Baseline: Select therapeutic targets for validation
Baseline of Select therapeutic targets for validation
Random and pathway-based selection
Baseline method for the use case, reviewed against its cited sources.
Evidence
Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.
Evidence table
Inspect claims, sources and review details
Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.
One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.
18 evidence rows matching the loaded filters
| Property and statement | Original source and location | Review and provenance |
|---|---|---|
| Claimed field baseline Context-only references | LLMs for Bayesian Optimization in Scientific Domains: Are We There Yet? tgtval-20261009-source-roohani2025: Appendix (human pathway baseline) and Table 6 (pathways), Table 2 (Random); tgtval-20261009-source-gupta2025: baselines description and Table 3 (Random) Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation. Version: Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2025, pages 15482-15510 | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: pdftotext -layout text layer, parsed by extract/extract_target_validation.py |
| Claimed field baseline Context-only references | BioDiscoveryAgent: An AI Agent for Designing Genetic Perturbation Experiments tgtval-20261009-source-roohani2025: Appendix (human pathway baseline) and Table 6 (pathways), Table 2 (Random); tgtval-20261009-source-gupta2025: baselines description and Table 3 (Random) Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation. Version: arXiv:2405.17631 version 3, updated 2025-03-09; published as a conference paper at ICLR 2025 | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: pdftotext -layout text layer, parsed by extract/extract_target_validation.py |
Method ids2 values
| LLMs for Bayesian Optimization in Scientific Domains: Are We There Yet? tgtval-20261009-source-roohani2025: Appendix (human pathway baseline) and Table 6 (pathways), Table 2 (Random); tgtval-20261009-source-gupta2025: baselines description and Table 3 (Random) Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation. Version: Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2025, pages 15482-15510 | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: pdftotext -layout text layer, parsed by extract/extract_target_validation.py |
Method ids2 values
| BioDiscoveryAgent: An AI Agent for Designing Genetic Perturbation Experiments tgtval-20261009-source-roohani2025: Appendix (human pathway baseline) and Table 6 (pathways), Table 2 (Random); tgtval-20261009-source-gupta2025: baselines description and Table 3 (Random) Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation. Version: arXiv:2405.17631 version 3, updated 2025-03-09; published as a conference paper at ICLR 2025 | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: pdftotext -layout text layer, parsed by extract/extract_target_validation.py |
Pinned records3 values
| LLMs for Bayesian Optimization in Scientific Domains: Are We There Yet? tgtval-20261009-source-roohani2025: Appendix (human pathway baseline) and Table 6 (pathways), Table 2 (Random); tgtval-20261009-source-gupta2025: baselines description and Table 3 (Random) Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation. Version: Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2025, pages 15482-15510 | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: pdftotext -layout text layer, parsed by extract/extract_target_validation.py |
Pinned records3 values
| BioDiscoveryAgent: An AI Agent for Designing Genetic Perturbation Experiments tgtval-20261009-source-roohani2025: Appendix (human pathway baseline) and Table 6 (pathways), Table 2 (Random); tgtval-20261009-source-gupta2025: baselines description and Table 3 (Random) Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation. Version: arXiv:2405.17631 version 3, updated 2025-03-09; published as a conference paper at ICLR 2025 | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: pdftotext -layout text layer, parsed by extract/extract_target_validation.py |
| Rationale There is no pre-machine-learning method for choosing which targets to perturb; the established comparators are random selection and genes chosen from relevant pathways. Agent and Bayesian optimisation methods are judged by how many more hits they find than these. Context-only references | LLMs for Bayesian Optimization in Scientific Domains: Are We There Yet? tgtval-20261009-source-roohani2025: Appendix (human pathway baseline) and Table 6 (pathways), Table 2 (Random); tgtval-20261009-source-gupta2025: baselines description and Table 3 (Random) Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation. Version: Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2025, pages 15482-15510 | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: pdftotext -layout text layer, parsed by extract/extract_target_validation.py |
