HyenaDNA (probed)
DNA language model evaluated by the DART-Eval authors in the probed setting.
Overview
DNA language model evaluated by the DART-Eval authors in the probed setting.
Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.
Evaluations and results
22 evaluations · 22 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.
Filter evaluations
Applied filters: All linked evaluations
| Tested configuration | Protocol and dataset | Finding | Evidence and details |
|---|---|---|---|
| Configuration: HyenaDNA (probed) | Task: DART-Eval CA-AUROC-GM12878: Chromatin activity prediction, GM12878, positives against negatives Dataset subset: ENCODE chromatin accessibility peaks in five cell lines (DART-Eval split) | 0.708 auroc fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceSeparating positive GM12878 peaks from matched negatives. Aggregation: Not reported DART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 5, row(Probed HyenaDNA), column(CA-AUROC-GM12878) |
| Configuration: HyenaDNA (probed) | Task: DART-Eval CA-AUROC-H1ESC: Chromatin activity prediction, H1ESC, positives against negatives Dataset subset: ENCODE chromatin accessibility peaks in five cell lines (DART-Eval split) | 0.728 auroc fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceSeparating positive H1ESC peaks from matched negatives. Aggregation: Not reported DART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 5, row(Probed HyenaDNA), column(CA-AUROC-H1ESC) |
| Configuration: HyenaDNA (probed) | Task: DART-Eval CA-AUROC-HEPG2: Chromatin activity prediction, HEPG2, positives against negatives Dataset subset: ENCODE chromatin accessibility peaks in five cell lines (DART-Eval split) | 0.641 auroc fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceSeparating positive HEPG2 peaks from matched negatives. Aggregation: Not reported DART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 5, row(Probed HyenaDNA), column(CA-AUROC-HEPG2) |
| Configuration: HyenaDNA (probed) | Task: DART-Eval CA-AUROC-IMR90: Chromatin activity prediction, IMR90, positives against negatives Dataset subset: ENCODE chromatin accessibility peaks in five cell lines (DART-Eval split) | 0.702 auroc fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceSeparating positive IMR90 peaks from matched negatives. Aggregation: Not reported DART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 5, row(Probed HyenaDNA), column(CA-AUROC-IMR90) |
| Configuration: HyenaDNA (probed) | Task: DART-Eval CA-AUROC-K562: Chromatin activity prediction, K562, positives against negatives Dataset subset: ENCODE chromatin accessibility peaks in five cell lines (DART-Eval split) | 0.662 auroc fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceSeparating positive K562 peaks from matched negatives. Aggregation: Not reported DART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 5, row(Probed HyenaDNA), column(CA-AUROC-K562) |
| Configuration: HyenaDNA (probed) | Task: DART-Eval CA-SPEARMAN-GM12878: Chromatin activity prediction, GM12878, positives only Dataset subset: ENCODE chromatin accessibility peaks in five cell lines (DART-Eval split) | 0.362 spearman_r correlation · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceRank correlation with measured accessibility among positive GM12878 peaks. Aggregation: Not reported DART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 5, row(Probed HyenaDNA), column(CA-SPEARMAN-GM12878) |
| Configuration: HyenaDNA (probed) | Task: DART-Eval CA-SPEARMAN-H1ESC: Chromatin activity prediction, H1ESC, positives only Dataset subset: ENCODE chromatin accessibility peaks in five cell lines (DART-Eval split) | 0.538 spearman_r correlation · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceRank correlation with measured accessibility among positive H1ESC peaks. Aggregation: Not reported DART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 5, row(Probed HyenaDNA), column(CA-SPEARMAN-H1ESC) |
| Configuration: HyenaDNA (probed) | Task: DART-Eval CA-SPEARMAN-HEPG2: Chromatin activity prediction, HEPG2, positives only Dataset subset: ENCODE chromatin accessibility peaks in five cell lines (DART-Eval split) | 0.345 spearman_r correlation · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceRank correlation with measured accessibility among positive HEPG2 peaks. Aggregation: Not reported DART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 5, row(Probed HyenaDNA), column(CA-SPEARMAN-HEPG2) |
| Configuration: HyenaDNA (probed) | Task: DART-Eval CA-SPEARMAN-IMR90: Chromatin activity prediction, IMR90, positives only Dataset subset: ENCODE chromatin accessibility peaks in five cell lines (DART-Eval split) | 0.237 spearman_r correlation · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceRank correlation with measured accessibility among positive IMR90 peaks. Aggregation: Not reported DART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 5, row(Probed HyenaDNA), column(CA-SPEARMAN-IMR90) |
| Configuration: HyenaDNA (probed) | Task: DART-Eval CA-SPEARMAN-K562: Chromatin activity prediction, K562, positives only Dataset subset: ENCODE chromatin accessibility peaks in five cell lines (DART-Eval split) | 0.438 spearman_r correlation · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceHyenaDNA (probed) on DART-Eval CA-SPEARMAN-K562: Chromatin activity prediction, K562, positives only Rank correlation with measured accessibility among positive K562 peaks. Aggregation: Not reported DART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 5, row(Probed HyenaDNA), column(CA-SPEARMAN-K562) |
| Configuration: HyenaDNA (probed) | Task: DART-Eval CTS-ACC: Cell-type-specific element classification, overall accuracy Dataset subset: ENCODE chromatin accessibility peaks in five cell lines (DART-Eval split) | 0.587 accuracy fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceHyenaDNA (probed) on DART-Eval CTS-ACC: Cell-type-specific element classification, overall accuracy Classify which of five cell lines a accessible element belongs to. Aggregation: Not reported DART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 4, row(Probed HyenaDNA), column(CTS-ACC) |
