rewirebio.iobenchmarks
Configuration

OpenFE under a fixed automated protocol

OpenFE run with its default settings and no per-system adjustment, which the comparison treats as the automated open-source free energy arm.

2 evaluations · 19 results

Overview

An explanatory profile has not yet been reviewed for this record.

Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.

Evaluations and results

2 evaluations · 19 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Sorted by Kendall tau (target average as printed, computed per assay and weighted by compound count) (higher is better). The best value in each column is highlighted. Decimals are rounded for display; each value links to the printed value and its source.

Tested configurationProtocol and datasetKendall tau (target average as printed, computed per assay and weighted by compound count)MAE (centered, computed per assay and averaged across assays weighted by compound count)MAE (non-centered, computed per assay and averaged across assays weighted by compound count)MAE (pairwise, target average as printed, computed per assay and weighted by compound count)Pearson (target average as printed, computed per assay and weighted by compound count)Proportion (within 1 kcal/mol, centered, computed per assay and averaged across assays weighted by compound count)Proportion (within 1 kcal/mol, non-centered, computed per assay and averaged across assays weighted by compound count)Proportion (within 2 kcal/mol, centered, computed per assay and averaged across assays weighted by compound count)Proportion (within 2 kcal/mol, non-centered, computed per assay and averaged across assays weighted by compound count)Accelerator time (per-method cost as printed beside the accuracy columns)
OpenFE under a fixed automated protocolEvaluationFEP+ benchmark four-target subset, affinity ranking and cost, Four-target subset of the public FEP benchmark0.51 (best in column)0.75 (best in column)N/A1.09 (best in column)0.66 (best in column)0.7 (best in column)N/A0.98 (best in column)N/A6-12 GPU hours
OpenFE under a fixed automated protocolEvaluationFEP+ benchmark OpenFE subset, affinity ranking, OpenFE subset of the public FEP benchmark0.470.94N/A1.370.630.65N/A0.91N/ANot reported
All 19 result rows with coverage, uncertainty and sources
Filter evaluations

Applied filters: All linked evaluations

Exact evaluated configurations and original reported results
Tested configurationProtocol and datasetFindingEvidence and details
Configuration: OpenFE under a fixed automated protocolProtocol: FEP+ benchmark OpenFE subset, affinity ranking
Dataset: OpenFE subset of the public FEP benchmark
0.47 Kendall tau (target average as printed, computed per assay and weighted by compound count)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Evaluation origin not reported · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

OpenFE on the FEP+ benchmark OpenFE subset

uc-leadopt-20261022-protocol-boltz2-fep-openfe-subset

Aggregation: Not reported

Boltz-2: Towards Accurate and Efficient Binding Affinity Prediction, supplementary appendix · Table 11, row "OpenFE", column "Kendall tau", sub-column "target avg." (text-layer line 1694)
Configuration: OpenFE under a fixed automated protocolProtocol: FEP+ benchmark OpenFE subset, affinity ranking
Dataset: OpenFE subset of the public FEP benchmark
0.94 MAE (centered, computed per assay and averaged across assays weighted by compound count)
kilocalorie-per-mole · lower

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Evaluation origin not reported · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

OpenFE on the FEP+ benchmark OpenFE subset

uc-leadopt-20261022-protocol-boltz2-fep-openfe-subset

Aggregation: Not reported

Boltz-2: Towards Accurate and Efficient Binding Affinity Prediction, supplementary appendix · Table 11, row "OpenFE", column "MAE", sub-column "cent." (text-layer line 1694)
Configuration: OpenFE under a fixed automated protocolProtocol: FEP+ benchmark OpenFE subset, affinity ranking
Dataset: OpenFE subset of the public FEP benchmark
N/A MAE (non-centered, computed per assay and averaged across assays weighted by compound count)
kilocalorie-per-mole · lower

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Evaluation origin not reported · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

OpenFE on the FEP+ benchmark OpenFE subset

uc-leadopt-20261022-protocol-boltz2-fep-openfe-subset

Aggregation: Not reported

Boltz-2: Towards Accurate and Efficient Binding Affinity Prediction, supplementary appendix · Table 11, row "OpenFE", column "MAE", sub-column "non-cent." (text-layer line 1694)
Configuration: OpenFE under a fixed automated protocolProtocol: FEP+ benchmark OpenFE subset, affinity ranking
Dataset: OpenFE subset of the public FEP benchmark
0.63 Pearson (target average as printed, computed per assay and weighted by compound count)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Evaluation origin not reported · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

