rewire.itbenchmarks
Protocol

Coronary smooth-muscle caQTL effect-size prediction (AlphaGenome paper)

Can local sequence changes predict the direction and magnitude of measured molecular-trait effects?

Sources (3)AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary comparison tables; AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary methods; alphagenome: Journal full-text XML · 'Suppl Table 4 Variant performan'!A33:P33; 'Suppl Table 4 Variant performan'!A34:P34; Supplementary Methods p.30, Chromosome Splits for Variant Benchmarks; Supplementary Methods pp.36–37, Chromatin accessibility variants & bQTLs; methods: pp.36–37, Chromatin accessibility variants & bQTLs; paper: Sec10; Fig.5a–c; Supplementary Fig.9; methods: p.30, Chromosome Splits for Variant Benchmarks; paper: Fig.1e; tables: Suppl Table 4 Variant performan; evaluation index 24; sheet rows 33, 34

3 evaluations · 3 results

Overview

Key specifications have not been extracted for this record. See the linked evaluation and sources for the reported setup.

Evaluation procedure diagram
How it worksCoronary smooth-muscle caQTL effect-size prediction: evaluation procedure
Coronary smooth-muscle caQTL effect-size prediction: evaluation procedure1. Select ancestry/cell-specific QTL test set. Then: 2. Match the reported assay tracks. Then: 3. Score local REF/ALT signal change. Then: 4. Correlate with measured effectsCoronary smooth-muscle caQTL effect-size prediction: evaluation procedure1. Select ancestry/cell-specific QTL test set. Then: 2. Match the reported assay tracks. Then: 3. Score local REF/ALT signal change. Then: 4. Correlate with measured effectsCoronary smooth-muscle caQTL effect-size prediction: evaluation procedure1. Select ancestry/cell-specific QTL test set. Then: 2. Match the reported assay tracks. Then: 3. Score local REF/ALT signal change. Then: 4. Correlate with measured effects

Conceptual summary of the cited procedure; model-specific conditions are given below.

Sources (3)AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary comparison tables; AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary methods; alphagenome: Journal full-text XML · 'Suppl Table 4 Variant performan'!A33:P33; 'Suppl Table 4 Variant performan'!A34:P34; Supplementary Methods p.30, Chromosome Splits for Variant Benchmarks; Supplementary Methods pp.36–37, Chromatin accessibility variants & bQTLs; methods: pp.36–37, Chromatin accessibility variants & bQTLs; paper: Sec10; Fig.5a–c; Supplementary Fig.9; methods: p.30, Chromosome Splits for Variant Benchmarks; paper: Fig.1e; tables: Suppl Table 4 Variant performan; evaluation index 24; sheet rows 33, 34

limited source coverage · Automated source review, 2026-09-17. All specifications and missing details

Results

Each comparison retains its reviewed evaluation scope, dataset and metric. Results are shown without a pooled ranking.

Coronary smooth-muscle caQTL effect-size prediction (AlphaGenome paper)

pearsonr (correlation) · Higher values are better.

Coronary smooth-muscle caQTL effect-size prediction (AlphaGenome paper) · Coronary smooth-muscle caQTL effect-size prediction: evaluated data subset

Evidence origin: Author-reported evaluation.

AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary comparison tables · 'Suppl Table 4 Variant performan'!L34; 'Suppl Table 4 Variant performan'!M33; 'Suppl Table 4 Variant performan'!M34; 'Suppl Table 4 Variant performan'!L33
  • Model inputs, training and inference budgets differ or remain partly unextracted. This figure does not establish a controlled architectural advantage.
  • Superseded and quarantined score conflicts are excluded; comparator-specific subsets remain separate.
Comparison details and limitations

Can local sequence changes predict the direction and magnitude of measured molecular-trait effects?

  • This is the AlphaGenome paper’s comparison. Source-checked scores are not independent reproductions.

Automated source review: 2026-09-17. Numerical source review does not establish independent reproduction.

Dots show point estimates. Whiskers show only explicitly defined uncertainty (standard deviation, standard error or a labelled interval); their definitions remain in Table. Unresolved uncertainty is not plotted. Differences do not establish statistical significance.

Showing 3 of 3 matching rows.