| Configuration: HyenaDNA (probed) | Task: DART-Eval CTS-GM12878: Cell-type-specific element classification, GM12878 Dataset subset: ENCODE chromatin accessibility peaks in five cell lines (DART-Eval split) | 0.849 auroc fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceHyenaDNA (probed) on DART-Eval CTS-GM12878: Cell-type-specific element classification, GM12878 One-against-rest AUROC for GM12878 accessible elements. Aggregation: Not reported DART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 4, row(Probed HyenaDNA), column(CTS-GM12878) |
| Configuration: HyenaDNA (probed) | Task: DART-Eval CTS-H1ESC: Cell-type-specific element classification, H1ESC Dataset subset: ENCODE chromatin accessibility peaks in five cell lines (DART-Eval split) | 0.889 auroc fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceHyenaDNA (probed) on DART-Eval CTS-H1ESC: Cell-type-specific element classification, H1ESC One-against-rest AUROC for H1ESC accessible elements. Aggregation: Not reported DART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 4, row(Probed HyenaDNA), column(CTS-H1ESC) |
| Configuration: HyenaDNA (probed) | Task: DART-Eval CTS-HEPG2: Cell-type-specific element classification, HEPG2 Dataset subset: ENCODE chromatin accessibility peaks in five cell lines (DART-Eval split) | 0.862 auroc fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceHyenaDNA (probed) on DART-Eval CTS-HEPG2: Cell-type-specific element classification, HEPG2 One-against-rest AUROC for HEPG2 accessible elements. Aggregation: Not reported DART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 4, row(Probed HyenaDNA), column(CTS-HEPG2) |
| Configuration: HyenaDNA (probed) | Task: DART-Eval CTS-IMR90: Cell-type-specific element classification, IMR90 Dataset subset: ENCODE chromatin accessibility peaks in five cell lines (DART-Eval split) | 0.882 auroc fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceHyenaDNA (probed) on DART-Eval CTS-IMR90: Cell-type-specific element classification, IMR90 One-against-rest AUROC for IMR90 accessible elements. Aggregation: Not reported DART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 4, row(Probed HyenaDNA), column(CTS-IMR90) |
| Configuration: HyenaDNA (probed) | Task: DART-Eval CTS-K562: Cell-type-specific element classification, K562 Dataset subset: ENCODE chromatin accessibility peaks in five cell lines (DART-Eval split) | 0.799 auroc fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceHyenaDNA (probed) on DART-Eval CTS-K562: Cell-type-specific element classification, K562 One-against-rest AUROC for K562 accessible elements. Aggregation: Not reported DART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 4, row(Probed HyenaDNA), column(CTS-K562) |
| Configuration: HyenaDNA (probed) | Task: DART-Eval REI-ABS: Regulatory element identification, absolute accuracy Dataset subset: ENCODE cCREs against dinucleotide-shuffled backgrounds (DART-Eval split) | 0.847 absolute_accuracy fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceHyenaDNA (probed) on DART-Eval REI-ABS: Regulatory element identification, absolute accuracy Distinguish ENCODE cCREs from dinucleotide-shuffled background sequences. The setting the model was run in is part of the method name. Aggregation: Not reported DART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 3, row(HyenaDNA), column(probed absolute_accuracy) |
| Configuration: HyenaDNA (probed) | Task: DART-Eval REI-PAIR: Regulatory element identification, paired accuracy Dataset subset: ENCODE cCREs against dinucleotide-shuffled backgrounds (DART-Eval split) | 0.935 paired_accuracy fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceHyenaDNA (probed) on DART-Eval REI-PAIR: Regulatory element identification, paired accuracy Distinguish ENCODE cCREs from dinucleotide-shuffled background sequences. The setting the model was run in is part of the method name. Aggregation: Not reported DART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 3, row(HyenaDNA), column(probed paired_accuracy) |
| Configuration: HyenaDNA (probed) | Task: DART-Eval VS-AFRICAN-AUROC: Variant scoring on Chromatin QTLs in African LCLs, AUROC Dataset subset: Chromatin QTLs in African LCLs (DART-Eval split) | 0.566 auroc fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceScore the effect of a variant on chromatin accessibility, against the measured QTL call. Aggregation: Not reported DART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 6, row(African HyenaDNA), column(probed auroc) |
| Configuration: HyenaDNA (probed) | Task: DART-Eval VS-AFRICAN-PEARSON_R: Variant scoring on Chromatin QTLs in African LCLs, Pearson r Dataset subset: Chromatin QTLs in African LCLs (DART-Eval split) | 0.012 pearson_r correlation · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceScore the effect of a variant on chromatin accessibility, against the measured QTL call. Aggregation: Not reported DART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 6, row(African HyenaDNA), column(probed pearson_r) |
| Configuration: HyenaDNA (probed) | Task: DART-Eval VS-YORUBAN-AUROC: Variant scoring on DNase QTLs in Yoruban LCLs, AUROC Dataset subset: DNase QTLs in Yoruban LCLs (DART-Eval split) | 0.467 auroc fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceScore the effect of a variant on chromatin accessibility, against the measured QTL call. Aggregation: Not reported DART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 6, row(Yoruban HyenaDNA), column(probed auroc) |
| Configuration: HyenaDNA (probed) | Task: DART-Eval VS-YORUBAN-PEARSON_R: Variant scoring on DNase QTLs in Yoruban LCLs, Pearson r Dataset subset: DNase QTLs in Yoruban LCLs (DART-Eval split) | -0.042 pearson_r correlation · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceScore the effect of a variant on chromatin accessibility, against the measured QTL call. Aggregation: Not reported DART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 6, row(Yoruban HyenaDNA), column(probed pearson_r) |
Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220.