OpenFE on the FEP+ benchmark OpenFE subset

uc-leadopt-20261022-protocol-boltz2-fep-openfe-subset

Aggregation: Not reported

Boltz-2: Towards Accurate and Efficient Binding Affinity Prediction, supplementary appendix · Table 11, row "OpenFE", column "Pearson R", sub-column "target avg." (text-layer line 1694)
Configuration: OpenFE under a fixed automated protocolProtocol: FEP+ benchmark OpenFE subset, affinity ranking
Dataset: OpenFE subset of the public FEP benchmark
1.37 MAE (pairwise, target average as printed, computed per assay and weighted by compound count)
kilocalorie-per-mole · lower

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Evaluation origin not reported · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

OpenFE on the FEP+ benchmark OpenFE subset

uc-leadopt-20261022-protocol-boltz2-fep-openfe-subset

Aggregation: Not reported

Boltz-2: Towards Accurate and Efficient Binding Affinity Prediction, supplementary appendix · Table 11, row "OpenFE", column "PMAE", sub-column "target avg." (text-layer line 1694)
Configuration: OpenFE under a fixed automated protocolProtocol: FEP+ benchmark OpenFE subset, affinity ranking
Dataset: OpenFE subset of the public FEP benchmark
0.65 Proportion (within 1 kcal/mol, centered, computed per assay and averaged across assays weighted by compound count)
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Evaluation origin not reported · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

OpenFE on the FEP+ benchmark OpenFE subset

uc-leadopt-20261022-protocol-boltz2-fep-openfe-subset

Aggregation: Not reported

Boltz-2: Towards Accurate and Efficient Binding Affinity Prediction, supplementary appendix · Table 11, row "OpenFE", column "Perc. within 1", sub-column "cent." (text-layer line 1694)
Configuration: OpenFE under a fixed automated protocolProtocol: FEP+ benchmark OpenFE subset, affinity ranking
Dataset: OpenFE subset of the public FEP benchmark
N/A Proportion (within 1 kcal/mol, non-centered, computed per assay and averaged across assays weighted by compound count)
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Evaluation origin not reported · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

OpenFE on the FEP+ benchmark OpenFE subset

uc-leadopt-20261022-protocol-boltz2-fep-openfe-subset

Aggregation: Not reported

Boltz-2: Towards Accurate and Efficient Binding Affinity Prediction, supplementary appendix · Table 11, row "OpenFE", column "Perc. within 1", sub-column "non-cent." (text-layer line 1694)
Configuration: OpenFE under a fixed automated protocolProtocol: FEP+ benchmark OpenFE subset, affinity ranking
Dataset: OpenFE subset of the public FEP benchmark
0.91 Proportion (within 2 kcal/mol, centered, computed per assay and averaged across assays weighted by compound count)
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Evaluation origin not reported · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

OpenFE on the FEP+ benchmark OpenFE subset

uc-leadopt-20261022-protocol-boltz2-fep-openfe-subset

Aggregation: Not reported

Boltz-2: Towards Accurate and Efficient Binding Affinity Prediction, supplementary appendix · Table 11, row "OpenFE", column "Perc. within 2", sub-column "cent." (text-layer line 1694)
Configuration: OpenFE under a fixed automated protocolProtocol: FEP+ benchmark OpenFE subset, affinity ranking
Dataset: OpenFE subset of the public FEP benchmark
N/A Proportion (within 2 kcal/mol, non-centered, computed per assay and averaged across assays weighted by compound count)
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Evaluation origin not reported · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

OpenFE on the FEP+ benchmark OpenFE subset

uc-leadopt-20261022-protocol-boltz2-fep-openfe-subset

Aggregation: Not reported

Boltz-2: Towards Accurate and Efficient Binding Affinity Prediction, supplementary appendix · Table 11, row "OpenFE", column "Perc. within 2", sub-column "non-cent." (text-layer line 1694)
Configuration: OpenFE under a fixed automated protocolProtocol: FEP+ benchmark four-target subset, affinity ranking and cost
Dataset: Four-target subset of the public FEP benchmark
0.51 Kendall tau (target average as printed, computed per assay and weighted by compound count)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Evaluation origin not reported · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

