Configuration

GENA-LM (fine-tuned)

GENA-LM (fine-tuned): DNA language model.

Overview

An explanatory profile has not yet been reviewed for this record.

Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.

Evaluations and results

22 evaluations · 22 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Sorted by AUROC (higher is better). The best value in each column is highlighted. Decimals are rounded for display; each value links to the printed value and its source.

Tested configuration	Protocol and dataset	AUROC	Spearman	Accuracy	Pearson	Paired accuracy
GENA-LM (fine-tuned)Evaluation	DART-Eval CA-AUROC-IMR90: Chromatin activity prediction, IMR90, positives against negatives, ENCODE chromatin accessibility peaks in five cell lines (DART-Eval split)	0.961 (best in column)	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported
GENA-LM (fine-tuned)Evaluation	DART-Eval CA-AUROC-H1ESC: Chromatin activity prediction, H1ESC, positives against negatives, ENCODE chromatin accessibility peaks in five cell lines (DART-Eval split)	0.942	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported
GENA-LM (fine-tuned)Evaluation	DART-Eval CTS-H1ESC: Cell-type-specific element classification, H1ESC, ENCODE chromatin accessibility peaks in five cell lines (DART-Eval split)	0.923	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported
GENA-LM (fine-tuned)Evaluation	DART-Eval CTS-IMR90: Cell-type-specific element classification, IMR90, ENCODE chromatin accessibility peaks in five cell lines (DART-Eval split)	0.911	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported
GENA-LM (fine-tuned)Evaluation	DART-Eval CA-AUROC-K562: Chromatin activity prediction, K562, positives against negatives, ENCODE chromatin accessibility peaks in five cell lines (DART-Eval split)	0.91	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported
GENA-LM (fine-tuned)Evaluation	DART-Eval CA-AUROC-GM12878: Chromatin activity prediction, GM12878, positives against negatives, ENCODE chromatin accessibility peaks in five cell lines (DART-Eval split)	0.908	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported
GENA-LM (fine-tuned)Evaluation	DART-Eval CTS-HEPG2: Cell-type-specific element classification, HEPG2, ENCODE chromatin accessibility peaks in five cell lines (DART-Eval split)	0.887	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported
GENA-LM (fine-tuned)Evaluation	DART-Eval CA-AUROC-HEPG2: Chromatin activity prediction, HEPG2, positives against negatives, ENCODE chromatin accessibility peaks in five cell lines (DART-Eval split)	0.878	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported
GENA-LM (fine-tuned)Evaluation	DART-Eval CTS-GM12878: Cell-type-specific element classification, GM12878, ENCODE chromatin accessibility peaks in five cell lines (DART-Eval split)	0.877	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported
GENA-LM (fine-tuned)Evaluation	DART-Eval CTS-K562: Cell-type-specific element classification, K562, ENCODE chromatin accessibility peaks in five cell lines (DART-Eval split)	0.862	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported
GENA-LM (fine-tuned)Evaluation	DART-Eval VS-YORUBAN-AUROC: Variant scoring on DNase QTLs in Yoruban LCLs, AUROC, DNase QTLs in Yoruban LCLs (DART-Eval split)	0.628	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported
GENA-LM (fine-tuned)Evaluation	DART-Eval VS-AFRICAN-AUROC: Variant scoring on Chromatin QTLs in African LCLs, AUROC, Chromatin QTLs in African LCLs (DART-Eval split)	0.604	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported
GENA-LM (fine-tuned)Evaluation	DART-Eval CA-SPEARMAN-GM12878: Chromatin activity prediction, GM12878, positives only, ENCODE chromatin accessibility peaks in five cell lines (DART-Eval split)	Not reported	0.467	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported
GENA-LM (fine-tuned)Evaluation	DART-Eval CA-SPEARMAN-H1ESC: Chromatin activity prediction, H1ESC, positives only, ENCODE chromatin accessibility peaks in five cell lines (DART-Eval split)	Not reported	0.696 (best in column)	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported
GENA-LM (fine-tuned)Evaluation	DART-Eval CA-SPEARMAN-HEPG2: Chromatin activity prediction, HEPG2, positives only, ENCODE chromatin accessibility peaks in five cell lines (DART-Eval split)	Not reported	0.439	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported
GENA-LM (fine-tuned)Evaluation	DART-Eval CA-SPEARMAN-IMR90: Chromatin activity prediction, IMR90, positives only, ENCODE chromatin accessibility peaks in five cell lines (DART-Eval split)	Not reported	0.421	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported
GENA-LM (fine-tuned)Evaluation	DART-Eval CA-SPEARMAN-K562: Chromatin activity prediction, K562, positives only, ENCODE chromatin accessibility peaks in five cell lines (DART-Eval split)	Not reported	0.532	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported
GENA-LM (fine-tuned)Evaluation	DART-Eval CTS-ACC: Cell-type-specific element classification, overall accuracy, ENCODE chromatin accessibility peaks in five cell lines (DART-Eval split)	Not reported	Not reported	0.636	Not reported	Not reported
GENA-LM (fine-tuned)Evaluation	DART-Eval REI-ABS: Regulatory element identification, absolute accuracy, ENCODE cCREs against dinucleotide-shuffled backgrounds (DART-Eval split)	Not reported	Not reported	0.909 (best in column)	Not reported	Not reported
GENA-LM (fine-tuned)Evaluation	DART-Eval REI-PAIR: Regulatory element identification, paired accuracy, ENCODE cCREs against dinucleotide-shuffled backgrounds (DART-Eval split)	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	0.972
GENA-LM (fine-tuned)Evaluation	DART-Eval VS-AFRICAN-PEARSON_R: Variant scoring on Chromatin QTLs in African LCLs, Pearson r, Chromatin QTLs in African LCLs (DART-Eval split)	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	0.201	Not reported
GENA-LM (fine-tuned)Evaluation	DART-Eval VS-YORUBAN-PEARSON_R: Variant scoring on DNase QTLs in Yoruban LCLs, Pearson r, DNase QTLs in Yoruban LCLs (DART-Eval split)	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	0.414 (best in column)	Not reported