Methods and evaluation design

Procedure, tasks and evaluated configurations

How it works

What is tested

Can local sequence changes predict the direction and magnitude of measured molecular-trait effects?

Sources (3)AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary comparison tables; AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary methods; alphagenome: Journal full-text XML · 'Suppl Table 4 Variant performan'!A33:P33; 'Suppl Table 4 Variant performan'!A34:P34; Supplementary Methods p.30, Chromosome Splits for Variant Benchmarks; Supplementary Methods pp.36–37, Chromatin accessibility variants & bQTLs; methods: pp.36–37, Chromatin accessibility variants & bQTLs; paper: Sec10; Fig.5a–c; Supplementary Fig.9; methods: p.30, Chromosome Splits for Variant Benchmarks; paper: Fig.1e; tables: Suppl Table 4 Variant performan; evaluation index 24; sheet rows 33, 34
Procedure

Use the source’s local log-fold-change scorer, select the task-specific cell/assay tracks and compare against the source-provided QTL labels or measured effects.

Sources (3)AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary comparison tables; AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary methods; alphagenome: Journal full-text XML · 'Suppl Table 4 Variant performan'!A33:P33; 'Suppl Table 4 Variant performan'!A34:P34; Supplementary Methods p.30, Chromosome Splits for Variant Benchmarks; Supplementary Methods pp.36–37, Chromatin accessibility variants & bQTLs; methods: pp.36–37, Chromatin accessibility variants & bQTLs; paper: Sec10; Fig.5a–c; Supplementary Fig.9; methods: p.30, Chromosome Splits for Variant Benchmarks; paper: Fig.1e; tables: Suppl Table 4 Variant performan; evaluation index 24; sheet rows 33, 34

Recorded evaluations

Each evaluation records what was tested and under which conditions.

Baseline coverage

Reference methods help show what a model adds beyond simple controls. We track a null control and a conventional method for each protocol.

0 of 2 active baseline roles have published Rewire measurements in this release. Measurements on a selected protocol do not establish coverage of an entire suite.

No execution recipe linked to this protocol. Recipe availability does not establish a completed evaluation.

No reviewed evaluations with results linked in this release.

Literature evidence is not a Rewire measurement. Executed but unpublished runs and private review status are not included.

Null control

Proposed control: requires review

Select a task-valid null control after reviewing inputs and metric

Protocol-specific applicability, permitted inputs, access, split, evaluator and execution requirements need review before implementation or execution.

This is a suggested selection rule, not a validated method or a measured score.

Conventional reference

Proposed control: requires review

Select an upstream conventional reference after reviewing the full protocol

Protocol-specific applicability, permitted inputs, access, split, evaluator and execution requirements need review before implementation or execution.

This is a suggested selection rule, not a validated method or a measured score.

Protocol coverage CSV · Model evaluation matrix · Source table · Release and checksums

Coverage is derived from release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220. Source citations describe the original records; they do not validate an unreviewed baseline proposal. No results have been generated by this audit.

Run instructions

No runnable recipe has been reviewed for this protocol. Dataset access, model requirements, licences and compute requirements must be checked against its sources before execution.

Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions

Strengths and limitations

Strengths and considerations

No source-reviewed explanatory claims are recorded here yet.

Limitations and conditions

  • Proxy tracks differ across models and are part of the evaluation configuration. ChromBPNet is specialized by cell type; AlphaGenome/Borzoi are evaluated without task-label training. The inspected paper delegates detailed QTL preprocessing to ChromBPNet and does not enumerate final row-level sample counts.
    Sources (3)AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary comparison tables; AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary methods; alphagenome: Journal full-text XML · 'Suppl Table 4 Variant performan'!A33:P33; 'Suppl Table 4 Variant performan'!A34:P34; Supplementary Methods p.30, Chromosome Splits for Variant Benchmarks; Supplementary Methods pp.36–37, Chromatin accessibility variants & bQTLs; methods: pp.36–37, Chromatin accessibility variants & bQTLs; paper: Sec10; Fig.5a–c; Supplementary Fig.9; methods: p.30, Chromosome Splits for Variant Benchmarks; paper: Fig.1e; tables: Suppl Table 4 Variant performan; evaluation index 24; sheet rows 33, 34
  • This is an author-reported protocol, not a rewire rerun. Different datasets, processing and adaptations cannot support an unrestricted leaderboard.
    Sources (3)AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary comparison tables; AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary methods; alphagenome: Journal full-text XML · 'Suppl Table 4 Variant performan'!A33:P33; 'Suppl Table 4 Variant performan'!A34:P34; Supplementary Methods p.30, Chromosome Splits for Variant Benchmarks; Supplementary Methods pp.36–37, Chromatin accessibility variants & bQTLs; methods: pp.36–37, Chromatin accessibility variants & bQTLs; paper: Sec10; Fig.5a–c; Supplementary Fig.9; methods: p.30, Chromosome Splits for Variant Benchmarks; paper: Fig.1e; tables: Suppl Table 4 Variant performan; evaluation index 24; sheet rows 33, 34
Profile review details

