rewirebio.iobenchmarks
Result

True positives (the screen's 200 strongest measured gene pairs found among the 200 strongest measured-plus-predicted values, round 4 of active learning) of NAIAD with MPE acquisition on Simpson et al. 2023 combinatorial CRISPRi in K562, gene-level viability (as processed by Qin et al. 2025)

141.7 (3.7) True positives (the screen's 200 strongest measured gene pairs found among the 200 strongest measured-plus-predicted values, round 4 of active learning)

Methods

Tested configuration
NAIAD with MPE acquisition
Protocol
Retrospective active learning on a fully measured two-gene CRISPR viability screen: top-200 gene pairs found by round 4
Dataset
Simpson et al. 2023 combinatorial CRISPRi in K562, gene-level viability (as processed by Qin et al. 2025)
Procedure
Retrospective active learning on a fully measured two-gene CRISPR viability screen: top-200 gene pairs found by round 4
Evaluation
NAIAD with MPE acquisition on Simpson (Table 4, NAIAD against RECOVER by acquisition function)
Coverage
Not reported scored / Not reported eligible
Uncertainty
SE 3.7. Caption: error is SE across three cross-fold replicates
Evidence
Author-reported evaluation · source checkedQin et al. 2025, Active Learning for Efficient Discovery of Optimal Combinatorial Perturbations (ICML 2025, PMLR 267) · Table 4, row "NAIAD MPE", column "Simpson"

A source-checked result verifies the numerical transcription, not every model or protocol detail. Evaluation metadata: source checked. Source checked does not mean independently reproduced.

Reproduction

Split
No held-out split; the whole screen is both the candidate pool and the ground truth
Adaptation
NAIAD ensemble; MPE acquisition
Scoring implementation
P_i = |X_i,P ∩ Y_i,P| at P = 200 (Appendix D)

No execution recipe has been verified for this exact configuration and evaluation. A benchmark's general instructions may use different inputs, splits or model settings.

Reproducing this published result requires matching its model configuration, data, split and scorer. Source checking or a successful smoke test does not establish score reproduction.

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

1 evidence row matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-10-23-5347695500ed
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance
Reported result
141.7 (3.7)
Individual claims
Qin et al. 2025, Active Learning for Efficient Discovery of Optimal Combinatorial Perturbations (ICML 2025, PMLR 267)

Original source ↗

Table 4, row "NAIAD MPE", column "Simpson"

Version: Proceedings of the 42nd ICML, PMLR 267:50363-50383, 2025; proceedings PDF qin25g.pdf. The arXiv preprint 2411.12010 was not read.
Retrieved: 2026-10-22T13:57:27Z

source checked

["source-hash-verification","pdf-text-parse","independent-cell-check","rendered-source-visual-check","scope-review"] · 2026-10-22

author reported

Audit details

Value, standard error, metric, qualifier, unit, direction and the linked configuration, dataset and protocol checked.

Field: attributes.printed_value

Source artifact SHA-256: 983b2da8aed78f0aced27053301c15f0f67ebd0fac706435bb6800e309dd64eb

Hash scope: pdftotext -layout text layer, parsed by extract/qin2025naiad.py

Inspected artifact

Extraction artifact SHA-256: 983b2da8aed78f0aced27053301c15f0f67ebd0fac706435bb6800e309dd64eb

Extraction artifact

Sources and history

Release 2026-10-23-5347695500ed · Record review: source checked

1 source record and release historyDownload this release (gzip)
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: pheno-20261022-qin2025-result-table4-naiad-mpe-simpson2023-top200-round4

metric
true-positive-count
metric qualifier
the screen's 200 strongest measured gene pairs found among the 200 strongest measured-plus-predicted values, round 4 of active learning
metric direction
higher
unit
count
unit detail
gene pairs, out of the 200 strongest measured pairs
printed value
141.7 (3.7)
numeric value
141.7
source locator
Table 4, row "NAIAD MPE", column "Simpson"
review
method: source-hash-verification; pdf-text-parse; independent-cell-check; rendered-source-visual-check; scope-review; reviewer: claude; reviewer note: Claude (Opus 5.5) review agent, independent of the extraction agent; no human review claimed; date: 2026-10-22; artifact sha256: 983b2da8aed78f0aced27053301c15f0f67ebd0fac706435bb6800e309dd64eb; retrieval url: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mlresearch/v267/main/assets/qin25g/qin25g.pdf; method note: Re-hashed the PDF in the scratchpad (SHA-256 matches the source record). Ran scripts/omics/batch.py check-values on the pdftotext -layout layer (200 in_row, 12 row_not_found). Then parsed Tables 1 to 8 with a separate reviewer script (review/qin2025naiad-check.py) that asserts row labels and cells per row, and matched each result to its cell through the evaluation's system and data links and the metric qualifier, not through its locator: 212 of 212 printed values, numeric values and standard errors match, and every locator names the same cell. Tables 1 to 8 were also compared by eye with the rendered PDF pages 6 to 8, 18 and 20, including column order.; note: Value, standard error, metric, qualifier, unit, direction and the linked configuration, dataset and protocol checked.
uncertainty
type: standard_error; value: 3.7; printed: (3.7); n: 3; scope: three cross-fold replicates; note: Caption: error is SE across three cross-fold replicates
Related records

Suggest a correction