Configuration

PHASTER

PHASTER as evaluated in the cited study. Paper-specific evaluated pipeline; exact checkpoint not inferred from label

Sources

LAMBDA: A Prophage Detection Benchmark for Genomic Language Models · Table 5., row PHASTER, column Precision; XML row4 column2

1 evaluation · 6 results

Overview

Key specifications have not been extracted for this record. See the linked evaluation and sources for the reported setup.

limited source coverage · Automated source review, 2026-09-17. All specifications and missing details

Evaluations and results

1 evaluation · 6 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Filter evaluations

Tested model or methodProtocolDatasetEvaluation setupMetricEvidence origin

Applied filters: All linked evaluations

Exact evaluated configurations and original reported results
Tested configuration	Protocol and dataset	Finding	Evidence and details
Configuration: PHASTER	Protocol: Genome-wide prophage detection (Genome-wide prophage detection) Dataset: LAMBDA genome-wide prophage test	0.011 FPR fraction · lower Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Author-reported evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source PHASTER: Genome-wide prophage detection Scan complete genomes with overlapping windows and postprocess predictions into prophage regions. Genome-wide metrics are computed at region level and macro-averaged across genomes. Filtered gLM pipelines include normalization, smoothing, clustering and size filtering; these are not standalone encoder scores. 80 bacterial genomes,47 species,four phyla;386 annotated prophage locations. Aggregation: Not reported LAMBDA: A Prophage Detection Benchmark for Genomic Language Models · Table 5., row PHASTER, column FPR; XML row4 column5
Configuration: PHASTER	Protocol: Genome-wide prophage detection (Genome-wide prophage detection) Dataset: LAMBDA genome-wide prophage test	0.764 Precision fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Author-reported evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source PHASTER: Genome-wide prophage detection Scan complete genomes with overlapping windows and postprocess predictions into prophage regions. Genome-wide metrics are computed at region level and macro-averaged across genomes. Filtered gLM pipelines include normalization, smoothing, clustering and size filtering; these are not standalone encoder scores. 80 bacterial genomes,47 species,four phyla;386 annotated prophage locations. Aggregation: Not reported LAMBDA: A Prophage Detection Benchmark for Genomic Language Models · Table 5., row PHASTER, column Precision; XML row4 column2
Configuration: PHASTER	Protocol: Genome-wide prophage detection (Genome-wide prophage detection) Dataset: LAMBDA genome-wide prophage test	0.786 MCC unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Author-reported evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source PHASTER: Genome-wide prophage detection Scan complete genomes with overlapping windows and postprocess predictions into prophage regions. Genome-wide metrics are computed at region level and macro-averaged across genomes. Filtered gLM pipelines include normalization, smoothing, clustering and size filtering; these are not standalone encoder scores. 80 bacterial genomes,47 species,four phyla;386 annotated prophage locations. Aggregation: Not reported LAMBDA: A Prophage Detection Benchmark for Genomic Language Models · Table 5., row PHASTER, column MCC; XML row4 column7
Configuration: PHASTER	Protocol: Genome-wide prophage detection (Genome-wide prophage detection) Dataset: LAMBDA genome-wide prophage test	0.989 Specificity fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Author-reported evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source PHASTER: Genome-wide prophage detection Scan complete genomes with overlapping windows and postprocess predictions into prophage regions. Genome-wide metrics are computed at region level and macro-averaged across genomes. Filtered gLM pipelines include normalization, smoothing, clustering and size filtering; these are not standalone encoder scores. 80 bacterial genomes,47 species,four phyla;386 annotated prophage locations. Aggregation: Not reported LAMBDA: A Prophage Detection Benchmark for Genomic Language Models · Table 5., row PHASTER, column Specificity; XML row4 column4
Configuration: PHASTER	Protocol: Genome-wide prophage detection (Genome-wide prophage detection) Dataset: LAMBDA genome-wide prophage test	0.855 Recall fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Author-reported evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source PHASTER: Genome-wide prophage detection Scan complete genomes with overlapping windows and postprocess predictions into prophage regions. Genome-wide metrics are computed at region level and macro-averaged across genomes. Filtered gLM pipelines include normalization, smoothing, clustering and size filtering; these are not standalone encoder scores. 80 bacterial genomes,47 species,four phyla;386 annotated prophage locations. Aggregation: Not reported LAMBDA: A Prophage Detection Benchmark for Genomic Language Models · Table 5., row PHASTER, column Recall; XML row4 column3
Configuration: PHASTER	Protocol: Genome-wide prophage detection (Genome-wide prophage detection) Dataset: LAMBDA genome-wide prophage test	0.78 F1 fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Author-reported evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source PHASTER: Genome-wide prophage detection Scan complete genomes with overlapping windows and postprocess predictions into prophage regions. Genome-wide metrics are computed at region level and macro-averaged across genomes. Filtered gLM pipelines include normalization, smoothing, clustering and size filtering; these are not standalone encoder scores. 80 bacterial genomes,47 species,four phyla;386 annotated prophage locations. Aggregation: Not reported LAMBDA: A Prophage Detection Benchmark for Genomic Language Models · Table 5., row PHASTER, column F1; XML row4 column6

Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220.