OpenFE on the FEP+ benchmark four-target subset

uc-leadopt-20261022-protocol-boltz2-fep-4target

Aggregation: Not reported

Boltz-2: Towards Accurate and Efficient Binding Affinity Prediction, supplementary appendix · Table 12, row "OpenFE", column "Kendall tau", sub-column "target avg." (text-layer line 1710)
Configuration: OpenFE under a fixed automated protocolProtocol: FEP+ benchmark four-target subset, affinity ranking and cost
Dataset: Four-target subset of the public FEP benchmark
0.75 MAE (centered, computed per assay and averaged across assays weighted by compound count)
kilocalorie-per-mole · lower

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Evaluation origin not reported · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

OpenFE on the FEP+ benchmark four-target subset

uc-leadopt-20261022-protocol-boltz2-fep-4target

Aggregation: Not reported

Boltz-2: Towards Accurate and Efficient Binding Affinity Prediction, supplementary appendix · Table 12, row "OpenFE", column "MAE", sub-column "cent." (text-layer line 1710)
Configuration: OpenFE under a fixed automated protocolProtocol: FEP+ benchmark four-target subset, affinity ranking and cost
Dataset: Four-target subset of the public FEP benchmark
N/A MAE (non-centered, computed per assay and averaged across assays weighted by compound count)
kilocalorie-per-mole · lower

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Evaluation origin not reported · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

OpenFE on the FEP+ benchmark four-target subset

uc-leadopt-20261022-protocol-boltz2-fep-4target

Aggregation: Not reported

Boltz-2: Towards Accurate and Efficient Binding Affinity Prediction, supplementary appendix · Table 12, row "OpenFE", column "MAE", sub-column "non-cent." (text-layer line 1710)
Configuration: OpenFE under a fixed automated protocolProtocol: FEP+ benchmark four-target subset, affinity ranking and cost
Dataset: Four-target subset of the public FEP benchmark
0.66 Pearson (target average as printed, computed per assay and weighted by compound count)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Evaluation origin not reported · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

OpenFE on the FEP+ benchmark four-target subset

uc-leadopt-20261022-protocol-boltz2-fep-4target

Aggregation: Not reported

Boltz-2: Towards Accurate and Efficient Binding Affinity Prediction, supplementary appendix · Table 12, row "OpenFE", column "Pearson R", sub-column "target avg." (text-layer line 1710)
Configuration: OpenFE under a fixed automated protocolProtocol: FEP+ benchmark four-target subset, affinity ranking and cost
Dataset: Four-target subset of the public FEP benchmark
1.09 MAE (pairwise, target average as printed, computed per assay and weighted by compound count)
kilocalorie-per-mole · lower

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Evaluation origin not reported · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

OpenFE on the FEP+ benchmark four-target subset

uc-leadopt-20261022-protocol-boltz2-fep-4target

Aggregation: Not reported

Boltz-2: Towards Accurate and Efficient Binding Affinity Prediction, supplementary appendix · Table 12, row "OpenFE", column "PMAE", sub-column "target avg." (text-layer line 1710)
Configuration: OpenFE under a fixed automated protocolProtocol: FEP+ benchmark four-target subset, affinity ranking and cost
Dataset: Four-target subset of the public FEP benchmark
6-12 GPU hours Accelerator time (per-method cost as printed beside the accuracy columns)
hour · lower

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Evaluation origin not reported · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

OpenFE on the FEP+ benchmark four-target subset

uc-leadopt-20261022-protocol-boltz2-fep-4target

Aggregation: Not reported

Boltz-2: Towards Accurate and Efficient Binding Affinity Prediction, supplementary appendix · Table 12, row "OpenFE", column "time" (text-layer line 1710)
Configuration: OpenFE under a fixed automated protocolProtocol: FEP+ benchmark four-target subset, affinity ranking and cost
Dataset: Four-target subset of the public FEP benchmark
0.7 Proportion (within 1 kcal/mol, centered, computed per assay and averaged across assays weighted by compound count)
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Evaluation origin not reported · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

