rewire.itbenchmarks
Benchmark

scTab published annotation evaluation

Source study/challenge grouping of the exact imported protocols. No claim that this intake implements or reproduces an executable benchmark.

21 evaluations · 26 results

Overview

Source study/challenge grouping of the exact imported protocols. No claim that this intake implements or reproduces an executable benchmark.

Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.

21 recorded evaluations, 26 metric rows. A comparison chart has not yet been validated for these results. The table retains the individual findings and their sources.

View coverage and remaining gaps across all benchmarks

Results

Results are available, but no reviewed comparison panel is linked in this release.

All evaluations

21 evaluations · 26 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Filter evaluations

Applied filters: All linked evaluations

Exact evaluated configurations and original reported results
Tested configurationProtocol and datasetFindingEvidence and details
Configuration: CellTypist — scTab Table 1Protocol: scTab Table 1b: seeded fits plus donor bootstrap
Dataset: scTab processed CELLxGENE 2023-05-15 donor holdouts
0.7291 ± 0.0072 macro-f1
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: type: source_printed_spread_semantics_conflicting; value: 0.0072; n: 4; note: Heading: confidence intervals; column: standard deviation. Do not interpret as 95% CI.

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

sctab bootstrap celltypist

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

scTab supplementary comparison tables · Supplementary Table 1b, celltypist row
Configuration: Optimized linear logistic regression — scTab Table 1Protocol: scTab Table 1b: seeded fits plus donor bootstrap
Dataset: scTab processed CELLxGENE 2023-05-15 donor holdouts
0.7846 ± 0.0072 macro-f1
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: type: source_printed_spread_semantics_conflicting; value: 0.0072; n: 4; note: Heading: confidence intervals; column: standard deviation. Do not interpret as 95% CI.

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

sctab bootstrap linear

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

scTab supplementary comparison tables · Supplementary Table 1b, linear row
Configuration: MLP — scTab Table 1Protocol: scTab Table 1b: seeded fits plus donor bootstrap
Dataset: scTab processed CELLxGENE 2023-05-15 donor holdouts
0.7973 ± 0.0074 macro-f1
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: type: source_printed_spread_semantics_conflicting; value: 0.0074; n: 4; note: Heading: confidence intervals; column: standard deviation. Do not interpret as 95% CI.

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

sctab bootstrap mlp

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

scTab supplementary comparison tables · Supplementary Table 1b, mlp row
Configuration: scTab — scTab Table 1Protocol: scTab Table 1b: seeded fits plus donor bootstrap
Dataset: scTab processed CELLxGENE 2023-05-15 donor holdouts
0.8300 ± 0.0069 macro-f1
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: type: source_printed_spread_semantics_conflicting; value: 0.0069; n: 4; note: Heading: confidence intervals; column: standard deviation. Do not interpret as 95% CI.

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

sctab bootstrap sctab

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

scTab supplementary comparison tables · Supplementary Table 1b, sctab row
Configuration: XGBoost — scTab Table 1Protocol: scTab Table 1b: seeded fits plus donor bootstrap
Dataset: scTab processed CELLxGENE 2023-05-15 donor holdouts
0.8136 ± 0.0060 macro-f1
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: type: source_printed_spread_semantics_conflicting; value: 0.0060; n: 4; note: Heading: confidence intervals; column: standard deviation. Do not interpret as 95% CI.

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

sctab bootstrap xgboost

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

scTab supplementary comparison tables · Supplementary Table 1b, xgboost row
Configuration: celltypist default parameters — scTab Table 6Protocol: scTab Table 1a: seeded model fits
Dataset: scTab processed CELLxGENE 2023-05-15 donor holdouts
0.6258 ± 0.0036 macro-f1
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: type: standard_deviation; value: 0.0036; n: 4

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

sctab default celltypist

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

scTab supplementary comparison tables · Supplementary Table 6, celltypist, default parameters
Configuration: xgboost default parameters — scTab Table 6Protocol: scTab Table 1a: seeded model fits
Dataset: scTab processed CELLxGENE 2023-05-15 donor holdouts
0.5855 ± 0.0112 macro-f1
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: type: standard_deviation; value: 0.0112; n: 4

