Strengths and considerations
No source-reviewed explanatory claims are recorded here yet.
Configuration
AK-score-single · 0.0007
AK-score-single as evaluated in the cited study. Table-specific network configuration; learning rate 0.0007
Sources
AK-Score: Accurate Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction Using an Ensemble of 3D-Convolutional Neural Networks · Table 1 (ijms-21-08424-t001), row 8 AK-score-single, column 3: PDBbind-2016 core set MAEOverview
Key specifications have not been extracted for this record. See the linked evaluation and sources for the reported setup.
limited source coverage · Automated source review, 2026-09-17. All specifications and missing details
Evaluations and results
4 evaluations · 9 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.
Filter evaluations
Applied filters: All linked evaluations
| Tested configuration | Protocol and dataset | Finding | Evidence and details |
|---|---|---|---|
| Configuration: AK-score-single · 0.0007 | Protocol: CASF-2016 docking (Protein–ligand binding affinity scoring) Dataset: CASF-2016 docking | 57.9% Top 3 success percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceAK-score-single · 0.0007: CASF-2016 docking Training uses 3,772 PDBbind-2016 refined-set complexes after removal of the 285-complex core test set. CASF separates scoring, ranking and docking power. Aggregation: Not reported AK-Score: Accurate Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction Using an Ensemble of 3D-Convolutional Neural Networks · Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 9 AK-score-single, column 9: CASF-2016 docking Top 3 success |
| Configuration: AK-score-single · 0.0007 | Protocol: CASF-2016 docking (Protein–ligand binding affinity scoring) Dataset: CASF-2016 docking | 47.1% Top 2 success percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceAK-score-single · 0.0007: CASF-2016 docking Training uses 3,772 PDBbind-2016 refined-set complexes after removal of the 285-complex core test set. CASF separates scoring, ranking and docking power. Aggregation: Not reported AK-Score: Accurate Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction Using an Ensemble of 3D-Convolutional Neural Networks · Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 9 AK-score-single, column 8: CASF-2016 docking Top 2 success |
| Configuration: AK-score-single · 0.0007 | Protocol: CASF-2016 docking (Protein–ligand binding affinity scoring) Dataset: CASF-2016 docking | 31.3% Top 1 success percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceAK-score-single · 0.0007: CASF-2016 docking Training uses 3,772 PDBbind-2016 refined-set complexes after removal of the 285-complex core test set. CASF separates scoring, ranking and docking power. Aggregation: Not reported AK-Score: Accurate Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction Using an Ensemble of 3D-Convolutional Neural Networks · Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 9 AK-score-single, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success |
| Configuration: AK-score-single · 0.0007 | Protocol: CASF-2016 ranking (Protein–ligand binding affinity scoring) Dataset: CASF-2016 ranking | 0.64 Predictive Index unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceAK-score-single · 0.0007: CASF-2016 ranking Training uses 3,772 PDBbind-2016 refined-set complexes after removal of the 285-complex core test set. CASF separates scoring, ranking and docking power. Aggregation: Not reported AK-Score: Accurate Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction Using an Ensemble of 3D-Convolutional Neural Networks · Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 9 AK-score-single, column 6: CASF-2016 ranking Predictive Index |
| Configuration: AK-score-single · 0.0007 | Protocol: CASF-2016 scoring (Protein–ligand binding affinity scoring) Dataset: CASF-2016 | 0.759 Pearson R unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceAK-score-single · 0.0007: CASF-2016 scoring Training uses 3,772 PDBbind-2016 refined-set complexes after removal of the 285-complex core test set. CASF separates scoring, ranking and docking power. Aggregation: Not reported AK-Score: Accurate Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction Using an Ensemble of 3D-Convolutional Neural Networks · Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 9 AK-score-single, column 3: CASF-2016 scoring Pearson R |
| Configuration: AK-score-single · 0.0007 | Protocol: PDBbind-2016 core set (Protein–ligand binding affinity scoring) Dataset: PDBbind-2016 core set | 1.13 MAE kcal/mol · lower Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceAK-score-single · 0.0007: PDBbind-2016 core set Training uses 3,772 PDBbind-2016 refined-set complexes after removal of the 285-complex core test set. CASF separates scoring, ranking and docking power. Aggregation: Not reported AK-Score: Accurate Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction Using an Ensemble of 3D-Convolutional Neural Networks · Table 1 (ijms-21-08424-t001), row 8 AK-score-single, column 3: PDBbind-2016 core set MAE |
| Configuration: AK-score-single · 0.0007 | Protocol: PDBbind-2016 core set (Protein–ligand binding affinity scoring) Dataset: PDBbind-2016 core set | 1.43 RMSE kcal/mol · lower Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceAK-score-single · 0.0007: PDBbind-2016 core set Training uses 3,772 PDBbind-2016 refined-set complexes after removal of the 285-complex core test set. CASF separates scoring, ranking and docking power. Aggregation: Not reported AK-Score: Accurate Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction Using an Ensemble of 3D-Convolutional Neural Networks · Table 1 (ijms-21-08424-t001), row 8 AK-score-single, column 4: PDBbind-2016 core set RMSE |