Use this model
How it works, versions and access
Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions
Evidence
Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.
Evidence table
Inspect claims, sources and review details
Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.
One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.
0 evidence rows matching the loaded filters
| Property and statement | Original source and location | Review and provenance |
|---|
No evidence rows match these filters. Choose another scope or clear the search.
Sources and history
View linked audit checks and correction history
Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220 · Record review: source checked
1 source records and release history
- DART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Original source · 2412.05430v1
Technical metadata and extraction receipts
Stable ID: dart-eval-method-hyenadna-probed
- areas
- dna-genomes
- source locator
- Table 1, row(HyenaDNA)
- missing metadata
- checkpoint revision: unreported; parameters: unextracted
Related records
- model: HyenaDNA (probed) on DART-Eval CA-AUROC-GM12878: Chromatin activity prediction, GM12878, positives against negatives
- model: HyenaDNA (probed) on DART-Eval CA-AUROC-H1ESC: Chromatin activity prediction, H1ESC, positives against negatives
- model: HyenaDNA (probed) on DART-Eval CA-AUROC-HEPG2: Chromatin activity prediction, HEPG2, positives against negatives
- model: HyenaDNA (probed) on DART-Eval CA-AUROC-IMR90: Chromatin activity prediction, IMR90, positives against negatives
- model: HyenaDNA (probed) on DART-Eval CA-AUROC-K562: Chromatin activity prediction, K562, positives against negatives
- model: HyenaDNA (probed) on DART-Eval CA-SPEARMAN-GM12878: Chromatin activity prediction, GM12878, positives only
- model: HyenaDNA (probed) on DART-Eval CA-SPEARMAN-H1ESC: Chromatin activity prediction, H1ESC, positives only
- model: HyenaDNA (probed) on DART-Eval CA-SPEARMAN-HEPG2: Chromatin activity prediction, HEPG2, positives only
- model: HyenaDNA (probed) on DART-Eval CA-SPEARMAN-IMR90: Chromatin activity prediction, IMR90, positives only
- model: HyenaDNA (probed) on DART-Eval CA-SPEARMAN-K562: Chromatin activity prediction, K562, positives only
- model: HyenaDNA (probed) on DART-Eval CTS-ACC: Cell-type-specific element classification, overall accuracy
- model: HyenaDNA (probed) on DART-Eval CTS-GM12878: Cell-type-specific element classification, GM12878
- model: HyenaDNA (probed) on DART-Eval CTS-H1ESC: Cell-type-specific element classification, H1ESC
- model: HyenaDNA (probed) on DART-Eval CTS-HEPG2: Cell-type-specific element classification, HEPG2
- model: HyenaDNA (probed) on DART-Eval CTS-IMR90: Cell-type-specific element classification, IMR90
- model: HyenaDNA (probed) on DART-Eval CTS-K562: Cell-type-specific element classification, K562
- model: HyenaDNA (probed) on DART-Eval REI-ABS: Regulatory element identification, absolute accuracy
- model: HyenaDNA (probed) on DART-Eval REI-PAIR: Regulatory element identification, paired accuracy
- model: HyenaDNA (probed) on DART-Eval VS-AFRICAN-AUROC: Variant scoring on Chromatin QTLs in African LCLs, AUROC
- model: HyenaDNA (probed) on DART-Eval VS-AFRICAN-PEARSON_R: Variant scoring on Chromatin QTLs in African LCLs, Pearson r
- model: HyenaDNA (probed) on DART-Eval VS-YORUBAN-AUROC: Variant scoring on DNase QTLs in Yoruban LCLs, AUROC
- model: HyenaDNA (probed) on DART-Eval VS-YORUBAN-PEARSON_R: Variant scoring on DNase QTLs in Yoruban LCLs, Pearson r