameter-protocols Aggregation: Not reported Refined preferences of prioritizers improve intelligent diagnosis for Mendelian diseases · Table 1 row (KGD, AMELIE, PROT C), column 'Top30 (%)' |
| Configuration: AMELIE 3.1.0, Protocol C (Yuan et al. 2024) | Protocol: Causal-gene rank in 152 KGD trio-family exomes across parameter protocols (Yuan et al. 2024 Table 1) Dataset: KingMed in-house trio cohort, 152 families (Yuan et al. 2024) | 88.2% top-40-accuracy percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcerare-ranking-20261009-protocol-yuan2024-kgd-parameter-protocols Aggregation: Not reported Refined preferences of prioritizers improve intelligent diagnosis for Mendelian diseases · Table 1 row (KGD, AMELIE, PROT C), column 'Top40 (%)' |
| Configuration: AMELIE 3.1.0, Protocol C (Yuan et al. 2024) | Protocol: Causal-gene rank in 152 KGD trio-family exomes across parameter protocols (Yuan et al. 2024 Table 1) Dataset: KingMed in-house trio cohort, 152 families (Yuan et al. 2024) | 81.6% top-5-accuracy percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcerare-ranking-20261009-protocol-yuan2024-kgd-parameter-protocols Aggregation: Not reported Refined preferences of prioritizers improve intelligent diagnosis for Mendelian diseases · Table 1 row (KGD, AMELIE, PROT C), column 'Top5 (%)' |
| Configuration: AMELIE 3.1.0, Protocol C (Yuan et al. 2024) | Protocol: Causal-gene rank in 152 KGD trio-family exomes across parameter protocols (Yuan et al. 2024 Table 1) Dataset: KingMed in-house trio cohort, 152 families (Yuan et al. 2024) | 88.2% top-50-accuracy percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcerare-ranking-20261009-protocol-yuan2024-kgd-parameter-protocols Aggregation: Not reported Refined preferences of prioritizers improve intelligent diagnosis for Mendelian diseases · Table 1 row (KGD, AMELIE, PROT C), column 'Top50 (%)' |
| Configuration: AMELIE 3.1.0, Protocol D (Yuan et al. 2024) | Protocol: Causal-gene rank in 152 KGD trio-family exomes across parameter protocols (Yuan et al. 2024 Table 1) Dataset: KingMed in-house trio cohort, 152 families (Yuan et al. 2024) | 55.9% top-1-accuracy percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcerare-ranking-20261009-protocol-yuan2024-kgd-parameter-protocols Aggregation: Not reported Refined preferences of prioritizers improve intelligent diagnosis for Mendelian diseases · Table 1 row (KGD, AMELIE, PROT D), column 'Top1 (%)' |
| Configuration: AMELIE 3.1.0, Protocol D (Yuan et al. 2024) | Protocol: Causal-gene rank in 152 KGD trio-family exomes across parameter protocols (Yuan et al. 2024 Table 1) Dataset: KingMed in-house trio cohort, 152 families (Yuan et al. 2024) | 86.8% top-10-accuracy percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcerare-ranking-20261009-protocol-yuan2024-kgd-parameter-protocols Aggregation: Not reported Refined preferences of prioritizers improve intelligent diagnosis for Mendelian diseases · Table 1 row (KGD, AMELIE, PROT D), column 'Top10 (%)' |
| Configuration: AMELIE 3.1.0, Protocol D (Yuan et al. 2024) | Protocol: Causal-gene rank in 152 KGD trio-family exomes across parameter protocols (Yuan et al. 2024 Table 1) Dataset: KingMed in-house trio cohort, 152 families (Yuan et al. 2024) | 87.5% top-20-accuracy percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcerare-ranking-20261009-protocol-yuan2024-kgd-parameter-protocols Aggregation: Not reported Refined preferences of prioritizers improve intelligent diagnosis for Mendelian diseases · Table 1 row (KGD, AMELIE, PROT D), column 'Top20 (%)' |
| Configuration: AMELIE 3.1.0, Protocol D (Yuan et al. 2024) | Protocol: Causal-gene rank in 152 KGD trio-family exomes across parameter protocols (Yuan et al. 2024 Table 1) Dataset: KingMed in-house trio cohort, 152 families (Yuan et al. 2024) | 88.2% top-30-accuracy percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcerare-ranking-20261009-protocol-yuan2024-kgd-parameter-protocols Aggregation: Not reported Refined preferences of prioritizers improve intelligent diagnosis for Mendelian diseases · Table 1 row (KGD, AMELIE, PROT D), column 'Top30 (%)' |
Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-10-10-6e93f504adfc.
