rewirebio.iobenchmarks
Result

AUROC (task: pathogenic vs common snp; outer test group 3 only (chromosomes 1, 4, 7, 8, 10, 13, 15), not averaged) of Caduceus-Ph, long sequence (pathogenic/common SNP classification) on Feng pathogenic/common SNP long-window dataset

0.625 AUROC (task: pathogenic vs common snp; outer test group 3 only (chromosomes 1, 4, 7, 8, 10, 13, 15), not averaged)

Methods

Tested configuration
Caduceus-Ph, long sequence (pathogenic/common SNP classification)
Protocol
Feng pathogenic-versus-common SNP classification
Dataset
Feng pathogenic/common SNP long-window dataset
Procedure
Table 5 set-up, AUC reported separately for each outer chromosome test group (Supplementary Data 4); frozen embeddings + random forest classifier
Evaluation
Caduceus-Ph, long sequence Pathogenic variants vs common per-test-group evaluation
Coverage
Not reported scored / Not reported eligible
Uncertainty
Not reported by the source: Supplementary Data 4 prints one AUC per test group, with no interval.
Evidence
Independent external evaluation · source checkedBenchmarking DNA foundation models for genomic and genetic tasks: Supplementary Data 1-6 · Supplementary Data 4 (workbook sheet 'Data 4'), block 'Pathogenic variants vs common', row 'Caduceus-Ph, long sequence', column 'Test Group 3 AUC' (cell D4). Test group 3 is chromosomes 1, 4, 7, 8, 10, 13, 15 (Methods, 'Variant effect quantification benchmark').

A source-checked result verifies the numerical transcription, not every model or protocol detail. Evaluation metadata: source checked. Source checked does not mean independently reproduced.

Reproduction

Split
Three disjoint outer chromosome test groups (3/6/9/12/16/18/19/21; 2/5/11/14/17/20/22/X; 1/4/7/8/10/13/15), each held out in turn with fourfold inner-chromosome cross-validation for hyperparameter tuning.
Adaptation
Frozen pretrained representation plus a supervised random-forest classifier head fitted for this task
Scoring implementation
Not reported

No execution recipe has been verified for this exact configuration and evaluation. A benchmark's general instructions may use different inputs, splits or model settings.

Reproducing this published result requires matching its model configuration, data, split and scorer. Source checking or a successful smoke test does not establish score reproduction.

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

1 evidence row matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-11-02-a7f03c9e55a5
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance
Reported result
0.6254
Individual claims
Benchmarking DNA foundation models for genomic and genetic tasks: Supplementary Data 1-6

Original source ↗

Supplementary Data 4 (workbook sheet 'Data 4'), block 'Pathogenic variants vs common', row 'Caduceus-Ph, long sequence', column 'Test Group 3 AUC' (cell D4). Test group 3 is chromosomes 1, 4, 7, 8, 10, 13, 15 (Methods, 'Variant effect quantification benchmark').

Version: Nature Communications 16, 10780 (2025); Supplementary Data 1-6 workbook (MOESM3, .xlsm)
Retrieved: 2026-10-13T14:08:10Z

source checked

["source-hash-verification","deterministic-table-parse","independent-cell-check"] · 2026-10-14T15:00:00Z

independent paper

Audit details

Extracted by extract/extract_feng.py (deterministic parse). Independent review: value, metric and identity match the source. The workbook stores the cell as a binary double in General number format; printed_value is the value as displayed. This per-group AUC is one of the three test-set values whose mean is the Table 5 cell already stored as amp-feng-20261007-result-variant-caduceus-ph-long-sequence-auc on evaluation amp-feng-20261007-eval-variant-caduceus-ph-long-sequence. It sits on its own evaluation because its aggregation differs.

Field: attributes.printed_value

Source artifact SHA-256: 4804c801e0e054eca5f776617c18a6a0cb31d6ce3d2a7a52f70e4dda5b3abd7a

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Extraction artifact SHA-256: 4804c801e0e054eca5f776617c18a6a0cb31d6ce3d2a7a52f70e4dda5b3abd7a

Extraction artifact

Sources and history

Release 2026-11-02-a7f03c9e55a5 · Record review: source checked

2 source records and release historyDownload this release (gzip)
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: feng-dna-fm-20261014-result-sd4-pathogenic-common-caduceus-ph-long-sequence-group-3-auc

metric
auroc
metric direction
higher
unit
unitless
printed value
0.6254
numeric value
0.6254
metric qualifier
task: pathogenic vs common snp; outer test group 3 only (chromosomes 1, 4, 7, 8, 10, 13, 15), not averaged
source locator
Supplementary Data 4 (workbook sheet 'Data 4'), block 'Pathogenic variants vs common', row 'Caduceus-Ph, long sequence', column 'Test Group 3 AUC' (cell D4). Test group 3 is chromosomes 1, 4, 7, 8, 10, 13, 15 (Methods, 'Variant effect quantification benchmark').
missing metadata
uncertainty: reason: unreported; note: Supplementary Data 4 prints one AUC per test group, with no interval.
review
method: source-hash-verification; deterministic-table-parse; independent-cell-check; method note: Re-downloaded the Supplementary Data workbook and matched the pinned SHA-256. Read sheet 'Data 4' with a separate parser (review/signoff.py) and checked the cell, printed and numeric value, qualifier, and that the result's evaluation has the same configuration, protocol and dataset as the stored Table 5/6 evaluation, whose printed mean is within rounding of the mean of the three groups.; reviewer: claude; reviewer note: Independent Claude (Opus 5.5) review agent for PR #157, separate from the extraction agent for issue #142 that built this batch. Automated review only; no human review claimed. Transcription, not reproduction.; reviewed at: 2026-10-14T15:00:00Z; artifact sha256: 4804c801e0e054eca5f776617c18a6a0cb31d6ce3d2a7a52f70e4dda5b3abd7a; retrieval url: https://static-content.springer.com/esm/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41467-025-65823-8/MediaObjects/41467_2025_65823_MOESM3_ESM.xlsm; note: Extracted by extract/extract_feng.py (deterministic parse). Independent review: value, metric and identity match the source. The workbook stores the cell as a binary double in General number format; printed_value is the value as displayed. This per-group AUC is one of the three test-set values whose mean is the Table 5 cell already stored as amp-feng-20261007-result-variant-caduceus-ph-long-sequence-auc on evaluation amp-feng-20261007-eval-variant-caduceus-ph-long-sequence. It sits on its own evaluation because its aggregation differs.
Related records

Suggest a correction