rewirebio.iobenchmarks
Configuration

CACHE #3 workflow WF1716

Selects commercially available compounds predicted to bind the SARS-CoV-2 Nsp3 macrodomain, and ranks the merged Round 1 library for predicted activity.

1 evaluation · 7 results

Overview

An explanatory profile has not yet been reviewed for this record.

Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.

Evaluations and results

1 evaluation · 7 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Protocol: CACHE #3 Round 1 own-selection outcome per workflow (Herasymenko et al. 2026 Table S8) · Dataset: CACHE #3 Round 1 compound library

Sorted by Cache challenge activity score (Activity score of the workflow's best confirmed Round 1 hit that was judged chemically novel) (higher is better). The best value in each column is highlighted. Decimals are rounded for display; each value links to the printed value and its source.

Tested configurationCache challenge activity score (Activity score of the workflow's best confirmed Round 1 hit that was judged chemically novel)Cache challenge activity score (Activity score of the workflow's best confirmed Round 1 hit)Cache challenge activity score (Sum of the activity scores of all the workflow's confirmed Round 1 hits)Cache challenge novelty score (Highest chemical novelty score among the workflow's confirmed Round 1 hits)Count (Compounds the workflow selected that were synthesised and experimentally tested)Count (Confirmed hits the Hit Evaluation Committee judged chemically novel, among the compounds the workflow selected)Count (Experimentally confirmed hits among the compounds the workflow selected)
CACHE #3 workflow WF1716Evaluation18.118.118.125111
All 7 result rows with coverage, uncertainty and sources
Filter evaluations

Applied filters: All linked evaluations

Exact evaluated configurations and original reported results
Tested configurationProtocol and datasetFindingEvidence and details
Configuration: CACHE #3 workflow WF1716Protocol: CACHE #3 Round 1 own-selection outcome per workflow (Herasymenko et al. 2026 Table S8)
Dataset: CACHE #3 Round 1 compound library
51 Count (Compounds the workflow selected that were synthesised and experimentally tested)
count · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: The source prints no interval or spread for this value

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

CACHE #3 workflow WF1716: own selection outcome

hitdisc-20261022-protocol-cache3-own-selection

Aggregation: Not reported

Herasymenko et al. 2026, CACHE Challenge #3, Supporting Information workbook ci5c02441_si_002.xlsx · Sheet 'S8', row with Workflow = 1716, column D ('Compounds tested')
Configuration: CACHE #3 workflow WF1716Protocol: CACHE #3 Round 1 own-selection outcome per workflow (Herasymenko et al. 2026 Table S8)
Dataset: CACHE #3 Round 1 compound library
1 Count (Experimentally confirmed hits among the compounds the workflow selected)
count · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: The source prints no interval or spread for this value

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

CACHE #3 workflow WF1716: own selection outcome

hitdisc-20261022-protocol-cache3-own-selection

Aggregation: Not reported

Herasymenko et al. 2026, CACHE Challenge #3, Supporting Information workbook ci5c02441_si_002.xlsx · Sheet 'S8', row with Workflow = 1716, column E ('Hits')
Configuration: CACHE #3 workflow WF1716Protocol: CACHE #3 Round 1 own-selection outcome per workflow (Herasymenko et al. 2026 Table S8)
Dataset: CACHE #3 Round 1 compound library
1 Count (Confirmed hits the Hit Evaluation Committee judged chemically novel, among the compounds the workflow selected)
count · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: The source prints no interval or spread for this value

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

CACHE #3 workflow WF1716: own selection outcome

hitdisc-20261022-protocol-cache3-own-selection

Aggregation: Not reported

Herasymenko et al. 2026, CACHE Challenge #3, Supporting Information workbook ci5c02441_si_002.xlsx · Sheet 'S8', row with Workflow = 1716, column F ('Chemically Novel Hits')
Configuration: CACHE #3 workflow WF1716Protocol: CACHE #3 Round 1 own-selection outcome per workflow (Herasymenko et al. 2026 Table S8)
Dataset: CACHE #3 Round 1 compound library
18.1 Cache challenge activity score (Activity score of the workflow's best confirmed Round 1 hit)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: The source prints no interval or spread for this value

