rewirebio.iobenchmarks
Benchmark

Ludaic and Elofsson 2026 RNA structure benchmark

Independent benchmark of ten deep learning methods on non-redundant monomeric RNAs and RNA-RNA and RNA-protein complexes released after the methods' training cut-offs, split into easy and hard sets by structural similarity to the PDB training data.

Results are recorded on the linked protocols, tasks or configurations listed below. Their settings and evaluations are kept separate.

30 protocols with results

Overview

An explanatory profile has not yet been reviewed for this record.

Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.

Results on linked records

This benchmark has no results of its own in this release. 30 linked records have results. They are not assigned to the underlying benchmark: each record keeps its own settings and evaluations, and its scores are on its own page.

Methods and evaluation design

Procedure, tasks and evaluated configurations

Baseline coverage

Reference methods help show what a model adds beyond simple controls. We track a null control and a conventional method for each protocol.

0 of 60 active baseline roles have published Rewire measurements in this release. Measurements on a selected protocol do not establish coverage of an entire suite.

Baseline status by linked protocol

Protocol coverage CSV (gzip) · Model evaluation matrix (gzip) · Source table (gzip) · Release and checksums (gzip)

Coverage is derived from release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6. Source citations describe the original records; they do not validate an unreviewed baseline proposal. No results have been generated by this audit.

Run instructions

No runnable recipe has been reviewed for this benchmark. Dataset access, model requirements, licences and compute requirements must be checked against its sources before execution.

Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

0 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance

No evidence rows match these filters. Choose another scope or clear the search.

Sources and history

Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6 · Record review: source checked

1 source record and release historyDownload this release (gzip)
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: lit-rna-20261011-rna3d-benchmark-ludaic2026

areas
rna-transcriptomes; protein-structure
contexts
research
entity level
suite
version
Published 2026 (PDB entries downloaded January 2026)
task
RNA 3D structure prediction for monomers and complexes
scope note
79 monomeric RNAs after excluding three long targets that DRfold and DeepFoldRNA did not produce (Methods); 158 complex structures. Easy/hard split for monomers: maximum RNA-align TM-score to the PDB training data at a 0.5 cut-off; for complexes: an RNA or protein chain with TM-score >= 0.7 to a pre-cut-off complex is easy.
source locator
Methods 'Benchmark dataset' and 'Model generation'; Results sections on monomers and complexes
limitations
The authors developed none of the benchmarked methods.; Means only; per-target scores are in Supplementary Tables S2-S5 and S9-S14.
Related records

Suggest a correction