rewire.itbenchmarks
Method

BayesDel

Computational variant-effect scoring method; study applies gene-specific evidence calibration.

4 evaluations · 34 results

Overview

Computational variant-effect scoring method; study applies gene-specific evidence calibration.

Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.

Evaluations and results

4 evaluations · 34 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Filter evaluations

Applied filters: All linked evaluations

Exact evaluated configurations and original reported results
Tested configurationProtocol and datasetFindingEvidence and details
Configuration: BayesDel generic Pejaver evidence thresholds in ENIGMA comparisonProtocol: BRCA1 generic BayesDel threshold evidence-code assignment
Dataset: BRCA1 functional reference calibration set
<10% benign_reference_assigned_bp4
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

BRCA1 generic BayesDel threshold comparator

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

Evidence-based recommendations for gene-specific ACMG/AMP variant classification from the ClinGen ENIGMA BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variant Curation Expert Panel · Results, BayesDel calibration, BP4 code would be assigned to <10% of BRCA1 and BRCA2 benign reference variants
Configuration: BayesDel generic Pejaver evidence thresholds in ENIGMA comparisonProtocol: BRCA1 generic BayesDel threshold evidence-code assignment
Dataset: BRCA1 functional reference calibration set
29% benign_reference_assigned_pp3
percent · lower

Uncertainty: Not reported

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

BRCA1 generic BayesDel threshold comparator

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

Evidence-based recommendations for gene-specific ACMG/AMP variant classification from the ClinGen ENIGMA BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variant Curation Expert Panel · Results, BayesDel calibration, sentence 29% for BRCA1 and 36% for BRCA2 incorrectly assigned PP3
Configuration: BayesDel with ENIGMA BRCA gene-specific score categoriesProtocol: BRCA1 BayesDel evidence calibration
Dataset: BRCA1 functional reference calibration set
149 high_benign_count
count · unknown

Uncertainty: Not reported

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

BRCA1 BayesDel gene-specific calibration

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

Evidence-based recommendations for gene-specific ACMG/AMP variant classification from the ClinGen ENIGMA BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variant Curation Expert Panel · Table 2, BRCA1, BayesDel ≥0.28, benign_count
Configuration: BayesDel with ENIGMA BRCA gene-specific score categoriesProtocol: BRCA1 BayesDel evidence calibration
Dataset: BRCA1 functional reference calibration set
12% high_benign_fraction
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

BRCA1 BayesDel gene-specific calibration

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

Evidence-based recommendations for gene-specific ACMG/AMP variant classification from the ClinGen ENIGMA BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variant Curation Expert Panel · Table 2, BRCA1, BayesDel ≥0.28, benign_fraction
Configuration: BayesDel with ENIGMA BRCA gene-specific score categoriesProtocol: BRCA1 BayesDel evidence calibration
Dataset: BRCA1 functional reference calibration set
7.09 high_likelihood_ratio
likelihood ratio · unknown

Uncertainty: type: confidence_interval; level: 0.95; lower: 6.06; upper: 8.30; printed: 6.06–8.30

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

BRCA1 BayesDel gene-specific calibration

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

Evidence-based recommendations for gene-specific ACMG/AMP variant classification from the ClinGen ENIGMA BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variant Curation Expert Panel · Table 2, BRCA1, BayesDel ≥0.28, likelihood_ratio
Configuration: BayesDel with ENIGMA BRCA gene-specific score categoriesProtocol: BRCA1 BayesDel evidence calibration
Dataset: BRCA1 functional reference calibration set
377 high_pathogenic_count
count · unknown

Uncertainty: Not reported

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

BRCA1 BayesDel gene-specific calibration

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

Evidence-based recommendations for gene-specific ACMG/AMP variant classification from the ClinGen ENIGMA BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variant Curation Expert Panel · Table 2, BRCA1, BayesDel ≥0.28, pathogenic_count
Configuration: BayesDel with ENIGMA BRCA gene-specific score categoriesProtocol: BRCA1 BayesDel evidence calibration
Dataset: BRCA1 functional reference calibration set
83% high_pathogenic_fraction
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

BRCA1 BayesDel gene-specific calibration

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

Evidence-based recommendations for gene-specific ACMG/AMP variant classification from the ClinGen ENIGMA BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variant Curation Expert Panel · Table 2, BRCA1, BayesDel ≥0.28, pathogenic_fraction
Configuration: BayesDel with ENIGMA BRCA gene-specific score categoriesProtocol: BRCA1 BayesDel evidence calibration
Dataset: BRCA1 functional reference calibration set
946 low_benign_count
count · unknown

Uncertainty: Not reported

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

BRCA1 BayesDel gene-specific calibration

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

Evidence-based recommendations for gene-specific ACMG/AMP variant classification from the ClinGen ENIGMA BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variant Curation Expert Panel · Table 2, BRCA1, BayesDel ≤0.15, benign_count
Configuration: BayesDel with ENIGMA BRCA gene-specific score categoriesProtocol: BRCA1 BayesDel evidence calibration
Dataset: BRCA1 functional reference calibration set
74% low_benign_fraction
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

