rewirebio.iobenchmarks
Configuration

Promoter fragmentation entropy (PFE), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)

Configuration as run in the cited comparison.

6 evaluations · 33 results

Overview

Configuration as run in the cited comparison.

Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.

Evaluations and results

6 evaluations · 33 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Filter evaluations

Applied filters: All linked evaluations

Exact evaluated configurations and original reported results
Tested configurationProtocol and datasetFindingEvidence and details
Configuration: Promoter fragmentation entropy (PFE), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.965 auroc
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.9532 to 0.9759

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

PFE (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, C14; group 'BRCA'; row 'PFE'; column 'AUC'
Configuration: Promoter fragmentation entropy (PFE), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.891 sensitivity-at-85-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.8654 to 0.9159

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

PFE (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, E14; group 'BRCA'; row 'PFE'; column 'Sensitivity @85% specificity'
Configuration: Promoter fragmentation entropy (PFE), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.819 sensitivity-at-95-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.7855 to 0.8525

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

PFE (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, D14; group 'BRCA'; row 'PFE'; column 'Sensitivity @95% specificity'
Configuration: Promoter fragmentation entropy (PFE), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.95 auroc
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.9366 to 0.9639

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

PFE (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, C24; group 'CHOL'; row 'PFE'; column 'AUC'
Configuration: Promoter fragmentation entropy (PFE), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.772 sensitivity-at-85-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.7133 to 0.8300

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

PFE (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, E24; group 'CHOL'; row 'PFE'; column 'Sensitivity @85% specificity'
Configuration: Promoter fragmentation entropy (PFE), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.673 sensitivity-at-95-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.6075 to 0.7391

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

PFE (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, D24; group 'CHOL'; row 'PFE'; column 'Sensitivity @95% specificity'
Configuration: Promoter fragmentation entropy (PFE), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.966 auroc
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.9556 to 0.9769

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

PFE (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, C34; group 'CRC'; row 'PFE'; column 'AUC'
Configuration: Promoter fragmentation entropy (PFE), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.872 sensitivity-at-85-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.8325 to 0.9108

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

PFE (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, E34; group 'CRC'; row 'PFE'; column 'Sensitivity @85% specificity'
Configuration: Promoter fragmentation entropy (PFE), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.793 sensitivity-at-95-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.7427 to 0.8440

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

PFE (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, D34; group 'CRC'; row 'PFE'; column 'Sensitivity @95% specificity'
Configuration: Promoter fragmentation entropy (PFE), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Jiang cohort cross-validation, liver cancer (Table S2)
Dataset: Jiang et al. 2018 plasma WGS, 90 liver cancer and 135 non-cancer (as used by Hou et al. 2024)
0.937 auroc
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.9260 to 0.9488

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

PFE (open chromatin), Jiang cohort liver cancer cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-jiang-lihc-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, C84; group 'LIHC'; row 'PFE'; column 'AUC'
Configuration: Promoter fragmentation entropy (PFE), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.971 auroc
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.9486 to 0.9925

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

PFE (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, C54; group 'NSCLC'; row 'PFE'; column 'AUC'
Configuration: Promoter fragmentation entropy (PFE), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.91 sensitivity-at-85-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.8574 to 0.9626

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

PFE (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, E54; group 'NSCLC'; row 'PFE'; column 'Sensitivity @85% specificity'
Configuration: Promoter fragmentation entropy (PFE), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.825 sensitivity-at-95-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.7538 to 0.8962

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

PFE (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, D54; group 'NSCLC'; row 'PFE'; column 'Sensitivity @95% specificity'
Configuration: Promoter fragmentation entropy (PFE), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.987 auroc
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.9812 to 0.9932

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

PFE (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, C64; group 'OV'; row 'PFE'; column 'AUC'
Configuration: Promoter fragmentation entropy (PFE), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.94 sensitivity-at-85-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.9082 to 0.9718. Closing bracket missing in the printed cell.

