accuracy_versus_macro_f1: cell-type-20261009-protocol-wu2025-ts-to-hlca
Descriptive fact transcribed from the pinned source.
Evidence
Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.
Evidence table
Inspect claims, sources and review details
Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.
One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.
6 evidence rows matching the loaded filters
| Property and statement | Original source and location | Review and provenance |
|---|---|---|
| attributes.field accuracy_versus_macro_f1 Context-only references | Biology-driven insights into the power of single-cell foundation models Results 'Cross-dataset validation' paragraph 2 Version: Genome Biology 26:334, published 2025-10-03; PMC12492631 full-text XML | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| attributes.source_locator Results 'Cross-dataset validation' paragraph 2 Context-only references | Biology-driven insights into the power of single-cell foundation models Results 'Cross-dataset validation' paragraph 2 Version: Genome Biology 26:334, published 2025-10-03; PMC12492631 full-text XML | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| attributes.value Although cross-dataset accuracy scores are all above 0.6, macro-F1 scores are much lower, which the authors read as poor handling of shifts in cell-type proportions and of rare subpopulations. Context-only references | Biology-driven insights into the power of single-cell foundation models Results 'Cross-dataset validation' paragraph 2 Version: Genome Biology 26:334, published 2025-10-03; PMC12492631 full-text XML | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| description Descriptive fact transcribed from the pinned source. Context-only references | Biology-driven insights into the power of single-cell foundation models Results 'Cross-dataset validation' paragraph 2 Version: Genome Biology 26:334, published 2025-10-03; PMC12492631 full-text XML | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Relationship: subject cell-type-20261009-protocol-wu2025-ts-to-hlca Context-only references | Biology-driven insights into the power of single-cell foundation models Results 'Cross-dataset validation' paragraph 2 Version: Genome Biology 26:334, published 2025-10-03; PMC12492631 full-text XML | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| name accuracy_versus_macro_f1: cell-type-20261009-protocol-wu2025-ts-to-hlca Context-only references | Biology-driven insights into the power of single-cell foundation models Results 'Cross-dataset validation' paragraph 2 Version: Genome Biology 26:334, published 2025-10-03; PMC12492631 full-text XML | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
Sources and history
Release 2026-10-10-6e93f504adfc · Record review: source checked
1 source records and release history
- Biology-driven insights into the power of single-cell foundation models · Original source · Genome Biology 26:334, published 2025-10-03; PMC12492631 full-text XML
Technical metadata and extraction receipts
Stable ID: cell-type-20261009-claim-wu2025-macro-f1-gap
- field
- accuracy_versus_macro_f1
- value
- Although cross-dataset accuracy scores are all above 0.6, macro-F1 scores are much lower, which the authors read as poor handling of shifts in cell-type proportions and of rare subpopulations.
- source locator
- Results 'Cross-dataset validation' paragraph 2
- review
- method: source-hash-verification; ai-assisted-source-review; reviewer: claude; reviewer note: Separate Claude review agent, independent of the extractor; no human review claimed; date: 2026-10-09; artifact sha256: 368051b7cda5acd4864331875a1faac6f1d68e0a209ed999e4c2ee3b25b57c2c; retrieval url: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12492631/fullTextXML; method note: Compared the claim with the cited paragraph of the re-downloaded article XML.; note: Transcribed from the pinned article XML. Pending independent review. Independent review 2026-10-09: matches the source.