rewirebio.iobenchmarks
Evidence claim

CASP16 affinity accuracy is no better than the earlier D3R challenges

Finding:no-better-than-d3r of CASP16 binding affinity challenge

best CASP16 stage 1 results no better than the typical best stage 1 D3R result, which averaged Kendall's τ of 0.48 (min 0.21, max 0.71). Source wording: "For affinity predictions, it seems clear that the best Stage 1 CASP16 results are no better than the typical best Stage 1 D3R result, which averaged Kendall's τ of 0.48, with min/max of 0.21 and 0.71."

Affinity-ranking finding stated in the body text of the CASP16 assessment.

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

6 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance
Claimed field
finding:no-better-than-d3r
Context-only references
Assessment of protein-ligand pose and affinity predictions in CASP16

Original source ↗

Discussion

Version: Proteins, cover date January 2026; Europe PMC full-text XML snapshot PMC12750038
Retrieved: 2026-10-22T11:58:25Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: attributes.field

Source artifact SHA-256: a1d7fdc52df61c4d75197f04be91b511b7d093d229d96a0815a11f95e350256b

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Source location
Discussion
Context-only references
Assessment of protein-ligand pose and affinity predictions in CASP16

Original source ↗

Discussion

Version: Proteins, cover date January 2026; Europe PMC full-text XML snapshot PMC12750038
Retrieved: 2026-10-22T11:58:25Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: attributes.source_locator

Source artifact SHA-256: a1d7fdc52df61c4d75197f04be91b511b7d093d229d96a0815a11f95e350256b

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Claimed value
best CASP16 stage 1 results no better than the typical best stage 1 D3R result, which averaged Kendall's τ of 0.48 (min 0.21, max 0.71). Source wording: "For affinity predictions, it seems clear that the best Stage 1 CASP16 results are no better than the typical best Stage 1 D3R result, which averaged Kendall's τ of 0.48, with min/max of 0.21 and 0.71."
Context-only references
Assessment of protein-ligand pose and affinity predictions in CASP16

Original source ↗

Discussion

Version: Proteins, cover date January 2026; Europe PMC full-text XML snapshot PMC12750038
Retrieved: 2026-10-22T11:58:25Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: attributes.value

Source artifact SHA-256: a1d7fdc52df61c4d75197f04be91b511b7d093d229d96a0815a11f95e350256b

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Description
Affinity-ranking finding stated in the body text of the CASP16 assessment.
Context-only references
Assessment of protein-ligand pose and affinity predictions in CASP16

Original source ↗

Discussion

Version: Proteins, cover date January 2026; Europe PMC full-text XML snapshot PMC12750038
Retrieved: 2026-10-22T11:58:25Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: description

Source artifact SHA-256: a1d7fdc52df61c4d75197f04be91b511b7d093d229d96a0815a11f95e350256b

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Relationship: subject
uc-leadopt-20261022-benchmark-casp16-affinity
Context-only references
Assessment of protein-ligand pose and affinity predictions in CASP16

Original source ↗

Discussion

Version: Proteins, cover date January 2026; Europe PMC full-text XML snapshot PMC12750038
Retrieved: 2026-10-22T11:58:25Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: links:subject:uc-leadopt-20261022-benchmark-casp16-affinity

Source artifact SHA-256: a1d7fdc52df61c4d75197f04be91b511b7d093d229d96a0815a11f95e350256b

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Name
CASP16 affinity accuracy is no better than the earlier D3R challenges
Context-only references
Assessment of protein-ligand pose and affinity predictions in CASP16

Original source ↗

Discussion

Version: Proteins, cover date January 2026; Europe PMC full-text XML snapshot PMC12750038
Retrieved: 2026-10-22T11:58:25Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: name

Source artifact SHA-256: a1d7fdc52df61c4d75197f04be91b511b7d093d229d96a0815a11f95e350256b

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Sources and history

Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6 · Record review: source checked

1 source record and release historyDownload this release (gzip)
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: uc-leadopt-20261022-claim-gilson-no-better-than-d3r

field
finding:no-better-than-d3r
value
best CASP16 stage 1 results no better than the typical best stage 1 D3R result, which averaged Kendall's τ of 0.48 (min 0.21, max 0.71). Source wording: "For affinity predictions, it seems clear that the best Stage 1 CASP16 results are no better than the typical best Stage 1 D3R result, which averaged Kendall's τ of 0.48, with min/max of 0.21 and 0.71."
source locator
Discussion
review
method: source-hash-verification; pdf-text-parse; independent-cell-check; rendered-source-visual-check; ai-assisted-source-review; method note: Re-retrieved all three sources and matched each pinned SHA-256. Re-rendered the Boltz-2 supplement with pdftotext -layout (poppler 26.08.0) and matched the text layer's recorded SHA-256. Re-read all 256 cells with a parser written for this review that does not import the extraction script, matching each result to its cell through its own source_locator, and separately read appendix tables 11, 12 and 14 from PNG renderings of PDF pages 29 and 30 at 160 dpi, and Ross Table 3 from the pinned XML markup. Checked printed value, numeric value, locator, metric concept, qualifier, direction, unit, uncertainty and the linked configuration, protocol and dataset, and that every N/A or '-' cell is recorded as missing with a reason.; reviewer: claude; reviewer note: Claude review agent, independent of the extraction agent; no human review claimed; reviewed at: 2026-10-22T13:40:00Z; artifact sha256: a1d7fdc52df61c4d75197f04be91b511b7d093d229d96a0815a11f95e350256b; retrieval url: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12750038/fullTextXML; note: Independent review 2026-10-22: the quoted wording was matched against the pinned artifact and the locator checked.
Related records

Suggest a correction