| Configuration: AK-score-single · 0.0007 | Protocol: CASF-2016 ranking (Protein–ligand binding affinity scoring) Dataset: CASF-2016 ranking | 0.616 Spearman correlation unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceAK-score-single · 0.0007: CASF-2016 ranking Training uses 3,772 PDBbind-2016 refined-set complexes after removal of the 285-complex core test set. CASF separates scoring, ranking and docking power. Aggregation: Not reported AK-Score: Accurate Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction Using an Ensemble of 3D-Convolutional Neural Networks · Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 9 AK-score-single, column 4: CASF-2016 ranking Spearman correlation |
| Configuration: AK-score-single · 0.0007 | Protocol: CASF-2016 ranking (Protein–ligand binding affinity scoring) Dataset: CASF-2016 ranking | 0.526 Kendall tau unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceAK-score-single · 0.0007: CASF-2016 ranking Training uses 3,772 PDBbind-2016 refined-set complexes after removal of the 285-complex core test set. CASF separates scoring, ranking and docking power. Aggregation: Not reported AK-Score: Accurate Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction Using an Ensemble of 3D-Convolutional Neural Networks · Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 9 AK-score-single, column 5: CASF-2016 ranking Kendall tau |
Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220.
Use this model
How it works, versions and access
How it works
Evaluation in this paper
Table-specific network configuration; learning rate 0.0007
Sources
AK-Score: Accurate Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction Using an Ensemble of 3D-Convolutional Neural Networks · Table 1 (ijms-21-08424-t001), row 8 AK-score-single, column 3: PDBbind-2016 core set MAEStrengths, limitations and unresolved questions
Strengths and limitations
Limitations and conditions
No source-reviewed explanatory claims are recorded here yet.
Profile review details
Primary-source transcription and separate automated review. No human sign-off or experimental reproduction.
Stable record: paper-model-d65dae9c3d5762ceb9Specifications
Inputs, training, access and other details
Explanatory profile: limited source coverage · Automated source review, 2026-09-17. Review applies to the cited claims; unresolved fields are listed below. Numerical results retain their own review status.
| Property | Description and evidence |
|---|---|
| Model type | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
| Inputs | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
| Outputs | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
| Parameters | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
| Known versions | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
| Training data | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
| Context limits | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
| Access | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
| Code licence | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
| Weights licence | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
Evidence
Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.
Evidence table
Inspect claims, sources and review details
Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.
One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.
2 evidence rows matching the loaded filters
| Property and statement | Original source and location | Review and provenance |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation in this paper Table-specific network configuration; learning rate 0.0007 Individual claims | AK-Score: Accurate Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction Using an Ensemble of 3D-Convolutional Neural Networks Table 1 (ijms-21-08424-t001), row 8 AK-score-single, column 3: PDBbind-2016 core set MAE Version: version of record | source checked automated source review · 2026-09-17 Audit detailsPrimary-source transcription and separate automated review. No human sign-off or experimental reproduction. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Introduction AK-score-single as evaluated in the cited study. Table-specific network configuration; learning rate 0.0007 Individual claims | AK-Score: Accurate Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction Using an Ensemble of 3D-Convolutional Neural Networks Table 1 (ijms-21-08424-t001), row 8 AK-score-single, column 3: PDBbind-2016 core set MAE Version: version of record | source checked automated source review · 2026-09-17 Audit detailsPrimary-source transcription and separate automated review. No human sign-off or experimental reproduction. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
Sources and history
View linked audit checks and correction history
Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220 · Record review: needs review
1 source records and release history
- AK-Score: Accurate Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction Using an Ensemble of 3D-Convolutional Neural Networks · Original source · version of record
Technical metadata and extraction receipts
Stable ID: paper-model-d65dae9c3d5762ceb9
- areas
- molecular-interactions
- tasks
- Protein–ligand binding affinity scoring
- entity level
- method
- configuration type
- reported_configuration
- version
- Table-specific network configuration; learning rate 0.0007
- legacy kinds
- model
- entity classification
- review date: 2026-09-17; rationale: This source-scoped entry preserves the method/configuration actually named in an evaluation. It is neither a global family identity nor proof of an immutable checkpoint; the linked evaluation retains adaptation, fitting and scoring details.; source ids: akscore-2020; source locator: Table 1 (ijms-21-08424-t001), row 8 AK-score-single, column 3: PDBbind-2016 core set MAE; ambiguities: Configuration means the source-labelled evaluated identity. It does not establish missing checkpoint hashes, default settings or equivalence to same-named records in other papers.