rewirebio.iobenchmarks
Evidence claim

observed_specificity: ctdnajam-20261010-protocol-ccga1-validation-sens-98spec

Observed specificity of CCGA substudy 1 validation set: cancer signal sensitivity at 98% specificity

At the 98% target the observed specificity was 97.9% (548/560) in training and 97.8% (354/362) in validation for every cfDNA classifier; for the clinical data classifier it was 98.0% (540/551) and 97.8% (350/358), with fewer participants because of a missing clinical variable.

Descriptive fact transcribed from the pinned source.

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

6 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-10-10-457d7eaef7d6
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance
Claimed field
observed_specificity
Context-only references
Evaluation of cell-free DNA approaches for multi-cancer early detection

Original source ↗

Table 3 footnotes a and e

Version: Cancer Cell 40(12):1537-1549.e12, published 2022-12-12; publisher PDF (1-s2.0-S153561082200513X-main.pdf) as deposited by the Francis Crick Institute on figshare, 10.25418/crick.21731870.v1
Retrieved: 2026-10-10T06:05:17Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: attributes.field

Source artifact SHA-256: 5159294dd203d511dd437837a34555b276e14e0edf615bcb58bae5d9a1246d9a

Hash scope: pdftotext -layout text layer, parsed by extract/extract_ctdna_jamshidi.py

Inspected artifact

Source location
Table 3 footnotes a and e
Context-only references
Evaluation of cell-free DNA approaches for multi-cancer early detection

Original source ↗

Table 3 footnotes a and e

Version: Cancer Cell 40(12):1537-1549.e12, published 2022-12-12; publisher PDF (1-s2.0-S153561082200513X-main.pdf) as deposited by the Francis Crick Institute on figshare, 10.25418/crick.21731870.v1
Retrieved: 2026-10-10T06:05:17Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: attributes.source_locator

Source artifact SHA-256: 5159294dd203d511dd437837a34555b276e14e0edf615bcb58bae5d9a1246d9a

Hash scope: pdftotext -layout text layer, parsed by extract/extract_ctdna_jamshidi.py

Inspected artifact

Claimed value
At the 98% target the observed specificity was 97.9% (548/560) in training and 97.8% (354/362) in validation for every cfDNA classifier; for the clinical data classifier it was 98.0% (540/551) and 97.8% (350/358), with fewer participants because of a missing clinical variable.
Context-only references
Evaluation of cell-free DNA approaches for multi-cancer early detection

Original source ↗

Table 3 footnotes a and e

Version: Cancer Cell 40(12):1537-1549.e12, published 2022-12-12; publisher PDF (1-s2.0-S153561082200513X-main.pdf) as deposited by the Francis Crick Institute on figshare, 10.25418/crick.21731870.v1
Retrieved: 2026-10-10T06:05:17Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: attributes.value

Source artifact SHA-256: 5159294dd203d511dd437837a34555b276e14e0edf615bcb58bae5d9a1246d9a

Hash scope: pdftotext -layout text layer, parsed by extract/extract_ctdna_jamshidi.py

Inspected artifact

Description
Descriptive fact transcribed from the pinned source.
Context-only references
Evaluation of cell-free DNA approaches for multi-cancer early detection

Original source ↗

Table 3 footnotes a and e

Version: Cancer Cell 40(12):1537-1549.e12, published 2022-12-12; publisher PDF (1-s2.0-S153561082200513X-main.pdf) as deposited by the Francis Crick Institute on figshare, 10.25418/crick.21731870.v1
Retrieved: 2026-10-10T06:05:17Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: description

Source artifact SHA-256: 5159294dd203d511dd437837a34555b276e14e0edf615bcb58bae5d9a1246d9a

Hash scope: pdftotext -layout text layer, parsed by extract/extract_ctdna_jamshidi.py

Inspected artifact

Relationship: subject
ctdnajam-20261010-protocol-ccga1-validation-sens-98spec
Context-only references
Evaluation of cell-free DNA approaches for multi-cancer early detection

Original source ↗

Table 3 footnotes a and e

Version: Cancer Cell 40(12):1537-1549.e12, published 2022-12-12; publisher PDF (1-s2.0-S153561082200513X-main.pdf) as deposited by the Francis Crick Institute on figshare, 10.25418/crick.21731870.v1
Retrieved: 2026-10-10T06:05:17Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: links:subject:ctdnajam-20261010-protocol-ccga1-validation-sens-98spec

Source artifact SHA-256: 5159294dd203d511dd437837a34555b276e14e0edf615bcb58bae5d9a1246d9a

Hash scope: pdftotext -layout text layer, parsed by extract/extract_ctdna_jamshidi.py

Inspected artifact

Name
observed_specificity: ctdnajam-20261010-protocol-ccga1-validation-sens-98spec
Context-only references
Evaluation of cell-free DNA approaches for multi-cancer early detection

Original source ↗

Table 3 footnotes a and e

Version: Cancer Cell 40(12):1537-1549.e12, published 2022-12-12; publisher PDF (1-s2.0-S153561082200513X-main.pdf) as deposited by the Francis Crick Institute on figshare, 10.25418/crick.21731870.v1
Retrieved: 2026-10-10T06:05:17Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: name

Source artifact SHA-256: 5159294dd203d511dd437837a34555b276e14e0edf615bcb58bae5d9a1246d9a

Hash scope: pdftotext -layout text layer, parsed by extract/extract_ctdna_jamshidi.py

Inspected artifact

Sources and history

Release 2026-10-10-457d7eaef7d6 · Record review: source checked

1 source record and release historyDownload this release (gzip)
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: ctdnajam-20261010-claim-observed-specificity

field
observed_specificity
value
At the 98% target the observed specificity was 97.9% (548/560) in training and 97.8% (354/362) in validation for every cfDNA classifier; for the clinical data classifier it was 98.0% (540/551) and 97.8% (350/358), with fewer participants because of a missing clinical variable.
source locator
Table 3 footnotes a and e
review
method: source-hash-verification; ai-assisted-source-review; method note: Compared the claim with the cited text of the re-downloaded PDF.; reviewer: claude; reviewer note: Separate Claude review agent, independent of the extractor; no human review claimed; date: 2026-10-10; artifact sha256: 5159294dd203d511dd437837a34555b276e14e0edf615bcb58bae5d9a1246d9a; retrieval url: https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/38559380; note: Text matches the source. Descriptive claim; no value or execution.
Related records

Suggest a correction