rewirebio.iobenchmarks
Result

Cache challenge activity score (Activity score of the workflow's best confirmed Round 1 hit) of CACHE #3 workflow WF1690 on CACHE #3 Round 1 compound library

23 Cache challenge activity score (Activity score of the workflow's best confirmed Round 1 hit)

Methods

Tested configuration
CACHE #3 workflow WF1690
Protocol
CACHE #3 Round 1 own-selection outcome per workflow (Herasymenko et al. 2026 Table S8)
Dataset
CACHE #3 Round 1 compound library
Procedure
CACHE #3 Round 1 own-selection outcome per workflow (Herasymenko et al. 2026 Table S8)
Evaluation
CACHE #3 workflow WF1690: own selection outcome
Coverage
Not reported scored / Not reported eligible
Uncertainty
Not reported by the source: The source prints no interval or spread for this value
Evidence
Author-reported evaluation · source checkedHerasymenko et al. 2026, CACHE Challenge #3, Supporting Information workbook ci5c02441_si_002.xlsx · Sheet 'S8', row with Workflow = 1690, column G ('Score of best hit')

A source-checked result verifies the numerical transcription, not every model or protocol detail. Evaluation metadata: source checked. Source checked does not mean independently reproduced.

Reproduction

Split
Whole Round 1 library; no training or test split applies
Adaptation
Each team's own workflow, submitted before any experimental result was known
Scoring implementation
Counts of tested compounds and confirmed hits, and the challenge's activity, novelty and normalised scores

No execution recipe has been verified for this exact configuration and evaluation. A benchmark's general instructions may use different inputs, splits or model settings.

Reproducing this published result requires matching its model configuration, data, split and scorer. Source checking or a successful smoke test does not establish score reproduction.

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

1 evidence row matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance
Reported result
23
Individual claims
Herasymenko et al. 2026, CACHE Challenge #3, Supporting Information workbook ci5c02441_si_002.xlsx

Original source ↗

Sheet 'S8', row with Workflow = 1690, column G ('Score of best hit')

Version: ci5c02441_si_002.xlsx, member of the Europe PMC supplementary archive of PMC12892310
Retrieved: 2026-10-22T11:55:00Z

source checked

["independent-cell-check","deterministic-table-parse"] · 2026-10-22

author reported

Audit details

Checked against the pinned source by an automated independent re-parse. Transcription checked; not reproduced and not reviewed by a human scientist.

Field: attributes.printed_value

Source artifact SHA-256: 5e655da5728da46c6a57882c5fef0643c057536d7897d16b9c98f6d55c12f5fe

Hash scope: artifact_sha256 is the SHA-256 of the member file ci5c02441_si_002.xlsx. The Europe PMC supplementaryFiles endpoint assembles a zip per request, so the archive's own hash is not stable; the member file's bytes are. The publisher's direct supplement URL (https://pubs.acs.org/doi/suppl/10.1021/acs.jcim.5c02441/suppl_file/ci5c02441_si_002.xlsx) returned HTTP 403 on 2026-10-22.

Archive member: ci5c02441_si_002.xlsx

Extraction artifact SHA-256: 5e655da5728da46c6a57882c5fef0643c057536d7897d16b9c98f6d55c12f5fe

Extraction artifact

Sources and history

Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6 · Record review: source checked

1 source record and release historyDownload this release (gzip)
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: hitdisc-20261022-result-cache3-own-selection-wf1690-g

metric
cache-challenge-activity-score
metric direction
higher
unit
unitless
metric qualifier
Activity score of the workflow's best confirmed Round 1 hit
printed value
23
numeric value
23
source locator
Sheet 'S8', row with Workflow = 1690, column G ('Score of best hit')
missing metadata
uncertainty: reason: unreported; note: The source prints no interval or spread for this value
review
method: independent-cell-check; deterministic-table-parse; reviewer: claude; reviewer note: Claude review agent, independent of the extraction agent; no human review claimed; date: 2026-10-22; method note: Re-downloaded the Europe PMC supplementary archive, matched the SHA-256 of the member file ci5c02441_si_002.xlsx, and re-parsed sheet S8 from xl/worksheets/sheet9.xml and xl/sharedStrings.xml with a parser written for this review (myparse_xlsx.py), independent of the extractor's. Compared every cell's round-tripped decimal, stored string and column header, and read the stored cell formulas.; note: Checked against the pinned source by an automated independent re-parse. Transcription checked; not reproduced and not reviewed by a human scientist.; artifact sha256: 5e655da5728da46c6a57882c5fef0643c057536d7897d16b9c98f6d55c12f5fe; retrieval url: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12892310/supplementaryFiles; receipt: data/omics/use-case-coverage-hitdisc-20261022/review.json
source table
Table S8
raw xml value
23
printed value basis
The workbook stores this cell as a double. printed_value is the shortest decimal that round-trips to that double, which is what a spreadsheet shows; raw_xml_value keeps the stored string.
workbook number format
Not applied: the cell's number format was not read, so printed_value is the round-tripped decimal rather than the displayed string.
Related records

Suggest a correction