Datasets
Long noncoding RNA sequences from RNAcentral with species labels.
Long-RNA species classification evaluates representation quality on an RNAcentral-derived seven-species dataset.
Long noncoding RNA sequences from RNAcentral with species labels.
F1 score; the reviewed task description does not establish the averaging convention.
Long RNA sequences.
Conceptual summary of the cited evaluation; exact task configuration and source version remain part of the protocol.
limited source coverage · Automated source review, 2026-09-16. All specifications and missing details
Results are available, but no reviewed comparison panel is linked in this release.
1 evaluation · 1 result. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.
Applied filters: All linked evaluations
| Tested configuration | Protocol and dataset | Finding | Evidence and details |
|---|---|---|---|
| Configuration: BiRNA-BERT | Task: extremely long RNA species classification Dataset: extremely long-sequence species classification | 0.804 F1 fraction · unknown Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceBiRNA-BERT: extremely long RNA species classification adaptive tokenization on full-length long RNA sequences Aggregation: Not reported BiRNA-BERT allows efficient RNA language modeling with adaptive tokenization · Table 2, BiRNA-BERT row, F1 Score column |
Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220.
Long noncoding RNA sequences from RNAcentral with species labels. The long-sequence species-classification Results paragraph specifies the dataset and F1 comparisons but does not give a train/validation/test assignment rule. F1 score; the reviewed task description does not establish the averaging convention. RNA-FM and RiNALMo are compared under their sequence-length constraints. The species-classification paragraph does not specify RNAcentral overlap exclusion between its benchmark sequences and model pretraining. Structure-task deduplication elsewhere is not this task.
Each evaluation records what was tested and under which conditions.
No runnable recipe has been reviewed for this task. Dataset access, model requirements, licences and compute requirements must be checked against its sources before execution.
A task describes a biological question. Choose a linked protocol to obtain concrete split and scoring instructions.
No source-reviewed explanatory claims are recorded here yet.
Relevant full-paper computational evaluation sections, tables/captions and cited supplementary task passages were reviewed. Reporting omissions are scoped to the inspected sources. Original numerical results are unchanged.
Stable record: reported-task-c40dac20d9af66Explanatory profile: limited source coverage · Automated source review, 2026-09-16. Review applies to the cited claims; unresolved fields are listed below. Numerical results retain their own review status.
| Property | Description and evidence |
|---|---|
| Datasets | Long noncoding RNA sequences from RNAcentral with species labels.SourcesBiRNA-BERT allows efficient RNA language modeling with adaptive tokenization · Results: BiRNA-BERT significantly outperforms in extremely long sequence task; Table 2; cached text lines 37–40 |
| Splits | The long-sequence species-classification Results paragraph specifies the dataset and F1 comparisons but does not give a train/validation/test assignment rule. · Not reported in inspected sourcesSourcesBiRNA-BERT allows efficient RNA language modeling with adaptive tokenization · Results: BiRNA-BERT significantly outperforms in extremely long sequence task; Table 2; cached text lines 37–40 |
| Metrics | F1 score; the reviewed task description does not establish the averaging convention.SourcesBiRNA-BERT allows efficient RNA language modeling with adaptive tokenization · Results: BiRNA-BERT significantly outperforms in extremely long sequence task; Table 2; cached text lines 37–40 |
| Baselines | RNA-FM and RiNALMo are compared under their sequence-length constraints.SourcesBiRNA-BERT allows efficient RNA language modeling with adaptive tokenization · Results: BiRNA-BERT significantly outperforms in extremely long sequence task; Table 2; cached text lines 37–40 |
| Leakage controls | The species-classification paragraph does not specify RNAcentral overlap exclusion between its benchmark sequences and model pretraining. Structure-task deduplication elsewhere is not this task. · Not reported in inspected sourcesSourcesBiRNA-BERT allows efficient RNA language modeling with adaptive tokenization · Results: BiRNA-BERT significantly outperforms in extremely long sequence task; Table 2; cached text lines 37–40 |
| Uncertainty | Table 2 reports one F1 score per model for long-sequence species classification. The corresponding main-text section and Supplementary Information do not define repeated runs, confidence intervals or a statistical comparison for this particular task. · Not reported in inspected sourcesSources (2)BiRNA-BERT allows efficient RNA language modeling with adaptive tokenization; birna journal Supplementary Information — pinned PDF · Results: extremely long sequence task and Table 2; Supplementary Information §§1–3 |
