CIViC MCP 2026 evidence-retrieval evaluation
Published-study grouping of the catalogued evaluation protocols. This grouping does not claim an executable suite, full-paper extraction or independent clinical validation.
Overview
Published-study grouping of the catalogued evaluation protocols. This grouping does not claim an executable suite, full-paper extraction or independent clinical validation.
Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.
3 recorded evaluations, 162 metric rows. A comparison chart has not yet been validated for these results. The table retains the individual findings and their sources.
Results
Results are available, but no reviewed comparison panel is linked in this release.
All evaluations
3 evaluations · 162 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.
Filter evaluations
Applied filters: All linked evaluations
| Tested configuration | Protocol and dataset | Finding | Evidence and details |
|---|---|---|---|
| Configuration: ChatGPT Agent Mode, 2–7 March 2026 CIViC evaluation | Protocol: CIViC evidence-direction retrieval, March 2026 Dataset: CIViC 100 molecular-profile/disease/therapy triplets, March 2026 | 0.83 overall_accuracy fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNot reported Aggregation: Not reported CIViC MCP: integrating large language models with the Clinical Interpretations of Variants in Cancer · Fig1c Overall Accuracy; Section 3 |
| Configuration: ChatGPT Agent Mode, 2–7 March 2026 CIViC evaluation | Protocol: CIViC evidence-direction retrieval, March 2026 Dataset: CIViC 100 molecular-profile/disease/therapy triplets, March 2026 | 0.84 diagnostic_micro_f1 F1 score · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNot reported Aggregation: Not reported CIViC MCP: integrating large language models with the Clinical Interpretations of Variants in Cancer · Figure 1c, diagnostic row, agent column |
| Configuration: ChatGPT Agent Mode, 2–7 March 2026 CIViC evaluation | Protocol: CIViC evidence-direction retrieval, March 2026 Dataset: CIViC 100 molecular-profile/disease/therapy triplets, March 2026 | 0 diagnostic_negative_f1 F1 score · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNot reported Aggregation: Not reported CIViC MCP supplementary methods and complete Tables 1–3 · Supplementary Table 3, Diagnostic / Negative, f1 |
| Configuration: ChatGPT Agent Mode, 2–7 March 2026 CIViC evaluation | Protocol: CIViC evidence-direction retrieval, March 2026 Dataset: CIViC 100 molecular-profile/disease/therapy triplets, March 2026 | 0 diagnostic_negative_precision fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNot reported Aggregation: Not reported CIViC MCP supplementary methods and complete Tables 1–3 · Supplementary Table 3, Diagnostic / Negative, precision |
| Configuration: ChatGPT Agent Mode, 2–7 March 2026 CIViC evaluation | Protocol: CIViC evidence-direction retrieval, March 2026 Dataset: CIViC 100 molecular-profile/disease/therapy triplets, March 2026 | 0 diagnostic_negative_recall fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNot reported Aggregation: Not reported CIViC MCP supplementary methods and complete Tables 1–3 · Supplementary Table 3, Diagnostic / Negative, recall |
| Configuration: ChatGPT Agent Mode, 2–7 March 2026 CIViC evaluation | Protocol: CIViC evidence-direction retrieval, March 2026 Dataset: CIViC 100 molecular-profile/disease/therapy triplets, March 2026 | 0.94 diagnostic_positive_f1 F1 score · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNot reported Aggregation: Not reported CIViC MCP supplementary methods and complete Tables 1–3 · Supplementary Table 3, Diagnostic / Positive, f1 |
| Configuration: ChatGPT Agent Mode, 2–7 March 2026 CIViC evaluation | Protocol: CIViC evidence-direction retrieval, March 2026 Dataset: CIViC 100 molecular-profile/disease/therapy triplets, March 2026 | 0.89 diagnostic_positive_precision fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNot reported Aggregation: Not reported CIViC MCP supplementary methods and complete Tables 1–3 · Supplementary Table 3, Diagnostic / Positive, precision |
| Configuration: ChatGPT Agent Mode, 2–7 March 2026 CIViC evaluation | Protocol: CIViC evidence-direction retrieval, March 2026 Dataset: CIViC 100 molecular-profile/disease/therapy triplets, March 2026 | 1 diagnostic_positive_recall fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNot reported Aggregation: Not reported CIViC MCP supplementary methods and complete Tables 1–3 · Supplementary Table 3, Diagnostic / Positive, recall |
| Configuration: ChatGPT Agent Mode, 2–7 March 2026 CIViC evaluation | Protocol: CIViC evidence-direction retrieval, March 2026 Dataset: CIViC 100 molecular-profile/disease/therapy triplets, March 2026 | 1 functional_dominant_negative_f1 F1 score · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNot reported Aggregation: Not reported CIViC MCP supplementary methods and complete Tables 1–3 · Supplementary Table 3, Functional / Dominant Negative, f1 |
