rewirebio.iobenchmarks
Configuration

ChemFormer two-stage retrieval, original candidate canonicalization (MassSpecGym in the Wild)

ChemFormer two-stage retrieval, original candidate canonicalization; no settings beyond its name are recorded.

4 evaluations · 4 results

Overview

An explanatory profile has not yet been reviewed for this record.

Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.

Evaluations and results

4 evaluations · 4 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Dataset: MassSpecGym test fold, formula-known retrieval candidates (bonus) (MassSpecGym in the Wild)

Sorted by Top-1 accuracy (retrieval) (higher is better). The best value in each column is highlighted. Decimals are rounded for display; each value links to the printed value and its source.

All 4 result rows with coverage, uncertainty and sources
Filter evaluations

Applied filters: All linked evaluations

Exact evaluated configurations and original reported results
Tested configurationProtocol and datasetFindingEvidence and details
Configuration: ChemFormer two-stage retrieval, original candidate canonicalization (MassSpecGym in the Wild)Protocol: MassSpecGym formula-known retrieval (bonus), Hit rate@1 (MassSpecGym in the Wild Table 3)
Dataset: MassSpecGym test fold, formula-known retrieval candidates (bonus) (MassSpecGym in the Wild)
63.89 (62.71-65.03)% Top-1 accuracy (retrieval)
percent · higher

Uncertainty: 99.9% CI 62.71 to 65.03. Range printed in parentheses after the mean. Appendix 'Confidence Intervals': 99.9% bootstrap interval over 20,000 resamples of the test set.

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

ChemFormer two-stage retrieval, original candidate canonicalization on MassSpecGym formula-retrieval (Hit rate@1)

lit-otheromics-20261011-msgwild-protocol-formula-retrieval-hit-rate-1

Aggregation: Not reported

MassSpecGym in the Wild: Uncovering and Correcting Evaluation Pitfalls in AI-Driven Molecule Discovery · Table 3, section 'Exploiting Canonicalization Artifacts (Not Valid Under Corrected Candidate Canonicalization)', row '(2) ChemFormer Two-Stage Retrieval (inflated)', column 'Hit rate@1'
Configuration: ChemFormer two-stage retrieval, original candidate canonicalization (MassSpecGym in the Wild)Protocol: MassSpecGym formula-known retrieval (bonus), Hit rate@20 (MassSpecGym in the Wild Table 3)
Dataset: MassSpecGym test fold, formula-known retrieval candidates (bonus) (MassSpecGym in the Wild)
75.86 (74.79-76.89)% Top-20 accuracy (retrieval)
percent · higher

Uncertainty: 99.9% CI 74.79 to 76.89. Range printed in parentheses after the mean. Appendix 'Confidence Intervals': 99.9% bootstrap interval over 20,000 resamples of the test set.

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

ChemFormer two-stage retrieval, original candidate canonicalization on MassSpecGym formula-retrieval (Hit rate@20)

lit-otheromics-20261011-msgwild-protocol-formula-retrieval-hit-rate-20

Aggregation: Not reported

MassSpecGym in the Wild: Uncovering and Correcting Evaluation Pitfalls in AI-Driven Molecule Discovery · Table 3, section 'Exploiting Canonicalization Artifacts (Not Valid Under Corrected Candidate Canonicalization)', row '(2) ChemFormer Two-Stage Retrieval (inflated)', column 'Hit rate@20'
Configuration: ChemFormer two-stage retrieval, original candidate canonicalization (MassSpecGym in the Wild)Protocol: MassSpecGym formula-known retrieval (bonus), Hit rate@5 (MassSpecGym in the Wild Table 3)
Dataset: MassSpecGym test fold, formula-known retrieval candidates (bonus) (MassSpecGym in the Wild)
70.52 (69.37-71.70)% Top-5 accuracy (retrieval)
percent · higher

Uncertainty: 99.9% CI 69.37 to 71.70. Range printed in parentheses after the mean. Appendix 'Confidence Intervals': 99.9% bootstrap interval over 20,000 resamples of the test set.

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

ChemFormer two-stage retrieval, original candidate canonicalization on MassSpecGym formula-retrieval (Hit rate@5)

lit-otheromics-20261011-msgwild-protocol-formula-retrieval-hit-rate-5

Aggregation: Not reported

MassSpecGym in the Wild: Uncovering and Correcting Evaluation Pitfalls in AI-Driven Molecule Discovery · Table 3, section 'Exploiting Canonicalization Artifacts (Not Valid Under Corrected Candidate Canonicalization)', row '(2) ChemFormer Two-Stage Retrieval (inflated)', column 'Hit rate@5'
Configuration: ChemFormer two-stage retrieval, original candidate canonicalization (MassSpecGym in the Wild)Protocol: MassSpecGym formula-known retrieval (bonus), MCES@1 (MassSpecGym in the Wild Table 3)
Dataset: MassSpecGym test fold, formula-known retrieval candidates (bonus) (MassSpecGym in the Wild)
5.39 (5.20-5.60) Top-1 MCES (retrieval)
unitless · lower

Uncertainty: 99.9% CI 5.20 to 5.60. Range printed in parentheses after the mean. Appendix 'Confidence Intervals': 99.9% bootstrap interval over 20,000 resamples of the test set.

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

ChemFormer two-stage retrieval, original candidate canonicalization on MassSpecGym formula-retrieval (MCES@1)

lit-otheromics-20261011-msgwild-protocol-formula-retrieval-mces-1

Aggregation: Not reported

MassSpecGym in the Wild: Uncovering and Correcting Evaluation Pitfalls in AI-Driven Molecule Discovery · Table 3, section 'Exploiting Canonicalization Artifacts (Not Valid Under Corrected Candidate Canonicalization)', row '(2) ChemFormer Two-Stage Retrieval (inflated)', column 'MCES@1'

Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-10-23-5347695500ed.

Use this configuration

How it works, versions and access

Additional methodological details, versions and access terms have not yet been extracted into a structured profile for this configuration. Consult the linked sources and evaluation records below.

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

0 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-10-23-5347695500ed
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance

No evidence rows match these filters. Choose another scope or clear the search.

Sources and history

Release 2026-10-23-5347695500ed · Record review: source checked

1 source record and release historyDownload this release (gzip)
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: lit-otheromics-20261011-msgwild-config-chemformer-two-stage-retrieval-original-candidate-canonicalization

areas
metabolomics
contexts
research
method types
foundation_model
reported name
(2) ChemFormer Two-Stage Retrieval (inflated)
foundation model eligible
true
parameters
ChemFormer two-stage retrieval, original candidate canonicalization
access reuse
Not stated in the source; see the cited work or https://github.com/pluskal-lab/MassSpecGym
source locator
Table 3 row '(2) ChemFormer Two-Stage Retrieval (inflated)'
missing metadata
version: reason: unreported; note: Only the printed row label identifies the setup
limitations
Grey: exploits the SMILES canonicalization artifact. Source marks this row in grey.
provenance note
ChemFormer two-stage retrieval, original candidate canonicalization, as listed in MassSpecGym in the Wild Table 3.
Related records

Suggest a correction