Reported Pearson R for DiffDock
Evidence
Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.
Evidence table
Inspect claims, sources and review details
Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.
One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.
6 evidence rows matching the loaded filters
| Property and statement | Original source and location | Review and provenance |
|---|---|---|
| attributes.field attributes.printed_value Context-only references | A Comparative Study of Deep Learning and Classical Modeling Approaches for Protein–Ligand Binding Pose and Affinity Prediction in Coronavirus Main Proteases Table 3, DiffDock row, Pearson’s R column Version: version of record | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| attributes.source_locator Table 3, DiffDock row, Pearson’s R column Context-only references | A Comparative Study of Deep Learning and Classical Modeling Approaches for Protein–Ligand Binding Pose and Affinity Prediction in Coronavirus Main Proteases Table 3, DiffDock row, Pearson’s R column Version: version of record | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| attributes.value 0.695 Context-only references | A Comparative Study of Deep Learning and Classical Modeling Approaches for Protein–Ligand Binding Pose and Affinity Prediction in Coronavirus Main Proteases Table 3, DiffDock row, Pearson’s R column Version: version of record | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| description No value recorded Context-only references | A Comparative Study of Deep Learning and Classical Modeling Approaches for Protein–Ligand Binding Pose and Affinity Prediction in Coronavirus Main Proteases Table 3, DiffDock row, Pearson’s R column Version: version of record | missing or unspecified No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Relationship: subject lit-048 Context-only references | A Comparative Study of Deep Learning and Classical Modeling Approaches for Protein–Ligand Binding Pose and Affinity Prediction in Coronavirus Main Proteases Table 3, DiffDock row, Pearson’s R column Version: version of record | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| name Reported Pearson R for DiffDock Context-only references | A Comparative Study of Deep Learning and Classical Modeling Approaches for Protein–Ligand Binding Pose and Affinity Prediction in Coronavirus Main Proteases Table 3, DiffDock row, Pearson’s R column Version: version of record | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
Sources and history
View linked audit checks and correction history
Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220 · Record review: source checked
1 source records and release history
- A Comparative Study of Deep Learning and Classical Modeling Approaches for Protein–Ligand Binding Pose and Affinity Prediction in Coronavirus Main Proteases · Original source · version of record
Technical metadata and extraction receipts
Stable ID: claim-lit-048
- areas
- molecular-interactions
- tasks
- Ligand potency prediction using generated poses
- field
- attributes.printed_value
- value
- 0.695
- source locator
- Table 3, DiffDock row, Pearson’s R column
- review
- method: independent_ai_table_review; reviewer: Codex omics research agent; independent source-table review, not human review; reviewed at: 2026-09-16T10:41:16.558815+00:00; notes: JATS label is bare 3. Selected SARS-CoV-2 Mpro potency Pearson R, not MERS-CoV table 2 or Boltz-2-Internal row; uncertainty retained in evidence. This verifies the central score at its source location, not every metadata field or an experimental reproduction.