rewire.itbenchmarks
Task

enhancer prediction

Enhancer classification uses species-specific VISTA sequence collections with separate validation and test partitions.

SourcesA deep learning model for DNA enhancer prediction based on nucleotide position aware feature encoding · Methods: Datasets; Model performance evaluation metrics; cached text lines 60–62, 87–89; matching task comparison table/ablation captions

1 evaluation · 1 result

Overview

Datasets

Human hg19 and mouse mm9 positive/negative VISTA enhancer sequences.

Metrics

Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, MCC and ROC-AUC.

Allowed inputs

DNA enhancer and negative sequences.

SourcesA deep learning model for DNA enhancer prediction based on nucleotide position aware feature encoding · Methods: Datasets; Model performance evaluation metrics; cached text lines 60–62, 87–89; matching task comparison table/ablation captions
Evaluation procedure diagram
How it worksComputational evaluation flow
Computational evaluation flow1. Input: DNA enhancer and negative sequences.. Then: 2. Evaluation: Supervised classification with separate train/validation/test partitions for each species.. Then: 3. Readout: Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, MCC and ROC-AUC.Computational evaluation flow1. Input: DNA enhancer and negative sequences.. Then: 2. Evaluation: Supervised classification with separate train/validation/test partitions for each species.. Then: 3. Readout: Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, MCC and ROC-AUC.Computational evaluation flow1. Input: DNA enhancer and negative sequences.. Then: 2. Evaluation: Supervised classification with separate train/validation/test partitions for each species.. Then: 3. Readout: Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, MCC and ROC-AUC.

Conceptual summary of the cited evaluation; exact task configuration and source version remain part of the protocol.

SourcesA deep learning model for DNA enhancer prediction based on nucleotide position aware feature encoding · Methods: Datasets; Model performance evaluation metrics; cached text lines 60–62, 87–89; matching task comparison table/ablation captions

limited source coverage · Automated source review, 2026-09-16. All specifications and missing details

Results

Results are available, but no reviewed comparison panel is linked in this release.

All evaluations

1 evaluation · 1 result. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Filter evaluations

Applied filters: All linked evaluations

Exact evaluated configurations and original reported results
Tested configurationProtocol and datasetFindingEvidence and details
Configuration: position-aware CNNTask: enhancer prediction
Dataset: human enhancer dataset
0.94 AUROC
fraction · unknown

Uncertainty: Not reported

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

position-aware CNN: enhancer prediction

Nucleotide position-aware feature encoding; average assessment of CNN classifier

Aggregation: Not reported

A deep learning model for DNA enhancer prediction based on nucleotide position aware feature encoding · Table 2, Human section, CNN row, AUC column

Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220.

Methods and evaluation design

Procedure, tasks and evaluated configurations

How it works

Evaluation methodology

Human hg19 and mouse mm9 positive/negative VISTA enhancer sequences. Each species dataset is divided into training, validation and testing in an 80:10:10 ratio. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, MCC and ROC-AUC. CNN, random forest, logistic regression, KNN, SVM and XGBoost under the compared feature encodings. The authors report CD-HIT-based removal of highly similar sequences before splitting. The cited text-accessible evaluation sections give no confidence-interval, resampling or repeat-run error-bar specification. Image-only tables and uninspected supplements are outside this absence claim.

SourcesA deep learning model for DNA enhancer prediction based on nucleotide position aware feature encoding · Methods: Datasets; Model performance evaluation metrics; cached text lines 60–62, 87–89; matching task comparison table/ablation captions

Recorded evaluations

Each evaluation records what was tested and under which conditions.

Run instructions

No runnable recipe has been reviewed for this task. Dataset access, model requirements, licences and compute requirements must be checked against its sources before execution.

A task describes a biological question. Choose a linked protocol to obtain concrete split and scoring instructions.

Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions

Strengths and limitations

Strengths and considerations

No source-reviewed explanatory claims are recorded here yet.

Profile review details

Task-specific computational methodology and field context checked in the cited primary-source artifact. Source-backed fields, inapplicable evaluator dimensions and unresolved details are distinguished. Numerical results were not reproduced.

Stable record: reported-task-64607443a9ba15

Specifications

Inputs, training, access and other details

Explanatory profile: limited source coverage · Automated source review, 2026-09-16. Review applies to the cited claims; unresolved fields are listed below. Numerical results retain their own review status.

