rewirebio.iobenchmarks
Evidence claim

reported_finding: feng-dna-fm-20261013-protocol-gtex-wb-expression-long-768

Reported finding of Feng GTEx whole-blood expression prediction, 768 genes, long input

Among long-input models, HyenaDNA-450K was significantly better than Enformer (p < 0.01) and Enformer was similar to Caduceus-Ph. On the same 768 genes, extending the input improved HyenaDNA (average correlation 0.122 short versus 0.137 long, two-sided Wilcoxon p = 0.0005) but not Caduceus-Ph (0.124 versus 0.127, p = 0.975).

Descriptive fact transcribed from the pinned source.

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

12 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-11-02-a7f03c9e55a5
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance
Claimed field
reported_finding
Context-only references
Benchmarking DNA foundation models for genomic and genetic tasks

Original source ↗

Results, 'Gene expression prediction', paragraph 2; Supplementary Table 4

Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation.

Version: PMC12663285.1
Retrieved: 2026-09-17T07:54:51.004119+00:00

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: attributes.field

Source artifact SHA-256: 5d8ca9bcf88cc1b38ad667906a2e4699b1aefa6d31c6f49259784930353f3202

Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes.

Inspected artifact

Claimed field
reported_finding
Context-only references
Benchmarking DNA foundation models for genomic and genetic tasks: Supplementary Information

Original source ↗

Results, 'Gene expression prediction', paragraph 2; Supplementary Table 4

Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation.

Version: Nature Communications 16, 10780 (2025); Supplementary Information PDF (MOESM1, 11 pages)
Retrieved: 2026-10-13T14:08:10Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: attributes.field

Source artifact SHA-256: 373f59b825c9e2bc51a0f122a9e2653f427c492727fbf73768cc9af02d094a15

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Source location
Results, 'Gene expression prediction', paragraph 2; Supplementary Table 4
Context-only references
Benchmarking DNA foundation models for genomic and genetic tasks

Original source ↗

Results, 'Gene expression prediction', paragraph 2; Supplementary Table 4

Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation.

Version: PMC12663285.1
Retrieved: 2026-09-17T07:54:51.004119+00:00

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: attributes.source_locator

Source artifact SHA-256: 5d8ca9bcf88cc1b38ad667906a2e4699b1aefa6d31c6f49259784930353f3202

Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes.

Inspected artifact

Source location
Results, 'Gene expression prediction', paragraph 2; Supplementary Table 4
Context-only references
Benchmarking DNA foundation models for genomic and genetic tasks: Supplementary Information

Original source ↗

Results, 'Gene expression prediction', paragraph 2; Supplementary Table 4

Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation.

Version: Nature Communications 16, 10780 (2025); Supplementary Information PDF (MOESM1, 11 pages)
Retrieved: 2026-10-13T14:08:10Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: attributes.source_locator

Source artifact SHA-256: 373f59b825c9e2bc51a0f122a9e2653f427c492727fbf73768cc9af02d094a15

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Claimed value
Among long-input models, HyenaDNA-450K was significantly better than Enformer (p < 0.01) and Enformer was similar to Caduceus-Ph. On the same 768 genes, extending the input improved HyenaDNA (average correlation 0.122 short versus 0.137 long, two-sided Wilcoxon p = 0.0005) but not Caduceus-Ph (0.124 versus 0.127, p = 0.975).
Context-only references
Benchmarking DNA foundation models for genomic and genetic tasks

Original source ↗

Results, 'Gene expression prediction', paragraph 2; Supplementary Table 4

Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation.

Version: PMC12663285.1
Retrieved: 2026-09-17T07:54:51.004119+00:00

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: attributes.value

Source artifact SHA-256: 5d8ca9bcf88cc1b38ad667906a2e4699b1aefa6d31c6f49259784930353f3202

Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes.

Inspected artifact

Claimed value
Among long-input models, HyenaDNA-450K was significantly better than Enformer (p < 0.01) and Enformer was similar to Caduceus-Ph. On the same 768 genes, extending the input improved HyenaDNA (average correlation 0.122 short versus 0.137 long, two-sided Wilcoxon p = 0.0005) but not Caduceus-Ph (0.124 versus 0.127, p = 0.975).
Context-only references
Benchmarking DNA foundation models for genomic and genetic tasks: Supplementary Information

Original source ↗

Results, 'Gene expression prediction', paragraph 2; Supplementary Table 4

Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation.