Primary-source transcription and separate automated source review. No human sign-off or independent experimental reproduction.

Stable record: alphagenome-2026-t4-protocol-24

Specifications

Inputs, training, access and other details

Explanatory profile: limited source coverage · Automated source review, 2026-09-17. Review applies to the cited claims; unresolved fields are listed below. Numerical results retain their own review status.

Data, procedure and scoring
PropertyDescription and evidence
Dataset and biological contextCoronary smooth-muscle caQTL data reused from the ChromBPNet evaluation; retain this ancestry/cell-type/trait identity.
Sources (3)AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary comparison tables; AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary methods; alphagenome: Journal full-text XML · 'Suppl Table 4 Variant performan'!A33:P33; 'Suppl Table 4 Variant performan'!A34:P34; Supplementary Methods p.30, Chromosome Splits for Variant Benchmarks; Supplementary Methods pp.36–37, Chromatin accessibility variants & bQTLs; methods: pp.36–37, Chromatin accessibility variants & bQTLs; paper: Sec10; Fig.5a–c; Supplementary Fig.9; methods: p.30, Chromosome Splits for Variant Benchmarks; paper: Fig.1e; tables: Suppl Table 4 Variant performan; evaluation index 24; sheet rows 33, 34
SplitZero-shot scorer development uses validation chromosomes 1,2,4,5,7,8,10,11,13,14,15,17,20,22,X; final test chromosomes are 3,6,9,12,16,18,19,21. This partitions variant evaluation labels; the distilled model’s teachers were trained on all reference-genome folds.
Sources (3)AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary comparison tables; AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary methods; alphagenome: Journal full-text XML · 'Suppl Table 4 Variant performan'!A33:P33; 'Suppl Table 4 Variant performan'!A34:P34; Supplementary Methods p.30, Chromosome Splits for Variant Benchmarks; Supplementary Methods pp.36–37, Chromatin accessibility variants & bQTLs; methods: pp.36–37, Chromatin accessibility variants & bQTLs; paper: Sec10; Fig.5a–c; Supplementary Fig.9; methods: p.30, Chromosome Splits for Variant Benchmarks; paper: Fig.1e; tables: Suppl Table 4 Variant performan; evaluation index 24; sheet rows 33, 34
Allowed inputs and adaptationREF/ALT sequence and local predicted assay-signal changes. Track selection performed on validation data: AlphaGenome left-cardiac-atrium ATAC; Borzoi vascular-smooth-muscle ATAC.
Sources (3)AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary comparison tables; AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary methods; alphagenome: Journal full-text XML · 'Suppl Table 4 Variant performan'!A33:P33; 'Suppl Table 4 Variant performan'!A34:P34; Supplementary Methods p.30, Chromosome Splits for Variant Benchmarks; Supplementary Methods pp.36–37, Chromatin accessibility variants & bQTLs; methods: pp.36–37, Chromatin accessibility variants & bQTLs; paper: Sec10; Fig.5a–c; Supplementary Fig.9; methods: p.30, Chromosome Splits for Variant Benchmarks; paper: Fig.1e; tables: Suppl Table 4 Variant performan; evaluation index 24; sheet rows 33, 34
Metrics as reportedpearsonr
Sources (3)AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary comparison tables; AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary methods; alphagenome: Journal full-text XML · 'Suppl Table 4 Variant performan'!A33:P33; 'Suppl Table 4 Variant performan'!A34:P34; Supplementary Methods p.30, Chromosome Splits for Variant Benchmarks; Supplementary Methods pp.36–37, Chromatin accessibility variants & bQTLs; methods: pp.36–37, Chromatin accessibility variants & bQTLs; paper: Sec10; Fig.5a–c; Supplementary Fig.9; methods: p.30, Chromosome Splits for Variant Benchmarks; paper: Fig.1e; tables: Suppl Table 4 Variant performan; evaluation index 24; sheet rows 33, 34
AggregationPearson correlation against reported effect sizes of the causal/significant QTL set.
Sources (3)AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary comparison tables; AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary methods; alphagenome: Journal full-text XML · 'Suppl Table 4 Variant performan'!A33:P33; 'Suppl Table 4 Variant performan'!A34:P34; Supplementary Methods p.30, Chromosome Splits for Variant Benchmarks; Supplementary Methods pp.36–37, Chromatin accessibility variants & bQTLs; methods: pp.36–37, Chromatin accessibility variants & bQTLs; paper: Sec10; Fig.5a–c; Supplementary Fig.9; methods: p.30, Chromosome Splits for Variant Benchmarks; paper: Fig.1e; tables: Suppl Table 4 Variant performan; evaluation index 24; sheet rows 33, 34
UncertaintyNot reported for these summary-table scores. · Not reported in inspected sources
Sources (3)AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary comparison tables; AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary methods; alphagenome: Journal full-text XML · 'Suppl Table 4 Variant performan'!A33:P33; 'Suppl Table 4 Variant performan'!A34:P34; Supplementary Methods p.30, Chromosome Splits for Variant Benchmarks; Supplementary Methods pp.36–37, Chromatin accessibility variants & bQTLs; methods: pp.36–37, Chromatin accessibility variants & bQTLs; paper: Sec10; Fig.5a–c; Supplementary Fig.9; methods: p.30, Chromosome Splits for Variant Benchmarks; paper: Fig.1e; tables: Suppl Table 4 Variant performan; evaluation index 24; sheet rows 33, 34
OrganismsNot extracted or verified for this record.
AssaysNot extracted or verified for this record.
BaselinesNot extracted or verified for this record.