Data, procedure and scoring
PropertyDescription and evidence
DatasetsHuman hg19 and mouse mm9 positive/negative VISTA enhancer sequences.
SourcesA deep learning model for DNA enhancer prediction based on nucleotide position aware feature encoding · Methods: Datasets; Model performance evaluation metrics; cached text lines 60–62, 87–89; matching task comparison table/ablation captions
SplitsEach species dataset is divided into training, validation and testing in an 80:10:10 ratio.
SourcesA deep learning model for DNA enhancer prediction based on nucleotide position aware feature encoding · Methods: Datasets; Model performance evaluation metrics; cached text lines 60–62, 87–89; matching task comparison table/ablation captions
MetricsSensitivity, specificity, accuracy, MCC and ROC-AUC.
SourcesA deep learning model for DNA enhancer prediction based on nucleotide position aware feature encoding · Methods: Datasets; Model performance evaluation metrics; cached text lines 60–62, 87–89; matching task comparison table/ablation captions
BaselinesCNN, random forest, logistic regression, KNN, SVM and XGBoost under the compared feature encodings.
SourcesA deep learning model for DNA enhancer prediction based on nucleotide position aware feature encoding · Methods: Datasets; Model performance evaluation metrics; cached text lines 60–62, 87–89; matching task comparison table/ablation captions
Leakage controlsThe authors report CD-HIT-based removal of highly similar sequences before splitting.
SourcesA deep learning model for DNA enhancer prediction based on nucleotide position aware feature encoding · Methods: Datasets; Model performance evaluation metrics; cached text lines 60–62, 87–89; matching task comparison table/ablation captions
UncertaintyThe cited text-accessible evaluation sections give no confidence-interval, resampling or repeat-run error-bar specification. Image-only tables and uninspected supplements are outside this absence claim. · Not reported in inspected sources
SourcesA deep learning model for DNA enhancer prediction based on nucleotide position aware feature encoding · Methods: Datasets; Model performance evaluation metrics; cached text lines 60–62, 87–89; matching task comparison table/ablation captions
Entity typePaper-specific computational evaluation protocol.
SourcesA deep learning model for DNA enhancer prediction based on nucleotide position aware feature encoding · Methods: Datasets; Model performance evaluation metrics; cached text lines 60–62, 87–89; matching task comparison table/ablation captions
OrganismsHuman hg19 and mouse mm9.
SourcesA deep learning model for DNA enhancer prediction based on nucleotide position aware feature encoding · Methods: Datasets; Model performance evaluation metrics; cached text lines 60–62, 87–89; matching task comparison table/ablation captions
AssaysVISTA enhancer annotations.
SourcesA deep learning model for DNA enhancer prediction based on nucleotide position aware feature encoding · Methods: Datasets; Model performance evaluation metrics; cached text lines 60–62, 87–89; matching task comparison table/ablation captions
Allowed inputsDNA enhancer and negative sequences.
SourcesA deep learning model for DNA enhancer prediction based on nucleotide position aware feature encoding · Methods: Datasets; Model performance evaluation metrics; cached text lines 60–62, 87–89; matching task comparison table/ablation captions
AdaptationSupervised classification with separate train/validation/test partitions for each species.
SourcesA deep learning model for DNA enhancer prediction based on nucleotide position aware feature encoding · Methods: Datasets; Model performance evaluation metrics; cached text lines 60–62, 87–89; matching task comparison table/ablation captions

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Papers and result coverage

Last literature check: 2026-09-17. Primary-paper discovery and source inspection. Source-checked results are not independently reproduced experiments.

Paper or primary resourceVersionReference
A deep learning model for DNA enhancer prediction based on nucleotide position aware feature encodingversion of recordRead source
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110030
Historical gaps recorded on 2026-09-17

The catalogue now holds 1 result rows for this benchmark. A note below about pending extraction describes the state on 2026-09-17 and may since have been answered by a later batch. The result rows and their sources are the current record.

  • Published Fig. 5/6 advanced-model comparisons require figure/source-data review; do not pretend Table 3 gives scores.
  • Avoid mixing human and mouse populations or treating source-level similarity filtering as an exact split manifest.
Search and extraction details

primary comparison table screened

Searches

  • "PMC11167433"

Evidence locations

  • Table 2
  • STAR Methods: Datasets
  • Results and discussion

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

17 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance
Diagram caption
Conceptual summary of the cited evaluation; exact task configuration and source version remain part of the protocol.
Individual claims
A deep learning model for DNA enhancer prediction based on nucleotide position aware feature encoding

Original source ↗

Methods: Datasets; Model performance evaluation metrics; cached text lines 60–62, 87–89; matching task comparison table/ablation captions

Version: version of record
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:41:06Z

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Task-specific computational methodology and field context checked in the cited primary-source artifact. Source-backed fields, inapplicable evaluator dimensions and unresolved details are distinguished. Numerical results were not reproduced.