Version: Nature Communications 16, 10780 (2025); Supplementary Information PDF (MOESM1, 11 pages)
Retrieved: 2026-10-13T14:08:10Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: attributes.value

Source artifact SHA-256: 373f59b825c9e2bc51a0f122a9e2653f427c492727fbf73768cc9af02d094a15

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Description
Descriptive fact transcribed from the pinned source.
Context-only references
Benchmarking DNA foundation models for genomic and genetic tasks

Original source ↗

Results, 'Gene expression prediction', paragraph 2; Supplementary Table 4

Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation.

Version: PMC12663285.1
Retrieved: 2026-09-17T07:54:51.004119+00:00

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: description

Source artifact SHA-256: 5d8ca9bcf88cc1b38ad667906a2e4699b1aefa6d31c6f49259784930353f3202

Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes.

Inspected artifact

Description
Descriptive fact transcribed from the pinned source.
Context-only references
Benchmarking DNA foundation models for genomic and genetic tasks: Supplementary Information

Original source ↗

Results, 'Gene expression prediction', paragraph 2; Supplementary Table 4

Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation.

Version: Nature Communications 16, 10780 (2025); Supplementary Information PDF (MOESM1, 11 pages)
Retrieved: 2026-10-13T14:08:10Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: description

Source artifact SHA-256: 373f59b825c9e2bc51a0f122a9e2653f427c492727fbf73768cc9af02d094a15

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Relationship: subject
feng-dna-fm-20261013-protocol-gtex-wb-expression-long-768
Context-only references
Benchmarking DNA foundation models for genomic and genetic tasks

Original source ↗

Results, 'Gene expression prediction', paragraph 2; Supplementary Table 4

Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation.

Version: PMC12663285.1
Retrieved: 2026-09-17T07:54:51.004119+00:00

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: links:subject:feng-dna-fm-20261013-protocol-gtex-wb-expression-long-768

Source artifact SHA-256: 5d8ca9bcf88cc1b38ad667906a2e4699b1aefa6d31c6f49259784930353f3202

Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes.

Inspected artifact

Relationship: subject
feng-dna-fm-20261013-protocol-gtex-wb-expression-long-768
Context-only references
Benchmarking DNA foundation models for genomic and genetic tasks: Supplementary Information

Original source ↗

Results, 'Gene expression prediction', paragraph 2; Supplementary Table 4

Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation.

Version: Nature Communications 16, 10780 (2025); Supplementary Information PDF (MOESM1, 11 pages)
Retrieved: 2026-10-13T14:08:10Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: links:subject:feng-dna-fm-20261013-protocol-gtex-wb-expression-long-768

Source artifact SHA-256: 373f59b825c9e2bc51a0f122a9e2653f427c492727fbf73768cc9af02d094a15

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

How to read the evidence

Sources and history

Release 2026-11-02-a7f03c9e55a5 · Record review: source checked

2 source records and release historyDownload this release (gzip)
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: feng-dna-fm-20261013-claim-gtex-long-finding

field
reported_finding
value
Among long-input models, HyenaDNA-450K was significantly better than Enformer (p < 0.01) and Enformer was similar to Caduceus-Ph. On the same 768 genes, extending the input improved HyenaDNA (average correlation 0.122 short versus 0.137 long, two-sided Wilcoxon p = 0.0005) but not Caduceus-Ph (0.124 versus 0.127, p = 0.975).
source locator
Results, 'Gene expression prediction', paragraph 2; Supplementary Table 4
review
method: source-hash-verification; ai-assisted-source-review; rendered-source-visual-check; method note: Checked against Results, 'Gene expression prediction', paragraph 2, and Supplementary Table 4 (PDF page 7).; reviewer: claude; reviewer note: Independent Claude (Opus 5.5) review agent, separate from the extraction agent feng-19 that built this batch. Automated review only; no human review claimed. Transcription, not reproduction.; reviewed at: 2026-10-13T14:40:00Z; artifact sha256: 5d8ca9bcf88cc1b38ad667906a2e4699b1aefa6d31c6f49259784930353f3202; retrieval url: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12663285/fullTextXML; note: Hand transcription by the extraction agent, written out by extract/extract_feng.py. Independent review: wording matches the cited text; nothing added that the source does not say.
Related records

Suggest a correction