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Papers and result coverage

Last literature check: 2026-09-17. Original Nature paper comparison; numerical source transcription was separately reviewed. No independent model execution.

Paper or primary resourceVersionReference
alphagenome: Journal full-text XMLRetrieved page snapshot; no immutable publisher revision suppliedRead source
AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary comparison tablesNature version of record, 28 January 2026Read source
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-025-10014-0
AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary methodsSupplement to Nature version of record, 28 January 2026; content hash pinnedRead source
Historical gaps recorded on 2026-09-17

The catalogue now holds 3 result rows for this benchmark. A note below about pending extraction describes the state on 2026-09-17 and may since have been answered by a later batch. The result rows and their sources are the current record.

  • Individual protocol input manifests, scoring counts and uncertainty remain unextracted where explicitly marked.
  • Subsequent studies use different datasets and are not pooled with this paper.
Search and extraction details

complete comparison extracted

Searches

  • AlphaGenome benchmark evaluation Nature 2026 supplementary Tables 3 4 regulatory variant prediction
  • AlphaGenome independent evaluation benchmark 2026 variant effects

Evidence locations

  • 'Suppl Table 4 Variant performan'!A33:P33; 'Suppl Table 4 Variant performan'!A34:P34; Supplementary Methods p.30, Chromosome Splits for Variant Benchmarks; Supplementary Methods pp.36–37, Chromatin accessibility variants & bQTLs; methods: pp.36–37, Chromatin accessibility variants & bQTLs; paper: Sec10; Fig.5a–c; Supplementary Fig.9; methods: p.30, Chromosome Splits for Variant Benchmarks; paper: Fig.1e; tables: Suppl Table 4 Variant performan; evaluation index 24; sheet rows 33, 34

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

42 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance
Diagram caption
Conceptual summary of the cited procedure; model-specific conditions are given below.
Individual claims
alphagenome: Journal full-text XML

Original source ↗

'Suppl Table 4 Variant performan'!A33:P33; 'Suppl Table 4 Variant performan'!A34:P34; Supplementary Methods p.30, Chromosome Splits for Variant Benchmarks; Supplementary Methods pp.36–37, Chromatin accessibility variants & bQTLs; methods: pp.36–37, Chromatin accessibility variants & bQTLs; paper: Sec10; Fig.5a–c; Supplementary Fig.9; methods: p.30, Chromosome Splits for Variant Benchmarks; paper: Fig.1e; tables: Suppl Table 4 Variant performan; evaluation index 24; sheet rows 33, 34

Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation.

