Evidence claim

Relevance of EVEE Evo 2 embedding extraction compute (Pearce et al. 2026) to "Select an execution workflow for large-scale diagnostic genomics"

Evidence concern: excluded from comparisons

The column labelled 'NTv3' in Figure 1b and 1c is not the method the Methods describe. The manuscript repository's plotting code (scripts/figure1/_heatmap_common.py at e5e4a43) renames 'NTv3 cosine dist' to 'NTv3' and drops 'NTv3 subref probe', whereas Methods 'Baseline methods' describe NTv3 650M layer-11 embeddings with L2-regularised logistic regression under 5-fold gene-holdout cross-validation. Figure 1d's NTv3 column is the supervised subref probe. The SNV and deconfounded NTv3 values are recorded as a zero-shot embedding distance.Interpretable variant effect prediction from genomic foundation model representations (EVEE), bioRxiv v4 · Figure 1b and 1c, column 'NTv3' (page 3); Methods 'Baseline methods', NTv3 (page 8); repository scripts/figure1/_heatmap_common.py RENAME_MAP and DROP_METHODS

AlphaMissense's 'Overall' cell in Figure 1b and 1c is its missense AUROC. The plotting code blanks AlphaMissense outside missense and copies the Missense value into the Overall row (scripts/figure1/_heatmap_common.py, am_ov_mask), so it is computed on a different, missense-only population from the other methods' Overall cells.Interpretable variant effect prediction from genomic foundation model representations (EVEE), bioRxiv v4 · Figure 1b and 1c, row 'Overall', column 'AlphaMissense' (page 3); repository scripts/figure1/_heatmap_common.py prepare()

Use case: Select an execution workflow for large-scale diagnostic genomics
Assessed by: EVEE Evo 2 embedding extraction compute (Pearce et al. 2026)
Relevance: Proxy evidence
Endpoint: Approximate total H100 GPU-hours to extract Evo 2 7B layer-27 embeddings (reference and variant, both strands, 65 kb windows) for 4,252,870 ClinVar variants

Proxy. The only linked figure for running a genomic foundation model over human variants at the scale of a whole variant database, which bears on the accelerator budget for scoring variants with such a model. It is a one-off research embedding harvest rather than a diagnostic workflow, and gives one approximate total with no GPU count, batch size, wall-clock time or per-sample figure.

1 reviewed evaluation

EVEE Evo 2 7B embedding extraction compute (Pearce et al. 2026)

