rewire.itbenchmarks
Task

TDC ADMET benchmark group TDC-CYP2D6-SUBSTRATE: Metabolism: TDC.CYP2D6 Substrate

Metabolism: TDC.CYP2D6 Substrate. Scored with AUPRC on TDC.CYP2D6 Substrate. Scaffold split, as the ADMET benchmark group defines it. Table 4 reports a value and a plus-or-minus spread but does not identify the spread's statistical meaning.

3 evaluations · 3 results

Overview

Metabolism: TDC.CYP2D6 Substrate. Scored with AUPRC on TDC.CYP2D6 Substrate. Scaffold split, as the ADMET benchmark group defines it. Table 4 reports a value and a plus-or-minus spread but does not identify the spread's statistical meaning.

Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.

Results

Each comparison retains its reviewed evaluation scope, dataset and metric. Results are shown without a pooled ranking.

TDC ADMET benchmark group TDC-CYP2D6-SUBSTRATE: Metabolism: TDC.CYP2D6 Substrate

auprc (fraction) · Higher values are better.

TDC ADMET benchmark group TDC-CYP2D6-SUBSTRATE: Metabolism: TDC.CYP2D6 Substrate · TDC.CYP2D6 Substrate (TDC ADMET benchmark group split)

Evidence origin: Author-reported evaluation.

Therapeutics Data Commons: Machine Learning Datasets and Tasks for Drug Discovery and Development · Table 3, row(TDC.CYP2D6 Substrate)
  • MAE datasets are better when lower. The metric comes from Table 3 and differs by dataset.
  • These are the paper's own simple baselines, not the current leaderboard for the ADMET group.
  • The pinned v1 source does not identify whether its plus-or-minus spreads are standard deviations, standard errors or another measure.
Comparison details and limitations

Every method TDC ADMET benchmark group reports on Metabolism: TDC.CYP2D6 Substrate, scored with AUPRC on TDC.CYP2D6 Substrate.

  • Author-reported numbers, source checked but not independently reproduced.

Automated source review: 2026-09-19. Numerical source review does not establish independent reproduction.

Dots show point estimates. Whiskers show only explicitly defined uncertainty (standard deviation, standard error or a labelled interval); their definitions remain in Table. Unresolved uncertainty is not plotted. Differences do not establish statistical significance.

Showing 3 of 3 matching rows.

Tested configuration
00.250.50.751
Reported score
  1. RDKit2D + MLP0.677 ± 0.047
  2. Morgan + MLP0.671 ± 0.066
  3. CNN0.485 ± 0.037

Methods and evaluation design

Procedure, tasks and evaluated configurations

Evaluation design

Benchmarks bring together tasks and protocols. A task describes the biological question; a protocol defines a particular test.

These source-backed links do not make different protocols or scores interchangeable.

Recorded evaluations

Each evaluation records what was tested and under which conditions.

Run instructions

No runnable recipe has been reviewed for this task. Dataset access, model requirements, licences and compute requirements must be checked against its sources before execution.

A task describes a biological question. Choose a linked protocol to obtain concrete split and scoring instructions.

Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

1 evidence row matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance
Relationship: part of
discovery-benchmark-tdc-molecular-tasks
Individual claims
Therapeutics Data Commons: Machine Learning Datasets and Tasks for Drug Discovery and Development

Original source ↗

Table 3, row(TDC.CYP2D6 Substrate)

Version: arXiv 2102.09548v1; later NSF v2 discovery retrieved partially but full artifact unavailable
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T21:04:55.709744+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-19

Audit details

Primary-source transcription with no human sign-off and no independent reproduction.

Field: links:part_of:discovery-benchmark-tdc-molecular-tasks

Claim: tdc-association-tdc-cyp2d6-substrate

Source artifact SHA-256: aaa5526f6f100093bc06c9921a8564ad08cfd5332270d614d7681051c2dd66bc

Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes.

Inspected artifact

Sources and history

View linked audit checks and correction history

Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220 · Record review: source checked

1 source records and release historyDownload this release
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: tdc-task-tdc-cyp2d6-substrate

areas
molecular-interactions
tasks
Metabolism: TDC.CYP2D6 Substrate
metric
AUPRC
metric direction
higher
dataset
TDC.CYP2D6 Substrate
protocol
Scaffold split, as the ADMET benchmark group defines it. Table 4 reports a value and a plus-or-minus spread but does not identify the spread's statistical meaning.
source locator
Table 3, row(TDC.CYP2D6 Substrate)
comparison panels
id: tdc-panel-tdc-cyp2d6-substrate; title: TDC ADMET benchmark group TDC-CYP2D6-SUBSTRATE: Metabolism: TDC.CYP2D6 Substrate; protocol id: tdc-task-tdc-cyp2d6-substrate; dataset id: tdc-dataset-tdc-cyp2d6-substrate; metric: auprc; unit: fraction; direction: higher; result ids: tdc-result-rdkit2d-plus-mlp-tdc-cyp2d6-substrate-auprc; tdc-result-morgan-plus-mlp-tdc-cyp2d6-substrate-auprc; tdc-result-cnn-tdc-cyp2d6-substrate-auprc; source ids: evidence-expansion-tdc-cached-v1-aaa5526f; source locator: Table 3, row(TDC.CYP2D6 Substrate); context: Every method TDC ADMET benchmark group reports on Metabolism: TDC.CYP2D6 Substrate, scored with AUPRC on TDC.CYP2D6 Substrate.; caveats: Author-reported numbers, source checked but not independently reproduced.; MAE datasets are better when lower. The metric comes from Table 3 and differs by dataset.; These are the paper's own simple baselines, not the current leaderboard for the ADMET group.; The pinned v1 source does not identify whether its plus-or-minus spreads are standard deviations, standard errors or another measure.; review: method: automated_source_review; date: 2026-09-19
Related records

Suggest a correction