| Configuration: GADO default, singleton (Yuan et al. 2022) | Protocol: Causal-gene rank in 305 DDD exomes, default singleton runs (Yuan et al. 2022 SM Table 3) Dataset: DDD 305 solved probands (Yuan et al. selection) | 0.3% top-1-accuracy percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceGADO default singleton on DDD 305 rare-ranking-20261009-protocol-yuan2022-ddd-singleton-default Aggregation: Not reported Evaluation of phenotype-driven gene prioritization methods for Mendelian diseases; Yuan et al. 2022, SM Table 3 (accuracy in each top level experiment) · SM Table 3 row 9 (DDD, GADO), column 'TOP 1(%)' |
|---|
| Configuration: GADO default, singleton (Yuan et al. 2022) | Protocol: Causal-gene rank in 305 DDD exomes, default singleton runs (Yuan et al. 2022 SM Table 3) Dataset: DDD 305 solved probands (Yuan et al. selection) | 2.3% top-10-accuracy percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceGADO default singleton on DDD 305 rare-ranking-20261009-protocol-yuan2022-ddd-singleton-default Aggregation: Not reported Evaluation of phenotype-driven gene prioritization methods for Mendelian diseases; Yuan et al. 2022, SM Table 3 (accuracy in each top level experiment) · SM Table 3 row 9 (DDD, GADO), column 'TOP 10(%)' |
|---|
| Configuration: GADO default, singleton (Yuan et al. 2022) | Protocol: Causal-gene rank in 305 DDD exomes, default singleton runs (Yuan et al. 2022 SM Table 3) Dataset: DDD 305 solved probands (Yuan et al. selection) | 3.6% top-20-accuracy percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceGADO default singleton on DDD 305 rare-ranking-20261009-protocol-yuan2022-ddd-singleton-default Aggregation: Not reported Evaluation of phenotype-driven gene prioritization methods for Mendelian diseases; Yuan et al. 2022, SM Table 3 (accuracy in each top level experiment) · SM Table 3 row 9 (DDD, GADO), column 'TOP 20(%)' |
|---|
| Configuration: GADO default, singleton (Yuan et al. 2022) | Protocol: Causal-gene rank in 305 DDD exomes, default singleton runs (Yuan et al. 2022 SM Table 3) Dataset: DDD 305 solved probands (Yuan et al. selection) | 4.3% top-30-accuracy percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceGADO default singleton on DDD 305 rare-ranking-20261009-protocol-yuan2022-ddd-singleton-default Aggregation: Not reported Evaluation of phenotype-driven gene prioritization methods for Mendelian diseases; Yuan et al. 2022, SM Table 3 (accuracy in each top level experiment) · SM Table 3 row 9 (DDD, GADO), column 'TOP 30(%)' |
|---|
| Configuration: GADO default, singleton (Yuan et al. 2022) | Protocol: Causal-gene rank in 305 DDD exomes, default singleton runs (Yuan et al. 2022 SM Table 3) Dataset: DDD 305 solved probands (Yuan et al. selection) | 5.6% top-40-accuracy percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceGADO default singleton on DDD 305 rare-ranking-20261009-protocol-yuan2022-ddd-singleton-default Aggregation: Not reported Evaluation of phenotype-driven gene prioritization methods for Mendelian diseases; Yuan et al. 2022, SM Table 3 (accuracy in each top level experiment) · SM Table 3 row 9 (DDD, GADO), column 'TOP 40(%)' |
|---|
| Configuration: GADO default, singleton (Yuan et al. 2022) | Protocol: Causal-gene rank in 305 DDD exomes, default singleton runs (Yuan et al. 2022 SM Table 3) Dataset: DDD 305 solved probands (Yuan et al. selection) | 1.3% top-5-accuracy percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceGADO default singleton on DDD 305 rare-ranking-20261009-protocol-yuan2022-ddd-singleton-default Aggregation: Not reported Evaluation of phenotype-driven gene prioritization methods for Mendelian diseases; Yuan et al. 2022, SM Table 3 (accuracy in each top level experiment) · SM Table 3 row 9 (DDD, GADO), column 'TOP 5(%)' |
|---|
| Configuration: GADO default, singleton (Yuan et al. 2022) | Protocol: Causal-gene rank in 305 DDD exomes, default singleton runs (Yuan et al. 2022 SM Table 3) Dataset: DDD 305 solved probands (Yuan et al. selection) | 6.6% top-50-accuracy percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceGADO default singleton on DDD 305 rare-ranking-20261009-protocol-yuan2022-ddd-singleton-default Aggregation: Not reported Evaluation of phenotype-driven gene prioritization methods for Mendelian diseases; Yuan et al. 2022, SM Table 3 (accuracy in each top level experiment) · SM Table 3 row 9 (DDD, GADO), column 'TOP 50(%)' |
|---|