Version: Retrieved page snapshot; no immutable publisher revision supplied
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T19:53:03.009088+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-17

Audit details

Primary-source transcription and separate automated source review. No human sign-off or independent experimental reproduction.

Field: attributes.profile.diagram.caption

Source artifact SHA-256: d159b791fc6cb7b679c151727b7b05a6e5b6388b08a89b675014983d85b6df36

Hash scope: SHA-256 of retrieved original artifact bytes

Format: original_artifact

Inspected artifact

Diagram caption
Conceptual summary of the cited procedure; model-specific conditions are given below.
Individual claims
AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary methods

Original source ↗

'Suppl Table 4 Variant performan'!A33:P33; 'Suppl Table 4 Variant performan'!A34:P34; Supplementary Methods p.30, Chromosome Splits for Variant Benchmarks; Supplementary Methods pp.36–37, Chromatin accessibility variants & bQTLs; methods: pp.36–37, Chromatin accessibility variants & bQTLs; paper: Sec10; Fig.5a–c; Supplementary Fig.9; methods: p.30, Chromosome Splits for Variant Benchmarks; paper: Fig.1e; tables: Suppl Table 4 Variant performan; evaluation index 24; sheet rows 33, 34

Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation.

Version: Supplement to Nature version of record, 28 January 2026; content hash pinned
Retrieved: 2026-09-17T06:37:01.778972+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-17

Audit details

Primary-source transcription and separate automated source review. No human sign-off or independent experimental reproduction.

Field: attributes.profile.diagram.caption

Source artifact SHA-256: 86b2e6a07543e3c201e2e157a3e9c6eb5235ff13eb8a5224f6fcb6fe1808d4c0

Hash scope: SHA-256 of exact publisher PDF bytes

Format: original_pdf

Inspected artifact

Diagram caption
Conceptual summary of the cited procedure; model-specific conditions are given below.
Individual claims
AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary comparison tables

Original source ↗

'Suppl Table 4 Variant performan'!A33:P33; 'Suppl Table 4 Variant performan'!A34:P34; Supplementary Methods p.30, Chromosome Splits for Variant Benchmarks; Supplementary Methods pp.36–37, Chromatin accessibility variants & bQTLs; methods: pp.36–37, Chromatin accessibility variants & bQTLs; paper: Sec10; Fig.5a–c; Supplementary Fig.9; methods: p.30, Chromosome Splits for Variant Benchmarks; paper: Fig.1e; tables: Suppl Table 4 Variant performan; evaluation index 24; sheet rows 33, 34

Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation.

Version: Nature version of record, 28 January 2026
Retrieved: 2026-09-17T06:31:06.887921+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-17

Audit details

Primary-source transcription and separate automated source review. No human sign-off or independent experimental reproduction.

Field: attributes.profile.diagram.caption

Source artifact SHA-256: 833cb78b6ae6fe39415cfff296ac00c48d800326139f13eb307531a1cc133154

Hash scope: SHA-256 of exact retrieved original artifact bytes

Format: xlsx

Inspected artifact

Diagram steps
  • Select ancestry/cell-specific QTL test set
  • Match the reported assay tracks
  • Score local REF/ALT signal change
  • Correlate with measured effects
Individual claims
alphagenome: Journal full-text XML

Original source ↗

'Suppl Table 4 Variant performan'!A33:P33; 'Suppl Table 4 Variant performan'!A34:P34; Supplementary Methods p.30, Chromosome Splits for Variant Benchmarks; Supplementary Methods pp.36–37, Chromatin accessibility variants & bQTLs; methods: pp.36–37, Chromatin accessibility variants & bQTLs; paper: Sec10; Fig.5a–c; Supplementary Fig.9; methods: p.30, Chromosome Splits for Variant Benchmarks; paper: Fig.1e; tables: Suppl Table 4 Variant performan; evaluation index 24; sheet rows 33, 34

Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation.