| Configuration: ChatGPT Agent Mode, 2–7 March 2026 CIViC evaluation | Protocol: CIViC evidence-direction retrieval, March 2026 Dataset: CIViC 100 molecular-profile/disease/therapy triplets, March 2026 | 1 functional_dominant_negative_precision fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNot reported Aggregation: Not reported CIViC MCP supplementary methods and complete Tables 1–3 · Supplementary Table 3, Functional / Dominant Negative, precision |
| Configuration: ChatGPT Agent Mode, 2–7 March 2026 CIViC evaluation | Protocol: CIViC evidence-direction retrieval, March 2026 Dataset: CIViC 100 molecular-profile/disease/therapy triplets, March 2026 | 1 functional_dominant_negative_recall fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNot reported Aggregation: Not reported CIViC MCP supplementary methods and complete Tables 1–3 · Supplementary Table 3, Functional / Dominant Negative, recall |
| Configuration: ChatGPT Agent Mode, 2–7 March 2026 CIViC evaluation | Protocol: CIViC evidence-direction retrieval, March 2026 Dataset: CIViC 100 molecular-profile/disease/therapy triplets, March 2026 | 0.88 functional_micro_f1 F1 score · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNot reported Aggregation: Not reported CIViC MCP: integrating large language models with the Clinical Interpretations of Variants in Cancer · Figure 1c, functional row, agent column |
| Configuration: ChatGPT Agent Mode, 2–7 March 2026 CIViC evaluation | Protocol: CIViC evidence-direction retrieval, March 2026 Dataset: CIViC 100 molecular-profile/disease/therapy triplets, March 2026 | 0.67 functional_gain_of_function_f1 F1 score · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNot reported Aggregation: Not reported CIViC MCP supplementary methods and complete Tables 1–3 · Supplementary Table 3, Functional / Gain of Function, f1 |
| Configuration: ChatGPT Agent Mode, 2–7 March 2026 CIViC evaluation | Protocol: CIViC evidence-direction retrieval, March 2026 Dataset: CIViC 100 molecular-profile/disease/therapy triplets, March 2026 | 0.75 functional_gain_of_function_precision fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNot reported Aggregation: Not reported CIViC MCP supplementary methods and complete Tables 1–3 · Supplementary Table 3, Functional / Gain of Function, precision |
| Configuration: ChatGPT Agent Mode, 2–7 March 2026 CIViC evaluation | Protocol: CIViC evidence-direction retrieval, March 2026 Dataset: CIViC 100 molecular-profile/disease/therapy triplets, March 2026 | 0.6 functional_gain_of_function_recall fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNot reported Aggregation: Not reported CIViC MCP supplementary methods and complete Tables 1–3 · Supplementary Table 3, Functional / Gain of Function, recall |
| Configuration: ChatGPT Agent Mode, 2–7 March 2026 CIViC evaluation | Protocol: CIViC evidence-direction retrieval, March 2026 Dataset: CIViC 100 molecular-profile/disease/therapy triplets, March 2026 | 0.92 functional_loss_of_function_f1 F1 score · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNot reported Aggregation: Not reported CIViC MCP supplementary methods and complete Tables 1–3 · Supplementary Table 3, Functional / Loss of Function, f1 |
| Configuration: ChatGPT Agent Mode, 2–7 March 2026 CIViC evaluation | Protocol: CIViC evidence-direction retrieval, March 2026 Dataset: CIViC 100 molecular-profile/disease/therapy triplets, March 2026 | 0.86 functional_loss_of_function_precision fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNot reported Aggregation: Not reported CIViC MCP supplementary methods and complete Tables 1–3 · Supplementary Table 3, Functional / Loss of Function, precision |
| Configuration: ChatGPT Agent Mode, 2–7 March 2026 CIViC evaluation | Protocol: CIViC evidence-direction retrieval, March 2026 Dataset: CIViC 100 molecular-profile/disease/therapy triplets, March 2026 | 1 functional_loss_of_function_recall fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNot reported Aggregation: Not reported CIViC MCP supplementary methods and complete Tables 1–3 · Supplementary Table 3, Functional / Loss of Function, recall |
| Configuration: ChatGPT Agent Mode, 2–7 March 2026 CIViC evaluation | Protocol: CIViC evidence-direction retrieval, March 2026 Dataset: CIViC 100 molecular-profile/disease/therapy triplets, March 2026 | 1 functional_unaltered_function_f1 F1 score · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNot reported Aggregation: Not reported CIViC MCP supplementary methods and complete Tables 1–3 · Supplementary Table 3, Functional / Unaltered Function, f1 |
| Configuration: ChatGPT Agent Mode, 2–7 March 2026 CIViC evaluation | Protocol: CIViC evidence-direction retrieval, March 2026 Dataset: CIViC 100 molecular-profile/disease/therapy triplets, March 2026 | 1 functional_unaltered_function_precision fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNot reported Aggregation: Not reported CIViC MCP supplementary methods and complete Tables 1–3 · Supplementary Table 3, Functional / Unaltered Function, precision |
