rewirebio.iobenchmarks
Configuration

Fragment size ratio (FSR), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)

Configuration as run in the cited comparison.

6 evaluations · 33 results

Overview

Configuration as run in the cited comparison.

Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.

Evaluations and results

6 evaluations · 33 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Filter evaluations

Applied filters: All linked evaluations

Exact evaluated configurations and original reported results
Tested configurationProtocol and datasetFindingEvidence and details
Configuration: Fragment size ratio (FSR), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.974 auroc
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.9673 to 0.9796

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

FSR (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, C15; group 'BRCA'; row 'FSR'; column 'AUC'
Configuration: Fragment size ratio (FSR), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.897 sensitivity-at-85-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.8721 to 0.9226

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

FSR (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, E15; group 'BRCA'; row 'FSR'; column 'Sensitivity @85% specificity'
Configuration: Fragment size ratio (FSR), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.771 sensitivity-at-95-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.7332 to 0.8088

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

FSR (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, D15; group 'BRCA'; row 'FSR'; column 'Sensitivity @95% specificity'
Configuration: Fragment size ratio (FSR), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.951 auroc
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.9390 to 0.9636

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

FSR (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, C25; group 'CHOL'; row 'FSR'; column 'AUC'
Configuration: Fragment size ratio (FSR), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.768 sensitivity-at-85-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.7110 to 0.8256

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

FSR (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, E25; group 'CHOL'; row 'FSR'; column 'Sensitivity @85% specificity'
Configuration: Fragment size ratio (FSR), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.667 sensitivity-at-95-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.6070 to 0.7264

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

FSR (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, D25; group 'CHOL'; row 'FSR'; column 'Sensitivity @95% specificity'
Configuration: Fragment size ratio (FSR), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.987 auroc
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.9798 to 0.9941

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

FSR (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, C35; group 'CRC'; row 'FSR'; column 'AUC'
Configuration: Fragment size ratio (FSR), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.953 sensitivity-at-85-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.9293 to 0.9774

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

FSR (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, E35; group 'CRC'; row 'FSR'; column 'Sensitivity @85% specificity'
Configuration: Fragment size ratio (FSR), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.935 sensitivity-at-95-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.9058 to 0.9642

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

FSR (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, D35; group 'CRC'; row 'FSR'; column 'Sensitivity @95% specificity'
Configuration: Fragment size ratio (FSR), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Jiang cohort cross-validation, liver cancer (Table S2)
Dataset: Jiang et al. 2018 plasma WGS, 90 liver cancer and 135 non-cancer (as used by Hou et al. 2024)
0.936 auroc
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.9263 to 0.9455

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

FSR (open chromatin), Jiang cohort liver cancer cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-jiang-lihc-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, C85; group 'LIHC'; row 'FSR'; column 'AUC'
Configuration: Fragment size ratio (FSR), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.945 auroc
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.9163 to 0.9730

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

FSR (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, C55; group 'NSCLC'; row 'FSR'; column 'AUC'
Configuration: Fragment size ratio (FSR), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.855 sensitivity-at-85-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.7896 to 0.9204

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

FSR (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, E55; group 'NSCLC'; row 'FSR'; column 'Sensitivity @85% specificity'
Configuration: Fragment size ratio (FSR), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.81 sensitivity-at-95-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.7383 to 0.8817

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

FSR (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, D55; group 'NSCLC'; row 'FSR'; column 'Sensitivity @95% specificity'
Configuration: Fragment size ratio (FSR), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.993 auroc
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.9899 to 0.9960

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

FSR (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, C65; group 'OV'; row 'FSR'; column 'AUC'
Configuration: Fragment size ratio (FSR), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.973 sensitivity-at-85-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.9539 to 0.9928

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

FSR (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, E65; group 'OV'; row 'FSR'; column 'Sensitivity @85% specificity'
Configuration: Fragment size ratio (FSR), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.883 sensitivity-at-95-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.8346 to 0.9321

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

FSR (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, D65; group 'OV'; row 'FSR'; column 'Sensitivity @95% specificity'
Configuration: Fragment size ratio (FSR), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.841 auroc
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.8109 to 0.8704

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

FSR (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, C75; group 'PAAD'; row 'FSR'; column 'AUC'
Configuration: Fragment size ratio (FSR), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.672 sensitivity-at-85-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.6223 to 0.7210

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

FSR (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, E75; group 'PAAD'; row 'FSR'; column 'Sensitivity @85% specificity'
Configuration: Fragment size ratio (FSR), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.569 sensitivity-at-95-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.5173 to 0.6211

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

FSR (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, D75; group 'PAAD'; row 'FSR'; column 'Sensitivity @95% specificity'
Configuration: Fragment size ratio (FSR), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.944 auroc
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.9369 to 0.9513

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

FSR (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, C5; group 'PANCAN'; row 'FSR'; column 'AUC'
Configuration: Fragment size ratio (FSR), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.959 auroc
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.9401 to 0.9788

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

FSR (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, C45; group 'STAD'; row 'FSR'; column 'AUC'
Configuration: Fragment size ratio (FSR), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.903 sensitivity-at-85-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.8646 to 0.9420

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

FSR (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, E45; group 'STAD'; row 'FSR'; column 'Sensitivity @85% specificity'
Configuration: Fragment size ratio (FSR), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.848 sensitivity-at-95-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.8030 to 0.8936

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

FSR (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, D45; group 'STAD'; row 'FSR'; column 'Sensitivity @95% specificity'
Configuration: Fragment size ratio (FSR), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 independent validation, Mathios et al. LUCAS cohort (Table S3)
Dataset: Mathios et al. 2021 LUCAS cohort, 129 lung cancer and 158 non-cancer (as used by Hou et al. 2024)
0.691 auroc
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

FSR (open chromatin), independent validation on Mathios et al. LUCAS dataset (LUNG)

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-mathios-lucas-independent

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S3, C15; data set 'Mathios et al. LUCAS dataset (LUNG)'; row 'FSR'; column 'AUC'
Configuration: Fragment size ratio (FSR), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 independent validation, Mathios et al. LUCAS cohort (Table S3)
Dataset: Mathios et al. 2021 LUCAS cohort, 129 lung cancer and 158 non-cancer (as used by Hou et al. 2024)
0.38 sensitivity-at-85-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

FSR (open chromatin), independent validation on Mathios et al. LUCAS dataset (LUNG)

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-mathios-lucas-independent

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S3, E15; data set 'Mathios et al. LUCAS dataset (LUNG)'; row 'FSR'; column 'Sensitivity @85% specificity'

Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-10-09-ba02f2f4a36e.

Use this model

How it works, versions and access
Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

0 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-10-09-ba02f2f4a36e
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance

No evidence rows match these filters. Choose another scope or clear the search.

Sources and history

Release 2026-10-09-ba02f2f4a36e · Record review: source checked

1 source records and release historyDownload this release (gzip)
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: ctdnafrag-20261009-config-hou2024-fsr-open-chromatin

areas
dna-genomes
contexts
clinical_research
method types
supervised_machine_learning
reported name
FSR
foundation model eligible
false
source locator
Article Table 1 row 'FSR', column 'open chromatin region'; Experimental Section P29-P41
missing metadata
version: reason: unreported; note: Hou et al. re-implementation; no software version or code commit is printed
parameters
Feature setting: open chromatin regions. Classifier: scikit-learn support vector machine with default parameters.
Related records

Suggest a correction