rewire.itbenchmarks
Result

0.908 ± 0.012 auroc

CNN · TDC ADMET benchmark group TDC-PGP · AUROC

Tested method
CNN
Task
TDC ADMET benchmark group TDC-PGP: Absorption: TDC.Pgp
Dataset subset
TDC.Pgp (TDC ADMET benchmark group split)
Procedure
Scaffold split, as the ADMET benchmark group defines it. Table 4 reports a value and a plus-or-minus spread but does not identify the spread's statistical meaning.
Evaluation
CNN on TDC ADMET benchmark group TDC-PGP: Absorption: TDC.Pgp
Coverage
scored: unreported; eligible: unreported
Uncertainty
type: reported_plus_minus_type_unresolved; value: 0.012
Evidence
Author-reported evaluation · source checkedTherapeutics Data Commons: Machine Learning Datasets and Tasks for Drug Discovery and Development · Table 4, block(Absorption), row(CNN), column(TDC.Pgp)

A source-checked result verifies the numerical transcription, not every model or protocol detail. Evaluation metadata: source checked. Source checked does not mean independently reproduced.

Reproduction

Split
Not reported
Adaptation
Not reported
Scoring implementation
AUROC

No execution recipe has been verified for this exact configuration and evaluation. A benchmark's general instructions may use different inputs, splits or model settings.

Reproducing this published result requires matching its model configuration, data, split and scorer. Source checking or a successful smoke test does not establish score reproduction.

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

1 evidence row matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance
Reported result
0.908 ± 0.012
Individual claims
Therapeutics Data Commons: Machine Learning Datasets and Tasks for Drug Discovery and Development

Original source ↗

Table 4, block(Absorption), row(CNN), column(TDC.Pgp)

Version: arXiv 2102.09548v1; later NSF v2 discovery retrieved partially but full artifact unavailable
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T21:04:55.709744+00:00

source checked

Deterministic parse of the pinned PDF text layer, with each dataset's direction cross-checked between Table 3 and the arrow in Table 4 · 2026-09-19

author reported

Audit details

Source checked, not reproduced. Metrics differ by task, so no composite score across tasks is computed or implied.

Field: attributes.printed_value

Source artifact SHA-256: aaa5526f6f100093bc06c9921a8564ad08cfd5332270d614d7681051c2dd66bc

Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes.

Inspected artifact

Extraction artifact SHA-256: aaa5526f6f100093bc06c9921a8564ad08cfd5332270d614d7681051c2dd66bc

Extraction artifact

Sources and history

View linked audit checks and correction history

Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220 · Record review: source checked

1 source records and release historyDownload this release
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: tdc-result-cnn-tdc-pgp-auroc

areas
molecular-interactions
tasks
Absorption: TDC.Pgp
metric
auroc
metric direction
higher
unit
fraction
printed value
0.908 ± 0.012
numeric value
0.908
uncertainty
type: reported_plus_minus_type_unresolved; value: 0.012
source locator
Table 4, block(Absorption), row(CNN), column(TDC.Pgp)
missing metadata
denominator: unextracted; seeds: unreported
review
method: Deterministic parse of the pinned PDF text layer, with each dataset's direction cross-checked between Table 3 and the arrow in Table 4; reviewer: Codex research agent; no human review claimed; date: 2026-09-19; artifact sha256: aaa5526f6f100093bc06c9921a8564ad08cfd5332270d614d7681051c2dd66bc; retrieval url: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2102.09548v1; notes: Source checked, not reproduced. Metrics differ by task, so no composite score across tasks is computed or implied.
Related records

Suggest a correction