Version: Retrieved page snapshot; no immutable publisher revision supplied
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T19:53:03.009088+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-17

Audit details

Primary-source transcription and separate automated source review. No human sign-off or independent experimental reproduction.

Field: attributes.profile.diagram.steps

Source artifact SHA-256: d159b791fc6cb7b679c151727b7b05a6e5b6388b08a89b675014983d85b6df36

Hash scope: SHA-256 of retrieved original artifact bytes

Format: original_artifact

Inspected artifact

Diagram steps
  • Select ancestry/cell-specific QTL test set
  • Match the reported assay tracks
  • Score local REF/ALT signal change
  • Correlate with measured effects
Individual claims
AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary methods

Original source ↗

'Suppl Table 4 Variant performan'!A33:P33; 'Suppl Table 4 Variant performan'!A34:P34; Supplementary Methods p.30, Chromosome Splits for Variant Benchmarks; Supplementary Methods pp.36–37, Chromatin accessibility variants & bQTLs; methods: pp.36–37, Chromatin accessibility variants & bQTLs; paper: Sec10; Fig.5a–c; Supplementary Fig.9; methods: p.30, Chromosome Splits for Variant Benchmarks; paper: Fig.1e; tables: Suppl Table 4 Variant performan; evaluation index 24; sheet rows 33, 34

Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation.

Version: Supplement to Nature version of record, 28 January 2026; content hash pinned
Retrieved: 2026-09-17T06:37:01.778972+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-17

Audit details

Primary-source transcription and separate automated source review. No human sign-off or independent experimental reproduction.

Field: attributes.profile.diagram.steps

Source artifact SHA-256: 86b2e6a07543e3c201e2e157a3e9c6eb5235ff13eb8a5224f6fcb6fe1808d4c0

Hash scope: SHA-256 of exact publisher PDF bytes

Format: original_pdf

Inspected artifact

Diagram steps
  • Select ancestry/cell-specific QTL test set
  • Match the reported assay tracks
  • Score local REF/ALT signal change
  • Correlate with measured effects
Individual claims
AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary comparison tables

Original source ↗

'Suppl Table 4 Variant performan'!A33:P33; 'Suppl Table 4 Variant performan'!A34:P34; Supplementary Methods p.30, Chromosome Splits for Variant Benchmarks; Supplementary Methods pp.36–37, Chromatin accessibility variants & bQTLs; methods: pp.36–37, Chromatin accessibility variants & bQTLs; paper: Sec10; Fig.5a–c; Supplementary Fig.9; methods: p.30, Chromosome Splits for Variant Benchmarks; paper: Fig.1e; tables: Suppl Table 4 Variant performan; evaluation index 24; sheet rows 33, 34

Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation.

Version: Nature version of record, 28 January 2026
Retrieved: 2026-09-17T06:31:06.887921+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-17

Audit details

Primary-source transcription and separate automated source review. No human sign-off or independent experimental reproduction.

Field: attributes.profile.diagram.steps

Source artifact SHA-256: 833cb78b6ae6fe39415cfff296ac00c48d800326139f13eb307531a1cc133154

Hash scope: SHA-256 of exact retrieved original artifact bytes

Format: xlsx

Inspected artifact

Diagram title
Coronary smooth-muscle caQTL effect-size prediction: evaluation procedure
Individual claims
alphagenome: Journal full-text XML

Original source ↗

'Suppl Table 4 Variant performan'!A33:P33; 'Suppl Table 4 Variant performan'!A34:P34; Supplementary Methods p.30, Chromosome Splits for Variant Benchmarks; Supplementary Methods pp.36–37, Chromatin accessibility variants & bQTLs; methods: pp.36–37, Chromatin accessibility variants & bQTLs; paper: Sec10; Fig.5a–c; Supplementary Fig.9; methods: p.30, Chromosome Splits for Variant Benchmarks; paper: Fig.1e; tables: Suppl Table 4 Variant performan; evaluation index 24; sheet rows 33, 34

Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation.

Version: Retrieved page snapshot; no immutable publisher revision supplied
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T19:53:03.009088+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-17

Audit details

Primary-source transcription and separate automated source review. No human sign-off or independent experimental reproduction.

