| Configuration: FoldX5.0 ΔΔG on experimental PDB structures, BP4 ≤+1.0 and PP3 ≥+3.0 (Ramadane-Morchadi et al. 2025) | Protocol: BRCA1 MAVE LoF discrimination at the PP3 threshold (Ramadane-Morchadi et al. 2025 Table 2)
Dataset: BRCA1 RING and BRCT missense variants with saturation genome editing functional class (Findlay et al. 2018), LoF versus FUNC | 86.3% accuracy percent · higher Uncertainty: 95% CI 84.2 to 88.3 Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceFoldX5.0 ΔΔG on experimental PDB structures ≥+3, BRCA1 MAVE LoF discrimination (Ramadane-Morchadi et al. 2025) brca-20261009-protocol-ramadane2025-binary Aggregation: Not reported ACMG/AMP interpretation of BRCA1 missense variants: Structure-informed scores add evidence strength granularity to the PP3/BP4 computational evidence · Table 2, 'ΔΔG PDB a' group, row '≥+3', column 'Accuracy' |
|---|
| Configuration: FoldX5.0 ΔΔG on experimental PDB structures, BP4 ≤+1.0 and PP3 ≥+3.0 (Ramadane-Morchadi et al. 2025) | Protocol: BRCA1 MAVE LoF discrimination at the PP3 threshold (Ramadane-Morchadi et al. 2025 Table 2)
Dataset: BRCA1 RING and BRCT missense variants with saturation genome editing functional class (Findlay et al. 2018), LoF versus FUNC | 96.1% negative-predictive-value percent · higher Uncertainty: 95% CI 94.7 to 97.2 Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceFoldX5.0 ΔΔG on experimental PDB structures ≥+3, BRCA1 MAVE LoF discrimination (Ramadane-Morchadi et al. 2025) brca-20261009-protocol-ramadane2025-binary Aggregation: Not reported ACMG/AMP interpretation of BRCA1 missense variants: Structure-informed scores add evidence strength granularity to the PP3/BP4 computational evidence · Table 2, 'ΔΔG PDB a' group, row '≥+3', column 'NPV' |
|---|
| Configuration: FoldX5.0 ΔΔG on experimental PDB structures, BP4 ≤+1.0 and PP3 ≥+3.0 (Ramadane-Morchadi et al. 2025) | Protocol: BRCA1 MAVE LoF discrimination at the PP3 threshold (Ramadane-Morchadi et al. 2025 Table 2)
Dataset: BRCA1 RING and BRCT missense variants with saturation genome editing functional class (Findlay et al. 2018), LoF versus FUNC | 63.7% precision percent · higher Uncertainty: 95% CI 59.7 to 67.6 Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceFoldX5.0 ΔΔG on experimental PDB structures ≥+3, BRCA1 MAVE LoF discrimination (Ramadane-Morchadi et al. 2025) brca-20261009-protocol-ramadane2025-binary Aggregation: Not reported ACMG/AMP interpretation of BRCA1 missense variants: Structure-informed scores add evidence strength granularity to the PP3/BP4 computational evidence · Table 2, 'ΔΔG PDB a' group, row '≥+3', column 'PPV' |
|---|
| Configuration: FoldX5.0 ΔΔG on experimental PDB structures, BP4 ≤+1.0 and PP3 ≥+3.0 (Ramadane-Morchadi et al. 2025) | Protocol: BRCA1 MAVE LoF discrimination at the PP3 threshold (Ramadane-Morchadi et al. 2025 Table 2)
Dataset: BRCA1 RING and BRCT missense variants with saturation genome editing functional class (Findlay et al. 2018), LoF versus FUNC | 87.7% recall percent · higher Uncertainty: 95% CI 83.1 to 91.4 Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceFoldX5.0 ΔΔG on experimental PDB structures ≥+3, BRCA1 MAVE LoF discrimination (Ramadane-Morchadi et al. 2025) brca-20261009-protocol-ramadane2025-binary Aggregation: Not reported ACMG/AMP interpretation of BRCA1 missense variants: Structure-informed scores add evidence strength granularity to the PP3/BP4 computational evidence · Table 2, 'ΔΔG PDB a' group, row '≥+3', column 'Sensitivity' |
|---|