Field: attributes.profile.diagram.caption

Source artifact SHA-256: 0183b6a111b1b02344cad35a571a1fd2c56257e406c5be1df69f7902c5d06749

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Diagram steps
  • Input: DNA enhancer and negative sequences.
  • Evaluation: Supervised classification with separate train/validation/test partitions for each species.
  • Readout: Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, MCC and ROC-AUC.
Individual claims
A deep learning model for DNA enhancer prediction based on nucleotide position aware feature encoding

Original source ↗

Methods: Datasets; Model performance evaluation metrics; cached text lines 60–62, 87–89; matching task comparison table/ablation captions

Version: version of record
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:41:06Z

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Task-specific computational methodology and field context checked in the cited primary-source artifact. Source-backed fields, inapplicable evaluator dimensions and unresolved details are distinguished. Numerical results were not reproduced.

Field: attributes.profile.diagram.steps

Source artifact SHA-256: 0183b6a111b1b02344cad35a571a1fd2c56257e406c5be1df69f7902c5d06749

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Diagram title
Computational evaluation flow
Individual claims
A deep learning model for DNA enhancer prediction based on nucleotide position aware feature encoding

Original source ↗

Methods: Datasets; Model performance evaluation metrics; cached text lines 60–62, 87–89; matching task comparison table/ablation captions

Version: version of record
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:41:06Z

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Task-specific computational methodology and field context checked in the cited primary-source artifact. Source-backed fields, inapplicable evaluator dimensions and unresolved details are distinguished. Numerical results were not reproduced.

Field: attributes.profile.diagram.title

Source artifact SHA-256: 0183b6a111b1b02344cad35a571a1fd2c56257e406c5be1df69f7902c5d06749

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Datasets
Human hg19 and mouse mm9 positive/negative VISTA enhancer sequences.
Individual claims
A deep learning model for DNA enhancer prediction based on nucleotide position aware feature encoding

Original source ↗

Methods: Datasets; Model performance evaluation metrics; cached text lines 60–62, 87–89; matching task comparison table/ablation captions

Version: version of record
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:41:06Z

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Task-specific computational methodology and field context checked in the cited primary-source artifact. Source-backed fields, inapplicable evaluator dimensions and unresolved details are distinguished. Numerical results were not reproduced.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.0.value

Source artifact SHA-256: 0183b6a111b1b02344cad35a571a1fd2c56257e406c5be1df69f7902c5d06749

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Splits
Each species dataset is divided into training, validation and testing in an 80:10:10 ratio.
Individual claims
A deep learning model for DNA enhancer prediction based on nucleotide position aware feature encoding

Original source ↗

Methods: Datasets; Model performance evaluation metrics; cached text lines 60–62, 87–89; matching task comparison table/ablation captions

Version: version of record
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:41:06Z

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Task-specific computational methodology and field context checked in the cited primary-source artifact. Source-backed fields, inapplicable evaluator dimensions and unresolved details are distinguished. Numerical results were not reproduced.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.1.value

Source artifact SHA-256: 0183b6a111b1b02344cad35a571a1fd2c56257e406c5be1df69f7902c5d06749

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Adaptation
Supervised classification with separate train/validation/test partitions for each species.
Individual claims
A deep learning model for DNA enhancer prediction based on nucleotide position aware feature encoding

Original source ↗

Methods: Datasets; Model performance evaluation metrics; cached text lines 60–62, 87–89; matching task comparison table/ablation captions

Version: version of record
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:41:06Z

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Task-specific computational methodology and field context checked in the cited primary-source artifact. Source-backed fields, inapplicable evaluator dimensions and unresolved details are distinguished. Numerical results were not reproduced.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.10.value

Source artifact SHA-256: 0183b6a111b1b02344cad35a571a1fd2c56257e406c5be1df69f7902c5d06749

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Metrics
Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, MCC and ROC-AUC.
Individual claims
A deep learning model for DNA enhancer prediction based on nucleotide position aware feature encoding

Original source ↗

Methods: Datasets; Model performance evaluation metrics; cached text lines 60–62, 87–89; matching task comparison table/ablation captions

Version: version of record
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:41:06Z