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

18 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6
Property and statement	Original source and location	Review and provenance
Citation locations 1 values source id gfm-guide-20261014-source-evee-v4 locator Methods 'Genomic foundation model', paragraphs 'Harvesting' and 'Dataset' (page 8, line 461) Context-only references	Interpretable variant effect prediction from genomic foundation model representations (EVEE), bioRxiv v4 Original source ↗ gfm-guide-20261014-source-evee-v4: Methods 'Genomic foundation model', paragraphs 'Harvesting' and 'Dataset' (page 8, line 461) Version: bioRxiv v4, posted 2026-07-11 (v1 posted 2026-04-11) Retrieved: 2026-10-14T12:02:25Z	not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Source has a recorded evidence concern. Consult its source page before using the claim. Audit details Field: `attributes.citation_locators` Source artifact SHA-256: `1d65b07059c50e8e3f88b8fde950f011630886097bf2784a6653282c6424eef8` Hash scope: SHA-256 of one retrieval of the bioRxiv PDF (2026-10-14T12:02:25Z). bioRxiv stamps the PDF on each download (XMP ModifyDate, MetadataDate, DocumentID and InstanceID, the Info ModDate and the trailer /ID), so later retrievals differ. The extractor's copy was not retained, so the pinned bytes could not be re-verified. The independent reviewer's retrieval on 2026-10-14 (5,466,701 bytes, 26 pages, ModDate D:20261014063735-07'00') had SHA-256 9e2176440dfae6740b9e799796297cdd70b9bd59edb5c0a1e7fcdb5d6978710a; its Figure 1c and 1d match the repository vector PDFs cell for cell in the Overall rows, and the quoted Methods and Competing interests sentences are present. Inspected artifact
Comparison group evee2026-evo2-embedding-extraction Context-only references	Interpretable variant effect prediction from genomic foundation model representations (EVEE), bioRxiv v4 Original source ↗ gfm-guide-20261014-source-evee-v4: Methods 'Genomic foundation model', paragraphs 'Harvesting' and 'Dataset' (page 8, line 461) Version: bioRxiv v4, posted 2026-07-11 (v1 posted 2026-04-11) Retrieved: 2026-10-14T12:02:25Z	not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Source has a recorded evidence concern. Consult its source page before using the claim. Audit details Field: `attributes.comparison_group` Source artifact SHA-256: `1d65b07059c50e8e3f88b8fde950f011630886097bf2784a6653282c6424eef8` Hash scope: SHA-256 of one retrieval of the bioRxiv PDF (2026-10-14T12:02:25Z). bioRxiv stamps the PDF on each download (XMP ModifyDate, MetadataDate, DocumentID and InstanceID, the Info ModDate and the trailer /ID), so later retrievals differ. The extractor's copy was not retained, so the pinned bytes could not be re-verified. The independent reviewer's retrieval on 2026-10-14 (5,466,701 bytes, 26 pages, ModDate D:20261014063735-07'00') had SHA-256 9e2176440dfae6740b9e799796297cdd70b9bd59edb5c0a1e7fcdb5d6978710a; its Figure 1c and 1d match the repository vector PDFs cell for cell in the Overall rows, and the quoted Methods and Competing interests sentences are present. Inspected artifact
Comparison title Evo 2 7B embedding extraction for all ClinVar variants (Pearce et al. 2026) Context-only references	Interpretable variant effect prediction from genomic foundation model representations (EVEE), bioRxiv v4 Original source ↗ gfm-guide-20261014-source-evee-v4: Methods 'Genomic foundation model', paragraphs 'Harvesting' and 'Dataset' (page 8, line 461) Version: bioRxiv v4, posted 2026-07-11 (v1 posted 2026-04-11) Retrieved: 2026-10-14T12:02:25Z	not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Source has a recorded evidence concern. Consult its source page before using the claim. Audit details Field: `attributes.comparison_title` Source artifact SHA-256: `1d65b07059c50e8e3f88b8fde950f011630886097bf2784a6653282c6424eef8` Hash scope: SHA-256 of one retrieval of the bioRxiv PDF (2026-10-14T12:02:25Z). bioRxiv stamps the PDF on each download (XMP ModifyDate, MetadataDate, DocumentID and InstanceID, the Info ModDate and the trailer /ID), so later retrievals differ. The extractor's copy was not retained, so the pinned bytes could not be re-verified. The independent reviewer's retrieval on 2026-10-14 (5,466,701 bytes, 26 pages, ModDate D:20261014063735-07'00') had SHA-256 9e2176440dfae6740b9e799796297cdd70b9bd59edb5c0a1e7fcdb5d6978710a; its Figure 1c and 1d match the repository vector PDFs cell for cell in the Overall rows, and the quoted Methods and Competing interests sentences are present. Inspected artifact