All 22 result rows with coverage, uncertainty and sources

Filter evaluations

Tested model or methodProtocolDatasetEvaluation setupMetricEvidence origin

Applied filters: All linked evaluations

Exact evaluated configurations and original reported results
Tested configuration	Protocol and dataset	Finding	Evidence and details
Configuration: GENA-LM (fine-tuned)	Task: DART-Eval CA-AUROC-GM12878: Chromatin activity prediction, GM12878, positives against negatives Dataset subset: ENCODE chromatin accessibility peaks in five cell lines (DART-Eval split)	0.908 AUROC unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not yet extracted Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Author-reported evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source GENA-LM (fine-tuned) on DART-Eval CA-AUROC-GM12878: Chromatin activity prediction, GM12878, positives against negatives Separating positive GM12878 peaks from matched negatives. Aggregation: Not reported DART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 5, row(Fine-Tuned GENA-LM), column(CA-AUROC-GM12878)
Configuration: GENA-LM (fine-tuned)	Task: DART-Eval CA-AUROC-H1ESC: Chromatin activity prediction, H1ESC, positives against negatives Dataset subset: ENCODE chromatin accessibility peaks in five cell lines (DART-Eval split)	0.942 AUROC unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not yet extracted Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Author-reported evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source GENA-LM (fine-tuned) on DART-Eval CA-AUROC-H1ESC: Chromatin activity prediction, H1ESC, positives against negatives Separating positive H1ESC peaks from matched negatives. Aggregation: Not reported DART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 5, row(Fine-Tuned GENA-LM), column(CA-AUROC-H1ESC)
Configuration: GENA-LM (fine-tuned)	Task: DART-Eval CA-AUROC-HEPG2: Chromatin activity prediction, HEPG2, positives against negatives Dataset subset: ENCODE chromatin accessibility peaks in five cell lines (DART-Eval split)	0.878 AUROC unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not yet extracted Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Author-reported evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source GENA-LM (fine-tuned) on DART-Eval CA-AUROC-HEPG2: Chromatin activity prediction, HEPG2, positives against negatives Separating positive HEPG2 peaks from matched negatives. Aggregation: Not reported DART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 5, row(Fine-Tuned GENA-LM), column(CA-AUROC-HEPG2)
Configuration: GENA-LM (fine-tuned)	Task: DART-Eval CA-AUROC-IMR90: Chromatin activity prediction, IMR90, positives against negatives Dataset subset: ENCODE chromatin accessibility peaks in five cell lines (DART-Eval split)	0.961 AUROC unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not yet extracted Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Author-reported evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source GENA-LM (fine-tuned) on DART-Eval CA-AUROC-IMR90: Chromatin activity prediction, IMR90, positives against negatives Separating positive IMR90 peaks from matched negatives. Aggregation: Not reported DART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 5, row(Fine-Tuned GENA-LM), column(CA-AUROC-IMR90)
Configuration: GENA-LM (fine-tuned)	Task: DART-Eval CA-AUROC-K562: Chromatin activity prediction, K562, positives against negatives Dataset subset: ENCODE chromatin accessibility peaks in five cell lines (DART-Eval split)	0.91 AUROC unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not yet extracted Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Author-reported evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source GENA-LM (fine-tuned) on DART-Eval CA-AUROC-K562: Chromatin activity prediction, K562, positives against negatives Separating positive K562 peaks from matched negatives. Aggregation: Not reported DART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 5, row(Fine-Tuned GENA-LM), column(CA-AUROC-K562)
Configuration: GENA-LM (fine-tuned)	Task: DART-Eval CA-SPEARMAN-GM12878: Chromatin activity prediction, GM12878, positives only Dataset subset: ENCODE chromatin accessibility peaks in five cell lines (DART-Eval split)	0.467 Spearman unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not yet extracted Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Author-reported evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source GENA-LM (fine-tuned) on DART-Eval CA-SPEARMAN-GM12878: Chromatin activity prediction, GM12878, positives only Rank correlation with measured accessibility among positive GM12878 peaks. Aggregation: Not reported DART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 5, row(Fine-Tuned GENA-LM), column(CA-SPEARMAN-GM12878)
