rewirebio.iobenchmarks
Result

AUROC (binary labels from absolute relative toxicity > 0.125; zero-shot) of ESM-1b, precomputed log-likelihood ratios (GPN-MSA paper) on ProteinGym v0.1 DMS TADBP_HUMAN Bolognesi 2019, binarised (GPN-MSA paper)

0.75 AUROC (binary labels from absolute relative toxicity > 0.125; zero-shot)

Methods

Tested configuration
ESM-1b, precomputed log-likelihood ratios (GPN-MSA paper)
Protocol
ProteinGym DMS TADBP binary classification, AUROC (GPN-MSA paper)
Dataset
ProteinGym v0.1 DMS TADBP_HUMAN Bolognesi 2019, binarised (GPN-MSA paper)
Procedure
ProteinGym DMS TADBP binary classification, AUROC (GPN-MSA paper)
Evaluation
ESM-1b on ProteinGym DMS TADBP binary classification (GPN-MSA paper)
Coverage
Not reported scored / Not reported eligible
Uncertainty
Not reported by the source
Evidence
Independent external evaluation · source checkedGPN-MSA: an alignment-based DNA language model for genome-wide variant effect prediction (bioRxiv v2) · Results paragraph beginning 'We also evaluate on deep mutational scanning', sentence 'Nevertheless, GPN-MSA performs better than ESM-1b on some proteins (e.g., TADBP, for which GPN-MSA AUROC is 0.83, while ESM-1b AUROC is 0.75)' (PDF page 6)

A source-checked result verifies the numerical transcription, not every model or protocol detail. Evaluation metadata: source checked. Source checked does not mean independently reproduced.

Reproduction

Split
Whole assay
Adaptation
zero-shot
Scoring implementation
Not reported

No execution recipe has been verified for this exact configuration and evaluation. A benchmark's general instructions may use different inputs, splits or model settings.

Reproducing this published result requires matching its model configuration, data, split and scorer. Source checking or a successful smoke test does not establish score reproduction.

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

1 evidence row matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance
Reported result
0.75
Individual claims
GPN-MSA: an alignment-based DNA language model for genome-wide variant effect prediction (bioRxiv v2)

Original source ↗

Results paragraph beginning 'We also evaluate on deep mutational scanning', sentence 'Nevertheless, GPN-MSA performs better than ESM-1b on some proteins (e.g., TADBP, for which GPN-MSA AUROC is 0.83, while ESM-1b AUROC is 0.75)' (PDF page 6)

Version: bioRxiv v2, posted 2024-04-06
Retrieved: 2026-10-14T12:02:16Z

source checked

["source-hash-verification","pdf-text-parse","independent-cell-check"] · 2026-10-14

independent paper

Audit details

Extraction: Transcribed from the PDF text layer; extract/build_gpnmsa.py asserts the sentence verbatim and its page. Independent review 2026-10-14: matched.

Field: attributes.printed_value

Source artifact SHA-256: 10411077df1ae59614f9a9a9f85384103d54127ba67a9b3c469a4a2d6c33cee4

Hash scope: SHA-256 of the PDF bytes as downloaded 2026-10-14T12:02:16Z. bioRxiv rewrites the XMP dates and document IDs, the Info ModDate and the trailer /ID on download, so a re-download does not reproduce the hash; the review found a fresh copy of the same length differing only in those 51 bytes, with an identical pdftotext -layout text layer.

Inspected artifact

Extraction artifact SHA-256: 10411077df1ae59614f9a9a9f85384103d54127ba67a9b3c469a4a2d6c33cee4

Extraction artifact

Sources and history

Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6 · Record review: source checked

1 source record and release historyDownload this release (gzip)
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: gfm-guides-20261014-gpnmsa-result-dms-tadbp-esm-1b-auroc

printed value
0.75
numeric value
0.75
metric
auroc
metric direction
higher
unit
unitless
metric qualifier
binary labels from absolute relative toxicity > 0.125; zero-shot
source locator
Results paragraph beginning 'We also evaluate on deep mutational scanning', sentence 'Nevertheless, GPN-MSA performs better than ESM-1b on some proteins (e.g., TADBP, for which GPN-MSA AUROC is 0.83, while ESM-1b AUROC is 0.75)' (PDF page 6)
missing metadata
uncertainty: reason: unreported
review
method: source-hash-verification; pdf-text-parse; independent-cell-check; method note: Sentence re-read verbatim in the pdftotext layer of the pinned PDF; DMS TADBP binarisation checked in the Methods.; reviewer: claude; reviewer note: Claude (Opus 5.5) research agent, independent of the extractor; no human review claimed; date: 2026-10-14; artifact sha256: 10411077df1ae59614f9a9a9f85384103d54127ba67a9b3c469a4a2d6c33cee4; retrieval url: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.10.10.561776v2.full.pdf; note: Extraction: Transcribed from the PDF text layer; extract/build_gpnmsa.py asserts the sentence verbatim and its page. Independent review 2026-10-14: matched.
Related records

Suggest a correction