Feng TAD recognition from NT-v2 attention
TAD recognition analysis of NT-v2 self-attention; Feng et al. 2025. Qualitative; no score is printed.
No reviewed evaluations are linked here in this release. See the sources below.
Overview
An explanatory profile has not yet been reviewed for this record.
Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.
Published results still to collect
This release has no source-checked evaluations linked to this page. It does not mean that the benchmark has no published results.
Charts will appear when compatible result tables have been checked against their sources.
Methods and evaluation design
Procedure, tasks and evaluated configurations
Additional methodological details, tasks and evaluated configurations have not yet been extracted into a structured profile for this protocol. Consult the linked sources and evaluation records below.
Baseline coverage
Reference methods help show what a model adds beyond simple controls. We track a null control and a conventional method for each protocol.
0 of 2 active baseline roles have published Rewire measurements in this release. Measurements on a selected protocol do not establish coverage of an entire suite.
No execution recipe linked to this protocol. Recipe availability does not establish a completed evaluation.
No reviewed evaluations with results linked in this release.
Literature evidence is not a Rewire measurement. Executed but unpublished runs and private review status are not included.
Null control
Proposed control: requires review
Select a task-valid null control after reviewing inputs and metric
Protocol-specific applicability, permitted inputs, access, split, evaluator and execution requirements need review before implementation or execution.
This is a suggested selection rule, not a validated method or a measured score.
Conventional reference
Proposed control: requires review
Select an upstream conventional reference after reviewing the full protocol
Protocol-specific applicability, permitted inputs, access, split, evaluator and execution requirements need review before implementation or execution.
This is a suggested selection rule, not a validated method or a measured score.
Protocol coverage CSV (gzip) · Model evaluation matrix (gzip) · Source table (gzip) · Release and checksums (gzip)
Coverage is derived from release 2026-11-02-a7f03c9e55a5. Source citations describe the original records; they do not validate an unreviewed baseline proposal. No results have been generated by this audit.
Run instructions
No runnable recipe has been reviewed for this protocol. Dataset access, model requirements, licences and compute requirements must be checked against its sources before execution.
Evidence
Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.
Evidence table
Inspect claims, sources and review details
Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.
One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.
0 evidence rows matching the loaded filters
| Property and statement | Original source and location | Review and provenance |
|---|
No evidence rows match these filters. Choose another scope or clear the search.
Sources and history
Release 2026-11-02-a7f03c9e55a5 · Record review: source checked
1 source record and release history
Download this release (gzip)Technical metadata and extraction receipts
Stable ID: feng-dna-fm-20261013-protocol-tad-attention-nt-v2
- areas
- dna-genomes
- contexts
- research
- scope note
- Attention matrices from all NT-v2 layers and heads are averaged over the 1,500 TAD-centred and the 1,500 background sequences and the two averages are compared over the central 400 tokens. No classifier is trained and no metric is reported, so the protocol has no evaluations. Only NT-v2 was analysed: the other models lack accessible attention or support too short an input.
- task
- Inspect whether frozen self-attention recognises TAD boundaries without fine-tuning
- version
- Results 'TAD region recognition'; Methods 'TAD region recognition benchmark'
- missing metadata
- metric: reason: inapplicable; note: Qualitative heatmap comparison; no metric is defined.