Constraints 4 values Inspect every linked evaluation's source locator before citing a result. Do not combine this mapping's evaluations with any other protocol's results; hardware, inputs, software versions and timing boundaries differ between sources. Read the value as approximate; it is printed as '∼20,000 H100-hours'. Do not divide it into a per-variant or per-sample cost without saying the division is yours; the source prints no per-variant timing, and the workload covers both strands and both alleles. Context-only references	Interpretable variant effect prediction from genomic foundation model representations (EVEE), bioRxiv v4 Original source ↗ gfm-guide-20261014-source-evee-v4: Methods 'Genomic foundation model', paragraphs 'Harvesting' and 'Dataset' (page 8, line 461) Version: bioRxiv v4, posted 2026-07-11 (v1 posted 2026-04-11) Retrieved: 2026-10-14T12:02:25Z	not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Source has a recorded evidence concern. Consult its source page before using the claim. Audit details Field: `attributes.constraints` Source artifact SHA-256: `1d65b07059c50e8e3f88b8fde950f011630886097bf2784a6653282c6424eef8` Hash scope: SHA-256 of one retrieval of the bioRxiv PDF (2026-10-14T12:02:25Z). bioRxiv stamps the PDF on each download (XMP ModifyDate, MetadataDate, DocumentID and InstanceID, the Info ModDate and the trailer /ID), so later retrievals differ. The extractor's copy was not retained, so the pinned bytes could not be re-verified. The independent reviewer's retrieval on 2026-10-14 (5,466,701 bytes, 26 pages, ModDate D:20261014063735-07'00') had SHA-256 9e2176440dfae6740b9e799796297cdd70b9bd59edb5c0a1e7fcdb5d6978710a; its Figure 1c and 1d match the repository vector PDFs cell for cell in the Overall rows, and the quoted Methods and Competing interests sentences are present. Inspected artifact
Endpoint Approximate total H100 GPU-hours to extract Evo 2 7B layer-27 embeddings (reference and variant, both strands, 65 kb windows) for 4,252,870 ClinVar variants Context-only references	Interpretable variant effect prediction from genomic foundation model representations (EVEE), bioRxiv v4 Original source ↗ gfm-guide-20261014-source-evee-v4: Methods 'Genomic foundation model', paragraphs 'Harvesting' and 'Dataset' (page 8, line 461) Version: bioRxiv v4, posted 2026-07-11 (v1 posted 2026-04-11) Retrieved: 2026-10-14T12:02:25Z	not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Source has a recorded evidence concern. Consult its source page before using the claim. Audit details Field: `attributes.endpoint` Source artifact SHA-256: `1d65b07059c50e8e3f88b8fde950f011630886097bf2784a6653282c6424eef8` Hash scope: SHA-256 of one retrieval of the bioRxiv PDF (2026-10-14T12:02:25Z). bioRxiv stamps the PDF on each download (XMP ModifyDate, MetadataDate, DocumentID and InstanceID, the Info ModDate and the trailer /ID), so later retrievals differ. The extractor's copy was not retained, so the pinned bytes could not be re-verified. The independent reviewer's retrieval on 2026-10-14 (5,466,701 bytes, 26 pages, ModDate D:20261014063735-07'00') had SHA-256 9e2176440dfae6740b9e799796297cdd70b9bd59edb5c0a1e7fcdb5d6978710a; its Figure 1c and 1d match the repository vector PDFs cell for cell in the Overall rows, and the quoted Methods and Competing interests sentences are present. Inspected artifact