Configuration: GENA-LM (fine-tuned)	Task: DART-Eval CA-SPEARMAN-H1ESC: Chromatin activity prediction, H1ESC, positives only Dataset subset: ENCODE chromatin accessibility peaks in five cell lines (DART-Eval split)	0.696 Spearman unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not yet extracted Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Author-reported evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source GENA-LM (fine-tuned) on DART-Eval CA-SPEARMAN-H1ESC: Chromatin activity prediction, H1ESC, positives only Rank correlation with measured accessibility among positive H1ESC peaks. Aggregation: Not reported DART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 5, row(Fine-Tuned GENA-LM), column(CA-SPEARMAN-H1ESC)
Configuration: GENA-LM (fine-tuned)	Task: DART-Eval CA-SPEARMAN-HEPG2: Chromatin activity prediction, HEPG2, positives only Dataset subset: ENCODE chromatin accessibility peaks in five cell lines (DART-Eval split)	0.439 Spearman unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not yet extracted Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Author-reported evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source GENA-LM (fine-tuned) on DART-Eval CA-SPEARMAN-HEPG2: Chromatin activity prediction, HEPG2, positives only Rank correlation with measured accessibility among positive HEPG2 peaks. Aggregation: Not reported DART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 5, row(Fine-Tuned GENA-LM), column(CA-SPEARMAN-HEPG2)
Configuration: GENA-LM (fine-tuned)	Task: DART-Eval CA-SPEARMAN-IMR90: Chromatin activity prediction, IMR90, positives only Dataset subset: ENCODE chromatin accessibility peaks in five cell lines (DART-Eval split)	0.421 Spearman unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not yet extracted Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Author-reported evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source GENA-LM (fine-tuned) on DART-Eval CA-SPEARMAN-IMR90: Chromatin activity prediction, IMR90, positives only Rank correlation with measured accessibility among positive IMR90 peaks. Aggregation: Not reported DART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 5, row(Fine-Tuned GENA-LM), column(CA-SPEARMAN-IMR90)
Configuration: GENA-LM (fine-tuned)	Task: DART-Eval CA-SPEARMAN-K562: Chromatin activity prediction, K562, positives only Dataset subset: ENCODE chromatin accessibility peaks in five cell lines (DART-Eval split)	0.532 Spearman unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not yet extracted Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Author-reported evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source GENA-LM (fine-tuned) on DART-Eval CA-SPEARMAN-K562: Chromatin activity prediction, K562, positives only Rank correlation with measured accessibility among positive K562 peaks. Aggregation: Not reported DART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 5, row(Fine-Tuned GENA-LM), column(CA-SPEARMAN-K562)
Configuration: GENA-LM (fine-tuned)	Task: DART-Eval CTS-ACC: Cell-type-specific element classification, overall accuracy Dataset subset: ENCODE chromatin accessibility peaks in five cell lines (DART-Eval split)	0.636 Accuracy fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not yet extracted Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Author-reported evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source GENA-LM (fine-tuned) on DART-Eval CTS-ACC: Cell-type-specific element classification, overall accuracy Classify which of five cell lines a accessible element belongs to. Aggregation: Not reported DART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 4, row(Fine-Tuned GENA-LM), column(CTS-ACC)
Configuration: GENA-LM (fine-tuned)	Task: DART-Eval CTS-GM12878: Cell-type-specific element classification, GM12878 Dataset subset: ENCODE chromatin accessibility peaks in five cell lines (DART-Eval split)	0.877 AUROC unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not yet extracted Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Author-reported evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source GENA-LM (fine-tuned) on DART-Eval CTS-GM12878: Cell-type-specific element classification, GM12878 One-against-rest AUROC for GM12878 accessible elements. Aggregation: Not reported DART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 4, row(Fine-Tuned GENA-LM), column(CTS-GM12878)