| Entity type | Paper-specific computational evaluation protocol.SourcesBiRNA-BERT allows efficient RNA language modeling with adaptive tokenization · Results: BiRNA-BERT significantly outperforms in extremely long sequence task; Table 2; cached text lines 37–40 |
| Organisms | Bos taurus, Gallus gallus, Gorilla gorilla, Homo sapiens, Mus musculus, Pan troglodytes and Rattus norvegicus.SourcesBiRNA-BERT allows efficient RNA language modeling with adaptive tokenization · Results: BiRNA-BERT significantly outperforms in extremely long sequence task; Table 2; cached text lines 37–40 |
| Assays | RNAcentral sequence/species annotations.SourcesBiRNA-BERT allows efficient RNA language modeling with adaptive tokenization · Results: BiRNA-BERT significantly outperforms in extremely long sequence task; Table 2; cached text lines 37–40 |
| Allowed inputs | Long RNA sequences.SourcesBiRNA-BERT allows efficient RNA language modeling with adaptive tokenization · Results: BiRNA-BERT significantly outperforms in extremely long sequence task; Table 2; cached text lines 37–40 |
| Adaptation | The long-sequence benchmark compares BiRNA-BERT, RiNALMo and RNA-FM, with comparator truncation stated. Its main-text description and Supplementary Information do not specify the classification head or whether each encoder is frozen or fine-tuned for this species task. · Not reported in inspected sourcesSources (2)BiRNA-BERT allows efficient RNA language modeling with adaptive tokenization; birna journal Supplementary Information — pinned PDF · Results: extremely long sequence task, Table 2; Supplementary Information §§1–3 |
Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.
Last literature check: 2026-09-17. Primary-paper discovery and source inspection. Source-checked results are not independently reproduced experiments.
| Paper or primary resource | Version | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| BiRNA-BERT allows efficient RNA language modeling with adaptive tokenization | journal full text in PMC | Read source DOI: 10.1038/s42003-025-08982-0 |
The catalogue now holds 1 result rows for this benchmark. A note below about pending extraction describes the state on 2026-09-17 and may since have been answered by a later batch. The result rows and their sources are the current record.
primary comparison table screened
Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.
One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.
20 evidence rows matching the loaded filters
| Property and statement | Original source and location | Review and provenance |
|---|---|---|
| Diagram caption Conceptual summary of the cited evaluation; exact task configuration and source version remain part of the protocol. Individual claims | BiRNA-BERT allows efficient RNA language modeling with adaptive tokenization Results: BiRNA-BERT significantly outperforms in extremely long sequence task; Table 2; cached text lines 37–40 Version: journal full text in PMC | source checked automated source review · 2026-09-16 Audit detailsRelevant full-paper computational evaluation sections, tables/captions and cited supplementary task passages were reviewed. Reporting omissions are scoped to the inspected sources. Original numerical results are unchanged. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
Diagram steps
| BiRNA-BERT allows efficient RNA language modeling with adaptive tokenization Results: BiRNA-BERT significantly outperforms in extremely long sequence task; Table 2; cached text lines 37–40 Version: journal full text in PMC | source checked automated source review · 2026-09-16 Audit detailsRelevant full-paper computational evaluation sections, tables/captions and cited supplementary task passages were reviewed. Reporting omissions are scoped to the inspected sources. Original numerical results are unchanged. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Diagram title Computational evaluation flow Individual claims | BiRNA-BERT allows efficient RNA language modeling with adaptive tokenization Results: BiRNA-BERT significantly outperforms in extremely long sequence task; Table 2; cached text lines 37–40 Version: journal full text in PMC | source checked automated source review · 2026-09-16 Audit detailsRelevant full-paper computational evaluation sections, tables/captions and cited supplementary task passages were reviewed. Reporting omissions are scoped to the inspected sources. Original numerical results are unchanged. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Datasets Long noncoding RNA sequences from RNAcentral with species labels. Individual claims | BiRNA-BERT allows efficient RNA language modeling with adaptive tokenization Results: BiRNA-BERT significantly outperforms in extremely long sequence task; Table 2; cached text lines 37–40 Version: journal full text in PMC | source checked automated source review · 2026-09-16 Audit detailsRelevant full-paper computational evaluation sections, tables/captions and cited supplementary task passages were reviewed. Reporting omissions are scoped to the inspected sources. Original numerical results are unchanged. