rewirebio.iobenchmarks
Benchmark

SEQC2 HCC1395 somatic CNV benchmark

Benchmark of six somatic CNV callers on a hyper-diploid cancer cell line.

No reviewed evaluations are linked here in this release. See the sources and separately identified configurations below.

0 evaluations · 0 results

Overview

Benchmark of six somatic CNV callers on a hyper-diploid cancer cell line.

Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.

Published results still to collect

This release has no source-checked evaluations linked to this page. It does not mean that the benchmark has no published results.

Charts will appear when compatible result tables have been checked against their sources.

View coverage and remaining gaps across all benchmarks

Results

All evaluations

0 evaluations · 0 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Applied filters: All linked evaluations

No evaluations linked in this release.

Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-10-09-8eac2440869c.

Methods and evaluation design

Procedure, tasks and evaluated configurations

Baseline coverage

Reference methods help show what a model adds beyond simple controls. We track a null control and a conventional method for each protocol.

No concrete protocols are explicitly linked to this suite. Protocol identification and baseline selection are outstanding.

Protocol coverage CSV (gzip) · Model evaluation matrix (gzip) · Source table (gzip) · Release and checksums (gzip)

Coverage is derived from release 2026-10-09-8eac2440869c. Source citations describe the original records; they do not validate an unreviewed baseline proposal. No results have been generated by this audit.

Run instructions

No runnable recipe has been reviewed for this benchmark. Dataset access, model requirements, licences and compute requirements must be checked against its sources before execution.

Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

0 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-10-09-8eac2440869c
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance

No evidence rows match these filters. Choose another scope or clear the search.

Sources and history

Release 2026-10-09-8eac2440869c · Record review: discovered

1 source records and release historyDownload this release (gzip)
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: cnv-20261009-benchmark-seqc2-hcc1395-somatic-cnv

areas
dna-genomes
contexts
clinical_research
entity level
suite
version
2024
task
Somatic copy-number gain, loss and LOH detection in tumour/normal WGS and WES
scope note
Callers ascatNgs 4.2.1, CNVkit 0.9.1, Control-FREEC 11.6, DRAGEN 4.0.x, FACETS 0.6.0, HATCHet 1.0.4. Accuracy is reported in figures only; no results extracted.
limitations
No per-caller accuracy table in the article or Additional file 1
Related records

Suggest a correction