rewirebio.iobenchmarks
Configuration

Windowed protection score (WPS), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)

Configuration as run in the cited comparison.

6 evaluations · 33 results

Overview

Configuration as run in the cited comparison.

Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.

Evaluations and results

6 evaluations · 33 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Filter evaluations

Applied filters: All linked evaluations

Exact evaluated configurations and original reported results
Tested configurationProtocol and datasetFindingEvidence and details
Configuration: Windowed protection score (WPS), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.968 auroc
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.9560 to 0.9791

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

WPS (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, C21; group 'BRCA'; row 'WPS'; column 'AUC'
Configuration: Windowed protection score (WPS), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.933 sensitivity-at-85-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.9117 to 0.9543

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

WPS (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, E21; group 'BRCA'; row 'WPS'; column 'Sensitivity @85% specificity'
Configuration: Windowed protection score (WPS), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.884 sensitivity-at-95-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.8524 to 0.9149

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

WPS (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, D21; group 'BRCA'; row 'WPS'; column 'Sensitivity @95% specificity'
Configuration: Windowed protection score (WPS), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.985 auroc
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.9794 to 0.9912

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

WPS (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, C31; group 'CHOL'; row 'WPS'; column 'AUC'
Configuration: Windowed protection score (WPS), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.922 sensitivity-at-85-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.8852 to 0.9582

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

WPS (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, E31; group 'CHOL'; row 'WPS'; column 'Sensitivity @85% specificity'
Configuration: Windowed protection score (WPS), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.83 sensitivity-at-95-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.7813 to 0.8787

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

WPS (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, D31; group 'CHOL'; row 'WPS'; column 'Sensitivity @95% specificity'
Configuration: Windowed protection score (WPS), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.98 auroc
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.9732 to 0.9875

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

WPS (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, C41; group 'CRC'; row 'WPS'; column 'AUC'
Configuration: Windowed protection score (WPS), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.915 sensitivity-at-85-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.8822 to 0.9478

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

WPS (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, E41; group 'CRC'; row 'WPS'; column 'Sensitivity @85% specificity'
Configuration: Windowed protection score (WPS), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.86 sensitivity-at-95-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.8195 to 0.9005

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

WPS (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, D41; group 'CRC'; row 'WPS'; column 'Sensitivity @95% specificity'
Configuration: Windowed protection score (WPS), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Jiang cohort cross-validation, liver cancer (Table S2)
Dataset: Jiang et al. 2018 plasma WGS, 90 liver cancer and 135 non-cancer (as used by Hou et al. 2024)
0.954 auroc
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.9442 to 0.9639

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

WPS (open chromatin), Jiang cohort liver cancer cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-jiang-lihc-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, C91; group 'LIHC'; row 'WPS'; column 'AUC'
Configuration: Windowed protection score (WPS), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.998 auroc
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.9967 to 1.0000

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

WPS (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, C61; group 'NSCLC'; row 'WPS'; column 'AUC'
Configuration: Windowed protection score (WPS), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.995 sensitivity-at-85-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.9852 to 1.0000

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

WPS (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, E61; group 'NSCLC'; row 'WPS'; column 'Sensitivity @85% specificity'
Configuration: Windowed protection score (WPS), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.97 sensitivity-at-95-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.9396 to 1.0000

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

WPS (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, D61; group 'NSCLC'; row 'WPS'; column 'Sensitivity @95% specificity'
Configuration: Windowed protection score (WPS), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
1 auroc
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.9992 to 1.0000

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

WPS (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, C71; group 'OV'; row 'WPS'; column 'AUC'
Configuration: Windowed protection score (WPS), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
1 sensitivity-at-85-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 1.0000 to 1.0000

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

WPS (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, E71; group 'OV'; row 'WPS'; column 'Sensitivity @85% specificity'
Configuration: Windowed protection score (WPS), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.993 sensitivity-at-95-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.9842 to 1.0000

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

WPS (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, D71; group 'OV'; row 'WPS'; column 'Sensitivity @95% specificity'
Configuration: Windowed protection score (WPS), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.841 auroc
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.8124 to 0.8703

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

WPS (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, C81; group 'PAAD'; row 'WPS'; column 'AUC'
Configuration: Windowed protection score (WPS), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.719 sensitivity-at-85-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.6760 to 0.7624

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

WPS (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, E81; group 'PAAD'; row 'WPS'; column 'Sensitivity @85% specificity'
Configuration: Windowed protection score (WPS), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.622 sensitivity-at-95-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.5685 to 0.6749

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

WPS (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, D81; group 'PAAD'; row 'WPS'; column 'Sensitivity @95% specificity'
Configuration: Windowed protection score (WPS), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.966 auroc
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.9598 to 0.9719

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

WPS (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, C11; group 'PANCAN'; row 'WPS'; column 'AUC'
Configuration: Windowed protection score (WPS), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.961 auroc
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.9434 to 0.9793

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

WPS (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, C51; group 'STAD'; row 'WPS'; column 'AUC'
Configuration: Windowed protection score (WPS), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.907 sensitivity-at-85-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.8693 to 0.9440

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

WPS (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, E51; group 'STAD'; row 'WPS'; column 'Sensitivity @85% specificity'
Configuration: Windowed protection score (WPS), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.833 sensitivity-at-95-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.7842 to 0.8824

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

WPS (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, D51; group 'STAD'; row 'WPS'; column 'Sensitivity @95% specificity'
Configuration: Windowed protection score (WPS), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 independent validation, Mathios et al. LUCAS cohort (Table S3)
Dataset: Mathios et al. 2021 LUCAS cohort, 129 lung cancer and 158 non-cancer (as used by Hou et al. 2024)
0.75 auroc
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

WPS (open chromatin), independent validation on Mathios et al. LUCAS dataset (LUNG)

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-mathios-lucas-independent

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S3, C21; data set 'Mathios et al. LUCAS dataset (LUNG)'; row 'WPS'; column 'AUC'
Configuration: Windowed protection score (WPS), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 independent validation, Mathios et al. LUCAS cohort (Table S3)
Dataset: Mathios et al. 2021 LUCAS cohort, 129 lung cancer and 158 non-cancer (as used by Hou et al. 2024)
0.512 sensitivity-at-85-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

WPS (open chromatin), independent validation on Mathios et al. LUCAS dataset (LUNG)

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-mathios-lucas-independent

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S3, E21; data set 'Mathios et al. LUCAS dataset (LUNG)'; row 'WPS'; column 'Sensitivity @85% specificity'

Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-10-10-7b8f80935f90.

Use this model

How it works, versions and access
Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

0 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-10-10-7b8f80935f90
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance

No evidence rows match these filters. Choose another scope or clear the search.

Sources and history

Release 2026-10-10-7b8f80935f90 · Record review: source checked

1 source records and release historyDownload this release (gzip)
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: ctdnafrag-20261009-config-hou2024-wps-open-chromatin

areas
dna-genomes
contexts
clinical_research
method types
supervised_machine_learning
reported name
WPS
foundation model eligible
false
source locator
Article Table 1 row 'WPS', column 'open chromatin region'; Experimental Section P29-P41
missing metadata
version: reason: unreported; note: Hou et al. re-implementation; no software version or code commit is printed
parameters
Feature setting: open chromatin regions. Classifier: scikit-learn support vector machine with default parameters.
Related records

Suggest a correction