SIFT (Chen et al. 2020): facets.method_types
Facets: method types of SIFT (Chen et al. 2020)
["conventional_pipeline"]
Correct the method type from specialist to conventional_pipeline (use-case baseline review 2026-10-12, table 2).
Evidence
Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.
Evidence table
Inspect claims, sources and review details
Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.
One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.
7 evidence rows matching the loaded filters
| Property and statement | Original source and location | Review and provenance |
|---|---|---|
| Claimed field facets.method_types Context-only references | Comprehensive assessment of computational algorithms in predicting cancer driver mutations Chen et al. 2020 Table 1: SIFT uses a position-specific scoring matrix Version: Genome Biology 21:43, published 2020-02-20; PMC7033911 full-text XML | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Previous value ["specialist"] Context-only references | Comprehensive assessment of computational algorithms in predicting cancer driver mutations Chen et al. 2020 Table 1: SIFT uses a position-specific scoring matrix Version: Genome Biology 21:43, published 2020-02-20; PMC7033911 full-text XML | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Source location Chen et al. 2020 Table 1: SIFT uses a position-specific scoring matrix Context-only references | Comprehensive assessment of computational algorithms in predicting cancer driver mutations Chen et al. 2020 Table 1: SIFT uses a position-specific scoring matrix Version: Genome Biology 21:43, published 2020-02-20; PMC7033911 full-text XML | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Claimed value ["conventional_pipeline"] Context-only references | Comprehensive assessment of computational algorithms in predicting cancer driver mutations Chen et al. 2020 Table 1: SIFT uses a position-specific scoring matrix Version: Genome Biology 21:43, published 2020-02-20; PMC7033911 full-text XML | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Description Correct the method type from specialist to conventional_pipeline (use-case baseline review 2026-10-12, table 2). Context-only references | Comprehensive assessment of computational algorithms in predicting cancer driver mutations Chen et al. 2020 Table 1: SIFT uses a position-specific scoring matrix Version: Genome Biology 21:43, published 2020-02-20; PMC7033911 full-text XML | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Relationship: subject somatic-oncogenicity-20261009-config-chen2020-sift Context-only references | Comprehensive assessment of computational algorithms in predicting cancer driver mutations Chen et al. 2020 Table 1: SIFT uses a position-specific scoring matrix Version: Genome Biology 21:43, published 2020-02-20; PMC7033911 full-text XML | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Name SIFT (Chen et al. 2020): facets.method_types Context-only references | Comprehensive assessment of computational algorithms in predicting cancer driver mutations Chen et al. 2020 Table 1: SIFT uses a position-specific scoring matrix Version: Genome Biology 21:43, published 2020-02-20; PMC7033911 full-text XML | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
Sources and history
Release 2026-11-02-a7f03c9e55a5 · Record review: source checked
1 source record and release history
- Comprehensive assessment of computational algorithms in predicting cancer driver mutations · Original source · Genome Biology 21:43, published 2020-02-20; PMC7033911 full-text XML
Technical metadata and extraction receipts
Stable ID: metadata-correction-tags-20261012-7438ed913877426175cb
- field
- facets.method_types
- previous value
- ["specialist"]
- value
- ["conventional_pipeline"]
- source locator
- Chen et al. 2020 Table 1: SIFT uses a position-specific scoring matrix
- review
- method: source-hash-verification; automated-source-review; reviewer: claude; reviewer note: Separate Claude review agent, independent of the agent that prepared the corrections; no human review claimed; date: 2026-10-12; method note: Compared previous_value with origin/main and the store; re-retrieved the source (matches the source record) and read the passage in source_locator; checked the new value against the method-type definitions in data/vocab/method-type.ttl.; artifact sha256: fef52f70c3a0ff3f82902f87080933c220e12274787de6309b41ee283daf8b8e; retrieval url: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC7033911/fullTextXML; note: Correct the method type from specialist to conventional_pipeline (use-case baseline review 2026-10-12, table 2). Evidence from docs/reviews/use-cases/baselines-2026-10-12.md. Independent review 2026-10-12: approved. See docs/reviews/2026-10-12-method-type-corrections.md.
Related records
- subject: SIFT (Chen et al. 2020)