PANTHER and SIFT: Clinical likelihood ratios and balanced accuracy for 44 in silico tools against multiple large-scale functional assays of cancer susceptibility genes and Livesey and Marsh 2025, Genome Biology 26:104 (Europe PMC full text XML) disagree
- Low severity
- Not yet reviewed
- two-study-conflict
- unknown
Clinical likelihood ratios and balanced accuracy for 44 in silico tools against multiple large-scale functional assays of cancer susceptibility genes ranks SIFT above PANTHER in 3 of 4 comparisons; Livesey and Marsh 2025, Genome Biology 26:104 (Europe PMC full text XML) ranks PANTHER above SIFT in 5 of 6 comparisons. No other study gives a verdict, so neither is the outlier.
2 papers rank PANTHER above SIFT in 6 of their 11 comparisons and SIFT higher in 4; 1 is a tie. Of those papers, Clinical likelihood ratios and balanced… ranks SIFT higher on its own (3 of 5).
Not reviewed yet.