| Configuration: FoldX5.0 ΔΔG on experimental PDB structures, BP4 ≤+1.0 and PP3 ≥+3.0 (Ramadane-Morchadi et al. 2025) | Protocol: BRCA1 MAVE LoF discrimination at the PP3 threshold (Ramadane-Morchadi et al. 2025 Table 2)
Dataset: BRCA1 RING and BRCT missense variants with saturation genome editing functional class (Findlay et al. 2018), LoF versus FUNC | 85.9% specificity percent · higher Uncertainty: 95% CI 83.4 to 88.2 Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceFoldX5.0 ΔΔG on experimental PDB structures ≥+3, BRCA1 MAVE LoF discrimination (Ramadane-Morchadi et al. 2025) brca-20261009-protocol-ramadane2025-binary Aggregation: Not reported ACMG/AMP interpretation of BRCA1 missense variants: Structure-informed scores add evidence strength granularity to the PP3/BP4 computational evidence · Table 2, 'ΔΔG PDB a' group, row '≥+3', column 'Specificity' |
|---|
| Configuration: FoldX5.0 ΔΔG on experimental PDB structures, BP4 ≤+1.0 and PP3 ≥+3.0 (Ramadane-Morchadi et al. 2025) | Protocol: BRCA1 MAVE PP3/BP4 evidence strength by score threshold (Ramadane-Morchadi et al. 2025 Table 1)
Dataset: BRCA1 RING and BRCT missense variants with saturation genome editing functional class (Findlay et al. 2018), LoF versus FUNC | −2.663 log2-likelihood-ratio unitless · lower Uncertainty: 95% CI -3.135 to -2.191 Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceFoldX5.0 ΔΔG on experimental PDB structures, BP4 ≤+1.0 and PP3 ≥+3.0, BRCA1 MAVE evidence strength (Ramadane-Morchadi et al. 2025) brca-20261009-protocol-ramadane2025-pp3-bp4 Aggregation: Not reported ACMG/AMP interpretation of BRCA1 missense variants: Structure-informed scores add evidence strength granularity to the PP3/BP4 computational evidence · Table 1, row 8 ('ΔΔG PDB b' group), column 'Benignity evidence (BP4): Evidence strength, log 2 LR (95% CI)' |
|---|
| Configuration: FoldX5.0 ΔΔG on experimental PDB structures, BP4 ≤+1.0 and PP3 ≥+3.0 (Ramadane-Morchadi et al. 2025) | Protocol: BRCA1 MAVE PP3/BP4 evidence strength by score threshold (Ramadane-Morchadi et al. 2025 Table 1)
Dataset: BRCA1 RING and BRCT missense variants with saturation genome editing functional class (Findlay et al. 2018), LoF versus FUNC | 26% proportion percent · lower Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceFoldX5.0 ΔΔG on experimental PDB structures, BP4 ≤+1.0 and PP3 ≥+3.0, BRCA1 MAVE evidence strength (Ramadane-Morchadi et al. 2025) brca-20261009-protocol-ramadane2025-pp3-bp4 Aggregation: Not reported ACMG/AMP interpretation of BRCA1 missense variants: Structure-informed scores add evidence strength granularity to the PP3/BP4 computational evidence · Table 1, row 8 ('ΔΔG PDB b' group), column 'No bioinformatic code applicable' |
|---|
| Configuration: FoldX5.0 ΔΔG on experimental PDB structures, BP4 ≤+1.0 and PP3 ≥+3.0 (Ramadane-Morchadi et al. 2025) | Protocol: BRCA1 MAVE PP3/BP4 evidence strength by score threshold (Ramadane-Morchadi et al. 2025 Table 1)
Dataset: BRCA1 RING and BRCT missense variants with saturation genome editing functional class (Findlay et al. 2018), LoF versus FUNC | 2.78 log2-likelihood-ratio unitless · higher Uncertainty: 95% CI 2.515 to 3.045 Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceFoldX5.0 ΔΔG on experimental PDB structures, BP4 ≤+1.0 and PP3 ≥+3.0, BRCA1 MAVE evidence strength (Ramadane-Morchadi et al. 2025) brca-20261009-protocol-ramadane2025-pp3-bp4 Aggregation: Not reported ACMG/AMP interpretation of BRCA1 missense variants: Structure-informed scores add evidence strength granularity to the PP3/BP4 computational evidence · Table 1, row 8 ('ΔΔG PDB b' group), column 'Pathogenicity evidence (PP3): Evidence strength, log 2 LR (95% CI)' |
|---|