| Rationale There is no pre-machine-learning method for choosing which targets to perturb; the established comparators are random selection and genes chosen from relevant pathways. Agent and Bayesian optimisation methods are judged by how many more hits they find than these. Context-only references | BioDiscoveryAgent: An AI Agent for Designing Genetic Perturbation Experiments tgtval-20261009-source-roohani2025: Appendix (human pathway baseline) and Table 6 (pathways), Table 2 (Random); tgtval-20261009-source-gupta2025: baselines description and Table 3 (Random) Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation. Version: arXiv:2405.17631 version 3, updated 2025-03-09; published as a conference paper at ICLR 2025 | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: pdftotext -layout text layer, parsed by extract/extract_target_validation.py |
| Source location tgtval-20261009-source-roohani2025: Appendix (human pathway baseline) and Table 6 (pathways), Table 2 (Random); tgtval-20261009-source-gupta2025: baselines description and Table 3 (Random) Context-only references | LLMs for Bayesian Optimization in Scientific Domains: Are We There Yet? tgtval-20261009-source-roohani2025: Appendix (human pathway baseline) and Table 6 (pathways), Table 2 (Random); tgtval-20261009-source-gupta2025: baselines description and Table 3 (Random) Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation. Version: Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2025, pages 15482-15510 | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: pdftotext -layout text layer, parsed by extract/extract_target_validation.py |
| Source location tgtval-20261009-source-roohani2025: Appendix (human pathway baseline) and Table 6 (pathways), Table 2 (Random); tgtval-20261009-source-gupta2025: baselines description and Table 3 (Random) Context-only references | BioDiscoveryAgent: An AI Agent for Designing Genetic Perturbation Experiments tgtval-20261009-source-roohani2025: Appendix (human pathway baseline) and Table 6 (pathways), Table 2 (Random); tgtval-20261009-source-gupta2025: baselines description and Table 3 (Random) Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation. Version: arXiv:2405.17631 version 3, updated 2025-03-09; published as a conference paper at ICLR 2025 | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: pdftotext -layout text layer, parsed by extract/extract_target_validation.py |
Sources and history
Release 2026-11-02-a7f03c9e55a5 · Record review: source checked
2 source records and release history
- BioDiscoveryAgent: An AI Agent for Designing Genetic Perturbation Experiments · Original source · arXiv:2405.17631 version 3, updated 2025-03-09; published as a conference paper at ICLR 2025
- LLMs for Bayesian Optimization in Scientific Domains: Are We There Yet? · Original source · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2025, pages 15482-15510
Technical metadata and extraction receipts
Stable ID: use-case-baseline-therapeutic-target-validation
- field
- baseline
- value
- Random and pathway-based selection
- source locator
- tgtval-20261009-source-roohani2025: Appendix (human pathway baseline) and Table 6 (pathways), Table 2 (Random); tgtval-20261009-source-gupta2025: baselines description and Table 3 (Random)
- method ids
- tgtval-20261009-method-random-selection; tgtval-20261009-method-human-pathway-selection
- rationale
- There is no pre-machine-learning method for choosing which targets to perturb; the established comparators are random selection and genes chosen from relevant pathways. Agent and Bayesian optimisation methods are judged by how many more hits they find than these.
- review
- method: source-hash-verification; automated-source-review; reviewer: claude; reviewer note: Separate Claude review agent, independent of the agent that proposed the baseline; no human review claimed; reviewed at: 2026-10-12T18:00:00Z; note: Accepted as proposed. Sources re-retrieved and read; method records and their configuration links checked against the use case's active comparisons. Names the reference newer methods are compared with, not a recommendation. See docs/reviews/use-cases/baselines-2026-10-12.md.
- pins
- record id: tgtval-20261009-source-gupta2025; fields: status; attributes.artifact_sha256; sha256: 6f5ca86baa095c19fc137331fb00935d89468ace1de74510fee46e8dba5971a7; record id: tgtval-20261009-source-roohani2025; fields: status; attributes.artifact_sha256; sha256: 2cd7fb822f68bd61204618ad8ffaf1f70dfb094237c5787671c3a3ecfc8afd5b; record id: use-case-therapeutic-target-validation; fields: status; name; description; facets; attributes.question; attributes.decision; attributes.inputs; attributes.output; attributes.exclusions; attributes.setting; attributes.clinical_scope; attributes.intended_users; sha256: 3b7601f2decfe5a3304ea2c8ccaa89929148f2d443b05bd6c9e92f1844c0a578