Source

Benchmarking of germline copy number variant callers from whole genome sequencing data for clinical applications

Primary source retrieved and hashed for the CNV detection use-case pass.

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

18 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-10-09-8eac2440869c
Property and statement	Original source and location	Review and provenance
attributes.artifact_sha256 ed6492f89d77454416d4fb135bb56bdcd5fb202e8a0ba94b92fa450441b4091f Source metadata	Benchmarking of germline copy number variant callers from whole genome sequencing data for clinical applications Original source ↗ No field-specific location recorded Version: Bioinformatics Advances 5(1):vbaf071, published 2025-04-10; PMC12005901 full-text XML Retrieved: 2026-10-09T15:24:22Z	catalogued No individual claim review recorded Source has a recorded evidence concern. Consult its source page before using the claim. Audit details Field: `attributes.artifact_sha256` Source artifact SHA-256: `ed6492f89d77454416d4fb135bb56bdcd5fb202e8a0ba94b92fa450441b4091f` Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record Inspected artifact
attributes.artifact_url https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12005901/fullTextXML Source metadata	Benchmarking of germline copy number variant callers from whole genome sequencing data for clinical applications Original source ↗ No field-specific location recorded Version: Bioinformatics Advances 5(1):vbaf071, published 2025-04-10; PMC12005901 full-text XML Retrieved: 2026-10-09T15:24:22Z	catalogued No individual claim review recorded Source has a recorded evidence concern. Consult its source page before using the claim. Audit details Field: `attributes.artifact_url` Source artifact SHA-256: `ed6492f89d77454416d4fb135bb56bdcd5fb202e8a0ba94b92fa450441b4091f` Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record Inspected artifact
attributes.doi 10.1093/bioadv/vbaf071 Source metadata	Benchmarking of germline copy number variant callers from whole genome sequencing data for clinical applications Original source ↗ No field-specific location recorded Version: Bioinformatics Advances 5(1):vbaf071, published 2025-04-10; PMC12005901 full-text XML Retrieved: 2026-10-09T15:24:22Z	catalogued No individual claim review recorded Source has a recorded evidence concern. Consult its source page before using the claim. Audit details Field: `attributes.doi` Source artifact SHA-256: `ed6492f89d77454416d4fb135bb56bdcd5fb202e8a0ba94b92fa450441b4091f` Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record Inspected artifact
attributes.evidence_concerns 1 values source id cnv-20261009-source-delavega2025 message Results 3.1 paragraph 5 says CNVnator and Cue were unable to detect events of 1-5 kb, but Supplemental Table 3 prints CNVnator 1-5 kb deletion sensitivity 0.3098 and precision 0.4207 (B9, C9). Results 3.1 paragraph 3 says Delly had the lowest precision, but Table S3 prints lower combined precision for Lumpy (W13 0.0107) than Delly (W11 0.1902). The prose may describe Figures 1 and 3 rather than the table; this was not checked. Table values are recorded. source locator Results 3.1 paragraphs 3 and 5 versus Supplemental_Table_3.xlsx B9, C9, W11, W13 artifact sha256 ed6492f89d77454416d4fb135bb56bdcd5fb202e8a0ba94b92fa450441b4091f reviewed at 2026-10-09T15:51:53Z review method ai-assisted-source-review Source metadata	Benchmarking of germline copy number variant callers from whole genome sequencing data for clinical applications Original source ↗ No field-specific location recorded Version: Bioinformatics Advances 5(1):vbaf071, published 2025-04-10; PMC12005901 full-text XML Retrieved: 2026-10-09T15:24:22Z	catalogued No individual claim review recorded Source has a recorded evidence concern. Consult its source page before using the claim. Audit details Field: `attributes.evidence_concerns` Source artifact SHA-256: `ed6492f89d77454416d4fb135bb56bdcd5fb202e8a0ba94b92fa450441b4091f` Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record Inspected artifact
attributes.licence CC-BY-4.0 Source metadata	Benchmarking of germline copy number variant callers from whole genome sequencing data for clinical applications Original source ↗ No field-specific location recorded Version: Bioinformatics Advances 5(1):vbaf071, published 2025-04-10; PMC12005901 full-text XML Retrieved: 2026-10-09T15:24:22Z	catalogued No individual claim review recorded Source has a recorded evidence concern. Consult its source page before using the claim. Audit details Field: `attributes.licence` Source artifact SHA-256: `ed6492f89d77454416d4fb135bb56bdcd5fb202e8a0ba94b92fa450441b4091f` Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record Inspected artifact
attributes.media_type application/xml Source metadata	Benchmarking of germline copy number variant callers from whole genome sequencing data for clinical applications Original source ↗ No field-specific location recorded Version: Bioinformatics Advances 5(1):vbaf071, published 2025-04-10; PMC12005901 full-text XML Retrieved: 2026-10-09T15:24:22Z	catalogued No individual claim review recorded Source has a recorded evidence concern. Consult its source page before using the claim. Audit details Field: `attributes.media_type` Source artifact SHA-256: `ed6492f89d77454416d4fb135bb56bdcd5fb202e8a0ba94b92fa450441b4091f` Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record Inspected artifact
attributes.publication_status peer_reviewed Source metadata	Benchmarking of germline copy number variant callers from whole genome sequencing data for clinical applications Original source ↗ No field-specific location recorded Version: Bioinformatics Advances 5(1):vbaf071, published 2025-04-10; PMC12005901 full-text XML Retrieved: 2026-10-09T15:24:22Z	catalogued No individual claim review recorded Source has a recorded evidence concern. Consult its source page before using the claim. Audit details Field: `attributes.publication_status` Source artifact SHA-256: `ed6492f89d77454416d4fb135bb56bdcd5fb202e8a0ba94b92fa450441b4091f` Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record Inspected artifact
attributes.retrieved_at 2026-10-09T15:24:22Z Source metadata	Benchmarking of germline copy number variant callers from whole genome sequencing data for clinical applications Original source ↗ No field-specific location recorded Version: Bioinformatics Advances 5(1):vbaf071, published 2025-04-10; PMC12005901 full-text XML Retrieved: 2026-10-09T15:24:22Z	catalogued No individual claim review recorded Source has a recorded evidence concern. Consult its source page before using the claim. Audit details Field: `attributes.retrieved_at` Source artifact SHA-256: `ed6492f89d77454416d4fb135bb56bdcd5fb202e8a0ba94b92fa450441b4091f` Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record Inspected artifact
attributes.url https://doi.org/10.1093/bioadv/vbaf071 Source metadata	Benchmarking of germline copy number variant callers from whole genome sequencing data for clinical applications Original source ↗ No field-specific location recorded Version: Bioinformatics Advances 5(1):vbaf071, published 2025-04-10; PMC12005901 full-text XML Retrieved: 2026-10-09T15:24:22Z	catalogued No individual claim review recorded Source has a recorded evidence concern. Consult its source page before using the claim. Audit details Field: `attributes.url` Source artifact SHA-256: `ed6492f89d77454416d4fb135bb56bdcd5fb202e8a0ba94b92fa450441b4091f` Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record Inspected artifact
attributes.version Bioinformatics Advances 5(1):vbaf071, published 2025-04-10; PMC12005901 full-text XML Source metadata	Benchmarking of germline copy number variant callers from whole genome sequencing data for clinical applications Original source ↗ No field-specific location recorded Version: Bioinformatics Advances 5(1):vbaf071, published 2025-04-10; PMC12005901 full-text XML Retrieved: 2026-10-09T15:24:22Z	catalogued No individual claim review recorded Source has a recorded evidence concern. Consult its source page before using the claim. Audit details Field: `attributes.version` Source artifact SHA-256: `ed6492f89d77454416d4fb135bb56bdcd5fb202e8a0ba94b92fa450441b4091f` Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record Inspected artifact