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

PFE (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, E64; group 'OV'; row 'PFE'; column 'Sensitivity @85% specificity'
Configuration: Promoter fragmentation entropy (PFE), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.89 sensitivity-at-95-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.8481 to 0.9319

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

PFE (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, D64; group 'OV'; row 'PFE'; column 'Sensitivity @95% specificity'
Configuration: Promoter fragmentation entropy (PFE), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.82 auroc
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.7884 to 0.8517

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

PFE (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, C74; group 'PAAD'; row 'PFE'; column 'AUC'
Configuration: Promoter fragmentation entropy (PFE), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.616 sensitivity-at-85-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.5621 to 0.6696

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

PFE (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, E74; group 'PAAD'; row 'PFE'; column 'Sensitivity @85% specificity'
Configuration: Promoter fragmentation entropy (PFE), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.523 sensitivity-at-95-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.4668 to 0.5798

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

PFE (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, D74; group 'PAAD'; row 'PFE'; column 'Sensitivity @95% specificity'
Configuration: Promoter fragmentation entropy (PFE), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.958 auroc
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.9528 to 0.9631

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

PFE (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, C4; group 'PANCAN'; row 'PFE'; column 'AUC'
Configuration: Promoter fragmentation entropy (PFE), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.962 auroc
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.9446 to 0.9803

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

PFE (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, C44; group 'STAD'; row 'PFE'; column 'AUC'
Configuration: Promoter fragmentation entropy (PFE), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.937 sensitivity-at-85-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.9098 to 0.9635

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

PFE (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, E44; group 'STAD'; row 'PFE'; column 'Sensitivity @85% specificity'
Configuration: Promoter fragmentation entropy (PFE), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.837 sensitivity-at-95-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.7938 to 0.8795

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

PFE (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, D44; group 'STAD'; row 'PFE'; column 'Sensitivity @95% specificity'
Configuration: Promoter fragmentation entropy (PFE), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 independent validation, Mathios et al. LUCAS cohort (Table S3)
Dataset: Mathios et al. 2021 LUCAS cohort, 129 lung cancer and 158 non-cancer (as used by Hou et al. 2024)
0.706 auroc
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

PFE (open chromatin), independent validation on Mathios et al. LUCAS dataset (LUNG)

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-mathios-lucas-independent

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S3, C14; data set 'Mathios et al. LUCAS dataset (LUNG)'; row 'PFE'; column 'AUC'
Configuration: Promoter fragmentation entropy (PFE), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 independent validation, Mathios et al. LUCAS cohort (Table S3)
Dataset: Mathios et al. 2021 LUCAS cohort, 129 lung cancer and 158 non-cancer (as used by Hou et al. 2024)
0.45 sensitivity-at-85-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

PFE (open chromatin), independent validation on Mathios et al. LUCAS dataset (LUNG)

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-mathios-lucas-independent

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S3, E14; data set 'Mathios et al. LUCAS dataset (LUNG)'; row 'PFE'; column 'Sensitivity @85% specificity'

Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-10-10-7b8f80935f90.

Use this model

How it works, versions and access
Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

0 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-10-10-7b8f80935f90
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance

No evidence rows match these filters. Choose another scope or clear the search.

Sources and history

Release 2026-10-10-7b8f80935f90 · Record review: source checked

1 source records and release historyDownload this release (gzip)
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: ctdnafrag-20261009-config-hou2024-pfe-open-chromatin

areas
dna-genomes
contexts
clinical_research
method types
supervised_machine_learning
reported name
PFE
foundation model eligible
false
source locator
Article Table 1 row 'PFE', column 'open chromatin region'; Experimental Section P29-P41
missing metadata
version: reason: unreported; note: Hou et al. re-implementation; no software version or code commit is printed
parameters
Feature setting: open chromatin regions. Classifier: scikit-learn support vector machine with default parameters.
Related records

Suggest a correction