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

sctab default xgboost

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

scTab supplementary comparison tables · Supplementary Table 6, xgboost, default parameters
Configuration: CellTypist — scTab Table 1Protocol: scTab Table 2 hardware-specific resources
Dataset: scTab processed CELLxGENE 2023-05-15 donor holdouts
~2000 inference-throughput
samples/second · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

sctab resources celltypist

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

scTab supplementary comparison tables · Supplementary Table 2, celltypist, inference time
Configuration: CellTypist — scTab Table 1Protocol: scTab Table 2 hardware-specific resources
Dataset: scTab processed CELLxGENE 2023-05-15 donor holdouts
~16h training-hours
hours · lower

Uncertainty: Not reported

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

sctab resources celltypist

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

scTab supplementary comparison tables · Supplementary Table 2, celltypist, training time
Configuration: Optimized linear logistic regression — scTab Table 1Protocol: scTab Table 2 hardware-specific resources
Dataset: scTab processed CELLxGENE 2023-05-15 donor holdouts
~29500 inference-throughput
samples/second · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

sctab resources linear

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

scTab supplementary comparison tables · Supplementary Table 2, linear, inference time
Configuration: Optimized linear logistic regression — scTab Table 1Protocol: scTab Table 2 hardware-specific resources
Dataset: scTab processed CELLxGENE 2023-05-15 donor holdouts
~20h training-hours
hours · lower

Uncertainty: Not reported

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

sctab resources linear

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

scTab supplementary comparison tables · Supplementary Table 2, linear, training time
Configuration: MLP — scTab Table 1Protocol: scTab Table 2 hardware-specific resources
Dataset: scTab processed CELLxGENE 2023-05-15 donor holdouts
~21400 inference-throughput
samples/second · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

sctab resources mlp

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

scTab supplementary comparison tables · Supplementary Table 2, mlp, inference time
Configuration: MLP — scTab Table 1Protocol: scTab Table 2 hardware-specific resources
Dataset: scTab processed CELLxGENE 2023-05-15 donor holdouts
~29h training-hours
hours · lower

Uncertainty: Not reported

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

sctab resources mlp

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

scTab supplementary comparison tables · Supplementary Table 2, mlp, training time
Configuration: scTab — scTab Table 1Protocol: scTab Table 2 hardware-specific resources
Dataset: scTab processed CELLxGENE 2023-05-15 donor holdouts
~10800 inference-throughput
samples/second · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

sctab resources sctab

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

scTab supplementary comparison tables · Supplementary Table 2, sctab, inference time
Configuration: scTab — scTab Table 1Protocol: scTab Table 2 hardware-specific resources
Dataset: scTab processed CELLxGENE 2023-05-15 donor holdouts
~33h training-hours
hours · lower

Uncertainty: Not reported

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

sctab resources sctab

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

scTab supplementary comparison tables · Supplementary Table 2, sctab, training time
Configuration: XGBoost — scTab Table 1Protocol: scTab Table 2 hardware-specific resources
Dataset: scTab processed CELLxGENE 2023-05-15 donor holdouts
~4200 inference-throughput
samples/second · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

sctab resources xgboost

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

scTab supplementary comparison tables · Supplementary Table 2, xgboost, inference time
Configuration: XGBoost — scTab Table 1Protocol: scTab Table 2 hardware-specific resources
Dataset: scTab processed CELLxGENE 2023-05-15 donor holdouts
~10h training-hours
hours · lower

Uncertainty: Not reported

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

sctab resources xgboost

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

scTab supplementary comparison tables · Supplementary Table 2, xgboost, training time
Configuration: CellTypist — scTab Table 1Protocol: scTab Table 1a: seeded model fits
Dataset: scTab processed CELLxGENE 2023-05-15 donor holdouts
0.7304 ± 0.0015 macro-f1
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: type: standard_deviation; value: 0.0015; n: 4

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

sctab seed celltypist

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

scTab supplementary comparison tables · Supplementary Table 1a, CellTypist row, macro F1 and number-of-runs columns
Configuration: CIForm — scTab Table 1Protocol: scTab Table 1a: seeded model fits
Dataset: scTab processed CELLxGENE 2023-05-15 donor holdouts
0.766 macro-f1
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

sctab seed ciform

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

scTab supplementary comparison tables · Supplementary Table 1a, CIForm row, macro F1 and number-of-runs columns
Configuration: Optimized linear logistic regression — scTab Table 1Protocol: scTab Table 1a: seeded model fits
Dataset: scTab processed CELLxGENE 2023-05-15 donor holdouts
0.7848 ± 0.0001 macro-f1
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: type: standard_deviation; value: 0.0001; n: 4