Field: attributes.profile.diagram.title

Source artifact SHA-256: d159b791fc6cb7b679c151727b7b05a6e5b6388b08a89b675014983d85b6df36

Hash scope: SHA-256 of retrieved original artifact bytes

Format: original_artifact

Inspected artifact

Diagram title
Coronary smooth-muscle caQTL effect-size prediction: evaluation procedure
Individual claims
AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary methods

Original source ↗

'Suppl Table 4 Variant performan'!A33:P33; 'Suppl Table 4 Variant performan'!A34:P34; Supplementary Methods p.30, Chromosome Splits for Variant Benchmarks; Supplementary Methods pp.36–37, Chromatin accessibility variants & bQTLs; methods: pp.36–37, Chromatin accessibility variants & bQTLs; paper: Sec10; Fig.5a–c; Supplementary Fig.9; methods: p.30, Chromosome Splits for Variant Benchmarks; paper: Fig.1e; tables: Suppl Table 4 Variant performan; evaluation index 24; sheet rows 33, 34

Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation.

Version: Supplement to Nature version of record, 28 January 2026; content hash pinned
Retrieved: 2026-09-17T06:37:01.778972+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-17

Audit details

Primary-source transcription and separate automated source review. No human sign-off or independent experimental reproduction.

Field: attributes.profile.diagram.title

Source artifact SHA-256: 86b2e6a07543e3c201e2e157a3e9c6eb5235ff13eb8a5224f6fcb6fe1808d4c0

Hash scope: SHA-256 of exact publisher PDF bytes

Format: original_pdf

Inspected artifact

Diagram title
Coronary smooth-muscle caQTL effect-size prediction: evaluation procedure
Individual claims
AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary comparison tables

Original source ↗

'Suppl Table 4 Variant performan'!A33:P33; 'Suppl Table 4 Variant performan'!A34:P34; Supplementary Methods p.30, Chromosome Splits for Variant Benchmarks; Supplementary Methods pp.36–37, Chromatin accessibility variants & bQTLs; methods: pp.36–37, Chromatin accessibility variants & bQTLs; paper: Sec10; Fig.5a–c; Supplementary Fig.9; methods: p.30, Chromosome Splits for Variant Benchmarks; paper: Fig.1e; tables: Suppl Table 4 Variant performan; evaluation index 24; sheet rows 33, 34

Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation.

Version: Nature version of record, 28 January 2026
Retrieved: 2026-09-17T06:31:06.887921+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-17

Audit details

Primary-source transcription and separate automated source review. No human sign-off or independent experimental reproduction.

Field: attributes.profile.diagram.title

Source artifact SHA-256: 833cb78b6ae6fe39415cfff296ac00c48d800326139f13eb307531a1cc133154

Hash scope: SHA-256 of exact retrieved original artifact bytes

Format: xlsx

Inspected artifact

Dataset and biological context
Coronary smooth-muscle caQTL data reused from the ChromBPNet evaluation; retain this ancestry/cell-type/trait identity.
Individual claims
alphagenome: Journal full-text XML

Original source ↗

'Suppl Table 4 Variant performan'!A33:P33; 'Suppl Table 4 Variant performan'!A34:P34; Supplementary Methods p.30, Chromosome Splits for Variant Benchmarks; Supplementary Methods pp.36–37, Chromatin accessibility variants & bQTLs; methods: pp.36–37, Chromatin accessibility variants & bQTLs; paper: Sec10; Fig.5a–c; Supplementary Fig.9; methods: p.30, Chromosome Splits for Variant Benchmarks; paper: Fig.1e; tables: Suppl Table 4 Variant performan; evaluation index 24; sheet rows 33, 34

Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation.