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

CACHE #3 workflow WF1716: own selection outcome

hitdisc-20261022-protocol-cache3-own-selection

Aggregation: Not reported

Herasymenko et al. 2026, CACHE Challenge #3, Supporting Information workbook ci5c02441_si_002.xlsx · Sheet 'S8', row with Workflow = 1716, column G ('Score of best hit')
Configuration: CACHE #3 workflow WF1716Protocol: CACHE #3 Round 1 own-selection outcome per workflow (Herasymenko et al. 2026 Table S8)
Dataset: CACHE #3 Round 1 compound library
18.1 Cache challenge activity score (Sum of the activity scores of all the workflow's confirmed Round 1 hits)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: The source prints no interval or spread for this value

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

CACHE #3 workflow WF1716: own selection outcome

hitdisc-20261022-protocol-cache3-own-selection

Aggregation: Not reported

Herasymenko et al. 2026, CACHE Challenge #3, Supporting Information workbook ci5c02441_si_002.xlsx · Sheet 'S8', row with Workflow = 1716, column H ('Aggregated score')
Configuration: CACHE #3 workflow WF1716Protocol: CACHE #3 Round 1 own-selection outcome per workflow (Herasymenko et al. 2026 Table S8)
Dataset: CACHE #3 Round 1 compound library
2 Cache challenge novelty score (Highest chemical novelty score among the workflow's confirmed Round 1 hits)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: The source prints no interval or spread for this value

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

CACHE #3 workflow WF1716: own selection outcome

hitdisc-20261022-protocol-cache3-own-selection

Aggregation: Not reported

Herasymenko et al. 2026, CACHE Challenge #3, Supporting Information workbook ci5c02441_si_002.xlsx · Sheet 'S8', row with Workflow = 1716, column I ('Top novelty score')
Configuration: CACHE #3 workflow WF1716Protocol: CACHE #3 Round 1 own-selection outcome per workflow (Herasymenko et al. 2026 Table S8)
Dataset: CACHE #3 Round 1 compound library
18.1 Cache challenge activity score (Activity score of the workflow's best confirmed Round 1 hit that was judged chemically novel)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: The source prints no interval or spread for this value

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

CACHE #3 workflow WF1716: own selection outcome

hitdisc-20261022-protocol-cache3-own-selection

Aggregation: Not reported

Herasymenko et al. 2026, CACHE Challenge #3, Supporting Information workbook ci5c02441_si_002.xlsx · Sheet 'S8', row with Workflow = 1716, column J ('Top score of novel hits')

Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6.

Use this configuration

How it works, versions and access
Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

0 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance

No evidence rows match these filters. Choose another scope or clear the search.

Sources and history

Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6 · Record review: source checked

1 source record and release historyDownload this release (gzip)
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: hitdisc-20261022-config-cache3-wf1716

areas
molecular-interactions
contexts
research
method types
conventional_pipeline
reported name
WF1716
configuration type
paper_evaluation
foundation model eligible
false
review
method: scope-review; automated-source-review; reviewer: claude; reviewer note: Claude review agent, independent of the extraction agent; no human review claimed; date: 2026-10-22; method note: Read the record against the pinned sources and against docs/use-cases.md and docs/record-contract.md.; note: Record checked against the pinned source and the record contract. Transcription checked; not reproduced and not reviewed by a human scientist.; artifact sha256: 5e655da5728da46c6a57882c5fef0643c057536d7897d16b9c98f6d55c12f5fe; retrieval url: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12892310/supplementaryFiles; receipt: data/omics/use-case-coverage-hitdisc-20261022/review.json
missing metadata
version: reason: unreported; note: Workflow components are shown only in Figures 2, 7 and 8 of the article; no version or software list is printed in text
source locator
Sheet 'S8', row with Workflow = 1716
provenance note
Blinded CACHE #3 Round 1 submission WF1716. Participant as printed: Minghu Song [U Connecticut]. No entity-level record was created for the workflow: its computational steps appear only in figures, which this batch does not read.
Related records

Suggest a correction