OpenFE on the FEP+ benchmark four-target subset

uc-leadopt-20261022-protocol-boltz2-fep-4target

Aggregation: Not reported

Boltz-2: Towards Accurate and Efficient Binding Affinity Prediction, supplementary appendix · Table 12, row "OpenFE", column "Perc. within 1", sub-column "cent." (text-layer line 1710)
Configuration: OpenFE under a fixed automated protocolProtocol: FEP+ benchmark four-target subset, affinity ranking and cost
Dataset: Four-target subset of the public FEP benchmark
N/A Proportion (within 1 kcal/mol, non-centered, computed per assay and averaged across assays weighted by compound count)
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Evaluation origin not reported · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

OpenFE on the FEP+ benchmark four-target subset

uc-leadopt-20261022-protocol-boltz2-fep-4target

Aggregation: Not reported

Boltz-2: Towards Accurate and Efficient Binding Affinity Prediction, supplementary appendix · Table 12, row "OpenFE", column "Perc. within 1", sub-column "non-cent." (text-layer line 1710)
Configuration: OpenFE under a fixed automated protocolProtocol: FEP+ benchmark four-target subset, affinity ranking and cost
Dataset: Four-target subset of the public FEP benchmark
0.98 Proportion (within 2 kcal/mol, centered, computed per assay and averaged across assays weighted by compound count)
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Evaluation origin not reported · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

OpenFE on the FEP+ benchmark four-target subset

uc-leadopt-20261022-protocol-boltz2-fep-4target

Aggregation: Not reported

Boltz-2: Towards Accurate and Efficient Binding Affinity Prediction, supplementary appendix · Table 12, row "OpenFE", column "Perc. within 2", sub-column "cent." (text-layer line 1710)
Configuration: OpenFE under a fixed automated protocolProtocol: FEP+ benchmark four-target subset, affinity ranking and cost
Dataset: Four-target subset of the public FEP benchmark
N/A Proportion (within 2 kcal/mol, non-centered, computed per assay and averaged across assays weighted by compound count)
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Evaluation origin not reported · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

OpenFE on the FEP+ benchmark four-target subset

uc-leadopt-20261022-protocol-boltz2-fep-4target

Aggregation: Not reported

Boltz-2: Towards Accurate and Efficient Binding Affinity Prediction, supplementary appendix · Table 12, row "OpenFE", column "Perc. within 2", sub-column "non-cent." (text-layer line 1710)

Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6.

Use this configuration

How it works, versions and access
Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

0 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance

No evidence rows match these filters. Choose another scope or clear the search.

Sources and history

Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6 · Record review: source checked

1 source record and release historyDownload this release (gzip)
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: uc-leadopt-20261022-config-openfe

areas
molecular-interactions
contexts
research
method types
conventional_pipeline
configuration type
reported_configuration
reported name
OpenFE
version
Not printed; the supplement cites Gowers et al. 2023 for the method and Horton 2025 for the results
access reuse
Open source.
source locator
Tables 11 and 12, row 'OpenFE'; appendix D.2.2
limitations
The cited source for these results is a blog post, which is not a primary source under this repository's rules and was not retrieved. The peer-reviewed OpenFE assessment (doi 10.1021/acs.jcim.6c00089) is behind an ACS paywall and was not retrieved.
review
method: source-hash-verification; pdf-text-parse; independent-cell-check; rendered-source-visual-check; ai-assisted-source-review; method note: Re-retrieved all three sources and matched each pinned SHA-256. Re-rendered the Boltz-2 supplement with pdftotext -layout (poppler 26.08.0) and matched the text layer's recorded SHA-256. Re-read all 256 cells with a parser written for this review that does not import the extraction script, matching each result to its cell through its own source_locator, and separately read appendix tables 11, 12 and 14 from PNG renderings of PDF pages 29 and 30 at 160 dpi, and Ross Table 3 from the pinned XML markup. Checked printed value, numeric value, locator, metric concept, qualifier, direction, unit, uncertainty and the linked configuration, protocol and dataset, and that every N/A or '-' cell is recorded as missing with a reason.; reviewer: claude; reviewer note: Claude review agent, independent of the extraction agent; no human review claimed; reviewed at: 2026-10-22T13:40:00Z; artifact sha256: be867a5d92add8b223d47d882a4213ad489741f3e4d5081a0901a54370342569; retrieval url: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12262699/supplementaryFiles
Related records

Suggest a correction