All evidence (JSONL) (gzip)How to read the evidence

Sources and history

Release 2026-10-09-8eac2440869c · Record review: source checked

0 source records and release history

No supporting source is linked yet.

Read original source

Download this release (gzip)

Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: cnv-20261009-source-delavega2025

areas: dna-genomes
contexts: clinical_research
url: https://doi.org/10.1093/bioadv/vbaf071
artifact url: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12005901/fullTextXML
version: Bioinformatics Advances 5(1):vbaf071, published 2025-04-10; PMC12005901 full-text XML
retrieved at: 2026-10-09T15:24:22Z
artifact sha256: ed6492f89d77454416d4fb135bb56bdcd5fb202e8a0ba94b92fa450441b4091f
doi: 10.1093/bioadv/vbaf071
publication status: peer_reviewed
licence: CC-BY-4.0
media type: application/xml
evidence concerns: source id: cnv-20261009-source-delavega2025; message: Results 3.1 paragraph 5 says CNVnator and Cue were unable to detect events of 1-5 kb, but Supplemental Table 3 prints CNVnator 1-5 kb deletion sensitivity 0.3098 and precision 0.4207 (B9, C9). Results 3.1 paragraph 3 says Delly had the lowest precision, but Table S3 prints lower combined precision for Lumpy (W13 0.0107) than Delly (W11 0.1902). The prose may describe Figures 1 and 3 rather than the table; this was not checked. Table values are recorded.; source locator: Results 3.1 paragraphs 3 and 5 versus Supplemental_Table_3.xlsx B9, C9, W11, W13; artifact sha256: ed6492f89d77454416d4fb135bb56bdcd5fb202e8a0ba94b92fa450441b4091f; reviewed at: 2026-10-09T15:51:53Z; review method: ai-assisted-source-review

Related records

Suggest a correction