BRCA1 BayesDel gene-specific calibration

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

Evidence-based recommendations for gene-specific ACMG/AMP variant classification from the ClinGen ENIGMA BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variant Curation Expert Panel · Table 2, BRCA1, BayesDel ≤0.15, benign_fraction
Configuration: BayesDel with ENIGMA BRCA gene-specific score categoriesProtocol: BRCA1 BayesDel evidence calibration
Dataset: BRCA1 functional reference calibration set
0.1 low_likelihood_ratio
likelihood ratio · unknown

Uncertainty: type: confidence_interval; level: 0.95; lower: 0.07; upper: 0.14; printed: 0.07–0.14

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

BRCA1 BayesDel gene-specific calibration

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

Evidence-based recommendations for gene-specific ACMG/AMP variant classification from the ClinGen ENIGMA BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variant Curation Expert Panel · Table 2, BRCA1, BayesDel ≤0.15, likelihood_ratio
Configuration: BayesDel with ENIGMA BRCA gene-specific score categoriesProtocol: BRCA1 BayesDel evidence calibration
Dataset: BRCA1 functional reference calibration set
34 low_pathogenic_count
count · unknown

Uncertainty: Not reported

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

BRCA1 BayesDel gene-specific calibration

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

Evidence-based recommendations for gene-specific ACMG/AMP variant classification from the ClinGen ENIGMA BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variant Curation Expert Panel · Table 2, BRCA1, BayesDel ≤0.15, pathogenic_count
Configuration: BayesDel with ENIGMA BRCA gene-specific score categoriesProtocol: BRCA1 BayesDel evidence calibration
Dataset: BRCA1 functional reference calibration set
7% low_pathogenic_fraction
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

BRCA1 BayesDel gene-specific calibration

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

Evidence-based recommendations for gene-specific ACMG/AMP variant classification from the ClinGen ENIGMA BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variant Curation Expert Panel · Table 2, BRCA1, BayesDel ≤0.15, pathogenic_fraction
Configuration: BayesDel with ENIGMA BRCA gene-specific score categoriesProtocol: BRCA1 BayesDel evidence calibration
Dataset: BRCA1 functional reference calibration set
183 middle_benign_count
count · unknown

Uncertainty: Not reported

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

BRCA1 BayesDel gene-specific calibration

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

Evidence-based recommendations for gene-specific ACMG/AMP variant classification from the ClinGen ENIGMA BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variant Curation Expert Panel · Table 2, BRCA1, BayesDel >0.15 and <0.28, benign_count
Configuration: BayesDel with ENIGMA BRCA gene-specific score categoriesProtocol: BRCA1 BayesDel evidence calibration
Dataset: BRCA1 functional reference calibration set
14% middle_benign_fraction
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

BRCA1 BayesDel gene-specific calibration

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

Evidence-based recommendations for gene-specific ACMG/AMP variant classification from the ClinGen ENIGMA BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variant Curation Expert Panel · Table 2, BRCA1, BayesDel >0.15 and <0.28, benign_fraction
Configuration: BayesDel with ENIGMA BRCA gene-specific score categoriesProtocol: BRCA1 BayesDel evidence calibration
Dataset: BRCA1 functional reference calibration set
0.69 middle_likelihood_ratio
likelihood ratio · unknown

Uncertainty: type: confidence_interval; level: 0.95; lower: 0.51; upper: 0.94; printed: 0.51–0.94

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

BRCA1 BayesDel gene-specific calibration

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

Evidence-based recommendations for gene-specific ACMG/AMP variant classification from the ClinGen ENIGMA BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variant Curation Expert Panel · Table 2, BRCA1, BayesDel >0.15 and <0.28, likelihood_ratio
Configuration: BayesDel with ENIGMA BRCA gene-specific score categoriesProtocol: BRCA1 BayesDel evidence calibration
Dataset: BRCA1 functional reference calibration set
45 middle_pathogenic_count
count · unknown

Uncertainty: Not reported

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

BRCA1 BayesDel gene-specific calibration

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

Evidence-based recommendations for gene-specific ACMG/AMP variant classification from the ClinGen ENIGMA BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variant Curation Expert Panel · Table 2, BRCA1, BayesDel >0.15 and <0.28, pathogenic_count
Configuration: BayesDel with ENIGMA BRCA gene-specific score categoriesProtocol: BRCA1 BayesDel evidence calibration
Dataset: BRCA1 functional reference calibration set
10% middle_pathogenic_fraction
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

BRCA1 BayesDel gene-specific calibration

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

Evidence-based recommendations for gene-specific ACMG/AMP variant classification from the ClinGen ENIGMA BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variant Curation Expert Panel · Table 2, BRCA1, BayesDel >0.15 and <0.28, pathogenic_fraction
Configuration: BayesDel generic Pejaver evidence thresholds in ENIGMA comparisonProtocol: BRCA2 generic BayesDel threshold evidence-code assignment
Dataset: BRCA2 functional reference calibration set
<10% benign_reference_assigned_bp4
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