Configuration: GENA-LM (fine-tuned)	Task: DART-Eval CTS-H1ESC: Cell-type-specific element classification, H1ESC Dataset subset: ENCODE chromatin accessibility peaks in five cell lines (DART-Eval split)	0.923 AUROC unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not yet extracted Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Author-reported evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source GENA-LM (fine-tuned) on DART-Eval CTS-H1ESC: Cell-type-specific element classification, H1ESC One-against-rest AUROC for H1ESC accessible elements. Aggregation: Not reported DART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 4, row(Fine-Tuned GENA-LM), column(CTS-H1ESC)
Configuration: GENA-LM (fine-tuned)	Task: DART-Eval CTS-HEPG2: Cell-type-specific element classification, HEPG2 Dataset subset: ENCODE chromatin accessibility peaks in five cell lines (DART-Eval split)	0.887 AUROC unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not yet extracted Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Author-reported evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source GENA-LM (fine-tuned) on DART-Eval CTS-HEPG2: Cell-type-specific element classification, HEPG2 One-against-rest AUROC for HEPG2 accessible elements. Aggregation: Not reported DART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 4, row(Fine-Tuned GENA-LM), column(CTS-HEPG2)
Configuration: GENA-LM (fine-tuned)	Task: DART-Eval CTS-IMR90: Cell-type-specific element classification, IMR90 Dataset subset: ENCODE chromatin accessibility peaks in five cell lines (DART-Eval split)	0.911 AUROC unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not yet extracted Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Author-reported evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source GENA-LM (fine-tuned) on DART-Eval CTS-IMR90: Cell-type-specific element classification, IMR90 One-against-rest AUROC for IMR90 accessible elements. Aggregation: Not reported DART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 4, row(Fine-Tuned GENA-LM), column(CTS-IMR90)
Configuration: GENA-LM (fine-tuned)	Task: DART-Eval CTS-K562: Cell-type-specific element classification, K562 Dataset subset: ENCODE chromatin accessibility peaks in five cell lines (DART-Eval split)	0.862 AUROC unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not yet extracted Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Author-reported evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source GENA-LM (fine-tuned) on DART-Eval CTS-K562: Cell-type-specific element classification, K562 One-against-rest AUROC for K562 accessible elements. Aggregation: Not reported DART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 4, row(Fine-Tuned GENA-LM), column(CTS-K562)
Configuration: GENA-LM (fine-tuned)	Task: DART-Eval REI-ABS: Regulatory element identification, absolute accuracy Dataset subset: ENCODE cCREs against dinucleotide-shuffled backgrounds (DART-Eval split)	0.909 Accuracy fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not yet extracted Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Author-reported evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source GENA-LM (fine-tuned) on DART-Eval REI-ABS: Regulatory element identification, absolute accuracy Distinguish ENCODE cCREs from dinucleotide-shuffled background sequences. The setting the model was run in is part of the method name. Aggregation: Not reported DART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 3, row(GENA-LM), column(fine-tuned absolute_accuracy)
Configuration: GENA-LM (fine-tuned)	Task: DART-Eval REI-PAIR: Regulatory element identification, paired accuracy Dataset subset: ENCODE cCREs against dinucleotide-shuffled backgrounds (DART-Eval split)	0.972 Paired accuracy fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not yet extracted Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Author-reported evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source GENA-LM (fine-tuned) on DART-Eval REI-PAIR: Regulatory element identification, paired accuracy Distinguish ENCODE cCREs from dinucleotide-shuffled background sequences. The setting the model was run in is part of the method name. Aggregation: Not reported DART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 3, row(GENA-LM), column(fine-tuned paired_accuracy)
