Result

Casf screening success rate (top-fraction cutoff not stated; printed beside EF 1%) of Vina on CASF-2016 blind docked poses

42.1% Casf screening success rate (top-fraction cutoff not stated; printed beside EF 1%)

Methods

Tested configuration: Vina
Task: Protein–ligand virtual screening
Dataset: CASF-2016 blind docked poses
Procedure: Vina scoring on the same DiffDock-NMDN blind docked poses; not ligand-pose RMSD.
Evaluation: Vina: Protein–ligand virtual screening
Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible
Uncertainty: Not yet extracted
Evidence: Independent external evaluation · source checkedNormalized Protein–Ligand Distance Likelihood Score for End-to-End Blind Docking and Virtual Screening · Table 2, Vina scoring row, success rate (%) column

A source-checked result verifies the numerical transcription, not every model or protocol detail. Evaluation metadata: needs review. Source checked does not mean independently reproduced.

Reproduction

Split: Not reported
Adaptation: Not reported
Scoring implementation: Not reported

No execution recipe has been verified for this exact configuration and evaluation. A benchmark's general instructions may use different inputs, splits or model settings.

Reproducing this published result requires matching its model configuration, data, split and scorer. Source checking or a successful smoke test does not establish score reproduction.

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

1 evidence row matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-11-02-a7f03c9e55a5
Property and statement	Original source and location	Review and provenance
Printed value 42.1 Individual claims	Normalized Protein–Ligand Distance Likelihood Score for End-to-End Blind Docking and Virtual Screening Original source ↗ Table 2, Vina scoring row, success rate (%) column Version: version of record Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:41:16.552697+00:00	source checked ["ai-assisted-source-review"] · 2026-09-16T10:41:16.554518+00:00 independent paper Audit details All scoring functions share DiffDock-NMDN poses via rowspan. Selected forward-screening success percentage, not docking pose success or scoring-power correlation. This verifies the central score at its source location, not every metadata field or an experimental reproduction. Field: `attributes.printed_value` Claim: claim-lit-044 Source artifact SHA-256: `194b21478aaedd9a7384cabb8b0040ca5b6a4938f4d275627b86a6b787affc20` Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record Inspected artifact Extraction artifact SHA-256: `194b21478aaedd9a7384cabb8b0040ca5b6a4938f4d275627b86a6b787affc20` Extraction artifact

How to read the evidence

Sources and history

Release 2026-11-02-a7f03c9e55a5 · Record review: source checked

1 source record and release history

Normalized Protein–Ligand Distance Likelihood Score for End-to-End Blind Docking and Virtual Screening · Original source · version of record

Download this release (gzip)

Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: lit-044

areas: molecular-interactions
tasks: Protein–ligand virtual screening
printed value: 42.1
numeric value: 42.1
metric: casf-screening-success-rate
metric direction: unknown
unit: percent
source locator: Table 2, Vina scoring row, success rate (%) column
review: method: ai-assisted-source-review; reviewer: codex; reviewed at: 2026-09-16T10:41:16.554518+00:00; evidence: {"table_xml_id": "tbl2", "row_cells": ["Vina38", "15.18", "42.1", "0.340", "0.323"], "selected_cell_zero_based": 2, "selected_cell_xml": "<td style=\"border:none;\" align=\"center\" colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">42.1</td>", "caption": "Performance of Representative Scoring Functions on the CASF-2016 Using the DiffDock-NMDN Blind Docked Posesa"}; artifact sha256: 194b21478aaedd9a7384cabb8b0040ca5b6a4938f4d275627b86a6b787affc20; retrieval url: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11815853/fullTextXML; method note: independent; table-level review; reviewer note: role: omics research agent; independent source-table review; not human review; note: All scoring functions share DiffDock-NMDN poses via rowspan. Selected forward-screening success percentage, not docking pose success or scoring-power correlation. This verifies the central score at its source location, not every metadata field or an experimental reproduction.
legacy id: lit-044
missing metadata: dataset version: reason: unextracted; model version: reason: unextracted; split: reason: unextracted; uncertainty: reason: unextracted
metric qualifier: top-fraction cutoff not stated; printed beside EF 1%

Related records

evaluation: Vina: Protein–ligand virtual screening
subject: Reported Forward-screening success rate for Vina

Suggest a correction