Version: Retrieved page snapshot; no immutable publisher revision supplied
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T19:53:03.009088+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-17

Audit details

Primary-source transcription and separate automated source review. No human sign-off or independent experimental reproduction.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.0.value

Source artifact SHA-256: d159b791fc6cb7b679c151727b7b05a6e5b6388b08a89b675014983d85b6df36

Hash scope: SHA-256 of retrieved original artifact bytes

Format: original_artifact

Inspected artifact

Sources and history

View linked audit checks and correction history

Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220 · Record review: needs review

3 source records and release historyDownload this release
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: alphagenome-2026-t4-protocol-24

areas
dna-genomes
entity level
protocol
version
Nature version of record, 28 January 2026
source evaluation index
24
source table
4
reference levels
metric: pearsonr; printed value: 0; numeric value: 0; source locator: Suppl Table 4 Variant performan!J33; note: Source reference quantity for relative-performance calculation, not a measured baseline run.; metric: pearsonr; printed value: 0; numeric value: 0; source locator: Suppl Table 4 Variant performan!J34; note: Source reference quantity for relative-performance calculation, not a measured baseline run.
comparison panels
id: paper-figure-3e83fb9cbcb7de02eb; title: Coronary smooth-muscle caQTL effect-size prediction (AlphaGenome paper); protocol id: alphagenome-2026-t4-protocol-24; dataset id: alphagenome-2026-t4-dataset-24; metric: pearsonr; unit: correlation; direction: higher; result ids: alphagenome-2026-result-621aa39f71bd0642; alphagenome-2026-result-d1bd92acb8609039; alphagenome-2026-result-e5b5c848a05ae1cb; source ids: source-alphagenome-nature2026-tables; source locator: 'Suppl Table 4 Variant performan'!L34; 'Suppl Table 4 Variant performan'!M33; 'Suppl Table 4 Variant performan'!M34; 'Suppl Table 4 Variant performan'!L33; context: Can local sequence changes predict the direction and magnitude of measured molecular-trait effects?; caveats: This is the AlphaGenome paper’s comparison. Source-checked scores are not independent reproductions.; Model inputs, training and inference budgets differ or remain partly unextracted. This figure does not establish a controlled architectural advantage.; Superseded and quarantined score conflicts are excluded; comparator-specific subsets remain separate.; review: method: automated_source_review; date: 2026-09-17
benchmark research
review date: 2026-09-17; status: complete_comparison_extracted; primary sources: evidence-official-56e5abfb5f12f1cd3b20; source-alphagenome-nature2026-tables; source-alphagenome-nature2026-supplementary-methods; inspected locators: 'Suppl Table 4 Variant performan'!A33:P33; 'Suppl Table 4 Variant performan'!A34:P34; Supplementary Methods p.30, Chromosome Splits for Variant Benchmarks; Supplementary Methods pp.36–37, Chromatin accessibility variants & bQTLs; methods: pp.36–37, Chromatin accessibility variants & bQTLs; paper: Sec10; Fig.5a–c; Supplementary Fig.9; methods: p.30, Chromosome Splits for Variant Benchmarks; paper: Fig.1e; tables: Suppl Table 4 Variant performan; evaluation index 24; sheet rows 33, 34; searched queries: AlphaGenome benchmark evaluation Nature 2026 supplementary Tables 3 4 regulatory variant prediction; AlphaGenome independent evaluation benchmark 2026 variant effects; gaps: Individual protocol input manifests, scoring counts and uncertainty remain unextracted where explicitly marked.; Subsequent studies use different datasets and are not pooled with this paper.; claim scope: Original Nature paper comparison; numerical source transcription was separately reviewed. No independent model execution.
legacy kinds
benchmark
entity classification
review date: 2026-09-17; rationale: The source-backed record identifies a specified evaluated procedure and its dataset/split/scoring context. Classify it as a protocol while preserving version and comparison restrictions.; source ids: source-alphagenome-nature2026-tables; source-alphagenome-nature2026-supplementary-methods; evidence-official-56e5abfb5f12f1cd3b20; source locator: 'Suppl Table 4 Variant performan'!A33:P33; 'Suppl Table 4 Variant performan'!A34:P34; Supplementary Methods p.30, Chromosome Splits for Variant Benchmarks; Supplementary Methods pp.36–37, Chromatin accessibility variants & bQTLs; methods: pp.36–37, Chromatin accessibility variants & bQTLs; paper: Sec10; Fig.5a–c; Supplementary Fig.9; methods: p.30, Chromosome Splits for Variant Benchmarks; paper: Fig.1e; tables: Suppl Table 4 Variant performan; evaluation index 24; sheet rows 33, 34; ambiguities: None recorded
Related records

Suggest a correction