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

sctab seed linear

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

scTab supplementary comparison tables · Supplementary Table 1a, Optimized linear logistic regression row, macro F1 and number-of-runs columns
Configuration: MLP — scTab Table 1Protocol: scTab Table 1a: seeded model fits
Dataset: scTab processed CELLxGENE 2023-05-15 donor holdouts
0.7971 ± 0.0012 macro-f1
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: type: standard_deviation; value: 0.0012; n: 5

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

sctab seed mlp

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

scTab supplementary comparison tables · Supplementary Table 1a, MLP row, macro F1 and number-of-runs columns
Configuration: scGPT fine-tuned — scTab Table 1Protocol: scTab Table 1a: seeded model fits
Dataset: scTab processed CELLxGENE 2023-05-15 donor holdouts
0.749 macro-f1
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

sctab seed scgpt ft

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

scTab supplementary comparison tables · Supplementary Table 1a, scGPT fine-tuned row, macro F1 and number-of-runs columns
Configuration: scGPT frozen embeddings + logistic regression — scTab Table 1Protocol: scTab Table 1a: seeded model fits
Dataset: scTab processed CELLxGENE 2023-05-15 donor holdouts
0.7301 ± 0.0035 macro-f1
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: type: standard_deviation; value: 0.0035; n: 5

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

sctab seed scgpt zero

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

scTab supplementary comparison tables · Supplementary Table 1a, scGPT frozen embeddings + logistic regression row, macro F1 and number-of-runs columns
Configuration: scTab — scTab Table 1Protocol: scTab Table 1a: seeded model fits
Dataset: scTab processed CELLxGENE 2023-05-15 donor holdouts
0.8295 ± 0.0007 macro-f1
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: type: standard_deviation; value: 0.0007; n: 5

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

sctab seed sctab

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

scTab supplementary comparison tables · Supplementary Table 1a, scTab row, macro F1 and number-of-runs columns
Configuration: UCE frozen embeddings + classifier — scTab Table 1Protocol: scTab Table 1a: seeded model fits
Dataset: scTab processed CELLxGENE 2023-05-15 donor holdouts
0.7611 ± 0.0018 macro-f1
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: type: standard_deviation; value: 0.0018; n: 4

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

sctab seed uce

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

scTab supplementary comparison tables · Supplementary Table 1a, UCE frozen embeddings + classifier row, macro F1 and number-of-runs columns

Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-09-30-e37e3ab1284d.

Methods and evaluation design

Procedure, tasks and evaluated configurations

Evaluation design

Benchmarks bring together tasks and protocols. A task describes the biological question; a protocol defines a particular test.

These source-backed links do not make different protocols or scores interchangeable.

Baseline coverage

Reference methods help show what a model adds beyond simple controls. We track a null control and a conventional method for each protocol.

0 of 6 active baseline roles have published Rewire measurements in this release. Measurements on a selected protocol do not establish coverage of an entire suite.

Baseline status by linked protocol

Protocol coverage CSV · Model evaluation matrix · Source table · Release and checksums

Coverage is derived from release 2026-09-30-e37e3ab1284d. Source citations describe the original records; they do not validate an unreviewed baseline proposal. No results have been generated by this audit.

Run this benchmark

Choose a concrete protocol before running an evaluation. Its inputs, split and scoring rules determine which results can be compared.

Run instructions

No runnable recipe has been reviewed for this benchmark. Dataset access, model requirements, licences and compute requirements must be checked against its sources before execution.

Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

0 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-09-30-e37e3ab1284d
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance

No evidence rows match these filters. Choose another scope or clear the search.

Sources and history

View linked audit checks and correction history

Release 2026-09-30-e37e3ab1284d · Record review: source checked

3 source records and release historyDownload this release
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: ucc-research-benchmark-sctab

entity level
suite
review
method: automated_source_review; actor: Codex research coverage worker; reviewed at: 2026-09-30T21:43:56Z; note: Primary-source table transcription and scope review; no independent reproduction or human scientific review.
source locator
Supplementary Tables 1,2,6
Related records

Suggest a correction