rewirebio.iobenchmarks
Result

Designability (Table 3 'Designability' column, printed as a group mean without data preprocessing; the Metrics section counts a backbone as designable when the mean sc-TM of its top 3 ProteinMPNN sequences refolded with ESMFold exceeds 0.5 (equation 1); the table does not state whether the value is the share of designable backbones or a mean sc-TM; not comparable with the 2 Angstrom sc-RMSD criterion in the concept definition; length 500) of FrameDiff (Scaffold-Lab unconditional generation) on Scaffold-Lab generated backbones (100 per length group)

0.448 Designability (Table 3 'Designability' column, printed as a group mean without data preprocessing; the Metrics section counts a backbone as designable when the mean sc-TM of its top 3 ProteinMPNN sequences refolded with ESMFold exceeds 0.5 (equation 1); the table does not state whether the value is the share of designable backbones or a mean sc-TM; not comparable with the 2 Angstrom sc-RMSD criterion in the concept definition; length 500)

Methods

Tested configuration
FrameDiff (Scaffold-Lab unconditional generation)
Protocol
Scaffold-Lab unconditional generation: Designability(↑)
Dataset
Scaffold-Lab generated backbones (100 per length group)
Procedure
Scaffold-Lab unconditional generation: Designability(↑)
Evaluation
FrameDiff Designability(↑) on Scaffold-Lab unconditional generation, length 500
Coverage
Not reported scored / Not reported eligible
Uncertainty
Not reported by the source
Evidence
Independent external evaluation · source checkedScaffold-Lab: Critical evaluation and ranking of protein backbone generation methods in a unified framework · Table 3, row 'Medium' / 'FrameDiff' / length 500, column 'Designability(↑)'

A source-checked result verifies the numerical transcription, not every model or protocol detail. Evaluation metadata: source checked. Source checked does not mean independently reproduced.

Reproduction

Split
Medium group, length 500
Adaptation
None; methods run with their released weights inside the Scaffold-Lab pipeline
Scoring implementation
Table 3 'Designability' column, printed as a group mean without data preprocessing; the Metrics section counts a backbone as designable when the mean sc-TM of its top 3 ProteinMPNN sequences refolded with ESMFold exceeds 0.5 (equation 1); the table does not state whether the value is the share of designable backbones or a mean sc-TM; not comparable with the 2 Angstrom sc-RMSD criterion in the concept definition

No execution recipe has been verified for this exact configuration and evaluation. A benchmark's general instructions may use different inputs, splits or model settings.

Reproducing this published result requires matching its model configuration, data, split and scorer. Source checking or a successful smoke test does not establish score reproduction.

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

1 evidence row matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-10-23-5347695500ed
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance
Reported result
0.448
Individual claims
Scaffold-Lab: Critical evaluation and ranking of protein backbone generation methods in a unified framework

Original source ↗

Table 3, row 'Medium' / 'FrameDiff' / length 500, column 'Designability(↑)'

Version: Version of record, PLoS Computational Biology 2026 (PMC13225634 JATS full text)
Retrieved: 2026-10-11T21:30:00Z

source checked

["source-hash-verification","deterministic-table-parse","independent-cell-check"] · 2026-10-11

independent paper

Source has a recorded evidence concern. Consult its source page before using the claim.

Audit details

Extraction: Parsed the pinned Europe PMC JATS XML with extract_scaffoldlab.py (table-wrap grid with rowspan and colspan expanded, type and method columns forward-filled); row and column labels asserted. Table 3, row 'Medium' / 'FrameDiff' / length 500, column 'Designability(↑)' Independent review 2026-10-11: value, locator, metric, unit, direction and linked configuration and protocol checked; corrections from the review applied by the extractor as listed in review.md.

Field: attributes.printed_value

Source artifact SHA-256: 9ff68ef80dc57d6ef85920d4d2104e86d071215ac9c74367a72b2a85669840d0

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Extraction artifact SHA-256: 9ff68ef80dc57d6ef85920d4d2104e86d071215ac9c74367a72b2a85669840d0

Extraction artifact

Sources and history

Release 2026-10-23-5347695500ed · Record review: source checked

1 source record and release historyDownload this release (gzip)
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: lit-structure-20261011-scaffoldlab-result-designability-framediff-medium-500

metric
designability
metric direction
higher
unit
fraction
printed value
0.448
source locator
Table 3, row 'Medium' / 'FrameDiff' / length 500, column 'Designability(↑)'
review
method: source-hash-verification; deterministic-table-parse; independent-cell-check; method note: Reviewer re-retrieved the Europe PMC JATS XML and matched its SHA-256; an independent table-grid parse matched all 140 per-length cells and all 20 mean Ci and rank records (mean Ci recomputed for all 10 groups); a hand sample of 45 values against the rendered PMC HTML matched.; reviewer: claude; reviewer note: Claude review agent reviewer-ps-2, independent of the extractor lit-protein-structure; no human review claimed; date: 2026-10-11; artifact sha256: 9ff68ef80dc57d6ef85920d4d2104e86d071215ac9c74367a72b2a85669840d0; retrieval url: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC13225634/fullTextXML; note: Extraction: Parsed the pinned Europe PMC JATS XML with extract_scaffoldlab.py (table-wrap grid with rowspan and colspan expanded, type and method columns forward-filled); row and column labels asserted. Table 3, row 'Medium' / 'FrameDiff' / length 500, column 'Designability(↑)' Independent review 2026-10-11: value, locator, metric, unit, direction and linked configuration and protocol checked; corrections from the review applied by the extractor as listed in review.md.
numeric value
0.448
metric qualifier
Table 3 'Designability' column, printed as a group mean without data preprocessing; the Metrics section counts a backbone as designable when the mean sc-TM of its top 3 ProteinMPNN sequences refolded with ESMFold exceeds 0.5 (equation 1); the table does not state whether the value is the share of designable backbones or a mean sc-TM; not comparable with the 2 Angstrom sc-RMSD criterion in the concept definition; length 500
missing metadata
uncertainty: reason: unreported
printed value basis
Value as printed in Table 3
scope note
Length group Medium; length 500
Related records

Suggest a correction