rewirebio.iobenchmarks
Evidence claim

reported_finding: splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-znabu2026-mfass-full-cohort

Descriptive fact transcribed from the pinned source.

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

6 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-10-10-6e93f504adfc
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance
attributes.field
reported_finding
Context-only references
A Reproducible MFASS Benchmark of Splice-Disruption Predictors Reveals a Shared Exon-Interior Blind Spot

Original source ↗

Section 5 'Where the tools fail' paragraph 3

Version: bioRxiv 2026.07.21.739871 v1, posted 2026-07-26; full-text PDF
Retrieved: 2026-10-09T20:52:21Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: attributes.field

Source artifact SHA-256: 52a2d1ccfd99ef62f847b323030acdb7d881ae75b6c9dda8805884a2e7727552

Hash scope: SHA-256 of the PDF as served. The PDF ModDate is 2026-10-09 21:52:24 BST; a re-download at review on 2026-10-09 returned identical bytes. bioRxiv can re-stamp the PDF on later downloads, so if the hash stops matching, compare the text layer.

Inspected artifact

attributes.source_locator
Section 5 'Where the tools fail' paragraph 3
Context-only references
A Reproducible MFASS Benchmark of Splice-Disruption Predictors Reveals a Shared Exon-Interior Blind Spot

Original source ↗

Section 5 'Where the tools fail' paragraph 3

Version: bioRxiv 2026.07.21.739871 v1, posted 2026-07-26; full-text PDF
Retrieved: 2026-10-09T20:52:21Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: attributes.source_locator

Source artifact SHA-256: 52a2d1ccfd99ef62f847b323030acdb7d881ae75b6c9dda8805884a2e7727552

Hash scope: SHA-256 of the PDF as served. The PDF ModDate is 2026-10-09 21:52:24 BST; a re-download at review on 2026-10-09 returned identical bytes. bioRxiv can re-stamp the PDF on later downloads, so if the hash stops matching, compare the text layer.

Inspected artifact

attributes.value
200 of 1,050 disrupting variants (19%) are missed by all five tools at a common 10% false-positive operating point; 77% of these lie more than 10 bp from a splice site and 149 of 200 are exonic.
Context-only references
A Reproducible MFASS Benchmark of Splice-Disruption Predictors Reveals a Shared Exon-Interior Blind Spot

Original source ↗

Section 5 'Where the tools fail' paragraph 3

Version: bioRxiv 2026.07.21.739871 v1, posted 2026-07-26; full-text PDF
Retrieved: 2026-10-09T20:52:21Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: attributes.value

Source artifact SHA-256: 52a2d1ccfd99ef62f847b323030acdb7d881ae75b6c9dda8805884a2e7727552

Hash scope: SHA-256 of the PDF as served. The PDF ModDate is 2026-10-09 21:52:24 BST; a re-download at review on 2026-10-09 returned identical bytes. bioRxiv can re-stamp the PDF on later downloads, so if the hash stops matching, compare the text layer.

Inspected artifact

description
Descriptive fact transcribed from the pinned source.
Context-only references
A Reproducible MFASS Benchmark of Splice-Disruption Predictors Reveals a Shared Exon-Interior Blind Spot

Original source ↗

Section 5 'Where the tools fail' paragraph 3

Version: bioRxiv 2026.07.21.739871 v1, posted 2026-07-26; full-text PDF
Retrieved: 2026-10-09T20:52:21Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: description

Source artifact SHA-256: 52a2d1ccfd99ef62f847b323030acdb7d881ae75b6c9dda8805884a2e7727552

Hash scope: SHA-256 of the PDF as served. The PDF ModDate is 2026-10-09 21:52:24 BST; a re-download at review on 2026-10-09 returned identical bytes. bioRxiv can re-stamp the PDF on later downloads, so if the hash stops matching, compare the text layer.

Inspected artifact

Relationship: subject
splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-znabu2026-mfass-full-cohort
Context-only references
A Reproducible MFASS Benchmark of Splice-Disruption Predictors Reveals a Shared Exon-Interior Blind Spot

Original source ↗

Section 5 'Where the tools fail' paragraph 3

Version: bioRxiv 2026.07.21.739871 v1, posted 2026-07-26; full-text PDF
Retrieved: 2026-10-09T20:52:21Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: links:subject:splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-znabu2026-mfass-full-cohort

Source artifact SHA-256: 52a2d1ccfd99ef62f847b323030acdb7d881ae75b6c9dda8805884a2e7727552

Hash scope: SHA-256 of the PDF as served. The PDF ModDate is 2026-10-09 21:52:24 BST; a re-download at review on 2026-10-09 returned identical bytes. bioRxiv can re-stamp the PDF on later downloads, so if the hash stops matching, compare the text layer.

Inspected artifact

name
reported_finding: splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-znabu2026-mfass-full-cohort
Context-only references
A Reproducible MFASS Benchmark of Splice-Disruption Predictors Reveals a Shared Exon-Interior Blind Spot

Original source ↗

Section 5 'Where the tools fail' paragraph 3

Version: bioRxiv 2026.07.21.739871 v1, posted 2026-07-26; full-text PDF
Retrieved: 2026-10-09T20:52:21Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: name

Source artifact SHA-256: 52a2d1ccfd99ef62f847b323030acdb7d881ae75b6c9dda8805884a2e7727552

Hash scope: SHA-256 of the PDF as served. The PDF ModDate is 2026-10-09 21:52:24 BST; a re-download at review on 2026-10-09 returned identical bytes. bioRxiv can re-stamp the PDF on later downloads, so if the hash stops matching, compare the text layer.

Inspected artifact

Sources and history

Release 2026-10-10-6e93f504adfc · Record review: source checked

1 source records and release historyDownload this release (gzip)
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: splicing-follow-up-20261009-claim-znabu2026-shared-misses

field
reported_finding
value
200 of 1,050 disrupting variants (19%) are missed by all five tools at a common 10% false-positive operating point; 77% of these lie more than 10 bp from a splice site and 149 of 200 are exonic.
source locator
Section 5 'Where the tools fail' paragraph 3
review
method: ai-assisted-source-review; method note: Compared with Section 5 'Where the tools fail' paragraph 3 of a fresh copy of the PDF text layer. Correct as worded.; reviewer: claude; reviewer note: Separate Claude review agent, independent of the extractor; no human review claimed; date: 2026-10-09; artifact sha256: 52a2d1ccfd99ef62f847b323030acdb7d881ae75b6c9dda8805884a2e7727552; retrieval url: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/early/2026/07/26/2026.07.21.739871.full.pdf; note: Hand transcription checked against the article text by the independent reviewer.
Related records

Suggest a correction