Claimed field links:assessed_by:gfm-guide-20261014-protocol-evee-embedding-extraction-compute Context-only references	Interpretable variant effect prediction from genomic foundation model representations (EVEE), bioRxiv v4 Original source ↗ gfm-guide-20261014-source-evee-v4: Methods 'Genomic foundation model', paragraphs 'Harvesting' and 'Dataset' (page 8, line 461) Version: bioRxiv v4, posted 2026-07-11 (v1 posted 2026-04-11) Retrieved: 2026-10-14T12:02:25Z	not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Source has a recorded evidence concern. Consult its source page before using the claim. Audit details Field: `attributes.field` Source artifact SHA-256: `1d65b07059c50e8e3f88b8fde950f011630886097bf2784a6653282c6424eef8` Hash scope: SHA-256 of one retrieval of the bioRxiv PDF (2026-10-14T12:02:25Z). bioRxiv stamps the PDF on each download (XMP ModifyDate, MetadataDate, DocumentID and InstanceID, the Info ModDate and the trailer /ID), so later retrievals differ. The extractor's copy was not retained, so the pinned bytes could not be re-verified. The independent reviewer's retrieval on 2026-10-14 (5,466,701 bytes, 26 pages, ModDate D:20261014063735-07'00') had SHA-256 9e2176440dfae6740b9e799796297cdd70b9bd59edb5c0a1e7fcdb5d6978710a; its Figure 1c and 1d match the repository vector PDFs cell for cell in the Overall rows, and the quoted Methods and Competing interests sentences are present. Inspected artifact
Headline metric accelerator-time Context-only references	Interpretable variant effect prediction from genomic foundation model representations (EVEE), bioRxiv v4 Original source ↗ gfm-guide-20261014-source-evee-v4: Methods 'Genomic foundation model', paragraphs 'Harvesting' and 'Dataset' (page 8, line 461) Version: bioRxiv v4, posted 2026-07-11 (v1 posted 2026-04-11) Retrieved: 2026-10-14T12:02:25Z	not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Source has a recorded evidence concern. Consult its source page before using the claim. Audit details Field: `attributes.headline_metric` Source artifact SHA-256: `1d65b07059c50e8e3f88b8fde950f011630886097bf2784a6653282c6424eef8` Hash scope: SHA-256 of one retrieval of the bioRxiv PDF (2026-10-14T12:02:25Z). bioRxiv stamps the PDF on each download (XMP ModifyDate, MetadataDate, DocumentID and InstanceID, the Info ModDate and the trailer /ID), so later retrievals differ. The extractor's copy was not retained, so the pinned bytes could not be re-verified. The independent reviewer's retrieval on 2026-10-14 (5,466,701 bytes, 26 pages, ModDate D:20261014063735-07'00') had SHA-256 9e2176440dfae6740b9e799796297cdd70b9bd59edb5c0a1e7fcdb5d6978710a; its Figure 1c and 1d match the repository vector PDFs cell for cell in the Overall rows, and the quoted Methods and Competing interests sentences are present. Inspected artifact
Limitations 5 values Developer-reported: EVEE's authors built the extraction pipeline, and three of them co-authored Evo 2 (claim gfm-guide-20261014-claim-evee-developer-overlap). Stated once in Methods (the 'Dataset' paragraph after 'Harvesting'); GPU count, batch size, wall-clock time and software versions are not given. The workload stores per-position embeddings (bf16, about 34 TB), which a diagnostic scoring pipeline would not need; the figure therefore includes work beyond scoring. Preprint (bioRxiv v4), not peer reviewed. The source carries an evidence concern about the NTv3 column of Figures 1b and 1c. It does not touch this figure, but an active judgement needs clean protocol sources, so this judgement stays withheld after review until that concern is resolved. Context-only references	Interpretable variant effect prediction from genomic foundation model representations (EVEE), bioRxiv v4 Original source ↗ gfm-guide-20261014-source-evee-v4: Methods 'Genomic foundation model', paragraphs 'Harvesting' and 'Dataset' (page 8, line 461) Version: bioRxiv v4, posted 2026-07-11 (v1 posted 2026-04-11) Retrieved: 2026-10-14T12:02:25Z	not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Source has a recorded evidence concern. Consult its source page before using the claim. Audit details Field: `attributes.limitations` Source artifact SHA-256: `1d65b07059c50e8e3f88b8fde950f011630886097bf2784a6653282c6424eef8` Hash scope: SHA-256 of one retrieval of the bioRxiv PDF (2026-10-14T12:02:25Z). bioRxiv stamps the PDF on each download (XMP ModifyDate, MetadataDate, DocumentID and InstanceID, the Info ModDate and the trailer /ID), so later retrievals differ. The extractor's copy was not retained, so the pinned bytes could not be re-verified. The independent reviewer's retrieval on 2026-10-14 (5,466,701 bytes, 26 pages, ModDate D:20261014063735-07'00') had SHA-256 9e2176440dfae6740b9e799796297cdd70b9bd59edb5c0a1e7fcdb5d6978710a; its Figure 1c and 1d match the repository vector PDFs cell for cell in the Overall rows, and the quoted Methods and Competing interests sentences are present. Inspected artifact