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Splits The long-sequence species-classification Results paragraph specifies the dataset and F1 comparisons but does not give a train/validation/test assignment rule. Individual claims | BiRNA-BERT allows efficient RNA language modeling with adaptive tokenization Results: BiRNA-BERT significantly outperforms in extremely long sequence task; Table 2; cached text lines 37–40 Version: journal full text in PMC | unreported automated source review · 2026-09-16 Audit detailsRelevant full-paper computational evaluation sections, tables/captions and cited supplementary task passages were reviewed. Reporting omissions are scoped to the inspected sources. Original numerical results are unchanged. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Adaptation The long-sequence benchmark compares BiRNA-BERT, RiNALMo and RNA-FM, with comparator truncation stated. Its main-text description and Supplementary Information do not specify the classification head or whether each encoder is frozen or fine-tuned for this species task. Individual claims | BiRNA-BERT allows efficient RNA language modeling with adaptive tokenization Results: extremely long sequence task, Table 2; Supplementary Information §§1–3 Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation. Version: journal full text in PMC | unreported automated source review · 2026-09-16 Audit detailsRelevant full-paper computational evaluation sections, tables/captions and cited supplementary task passages were reviewed. Reporting omissions are scoped to the inspected sources. Original numerical results are unchanged. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Adaptation The long-sequence benchmark compares BiRNA-BERT, RiNALMo and RNA-FM, with comparator truncation stated. Its main-text description and Supplementary Information do not specify the classification head or whether each encoder is frozen or fine-tuned for this species task. Individual claims | birna journal Supplementary Information — pinned PDF Results: extremely long sequence task, Table 2; Supplementary Information §§1–3 Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation. Version: Published supplementary PDF 42003_2025_8982_MOESM2_ESM.pdf; sha256:7897d4dcf456d1f22b0631beabf7c5fd8678d0b8765cd40325195eb5addf4493 | unreported automated source review · 2026-09-16 Audit detailsRelevant full-paper computational evaluation sections, tables/captions and cited supplementary task passages were reviewed. Reporting omissions are scoped to the inspected sources. Original numerical results are unchanged. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record Archive member: 42003_2025_8982_MOESM2_ESM.pdf |
| Metrics F1 score; the reviewed task description does not establish the averaging convention. Individual claims | BiRNA-BERT allows efficient RNA language modeling with adaptive tokenization Results: BiRNA-BERT significantly outperforms in extremely long sequence task; Table 2; cached text lines 37–40 Version: journal full text in PMC | source checked automated source review · 2026-09-16 Audit detailsRelevant full-paper computational evaluation sections, tables/captions and cited supplementary task passages were reviewed. Reporting omissions are scoped to the inspected sources. Original numerical results are unchanged. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Baselines RNA-FM and RiNALMo are compared under their sequence-length constraints. Individual claims | BiRNA-BERT allows efficient RNA language modeling with adaptive tokenization Results: BiRNA-BERT significantly outperforms in extremely long sequence task; Table 2; cached text lines 37–40 Version: journal full text in PMC | source checked automated source review · 2026-09-16 Audit detailsRelevant full-paper computational evaluation sections, tables/captions and cited supplementary task passages were reviewed. Reporting omissions are scoped to the inspected sources. Original numerical results are unchanged. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Leakage controls The species-classification paragraph does not specify RNAcentral overlap exclusion between its benchmark sequences and model pretraining. Structure-task deduplication elsewhere is not this task. Individual claims | BiRNA-BERT allows efficient RNA language modeling with adaptive tokenization Results: BiRNA-BERT significantly outperforms in extremely long sequence task; Table 2; cached text lines 37–40 Version: journal full text in PMC | unreported automated source review · 2026-09-16 Audit detailsRelevant full-paper computational evaluation sections, tables/captions and cited supplementary task passages were reviewed. Reporting omissions are scoped to the inspected sources. Original numerical results are unchanged. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
View linked audit checks and correction history
Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220 · Record review: needs review
Stable ID: reported-task-c40dac20d9af66