Use this model

How it works, versions and access

How it works

Evaluation in this paper

Paper-specific evaluated pipeline; exact checkpoint not inferred from label

Sources

LAMBDA: A Prophage Detection Benchmark for Genomic Language Models · Table 5., row PHASTER, column Precision; XML row4 column2

Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions

Strengths and limitations

Strengths and considerations

No source-reviewed explanatory claims are recorded here yet.

Limitations and conditions

No source-reviewed explanatory claims are recorded here yet.

Profile review details

Primary-source transcription and separate automated review. No human sign-off or experimental reproduction.

Stable record: paper-model-4b6b5df37bc0a8bbc9

Specifications

Inputs, training, access and other details

Explanatory profile: limited source coverage · Automated source review, 2026-09-17. Review applies to the cited claims; unresolved fields are listed below. Numerical results retain their own review status.

Inputs, outputs and configuration
Property	Description and evidence
Model type	Not extracted or verified for this record.
Inputs	Not extracted or verified for this record.
Outputs	Not extracted or verified for this record.
Parameters	Not extracted or verified for this record.
Known versions	Not extracted or verified for this record.
Training data	Not extracted or verified for this record.
Context limits	Not extracted or verified for this record.
Access	Not extracted or verified for this record.
Code licence	Not extracted or verified for this record.
Weights licence	Not extracted or verified for this record.

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

2 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220
Property and statement	Original source and location	Review and provenance
Evaluation in this paper Paper-specific evaluated pipeline; exact checkpoint not inferred from label Individual claims	LAMBDA: A Prophage Detection Benchmark for Genomic Language Models Original source ↗ Table 5., row PHASTER, column Precision; XML row4 column2 Version: PMC13041943.1 Retrieved: 2026-09-17T07:56:21.006973+00:00	source checked automated source review · 2026-09-17 Audit details Primary-source transcription and separate automated review. No human sign-off or experimental reproduction. Field: `attributes.profile.sections.0.body` Source artifact SHA-256: `22c2e218e87dce757907f6086a0e2ad37c13f785b34fff5bea7cfa1a6c276b16` Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. Inspected artifact
Introduction PHASTER as evaluated in the cited study. Paper-specific evaluated pipeline; exact checkpoint not inferred from label Individual claims	LAMBDA: A Prophage Detection Benchmark for Genomic Language Models Original source ↗ Table 5., row PHASTER, column Precision; XML row4 column2 Version: PMC13041943.1 Retrieved: 2026-09-17T07:56:21.006973+00:00	source checked automated source review · 2026-09-17 Audit details Primary-source transcription and separate automated review. No human sign-off or experimental reproduction. Field: `attributes.profile.summary` Source artifact SHA-256: `22c2e218e87dce757907f6086a0e2ad37c13f785b34fff5bea7cfa1a6c276b16` Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. Inspected artifact

All evidence (CSV)All evidence (JSONL)How to read the evidence

Sources and history

View linked audit checks and correction history

Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220 · Record review: needs review

1 source records and release history

LAMBDA: A Prophage Detection Benchmark for Genomic Language Models · Original source · PMC13041943.1

Download this release

Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: paper-model-4b6b5df37bc0a8bbc9

areas: microbes-communities
tasks: Genome-wide prophage detection
entity level: method
configuration type: reported_configuration
version: Paper-specific evaluated pipeline; exact checkpoint not inferred from label
legacy kinds: model
entity classification: review date: 2026-09-17; rationale: This source-scoped entry preserves the method/configuration actually named in an evaluation. It is neither a global family identity nor proof of an immutable checkpoint; the linked evaluation retains adaptation, fitting and scoring details.; source ids: part2-lambda-prophage-2026; source locator: Table 5., row PHASTER, column Precision; XML row4 column2; ambiguities: Configuration means the source-labelled evaluated identity. It does not establish missing checkpoint hashes, default settings or equivalence to same-named records in other papers.

Related records

model: PHASTER: Genome-wide prophage detection

Suggest a correction