Pinned records 5 values record id gfm-guide-20261014-eval-evee-embedding-extraction-compute fields status links attributes.origin attributes.comparison sha256 53403c68ad5bea53431fee3eb1b4e81b5cff414530d292e710041a63abd5422a record id gfm-guide-20261014-protocol-evee-embedding-extraction-compute fields status name description facets source_ids links attributes sha256 c5c5c758a9673043af191956af05d68bfe66247b928364969f52684a897c9294 record id gfm-guide-20261014-result-evee-embedding-extraction-h100-hours fields status attributes.metric attributes.metric_qualifier attributes.printed_value attributes.numeric_value sha256 87e35eacbfca259a686cae9b9fa7b3829ee9358124ea5b57f1d002c6fa0dd6eb record id gfm-guide-20261014-source-evee-v4 fields status attributes.artifact_sha256 sha256 7fa901d074087100fbb320434beaf2f77ce2000077cd20e456c03c9285263dd7 record id use-case-diagnostic-genomics-model-execution fields status name description facets attributes.question attributes.decision attributes.inputs attributes.output attributes.exclusions attributes.setting attributes.clinical_scope attributes.intended_users sha256 1c2a12431556cc6581f5aab019cf91576d2393387b88a8a2bea35ea2a3ee4a70 Context-only references	Interpretable variant effect prediction from genomic foundation model representations (EVEE), bioRxiv v4 Original source ↗ gfm-guide-20261014-source-evee-v4: Methods 'Genomic foundation model', paragraphs 'Harvesting' and 'Dataset' (page 8, line 461) Version: bioRxiv v4, posted 2026-07-11 (v1 posted 2026-04-11) Retrieved: 2026-10-14T12:02:25Z	not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Source has a recorded evidence concern. Consult its source page before using the claim. Audit details Field: `attributes.pins` Source artifact SHA-256: `1d65b07059c50e8e3f88b8fde950f011630886097bf2784a6653282c6424eef8` Hash scope: SHA-256 of one retrieval of the bioRxiv PDF (2026-10-14T12:02:25Z). bioRxiv stamps the PDF on each download (XMP ModifyDate, MetadataDate, DocumentID and InstanceID, the Info ModDate and the trailer /ID), so later retrievals differ. The extractor's copy was not retained, so the pinned bytes could not be re-verified. The independent reviewer's retrieval on 2026-10-14 (5,466,701 bytes, 26 pages, ModDate D:20261014063735-07'00') had SHA-256 9e2176440dfae6740b9e799796297cdd70b9bd59edb5c0a1e7fcdb5d6978710a; its Figure 1c and 1d match the repository vector PDFs cell for cell in the Overall rows, and the quoted Methods and Competing interests sentences are present. Inspected artifact
Rationale Proxy. The only linked figure for running a genomic foundation model over human variants at the scale of a whole variant database, which bears on the accelerator budget for scoring variants with such a model. It is a one-off research embedding harvest rather than a diagnostic workflow, and gives one approximate total with no GPU count, batch size, wall-clock time or per-sample figure. Context-only references	Interpretable variant effect prediction from genomic foundation model representations (EVEE), bioRxiv v4 Original source ↗ gfm-guide-20261014-source-evee-v4: Methods 'Genomic foundation model', paragraphs 'Harvesting' and 'Dataset' (page 8, line 461) Version: bioRxiv v4, posted 2026-07-11 (v1 posted 2026-04-11) Retrieved: 2026-10-14T12:02:25Z	not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Source has a recorded evidence concern. Consult its source page before using the claim. Audit details Field: `attributes.rationale` Source artifact SHA-256: `1d65b07059c50e8e3f88b8fde950f011630886097bf2784a6653282c6424eef8` Hash scope: SHA-256 of one retrieval of the bioRxiv PDF (2026-10-14T12:02:25Z). bioRxiv stamps the PDF on each download (XMP ModifyDate, MetadataDate, DocumentID and InstanceID, the Info ModDate and the trailer /ID), so later retrievals differ. The extractor's copy was not retained, so the pinned bytes could not be re-verified. The independent reviewer's retrieval on 2026-10-14 (5,466,701 bytes, 26 pages, ModDate D:20261014063735-07'00') had SHA-256 9e2176440dfae6740b9e799796297cdd70b9bd59edb5c0a1e7fcdb5d6978710a; its Figure 1c and 1d match the repository vector PDFs cell for cell in the Overall rows, and the quoted Methods and Competing interests sentences are present. Inspected artifact

