rewire.itbenchmarks
Configuration

GROVER

Genomic foundation model evaluated by the GENEB authors with frozen embeddings and a probe.

2 evaluations · 2 results

Overview

Genomic foundation model evaluated by the GENEB authors with frozen embeddings and a probe.

Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.

Evaluations and results

2 evaluations · 2 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Filter evaluations

Applied filters: All linked evaluations

Exact evaluated configurations and original reported results
Tested configurationProtocol and datasetFindingEvidence and details
Configuration: GROVERTask: GENEB LINEAR-PROBE: Average macro-MCC across the 13 representative tasks, linear probe
Dataset subset: GENEB representative task subset (GENEB split)
0.466 macro_mcc
correlation · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

GROVER on GENEB LINEAR-PROBE: Average macro-MCC across the 13 representative tasks, linear probe

Frozen embeddings scored with a probe over the thirteen representative tasks, one from each functional category (Table 7).

Aggregation: Not reported

GENEB: Why Genomic Models Are Hard to Compare · Table 8, row(GROVER), column(Linear MCC)
Configuration: GROVERTask: GENEB MLP-PROBE: Average macro-MCC across the 13 representative tasks, MLP probe
Dataset subset: GENEB representative task subset (GENEB split)
0.477 macro_mcc
correlation · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

GROVER on GENEB MLP-PROBE: Average macro-MCC across the 13 representative tasks, MLP probe

Frozen embeddings scored with a probe over the thirteen representative tasks, one from each functional category (Table 7).

Aggregation: Not reported

GENEB: Why Genomic Models Are Hard to Compare · Table 8, row(GROVER), column(MLP MCC)

Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220.

Use this model

How it works, versions and access
Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

0 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance

No evidence rows match these filters. Choose another scope or clear the search.

Sources and history

View linked audit checks and correction history

Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220 · Record review: source checked

1 source records and release historyDownload this release
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: geneb-method-grover

areas
dna-genomes
source locator
Table 8, row(GROVER)
missing metadata
checkpoint revision: unreported; parameters: unextracted
Related records

Suggest a correction