| Configuration: GADO default, singleton (Yuan et al. 2022) | Protocol: Causal-gene rank in 209 in-house exomes, default singleton runs (Yuan et al. 2022 SM Table 3) Dataset: KingMed Changsha in-house cohort, 209 solved cases (Yuan et al. 2022) | 0% top-1-accuracy percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceGADO default singleton on KMCGD 209 rare-ranking-20261009-protocol-yuan2022-kmcgd-singleton-default Aggregation: Not reported Evaluation of phenotype-driven gene prioritization methods for Mendelian diseases; Yuan et al. 2022, SM Table 3 (accuracy in each top level experiment) · SM Table 3 row 20 (KMCGD, GADO), column 'TOP 1(%)' |
|---|
| Configuration: GADO default, singleton (Yuan et al. 2022) | Protocol: Causal-gene rank in 209 in-house exomes, default singleton runs (Yuan et al. 2022 SM Table 3) Dataset: KingMed Changsha in-house cohort, 209 solved cases (Yuan et al. 2022) | 1% top-10-accuracy percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceGADO default singleton on KMCGD 209 rare-ranking-20261009-protocol-yuan2022-kmcgd-singleton-default Aggregation: Not reported Evaluation of phenotype-driven gene prioritization methods for Mendelian diseases; Yuan et al. 2022, SM Table 3 (accuracy in each top level experiment) · SM Table 3 row 20 (KMCGD, GADO), column 'TOP 10(%)' |
|---|
| Configuration: GADO default, singleton (Yuan et al. 2022) | Protocol: Causal-gene rank in 209 in-house exomes, default singleton runs (Yuan et al. 2022 SM Table 3) Dataset: KingMed Changsha in-house cohort, 209 solved cases (Yuan et al. 2022) | 2.4% top-20-accuracy percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceGADO default singleton on KMCGD 209 rare-ranking-20261009-protocol-yuan2022-kmcgd-singleton-default Aggregation: Not reported Evaluation of phenotype-driven gene prioritization methods for Mendelian diseases; Yuan et al. 2022, SM Table 3 (accuracy in each top level experiment) · SM Table 3 row 20 (KMCGD, GADO), column 'TOP 20(%)' |
|---|
| Configuration: GADO default, singleton (Yuan et al. 2022) | Protocol: Causal-gene rank in 209 in-house exomes, default singleton runs (Yuan et al. 2022 SM Table 3) Dataset: KingMed Changsha in-house cohort, 209 solved cases (Yuan et al. 2022) | 2.9% top-30-accuracy percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceGADO default singleton on KMCGD 209 rare-ranking-20261009-protocol-yuan2022-kmcgd-singleton-default Aggregation: Not reported Evaluation of phenotype-driven gene prioritization methods for Mendelian diseases; Yuan et al. 2022, SM Table 3 (accuracy in each top level experiment) · SM Table 3 row 20 (KMCGD, GADO), column 'TOP 30(%)' |
|---|
| Configuration: GADO default, singleton (Yuan et al. 2022) | Protocol: Causal-gene rank in 209 in-house exomes, default singleton runs (Yuan et al. 2022 SM Table 3) Dataset: KingMed Changsha in-house cohort, 209 solved cases (Yuan et al. 2022) | 3.8% top-40-accuracy percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceGADO default singleton on KMCGD 209 rare-ranking-20261009-protocol-yuan2022-kmcgd-singleton-default Aggregation: Not reported Evaluation of phenotype-driven gene prioritization methods for Mendelian diseases; Yuan et al. 2022, SM Table 3 (accuracy in each top level experiment) · SM Table 3 row 20 (KMCGD, GADO), column 'TOP 40(%)' |
|---|
| Configuration: GADO default, singleton (Yuan et al. 2022) | Protocol: Causal-gene rank in 209 in-house exomes, default singleton runs (Yuan et al. 2022 SM Table 3) Dataset: KingMed Changsha in-house cohort, 209 solved cases (Yuan et al. 2022) | 1% top-5-accuracy percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceGADO default singleton on KMCGD 209 rare-ranking-20261009-protocol-yuan2022-kmcgd-singleton-default Aggregation: Not reported Evaluation of phenotype-driven gene prioritization methods for Mendelian diseases; Yuan et al. 2022, SM Table 3 (accuracy in each top level experiment) · SM Table 3 row 20 (KMCGD, GADO), column 'TOP 5(%)' |
|---|
| Configuration: GADO default, singleton (Yuan et al. 2022) | Protocol: Causal-gene rank in 209 in-house exomes, default singleton runs (Yuan et al. 2022 SM Table 3) Dataset: KingMed Changsha in-house cohort, 209 solved cases (Yuan et al. 2022) | 3.8% top-50-accuracy percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceGADO default singleton on KMCGD 209 rare-ranking-20261009-protocol-yuan2022-kmcgd-singleton-default Aggregation: Not reported Evaluation of phenotype-driven gene prioritization methods for Mendelian diseases; Yuan et al. 2022, SM Table 3 (accuracy in each top level experiment) · SM Table 3 row 20 (KMCGD, GADO), column 'TOP 50(%)' |
|---|