How to read the evidence

Sources and history

Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6 · Record review: source checked

1 source record and release history

Interpretable variant effect prediction from genomic foundation model representations (EVEE), bioRxiv v4 · Original source · bioRxiv v4, posted 2026-07-11 (v1 posted 2026-04-11)

Download this release (gzip)

Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: use-case-mapping-gfm-guide-20261014-evee-embedding-extraction

field: links:assessed_by:gfm-guide-20261014-protocol-evee-embedding-extraction-compute
value: gfm-guide-20261014-protocol-evee-embedding-extraction-compute
relevance: proxy
endpoint: Approximate total H100 GPU-hours to extract Evo 2 7B layer-27 embeddings (reference and variant, both strands, 65 kb windows) for 4,252,870 ClinVar variants
rationale: Proxy. The only linked figure for running a genomic foundation model over human variants at the scale of a whole variant database, which bears on the accelerator budget for scoring variants with such a model. It is a one-off research embedding harvest rather than a diagnostic workflow, and gives one approximate total with no GPU count, batch size, wall-clock time or per-sample figure.
constraints: Inspect every linked evaluation's source locator before citing a result.; Do not combine this mapping's evaluations with any other protocol's results; hardware, inputs, software versions and timing boundaries differ between sources.; Read the value as approximate; it is printed as '∼20,000 H100-hours'.; Do not divide it into a per-variant or per-sample cost without saying the division is yours; the source prints no per-variant timing, and the workload covers both strands and both alleles.
limitations: Developer-reported: EVEE's authors built the extraction pipeline, and three of them co-authored Evo 2 (claim gfm-guide-20261014-claim-evee-developer-overlap).; Stated once in Methods (the 'Dataset' paragraph after 'Harvesting'); GPU count, batch size, wall-clock time and software versions are not given.; The workload stores per-position embeddings (bf16, about 34 TB), which a diagnostic scoring pipeline would not need; the figure therefore includes work beyond scoring.; Preprint (bioRxiv v4), not peer reviewed.; The source carries an evidence concern about the NTv3 column of Figures 1b and 1c. It does not touch this figure, but an active judgement needs clean protocol sources, so this judgement stays withheld after review until that concern is resolved.
revision: 1
reason: Add relevance judgements for the execution and compute protocols of the genomic foundation model guide sources batch (data/omics/gfm-guide-sources-20261014, issue #162), independently reviewed in PR #169.
citation locators: source id: gfm-guide-20261014-source-evee-v4; locator: Methods 'Genomic foundation model', paragraphs 'Harvesting' and 'Dataset' (page 8, line 461)
source locator: gfm-guide-20261014-source-evee-v4: Methods 'Genomic foundation model', paragraphs 'Harvesting' and 'Dataset' (page 8, line 461)
comparison group: evee2026-evo2-embedding-extraction
comparison title: Evo 2 7B embedding extraction for all ClinVar variants (Pearce et al. 2026)
headline metric: accelerator-time
reviewed evaluations: gfm-guide-20261014-eval-evee-embedding-extraction-compute
review: method: independent-cell-check; scope-review; reviewer: claude; reviewer note: Claude (Opus 5.5) review agent review-169, independent of the agent that drafted these judgements for issue #162; no human review claimed; reviewed at: 2026-10-14T19:00:00Z; note: Independent relevance review: grade, endpoint, rationale, constraints, limitations and locators checked against the use case and the source text; every value of the listed evaluations checked against the source. No execution, reproduction, qualified human scientific review or clinical validation. See docs/reviews/use-cases/diagnostic-genomics-model-execution-judgements-2026-10-14.md. Checked in a fresh copy of the bioRxiv v4 PDF; bioRxiv stamps each download, so its hash differs from the pinned bytes (hash_scope on the source). Stays withheld while the source carries its evidence concern.
pins: record id: gfm-guide-20261014-eval-evee-embedding-extraction-compute; fields: status; links; attributes.origin; attributes.comparison; sha256: 53403c68ad5bea53431fee3eb1b4e81b5cff414530d292e710041a63abd5422a; record id: gfm-guide-20261014-protocol-evee-embedding-extraction-compute; fields: status; name; description; facets; source_ids; links; attributes; sha256: c5c5c758a9673043af191956af05d68bfe66247b928364969f52684a897c9294; record id: gfm-guide-20261014-result-evee-embedding-extraction-h100-hours; fields: status; attributes.metric; attributes.metric_qualifier; attributes.printed_value; attributes.numeric_value; sha256: 87e35eacbfca259a686cae9b9fa7b3829ee9358124ea5b57f1d002c6fa0dd6eb; record id: gfm-guide-20261014-source-evee-v4; fields: status; attributes.artifact_sha256; sha256: 7fa901d074087100fbb320434beaf2f77ce2000077cd20e456c03c9285263dd7; record id: use-case-diagnostic-genomics-model-execution; fields: status; name; description; facets; attributes.question; attributes.decision; attributes.inputs; attributes.output; attributes.exclusions; attributes.setting; attributes.clinical_scope; attributes.intended_users; sha256: 1c2a12431556cc6581f5aab019cf91576d2393387b88a8a2bea35ea2a3ee4a70

Related records

subject: Select an execution workflow for large-scale diagnostic genomics

Suggest a correction