Configuration: GENA-LM (fine-tuned)	Task: DART-Eval VS-AFRICAN-AUROC: Variant scoring on Chromatin QTLs in African LCLs, AUROC Dataset subset: Chromatin QTLs in African LCLs (DART-Eval split)	0.604 AUROC unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not yet extracted Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Author-reported evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source GENA-LM (fine-tuned) on DART-Eval VS-AFRICAN-AUROC: Variant scoring on Chromatin QTLs in African LCLs, AUROC Score the effect of a variant on chromatin accessibility, against the measured QTL call. Aggregation: Not reported DART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 6, row(African GENA-LM), column(fine-tuned auroc)
Configuration: GENA-LM (fine-tuned)	Task: DART-Eval VS-AFRICAN-PEARSON_R: Variant scoring on Chromatin QTLs in African LCLs, Pearson r Dataset subset: Chromatin QTLs in African LCLs (DART-Eval split)	0.201 Pearson unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not yet extracted Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Author-reported evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source GENA-LM (fine-tuned) on DART-Eval VS-AFRICAN-PEARSON_R: Variant scoring on Chromatin QTLs in African LCLs, Pearson r Score the effect of a variant on chromatin accessibility, against the measured QTL call. Aggregation: Not reported DART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 6, row(African GENA-LM), column(fine-tuned pearson_r)
Configuration: GENA-LM (fine-tuned)	Task: DART-Eval VS-YORUBAN-AUROC: Variant scoring on DNase QTLs in Yoruban LCLs, AUROC Dataset subset: DNase QTLs in Yoruban LCLs (DART-Eval split)	0.628 AUROC unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not yet extracted Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Author-reported evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source GENA-LM (fine-tuned) on DART-Eval VS-YORUBAN-AUROC: Variant scoring on DNase QTLs in Yoruban LCLs, AUROC Score the effect of a variant on chromatin accessibility, against the measured QTL call. Aggregation: Not reported DART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 6, row(Yoruban GENA-LM), column(fine-tuned auroc)
Configuration: GENA-LM (fine-tuned)	Task: DART-Eval VS-YORUBAN-PEARSON_R: Variant scoring on DNase QTLs in Yoruban LCLs, Pearson r Dataset subset: DNase QTLs in Yoruban LCLs (DART-Eval split)	0.414 Pearson unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not yet extracted Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Author-reported evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source GENA-LM (fine-tuned) on DART-Eval VS-YORUBAN-PEARSON_R: Variant scoring on DNase QTLs in Yoruban LCLs, Pearson r Score the effect of a variant on chromatin accessibility, against the measured QTL call. Aggregation: Not reported DART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 6, row(Yoruban GENA-LM), column(fine-tuned pearson_r)

Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-11-02-a7f03c9e55a5.

Use this configuration

How it works, versions and access

Additional methodological details, versions and access terms have not yet been extracted into a structured profile for this configuration. Consult the linked sources and evaluation records below.

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

0 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-11-02-a7f03c9e55a5
Property and statement	Original source and location	Review and provenance

No evidence rows match these filters. Choose another scope or clear the search.

How to read the evidence

Sources and history

Release 2026-11-02-a7f03c9e55a5 · Record review: source checked

1 source record and release history

DART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Original source · 2412.05430v1

Download this release (gzip)

Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: dart-eval-method-gena-lm-fine-tuned

areas: dna-genomes
source locator: Table 1, row(GENA-LM)
missing metadata: checkpoint revision: reason: unreported; parameters: reason: unextracted
provenance note: DNA language model evaluated by the DART-Eval authors in the fine-tuned setting.

Related records

Suggest a correction