printed_value_conflict: lit-structure-20261011-afesmfold-source-mahtha2026
Printed value conflict of Comparative evaluation of the prediction accuracy of AlphaFold and ESMFold for monomeric and dimeric proteins
The Abstract prints one dimer figure for both tools: 'AlphaFold2 and AlphaFold3 correctly predicted 88% of monomeric structures and 77% of dimeric proteins.' Table 2 gives AlphaFold2 361 high, 297 medium and 105 acceptable quality dimers out of 994, and AlphaFold3 346, 306 and 93. The Results print these totals as 763 (76.8%) for AlphaFold2 and 745 (75%) for AlphaFold3, and the Discussion as 76.8% and 75%. The Abstract's 77% matches AlphaFold2 only; for AlphaFold3 the Table 2 counts give 745/994, 74.9% to one decimal (computed here, not printed).
Descriptive fact transcribed from the pinned source.
Evidence
Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.
Evidence table
Inspect claims, sources and review details
Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.
One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.
6 evidence rows matching the loaded filters
| Property and statement | Original source and location | Review and provenance |
|---|---|---|
| Claimed field printed_value_conflict Context-only references | Comparative evaluation of the prediction accuracy of AlphaFold and ESMFold for monomeric and dimeric proteins Abstract sentence 3; Table 2, AlphaFold2 and AlphaFold3 rows 'High quality', 'Medium quality', 'Acceptable quality', column 'No.'; Results section 'Performance of AlphaFold for dimeric structure prediction' paragraphs 1 and 3; Discussion paragraph 3 Version: Version of record, NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics 2026 (PMC12809598 JATS full text) | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Source has a recorded evidence concern. Consult its source page before using the claim. Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Source location Abstract sentence 3; Table 2, AlphaFold2 and AlphaFold3 rows 'High quality', 'Medium quality', 'Acceptable quality', column 'No.'; Results section 'Performance of AlphaFold for dimeric structure prediction' paragraphs 1 and 3; Discussion paragraph 3 Context-only references | Comparative evaluation of the prediction accuracy of AlphaFold and ESMFold for monomeric and dimeric proteins Abstract sentence 3; Table 2, AlphaFold2 and AlphaFold3 rows 'High quality', 'Medium quality', 'Acceptable quality', column 'No.'; Results section 'Performance of AlphaFold for dimeric structure prediction' paragraphs 1 and 3; Discussion paragraph 3 Version: Version of record, NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics 2026 (PMC12809598 JATS full text) | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Source has a recorded evidence concern. Consult its source page before using the claim. Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Claimed value The Abstract prints one dimer figure for both tools: 'AlphaFold2 and AlphaFold3 correctly predicted 88% of monomeric structures and 77% of dimeric proteins.' Table 2 gives AlphaFold2 361 high, 297 medium and 105 acceptable quality dimers out of 994, and AlphaFold3 346, 306 and 93. The Results print these totals as 763 (76.8%) for AlphaFold2 and 745 (75%) for AlphaFold3, and the Discussion as 76.8% and 75%. The Abstract's 77% matches AlphaFold2 only; for AlphaFold3 the Table 2 counts give 745/994, 74.9% to one decimal (computed here, not printed). Context-only references | Comparative evaluation of the prediction accuracy of AlphaFold and ESMFold for monomeric and dimeric proteins Abstract sentence 3; Table 2, AlphaFold2 and AlphaFold3 rows 'High quality', 'Medium quality', 'Acceptable quality', column 'No.'; Results section 'Performance of AlphaFold for dimeric structure prediction' paragraphs 1 and 3; Discussion paragraph 3 Version: Version of record, NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics 2026 (PMC12809598 JATS full text) | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Source has a recorded evidence concern. Consult its source page before using the claim. Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Description Descriptive fact transcribed from the pinned source. Context-only references | Comparative evaluation of the prediction accuracy of AlphaFold and ESMFold for monomeric and dimeric proteins Abstract sentence 3; Table 2, AlphaFold2 and AlphaFold3 rows 'High quality', 'Medium quality', 'Acceptable quality', column 'No.'; Results section 'Performance of AlphaFold for dimeric structure prediction' paragraphs 1 and 3; Discussion paragraph 3 Version: Version of record, NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics 2026 (PMC12809598 JATS full text) | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Source has a recorded evidence concern. Consult its source page before using the claim. Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Relationship: subject lit-structure-20261011-afesmfold-source-mahtha2026 Context-only references | Comparative evaluation of the prediction accuracy of AlphaFold and ESMFold for monomeric and dimeric proteins Abstract sentence 3; Table 2, AlphaFold2 and AlphaFold3 rows 'High quality', 'Medium quality', 'Acceptable quality', column 'No.'; Results section 'Performance of AlphaFold for dimeric structure prediction' paragraphs 1 and 3; Discussion paragraph 3 Version: Version of record, NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics 2026 (PMC12809598 JATS full text) | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Source has a recorded evidence concern. Consult its source page before using the claim. Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Name printed_value_conflict: lit-structure-20261011-afesmfold-source-mahtha2026 Context-only references | Comparative evaluation of the prediction accuracy of AlphaFold and ESMFold for monomeric and dimeric proteins Abstract sentence 3; Table 2, AlphaFold2 and AlphaFold3 rows 'High quality', 'Medium quality', 'Acceptable quality', column 'No.'; Results section 'Performance of AlphaFold for dimeric structure prediction' paragraphs 1 and 3; Discussion paragraph 3 Version: Version of record, NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics 2026 (PMC12809598 JATS full text) | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Source has a recorded evidence concern. Consult its source page before using the claim. Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
Sources and history
Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6 · Record review: source checked
1 source record and release history
- Comparative evaluation of the prediction accuracy of AlphaFold and ESMFold for monomeric and dimeric proteins · Original source · Version of record, NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics 2026 (PMC12809598 JATS full text)
Technical metadata and extraction receipts
Stable ID: gfm-guides-20261014-mahtha2026-claim-dimer-accuracy-abstract-vs-table2
- field
- printed_value_conflict
- value
- The Abstract prints one dimer figure for both tools: 'AlphaFold2 and AlphaFold3 correctly predicted 88% of monomeric structures and 77% of dimeric proteins.' Table 2 gives AlphaFold2 361 high, 297 medium and 105 acceptable quality dimers out of 994, and AlphaFold3 346, 306 and 93. The Results print these totals as 763 (76.8%) for AlphaFold2 and 745 (75%) for AlphaFold3, and the Discussion as 76.8% and 75%. The Abstract's 77% matches AlphaFold2 only; for AlphaFold3 the Table 2 counts give 745/994, 74.9% to one decimal (computed here, not printed).
- source locator
- Abstract sentence 3; Table 2, AlphaFold2 and AlphaFold3 rows 'High quality', 'Medium quality', 'Acceptable quality', column 'No.'; Results section 'Performance of AlphaFold for dimeric structure prediction' paragraphs 1 and 3; Discussion paragraph 3
- review
- method: source-hash-verification; transcription; method note: Europe PMC JATS re-downloaded on 2026-10-14 (SHA-256 matches the source record); Abstract, Table 2, Results and Discussion re-read.; reviewer: claude; reviewer note: Claude (Opus 5.5) research agent, independent of the extractor; no human review claimed; date: 2026-10-14; artifact sha256: aae321d05839186a7595987d05af6e95aec5ac32b93b35c5cf1126902fe798b8; retrieval url: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12809598/fullTextXML; note: Extraction: Re-retrieved the pinned Europe PMC JATS XML (SHA-256 matches the source record) and transcribed the Abstract sentence, the six Table 2 cells and the Results and Discussion sentences from the parsed text. Independent review 2026-10-14: matched. No evidence concern added: the stored results come from Table 2, which agrees with the Results text. The Abstract also gives ESMFold 76% of monomers where the Discussion gives 77%; not recorded as a claim.