| Configuration: ChatGPT Agent Mode, 2–7 March 2026 CIViC evaluation | Protocol: CIViC evidence-direction retrieval, March 2026 Dataset: CIViC 100 molecular-profile/disease/therapy triplets, March 2026 | 1 functional_unaltered_function_recall fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNot reported Aggregation: Not reported CIViC MCP supplementary methods and complete Tables 1–3 · Supplementary Table 3, Functional / Unaltered Function, recall |
| Configuration: ChatGPT Agent Mode, 2–7 March 2026 CIViC evaluation | Protocol: CIViC evidence-direction retrieval, March 2026 Dataset: CIViC 100 molecular-profile/disease/therapy triplets, March 2026 | 0.91 micro_f1 F1 score · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNot reported Aggregation: Not reported CIViC MCP: integrating large language models with the Clinical Interpretations of Variants in Cancer · Fig1c Micro F1; Section 3 |
| Configuration: ChatGPT Agent Mode, 2–7 March 2026 CIViC evaluation | Protocol: CIViC evidence-direction retrieval, March 2026 Dataset: CIViC 100 molecular-profile/disease/therapy triplets, March 2026 | 0.96 oncogenic_micro_f1 F1 score · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNot reported Aggregation: Not reported CIViC MCP: integrating large language models with the Clinical Interpretations of Variants in Cancer · Figure 1c, oncogenic row, agent column |
| Configuration: ChatGPT Agent Mode, 2–7 March 2026 CIViC evaluation | Protocol: CIViC evidence-direction retrieval, March 2026 Dataset: CIViC 100 molecular-profile/disease/therapy triplets, March 2026 | 0.96 oncogenic_oncogenicity_f1 F1 score · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNot reported Aggregation: Not reported CIViC MCP supplementary methods and complete Tables 1–3 · Supplementary Table 3, Oncogenic / Oncogenicity, f1 |
| Configuration: ChatGPT Agent Mode, 2–7 March 2026 CIViC evaluation | Protocol: CIViC evidence-direction retrieval, March 2026 Dataset: CIViC 100 molecular-profile/disease/therapy triplets, March 2026 | 0.92 oncogenic_oncogenicity_precision fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNot reported Aggregation: Not reported CIViC MCP supplementary methods and complete Tables 1–3 · Supplementary Table 3, Oncogenic / Oncogenicity, precision |
Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-09-30-e37e3ab1284d.
Methods and evaluation design
Procedure, tasks and evaluated configurations
Evaluation design
Benchmarks bring together tasks and protocols. A task describes the biological question; a protocol defines a particular test.
These source-backed links do not make different protocols or scores interchangeable.
Baseline coverage
Reference methods help show what a model adds beyond simple controls. We track a null control and a conventional method for each protocol.
0 of 2 active baseline roles have published Rewire measurements in this release. Measurements on a selected protocol do not establish coverage of an entire suite.
Baseline status by linked protocol
- CIViC evidence-direction retrieval, March 2026 · 0/2 roles measured
Protocol coverage CSV · Model evaluation matrix · Source table · Release and checksums
Coverage is derived from release 2026-09-30-e37e3ab1284d. Source citations describe the original records; they do not validate an unreviewed baseline proposal. No results have been generated by this audit.
Run this benchmark
Choose a concrete protocol before running an evaluation. Its inputs, split and scoring rules determine which results can be compared.
Run instructions
No runnable recipe has been reviewed for this benchmark. Dataset access, model requirements, licences and compute requirements must be checked against its sources before execution.
Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions
Evidence
Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.
Evidence table
Inspect claims, sources and review details
Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.
One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.
0 evidence rows matching the loaded filters
| Property and statement | Original source and location | Review and provenance |
|---|
No evidence rows match these filters. Choose another scope or clear the search.
Sources and history
View linked audit checks and correction history
Release 2026-09-30-e37e3ab1284d · Record review: source checked
2 source records and release history
- CIViC MCP: integrating large language models with the Clinical Interpretations of Variants in Cancer · Original source · Final article corrected and typeset 12 August 2026
- CIViC MCP supplementary methods and complete Tables 1–3 · Original source · vbag209_supplementary_data.docx, final article supplement
Technical metadata and extraction receipts
Stable ID: uc-clinical-20260930-benchmark-civic-study
- areas
- dna-genomes
- contexts
- clinical_research
- entity level
- suite
- grouping type
- published_study_evaluations
- executable suite
- false
- source locator
- Figure1c; Supplementary Tables1–3 and implementation methods
- review
- method: automated_source_review; reviewer: Codex clinical coverage worker; date: 2026-09-30; note: Transcription from inspected primary source. No execution, independent replication or human scientific review.; source id: uc-clinical-20260930-source-civic