rewirebio.iobenchmarks
Result

92.1% top-40-accuracy

yuan2024-kgd-phenix-protocol-d-top40 top-40-accuracy

Tested configuration
PhenIX 1.16, Protocol D (Yuan et al. 2024)
Protocol
Causal-gene rank in 152 KGD trio-family exomes across parameter protocols (Yuan et al. 2024 Table 1)
Dataset
KingMed in-house trio cohort, 152 families (Yuan et al. 2024)
Procedure
rare-ranking-20261009-protocol-yuan2024-kgd-parameter-protocols
Evaluation
PhenIX Protocol D on KGD
Coverage
Not reported scored / Not reported eligible
Uncertainty
Not reported by the source
Evidence
Independent external evaluation · source checkedRefined preferences of prioritizers improve intelligent diagnosis for Mendelian diseases · Table 1 row (KGD, PhenIX, PROT D), column 'Top40 (%)'

A source-checked result verifies the numerical transcription, not every model or protocol detail. Evaluation metadata: source checked. Source checked does not mean independently reproduced.

Reproduction

Split
No split
Adaptation
Trio mode; chosen as optimal by the authors
Scoring implementation
Rank of the causal gene per case

No execution recipe has been verified for this exact configuration and evaluation. A benchmark's general instructions may use different inputs, splits or model settings.

Reproducing this published result requires matching its model configuration, data, split and scorer. Source checking or a successful smoke test does not establish score reproduction.

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

1 evidence row matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-10-10-6e93f504adfc
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance
Reported result
92.1
Individual claims
Refined preferences of prioritizers improve intelligent diagnosis for Mendelian diseases

Original source ↗

Table 1 row (KGD, PhenIX, PROT D), column 'Top40 (%)'

Version: Scientific Reports 14:2845, published 2024-02-03; PMC10838329 full-text XML
Retrieved: 2026-10-09T21:20:19Z

source checked

["source-hash-verification","deterministic-table-parse","independent-cell-check"] · 2026-10-09

independent paper

Audit details

Deterministic parse of the pinned article XML table (extract/extract_rare_ranking.py) with caption, column headers, cohort, prioritizer and protocol labels asserted; row-spanning cells resolved by position. Independent review 2026-10-09: matches Table 1 (table-wrap id 'Tab1'). The row is monotone from top 1 to top 50, and the percentage equals a whole number of cases out of the cohort size (305 DDD or 152 KGD) at the printed precision.

Field: attributes.printed_value

Source artifact SHA-256: a5dbb24eb1e29ef8fde2832da1ff49a436464210d0e54d2a1fd10ad764a24b45

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Extraction artifact SHA-256: a5dbb24eb1e29ef8fde2832da1ff49a436464210d0e54d2a1fd10ad764a24b45

Extraction artifact

Sources and history

Release 2026-10-10-6e93f504adfc · Record review: source checked

1 source records and release historyDownload this release (gzip)
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: rare-ranking-20261009-result-yuan2024-kgd-phenix-protocol-d-top40

metric
top-40-accuracy
metric direction
higher
unit
percent
printed value
92.1
numeric value
92.1
source locator
Table 1 row (KGD, PhenIX, PROT D), column 'Top40 (%)'
missing metadata
uncertainty: reason: unreported
metric qualifier
proportion of solved cases with the causal gene within the tool's top-ranked genes
review
method: source-hash-verification; deterministic-table-parse; independent-cell-check; method note: Re-downloaded the artifact and matched its SHA-256. Read the cell with a separate parser written for this review; the extractor script was not imported or run. Checked printed and numeric value, locator, metric, qualifier, unit, direction and the linked evaluation, configuration, protocol and dataset.; reviewer: claude; reviewer note: Separate Claude review agent, independent of the extractor; no human review claimed; date: 2026-10-09; artifact sha256: a5dbb24eb1e29ef8fde2832da1ff49a436464210d0e54d2a1fd10ad764a24b45; retrieval url: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC10838329/fullTextXML; note: Deterministic parse of the pinned article XML table (extract/extract_rare_ranking.py) with caption, column headers, cohort, prioritizer and protocol labels asserted; row-spanning cells resolved by position. Independent review 2026-10-09: matches Table 1 (table-wrap id 'Tab1'). The row is monotone from top 1 to top 50, and the percentage equals a whole number of cases out of the cohort size (305 DDD or 152 KGD) at the printed precision.
Related records

Suggest a correction