BRCA2 generic BayesDel threshold comparator

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

Evidence-based recommendations for gene-specific ACMG/AMP variant classification from the ClinGen ENIGMA BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variant Curation Expert Panel · Results, BayesDel calibration, BP4 code would be assigned to <10% of BRCA1 and BRCA2 benign reference variants
Configuration: BayesDel generic Pejaver evidence thresholds in ENIGMA comparisonProtocol: BRCA2 generic BayesDel threshold evidence-code assignment
Dataset: BRCA2 functional reference calibration set
36% benign_reference_assigned_pp3
percent · lower

Uncertainty: Not reported

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

BRCA2 generic BayesDel threshold comparator

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

Evidence-based recommendations for gene-specific ACMG/AMP variant classification from the ClinGen ENIGMA BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variant Curation Expert Panel · Results, BayesDel calibration, sentence 29% for BRCA1 and 36% for BRCA2 incorrectly assigned PP3
Configuration: BayesDel with ENIGMA BRCA gene-specific score categoriesProtocol: BRCA2 BayesDel evidence calibration
Dataset: BRCA2 functional reference calibration set
29 high_benign_count
count · unknown

Uncertainty: Not reported

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

BRCA2 BayesDel gene-specific calibration

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

Evidence-based recommendations for gene-specific ACMG/AMP variant classification from the ClinGen ENIGMA BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variant Curation Expert Panel · Table 2, BRCA2, BayesDel ≥0.30, benign_count
Configuration: BayesDel with ENIGMA BRCA gene-specific score categoriesProtocol: BRCA2 BayesDel evidence calibration
Dataset: BRCA2 functional reference calibration set
10% high_benign_fraction
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

BRCA2 BayesDel gene-specific calibration

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

Evidence-based recommendations for gene-specific ACMG/AMP variant classification from the ClinGen ENIGMA BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variant Curation Expert Panel · Table 2, BRCA2, BayesDel ≥0.30, benign_fraction
Configuration: BayesDel with ENIGMA BRCA gene-specific score categoriesProtocol: BRCA2 BayesDel evidence calibration
Dataset: BRCA2 functional reference calibration set
6.59 high_likelihood_ratio
likelihood ratio · unknown

Uncertainty: type: confidence_interval; level: 0.95; lower: 4.40; upper: 9.90; printed: 4.40–9.90

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

BRCA2 BayesDel gene-specific calibration

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

Evidence-based recommendations for gene-specific ACMG/AMP variant classification from the ClinGen ENIGMA BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variant Curation Expert Panel · Table 2, BRCA2, BayesDel ≥0.30, likelihood_ratio
Configuration: BayesDel with ENIGMA BRCA gene-specific score categoriesProtocol: BRCA2 BayesDel evidence calibration
Dataset: BRCA2 functional reference calibration set
88 high_pathogenic_count
count · unknown

Uncertainty: Not reported

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

BRCA2 BayesDel gene-specific calibration

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

Evidence-based recommendations for gene-specific ACMG/AMP variant classification from the ClinGen ENIGMA BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variant Curation Expert Panel · Table 2, BRCA2, BayesDel ≥0.30, pathogenic_count
Configuration: BayesDel with ENIGMA BRCA gene-specific score categoriesProtocol: BRCA2 BayesDel evidence calibration
Dataset: BRCA2 functional reference calibration set
66% high_pathogenic_fraction
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

BRCA2 BayesDel gene-specific calibration

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

Evidence-based recommendations for gene-specific ACMG/AMP variant classification from the ClinGen ENIGMA BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variant Curation Expert Panel · Table 2, BRCA2, BayesDel ≥0.30, pathogenic_fraction
Configuration: BayesDel with ENIGMA BRCA gene-specific score categoriesProtocol: BRCA2 BayesDel evidence calibration
Dataset: BRCA2 functional reference calibration set
216 low_benign_count
count · unknown

Uncertainty: Not reported

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

BRCA2 BayesDel gene-specific calibration

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

Evidence-based recommendations for gene-specific ACMG/AMP variant classification from the ClinGen ENIGMA BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variant Curation Expert Panel · Table 2, BRCA2, BayesDel ≤0.18, benign_count

Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-09-30-e37e3ab1284d.

Use this model

How it works, versions and access

Versions and evaluated configurations

Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

0 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-09-30-e37e3ab1284d
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance

No evidence rows match these filters. Choose another scope or clear the search.

Sources and history

View linked audit checks and correction history

Release 2026-09-30-e37e3ab1284d · Record review: source checked

1 source records and release historyDownload this release
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: uc-clinical-20260930-method-bayesdel

areas
dna-genomes
contexts
clinical_research
source locator
Results; Table 2; reference 22
review
method: automated_source_review; reviewer: Codex clinical coverage worker; date: 2026-09-30; note: Transcription from inspected primary source. No execution, independent replication or human scientific review.; source id: uc-clinical-20260930-source-enigma
Related records

Suggest a correction