Methods and evaluation design
Procedure, tasks and evaluated configurations
Recorded evaluations
Each evaluation records what was tested and under which conditions.
Baseline coverage
Reference methods help show what a model adds beyond simple controls. We track a null control and a conventional method for each protocol.
0 of 2 active baseline roles have published Rewire measurements in this release. Measurements on a selected protocol do not establish coverage of an entire suite.
No execution recipe linked to this protocol. Recipe availability does not establish a completed evaluation.
- External evaluations
- 13
Literature evidence is not a Rewire measurement. Executed but unpublished runs and private review status are not included.
Null control
Proposed control: requires review
Select a task-valid null control after reviewing inputs and metric
Protocol-specific applicability, permitted inputs, access, split, evaluator and execution requirements need review before implementation or execution.
This is a suggested selection rule, not a validated method or a measured score.
Conventional reference
Proposed control: requires review
Select an upstream conventional reference after reviewing the full protocol
Protocol-specific applicability, permitted inputs, access, split, evaluator and execution requirements need review before implementation or execution.
This is a suggested selection rule, not a validated method or a measured score.
Protocol coverage CSV (gzip) · Model evaluation matrix (gzip) · Source table (gzip) · Release and checksums (gzip)
Coverage is derived from release 2026-10-10-6e93f504adfc. Source citations describe the original records; they do not validate an unreviewed baseline proposal. No results have been generated by this audit.
Run instructions
No runnable recipe has been reviewed for this protocol. Dataset access, model requirements, licences and compute requirements must be checked against its sources before execution.
Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions
Evidence
Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.
Evidence table
Inspect claims, sources and review details
Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.
One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.
0 evidence rows matching the loaded filters
| Property and statement | Original source and location | Review and provenance |
|---|
No evidence rows match these filters. Choose another scope or clear the search.
Sources and history
Release 2026-10-10-6e93f504adfc · Record review: source checked
1 source records and release history
- Refined preferences of prioritizers improve intelligent diagnosis for Mendelian diseases · Original source · Scientific Reports 14:2845, published 2024-02-03; PMC10838329 full-text XML
Technical metadata and extraction receipts
Stable ID: rare-ranking-20261009-protocol-yuan2024-kgd-parameter-protocols
- areas
- dna-genomes
- contexts
- clinical_research
- protocol
- Run Exomiser and PhenIX under Protocols A-D (pathogenicity source and trio mode), AMELIE under Protocols A-D (allele-frequency cutoff and filterByCount) and LIRICAL once; record the rank of the causal gene; report the percentage of cases in the top 1 and within top 5, 10, 20, 30, 40 and 50.
- version
- Table 1 rows 'KGD'
- source locator
- Table 1 rows 'KGD'; Methods 'Visualization and statistical analysis'
- limitations
- Ranking of the known causal gene in solved cases; does not establish pathogenicity or a diagnosis.; Each case has a single causal gene; cases with no or several causal genes are not represented.; Only Exomiser and PhenIX Protocols C and D are trio mode. Every other row, including all AMELIE and LIRICAL rows, is singleton (Discussion paragraph 1, item 4). The authors' comparison of optimised settings sets trio-mode Exomiser and PhenIX (Protocol D) against singleton AMELIE (Protocol B) and LIRICAL; compare within mode only.; The authors chose Protocol D for Exomiser and PhenIX and Protocol B for AMELIE on these same cohorts, so those six rows (two cohorts) overstate expected performance on new cases. The values of all rows are as printed.; Same authors as Yuan et al. 2022; none developed the tools compared.; What distinguishes Exomiser and PhenIX Protocol C from Protocol D is shown only in the Figure 2 option table (image, not read); the text says only that both are trio mode. The pathogenicity source for C and D is not stated in the text.
Related records
- uses data: KingMed in-house trio cohort, 152 families (Yuan et al. 2024)
- assessment: AMELIE Protocol A on KGD
- assessment: AMELIE Protocol B on KGD
- assessment: AMELIE Protocol C on KGD
- assessment: AMELIE Protocol D on KGD
- assessment: Exomiser Protocol A on KGD
- assessment: Exomiser Protocol B on KGD
- assessment: Exomiser Protocol C on KGD
- assessment: Exomiser Protocol D on KGD
- assessment: LIRICAL on KGD
- assessment: PhenIX Protocol A on KGD
- assessment: PhenIX Protocol B on KGD
- assessment: PhenIX Protocol C on KGD
- assessment: PhenIX Protocol D on KGD
- assessed by: Rank rare-disease variants for review