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Task-specific computational methodology and field context checked in the cited primary-source artifact. Source-backed fields, inapplicable evaluator dimensions and unresolved details are distinguished. Numerical results were not reproduced.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.2.value

Source artifact SHA-256: 0183b6a111b1b02344cad35a571a1fd2c56257e406c5be1df69f7902c5d06749

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Baselines
CNN, random forest, logistic regression, KNN, SVM and XGBoost under the compared feature encodings.
Individual claims
A deep learning model for DNA enhancer prediction based on nucleotide position aware feature encoding

Original source ↗

Methods: Datasets; Model performance evaluation metrics; cached text lines 60–62, 87–89; matching task comparison table/ablation captions

Version: version of record
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:41:06Z

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Task-specific computational methodology and field context checked in the cited primary-source artifact. Source-backed fields, inapplicable evaluator dimensions and unresolved details are distinguished. Numerical results were not reproduced.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.3.value

Source artifact SHA-256: 0183b6a111b1b02344cad35a571a1fd2c56257e406c5be1df69f7902c5d06749

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Leakage controls
The authors report CD-HIT-based removal of highly similar sequences before splitting.
Individual claims
A deep learning model for DNA enhancer prediction based on nucleotide position aware feature encoding

Original source ↗

Methods: Datasets; Model performance evaluation metrics; cached text lines 60–62, 87–89; matching task comparison table/ablation captions

Version: version of record
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:41:06Z

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Task-specific computational methodology and field context checked in the cited primary-source artifact. Source-backed fields, inapplicable evaluator dimensions and unresolved details are distinguished. Numerical results were not reproduced.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.4.value

Source artifact SHA-256: 0183b6a111b1b02344cad35a571a1fd2c56257e406c5be1df69f7902c5d06749

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Uncertainty
The cited text-accessible evaluation sections give no confidence-interval, resampling or repeat-run error-bar specification. Image-only tables and uninspected supplements are outside this absence claim.
Individual claims
A deep learning model for DNA enhancer prediction based on nucleotide position aware feature encoding

Original source ↗

Methods: Datasets; Model performance evaluation metrics; cached text lines 60–62, 87–89; matching task comparison table/ablation captions

Version: version of record
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:41:06Z

unreported

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Task-specific computational methodology and field context checked in the cited primary-source artifact. Source-backed fields, inapplicable evaluator dimensions and unresolved details are distinguished. Numerical results were not reproduced.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.5.value

Source artifact SHA-256: 0183b6a111b1b02344cad35a571a1fd2c56257e406c5be1df69f7902c5d06749

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Sources and history

View linked audit checks and correction history

Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220 · Record review: needs review

2 source records and release historyDownload this release
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: reported-task-64607443a9ba15

areas
dna-genomes
tasks
enhancer prediction
entity level
task
version
Not reported
task
enhancer prediction
scope note
Paper-specific evaluation task; protocol completeness requires further extraction.
benchmark research
review date: 2026-09-17; status: primary_comparison_table_screened; primary sources: expansion-p3-enhancer-position-encoding-2024; inspected locators: Table 2; STAR Methods: Datasets; Results and discussion; searched queries: "PMC11167433"; gaps: Published Fig. 5/6 advanced-model comparisons require figure/source-data review; do not pretend Table 3 gives scores.; Avoid mixing human and mouse populations or treating source-level similarity filtering as an exact split manifest.; claim scope: Primary-paper discovery and source inspection. Source-checked results are not independently reproduced experiments.
historical missing metadata
protocol version: not_reported_in_legacy_extract; split: not_reported_in_legacy_extract
metadata review scope
historical_missing_metadata preserves the original discovery state. Current descriptive evidence and missingness are recorded in profile.facts; numerical-result review is separate.
legacy kinds
benchmark
entity classification
review date: 2026-09-17; rationale: This source-scoped record identifies the biological prediction task and holds its paper context. Preserve the existing task identity; exact split, model adaptation and scoring remain in linked evaluations or separate protocol records.; source ids: enhancer-position-encoding-2024; source locator: Methods: Datasets; Model performance evaluation metrics; cached text lines 60–62, 87–89; matching task comparison table/ablation captions; ambiguities: A paper- or suite-specific task may constrain some inputs or metrics; that alone does not make it interchangeable with a complete versioned protocol. No protocol equivalence is inferred.; Some legacy profile Entity type facts use the generic phrase computational evaluation protocol. That boilerplate is not sufficient to establish a single fixed protocol identity or to merge this task with another protocol record.
Related records

Suggest a correction