rewirebio.iobenchmarks
Method

Independent repeat affinity assay

Takes a second, independent experimental affinity measurement of the same compounds as the estimate of their relative binding free energies. This is a measurement of assay reproducibility, not a prediction method: it bounds the accuracy any predictor could reach on this kind of data and cannot be ranked against predictors as though it were one.

Results are recorded on linked configurations and versions of this method. Their settings and evaluations are kept separate below.

1 configuration with results

Results on linked records

This method has no results of its own in this release. One linked record has results. They are not assigned to the underlying method: each record keeps its own settings and evaluations, and its scores are on its own page.

Overview

An explanatory profile has not yet been reviewed for this record.

Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.

Use this method

How it works, versions and access
Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

0 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance

No evidence rows match these filters. Choose another scope or clear the search.

Sources and history

Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6 · Record review: source checked

1 source record and release historyDownload this release (gzip)
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: uc-leadopt-20261022-method-experimental-reassay

areas
molecular-interactions
contexts
research
entity level
method
reported name
Experimental survey
reference kind
experimental_reference
source locator
Table 3, column 'Experimental survey'; Methods, 'Experimental reproducibility'
provenance note
Recorded as a method so that the assay noise floor can sit beside the prediction methods on the same protocol family. It is an experimental reference, not a predictive method.
review
method: source-hash-verification; pdf-text-parse; independent-cell-check; rendered-source-visual-check; ai-assisted-source-review; method note: Re-retrieved all three sources and matched each pinned SHA-256. Re-rendered the Boltz-2 supplement with pdftotext -layout (poppler 26.08.0) and matched the text layer's recorded SHA-256. Re-read all 256 cells with a parser written for this review that does not import the extraction script, matching each result to its cell through its own source_locator, and separately read appendix tables 11, 12 and 14 from PNG renderings of PDF pages 29 and 30 at 160 dpi, and Ross Table 3 from the pinned XML markup. Checked printed value, numeric value, locator, metric concept, qualifier, direction, unit, uncertainty and the linked configuration, protocol and dataset, and that every N/A or '-' cell is recorded as missing with a reason.; reviewer: claude; reviewer note: Claude review agent, independent of the extraction agent; no human review claimed; reviewed at: 2026-10-22T13:40:00Z; artifact sha256: f371d2e373306588d11b695b8de21b253a90293d6a15884f635bcf927bdebb1d; retrieval url: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC10576784/fullTextXML
Related records

Suggest a correction